The Serbian government will continue providing support to the national carrier in the coming years, the country's Prime Minister, Ana Brnabić, has said, after the state gave some twenty million euros to the airline last year. She noted, "The government of Serbia will maintain its strong support for Air Serbia. This support will be in line with European Union regulations, as it has been so far, however, no one can prevent us or limit our support for Air Serbia". The PM added, "Air Serbia plays an important role in the development of tourism, improves our economic ties with numerous countries and strengthens our country's brand. It has been an important driver of economic growth and I am certain that we will see even better results ahead since there are good prospects for further growth".
Air Serbia has posted a profit for the past four years but has also received state funds. In 2014, the carrier's net profit stood at 2.7 million euros, which was followed by a 3.7 million euro profit in 2015. In 2016, upon launching its first long haul service, the airline's figures declined 77% with Air Serbia managing a 990.000 euro profit. However, in 2017 its profit soared to sixteen million euros. Last year's record results were achieved in part due to a significant reduction in expenditures and an increase in revenue. Furthermore, the state provided a twenty million euro subsidy, which is half of what the company used to receive from its majority shareholder, although the carrier was also granted twelve million euros for the "development of tourism". The Serbian Finance Minister, Siniša Mali, has said that the payment credited under tourism development is primarily for the support of the carrier's long haul service to New York. "As part of our tourism development strategy until 2025, the Serbian government has decided to extend its support to whatever contributes to tourism growth. In this case, it is flights to North America. Without that support there would be no service to the US. However, Air Serbia's financial performance would remain unchanged", Mr Mali said recently.
Air Serbia has justified the support by noting it gives back one billion dollars to the Serbian economy each year and that it plays an instrumental role in the country's economy. It provides some 13.230 people with employment (both directly and indirectly) and adds $210 million to the Serbian economy through its core operations including expenditures on fuel, maintenance costs and local Serbian suppliers. This includes over 1.600 direct jobs at Air Serbia in Serbia, 5.450 indirect jobs supported by the airline’s procurement of goods and services and 6.130 additional jobs supported by staff spending their wages in Serbia. Furthermore, the airline maintains it carries over half a million international visitors, predominantly from Europe and North America, to Serbia. In addition, Etihad Airways, which holds a 49% share in the company, supports some 3.900 jobs through its operations in Serbia, which equates to an economic contribution of $45 million. "The contribution that Air Serbia makes to the national economy and the job market in Serbia cannot be overstated. We support thousands of jobs directly, through our airline operations, and indirectly, through the powerful domino effect that Air Serbia has on stimulating economic activity throughout the country. Our flights benefit many jobs in Serbia, such as the local suppliers we use for inflight catering, to the many industries that rely on business from air travellers, including hotels, restaurants and other tourism and hospitality-related sectors", the airline said in previous years.

Comments
Despite their shortfalls it's nice to see them keeping LCA during the slow months.
Прво то је крајње глуп коментар посебно када се узме у вид чињеница да је ЈУ непрекидно летео за Ларнаку од 1992. године.
По тренутним проценама амбасаде Србије на Кипру, на острву живи између 2.000 и 3.000 Срба а тај број се повећава сваког месеца.
Прошле зиме Визер је имао у просеку 110 путника на летовима за Ларнаку (изван сезоне) што и није тако лоше. Ер Србија са својим А319 и путницима који преседају у Београду може сасвим солидно да опстане на тржишту.
Maybe other airlines can also get Money from Serbia flying there, as they have the same effect on the Serbian Economy ..... distortion of the market..
pets are nice to have but are not necessary, and they tend to cost a lot.
the governments shouldn't have pets.
HIPP (profitable company btw) and MSK are in process of privatization.
railways are getting torn apart into several companies with major investments in high speed railway (also note that railways, are not in the same basket as airlines, due to higher effect on the economy - freight transport).
SrbijaGas & EPS both profitable, would be even more if the state would allow to price the product properly.
Železara & RTB Bor sold to chinese...
It seems to me that JU is left as the one of the most problematic state owned companies, losing €30-40 mil yearly
+1000
So it is only natural that state subsidies are needed.
SMFH!
To need to do and to do are two differrent things. Unfortunatelly what is needed to be done has not been done for several years, because the whole deal is results of politics, and employing party people is just one of the results, the same as PM 's speech from today' s topic
all of them, except one
I really hope so. Enough with the consolidation and shrinking.
"6.130 additional jobs supported by staff spending their wages in Serbia"
So because staff spend their wages thr local shop clerk is also included in the number of jobs Air Serbia is supporting.
Also, there are enough Serbs in Cyprus to sustain at least a one weekly flight. Jat used to operate two weekly BEG-LCA-TLV when there were around 1.500 Serbs living on the island.
And btw I might be wrong but I think Wizz Air has further downgraded their BEG operations. On some days they have one or two departures.
Until when will this be tolerated? Are we going to witness new Serbian, political routes?
When will ASL enjoy LOWER airport taxes to help it regain its legacy status?
I see no other reason for so much hate towards JU from you
On the other hand, is your life/work/business benefiting in any way (directly or indirectly) from growth of homegrown aviation industries and Air Serbia?
Ahahahaha
BEG can consider a train terminal to connect the entire country just like DE Bahn.
Hahahahaha, have you ever travelled by train in Serbia? LOL LOL LOL
hundred dinars for oxygen wasters in municipalities
thousand dinars for fixed tenders
hundred dinars for that hill in grdelička klisura that keeps falling on highway
hundred dinars for maintaining SNS lokalne odbore,
hundred dinars for bankrupted banks (agrobanka, srpska banka, univerzal...)
hundred dinars for beloved tycoons & party financiers
....
all of those times 7 million population and you have completely bankrupt economy
the purpose is to have efficient economy not lose money and then try to find excuses for it
the problem is that they would need to scale back from hub model to p2p, but that would create a world of troubles for BEG and Vinci
For example: New York to Novi Sad: fly direct and then hop into the train.
Electronic ticketing.
Every country needs a government-owned flag carrier!
Because Serbia is a rich country full of rich people that should prioritise national airline.
The livery is nice, but it should be related to Serbian heritage and not cheap blue and yellow like Nouvelair.
Charters are becoming more and more popular and upgrading from current 737 to 737 Max 9 or 10 seems a wise decision.
Aviolet is seriously underestimated and this should not be like this.
My idea was to also be able to sell tickets freely on their website and not reply entirely on local travel agents and touroperaters. The need of Aviolet for bigger aeroplanes is just very important.
Poor Englishmen
http://www.reallyloud.co.uk/yugo/
You are absolutely right!
They must give up this redicilous wanna be hub system and stop flying half empty jets most of the year to most of destinstions. Any European flight during school holidays is full but that is too little to cover all the costs of running airline the whole year.
Also, almost no one drives a Yugo anymore, they are quite rare these days.
YU-ARA best represents Serbia and proudly serves the nation. Or is that a crime?
Yes, because you enjoyed those brand new DC-10 we are now forced to pay crazy amount of loans. You overburdened several generations to come. If it weren't for your megalomania JU would have a whole bunch of A330s.