Air Serbia will be adding frequencies on a number of its existing routes this summer season as it prepares to introduce nine new destinations to its network. The airline will also boost capacity on selected services. At this point, the Serbian carrier will add an extra weekly flight onto seven routes. These include Copenhagen, Dubrovnik, Paris, Sofia, Stockholm, Tivat and Zagreb, while an additional two weekly services will be introduced to Zurich, when compared to the 2018 summer season. The airline will run double daily flights to the French capital, where it will compete against Air France and ASL Airlines France this summer. Furthermore, in a boost to its Scandinavian operations, both Copenhagen and Stockholm will be maintained on a daily basis. In addition, Tivat will be operated 22 times per week, Zagreb twelve, Sofia eight per week, while Zurich will be run up to eighteen times per week.
The airline plans to boost capacity on some routes as well. Three of its double daily flights to Vienna will be operated with the 144-seat Airbus A319 aircraft this summer instead of the seventy-seat ATR72 turboprop, while all six of its services to Split will be maintained with the A319 instead of the ATR. On the other hand, the airline will also decrease frequencies on five routes by one weekly flight, in order to free up capacity for some of the abovementioned destinations. Athens, Berlin, Milan, Skopje and St Petersburg will all have one flight per week less than last year. As a result, operations to the Greek capital (double daily), as well as Milan (daily), and St Petersburg (three weekly) will now be maintained by the same number of frequencies as they were during the 2017 summer season.
Air Serbia previously announced the launch of nine new routes, seven of which will be year-round and two of which will be maintained seasonally. The new destinations will mostly see Air Serbia return to markets formerly operated by its predecessor JAT Yugoslav Airlines. Flights to Rijeka and Zadar were last run in August 1990, services to Madrid and Barcelona last operated in November 1998, to Cairo in March 2005 and to Kiev in September 2016. Nice, Krasnodar and Helsinki have never been served from Belgrade by either Air Serbia or its predecessor. Commenting on its new link to Belgrade, the Director of Route Development at Helsinki Airport's operator Finavia, Petri Vuori, said, "It's great to see yet another airline joining Helsinki Airport. Air Serbia and the new Belgrade route opening is a great addition to our connections to the Balkan Peninsula".


Comments
By the way, I was looking at some flights to BCN in August and some are already fully booked while some are on the A320! Maybe we see an increase there?
As for Dubrovnik, I think we might see a drop in demand to the Croatian coast after the waterpolo incident. I guess JU could easily redirect those flights to MNE.
SOF was initially launched as 9 weekly and was a clear success for JP too.
Lets hope JU can cope with this sudden, massive expansion and avoid a Vueling scenario in 2016, where they expanded like crazy and had serious problems in summer.
Anyway, best of luck ASL!
Nonsense, another plane is coming before the summer season.
I think they will restore the previous SOF timetable - late night departe/early morning outbound.
There was an "agressive" Facebook ad in Spanish promoting Belgrade as a destination.
I think there will be more demand from MAD and fewer from BCN due to lack of flights.
A group of athletes being attacked just becuase they are from Serbia is not a small thing. Most tourists refuse to go to areas that are dangerous for them. The only place where Serbs can feel safe in Croatia is Istra. I wouldn't be surprised if many tourists are redirected there by tour operators. Good thing that JU is adding RJK flights.
Their load factor in 2018 was just slightly above 80%, which is a disaster for LCC. For example, FR had LF 96%, EZY 93% and W6 92%.
ATH because of A3 increasing frequencies and equipment.
SKP because of the W6. W6 is becoming absolutely dominant as a carrier in Macedonia.
LED because of KRR and fewer demand compared to SVO.
The other increases were extremely logical: Scandinavia always with demand.
Clearly demand for the Croatian coast and SOF because of both transfer and O&D.
I like the JU plan for 2019. Very well conducted.
New route manager seems to be doing a good job.
What exactly do you mean by "extremely profitable" short-haul for Norwegian?
Do you have any data to back your claim?
SKP and LED are probably cut because they needed planes elsewhere. Same way why Tirana and Bucharest are mostly operated at night. In OTP's case that's really good as an Atr can't make it there and back in time during the noon wave.
VY is horrible, their schedule is a disaster! Imagine arriving to BCN at 04.55! I think they will reduce or cancel Belgrade after JU entered the market.
JU will be flying to
ZAG
RJK
ZAD
SPU
DBV
there were rumours that 2 more destinations in Croatia will be flown by JU
OU will be flying to
BEG
As a result every summer in BCN they have massive delays, cancellations and disruptions of all kinds.
So for summer 2019 they are cutting about 30 destinations from BCN!!!
So do you have any real data for your claims?
This follows canselations that they made in the last couple of years.
A total of 49 routes droppped so far!
1. Accra
2. Amman
3. Ancona
4. Belfast City
5. Bergen
6. Cardiff
7. Ciudad Real
8. Cluj Napoca
9. Constantine
10. Djerba
11. Dortmund
12. Dresden
13. Eindhoven
14. Frankfurt
15. Groningen
16. Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen
17. Kaliningrad
18. Kazan
19. Kos
20. Krasnodar
21. Larnaca
22. Leeds
23. Leipzig
24. Ljubljana
25. London
26. London
27. Lourdes
28. Luxembourg
29. Maastricht
30. Moscow Sheremetyevo
31. Newcastle
32. Pamplona
33. Rabat
34. Rhodes
35. Riga
36. Rotterdam
37. Sal (Cape Verde)
38. Samara
39. Sofia
40. Southampton
41. Stavanger
42. Strasbourg
43. Tallinn
44. Thessaloniki
45. Trieste
46. Verona
47. Vilnius
48. Yerevan
49. Warsaw
Many thanks for any info.
So Norwegian for the last few years is loss making.
That is the company we are talking about and not the one from 2013.
Exactly.
I got impression that they were very stabborn and spiteful with introducing BEG-BCN flights and now that opportunity is gone.
Well done JU!
Someone above mentioned their poor LF, but their high costs are by far the biggest problem. I guess O'Leary is right when he says Norwegian is a low-fare but not a low-cost airline.
I believe it ok for both sides- BEG reducing the frequency and pax from SKP not really being upset about it.
JU pays way more than the current market rates for YU-ARAs lease.
They are in really bad shape right now and I wouldn't want to take that risk.
i also think that the cut of one frequency is not because of lack of pax, its to accommodate the new routes
Once I get more info I`ll post it here.
https://www.exyuaviation.com/p/air-serbia-belgrade-rjeka.html
Sa nadom za razvoj kompanije Air Serbia ostajte u dobru.
U izcekivanju preksutrasnje prezentacije plana, mape razvoja Beogradskog aerodroma od strane VINCI Airports, veliki pozdrav.
Kraljevo // Sydney.
Radovan,
It's like getting a mortgage if you are broke vs if you have 10 houses already. Who do you think is going to get a better deal?
Correct, and there is more to the lease deal than just a price. I remember reports in early 2016 (when Air Serbia was getting ready to launch JFK) about other support Etihad is providing to get that route off the ground, including crew training at AUH and FCO, painting and reconfiguring A330 at AUH, ongoing maintenance, additional backup with Etihad equipment when YU-ARA A330 is out of service (as is right now: BEG-JFK service is operated by Etihad plane while ARA is undergoing maintenance in AUH) etc. When you have only one A330, that overall "we got your back" from EY is more important than just getting rock bottom lease rate on the market. But haters don't have smarts to understand that.
And almost all of them are legacy carriers!
What a great result for Belgrade Airport and Air Serbia!
-- --5-- BEG-ZAG-CPH-GOT DC-9
------ 7 BEG-ZAG-GOT-ARN B727
And during those times SAS also operated : 1-3-567 BEG-ZAG-CPH DC-9
DME-BEG 16.10-18.00
BEG-DME 19.00-22.50
It's not a bad schedule especially since SU is moving its own evening flight to 20.20. Red Wings will have the most convenient evening departure out of Belgrade.
Departures from BEG at:
00.45 SU
06.35 JU
13.10 SU
17.05 JU
19.00 WZ
20.20 SU
23.40 JU
34 weekly flights.
Speaking of AYT, I wonder if it is worth JU making it a seasonal destination rather than just keeping it charter. That is, block a set amount of seats requested by agencies and selling excess capacity.
Regarding API and APJ, there was rumours that they would be replaced by ex Rossiya A319's, one being reported as EI-EZD however that ended up going to RJ and is re-registered JY-AYY. Another rumour was that an ATR (VT-JCZ) that arrived from 9W in BEG last week was probably for JU however that flew out to Denmark a few days ago.
https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1399391
JFK seems to be doing ok for JU. They seem to be making money May-September since they're boosting it a second season to 6 pw. Another 1-2 A330's might be good for JU. EY is bringing out their A330's from their fleet that are around YU-ARA's age.
DEL could easily fit into connecting the European and North American banks:
BEG DEL 1315 0045
DEL BEG 0215 0530
YYZ should be slightly shorter than JFK. China (PVG) is something that would utilize the A330 almost 24h. Boost JFK to daily in peak season and 3-5 pw in the winter. Add in the possibility for a charter flight between rotations (AYT for example). Additional long haul destinations could help the seasonality of the A330 fleet.