Norwegian Air Shuttle will discontinue a number of routes to the former Yugoslavia this summer but will also introduce several new seasonal services to the region. The budget carrier will launch new flights from Gothenburg to Sarajevo, Stockholm to Pristina and from Helsinki to Tivat, however, all three will operate on a low-frequency basis of only one flight per week. As a result, there will be a total of eight services between Gothenburg and Sarajevo, with flights launching June 21. Services between the Swedish capital to Pristina will commence on April 2, while operations from Helsinki to Tivat will be inaugurated on April 16.
On the other hand, the airline will discontinue a number of its routes, primarily to Croatia. It will not be resuming flights between Stockholm and Zagreb and will shorten its seasonal operations from Copenhagen to the Croatian capital. Norwegian will also suspend its summer services from Stavanger and Trondheim in Norway to Pula, as well as from Oslo to Rijeka. Despite initial plans to discontinue flights between Norway's capital and Sarajevo, the airline has reversed its decision following appeals by the Embassy of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Norway. Services will now resume on May 25 and run twice per week until the end of the summer season.
In a statement, Norwegian Air Shuttle said, "This is a very important market for Norwegian. We’ve had scheduled flights to the Balkans since 2004 and our presence and network has grown every year. We always explore the possibility to add new destinations to our network. Notably, passengers from the Balkans have the possibility to connect to our long haul routes". Norwegian Air Shuttle recently switched its focus from growth to profitability and outlined plans to launch a rights issue as well as a cost cutting program while at the same time selling aircraft, postponing deliveries and optimising its base structure and route network. "Going into 2019, we will enter a period of slower growth and fewer investments, while constantly looking for new and smarter ways to improve our efficiency and offer new products and services to attract new customers", the airline's CEO, Bjorn Kjos, said.


Comments
How many flights did they operate from ARN to ZAG? Was it one weekly?
BRU
LJU 13
ZAG 16
TXL
LJU 0
ZAG 3
CGN
LJU 0
ZAG 7
CPH
LJU 7
ZAG 7
DUS
LJU 0
ZAG 4
FRA
LJU 21
ZAG 35
IST
LJU 14
ZAG 14
MUC
LJU 14
ZAG 28
OSL
LJU 0
ZAG 3
ARN
LJU 0
ZAG 3
VIE
LJU 14
ZAG 33
WAW
LJU 6
ZAG 14
ZRH
LJU 20
ZAG 17
In total weekly flights
LJU 109
ZAG 184
but still ZAG has many P2P routes, and routes to Star Alliance hubs in other Croatian airports (PUY, ZAD, RJK, SPU, DBV, OSI) with more than 100 weekly flights,
It looks like the fairytail about bringing new airlines in ZAG is over...
Also LJU-WAW is 7, not 6 weekly flights.
It is certain that they have some financial issues, but they aren't the first and surely not the last air carrier that survives despite having financial issues
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2018/11/ryanair-in-talks-over-zagreb-and-split.html
Also could it be that DY is getting subventions from Bosnia if the embassy intervened regarding OSL-SJJ?
The truth is out there
Or more likely the explanation is that those two airlines are in well known financial troubles.
If it was a Dalmatian coast issue they wouldn't be cutting their flight schedule all over Europe.
They will make money on that route and also on the BCN-ORD.
In Europe their problem is that they try to compete with the likes of FR and W6 while paying Scandinavian level of wages to their staff.
I don't see them having a happy long term life as a company.
https://i.imgur.com/5b0bTfP.png
At the same time they launch flights from lower wage cost countries like Spain and Greece.
Still, I see them to continue to straggle, especially if the price of Oil goes back up at 2018 levels.
what is interesting is that they stole pilots from ryanair and pressured o'learry to allow unions. now they will fail or downsize considerably, a lot of pilots will be on the market, but ryanair business model was changed indfinetly. all in 2y period.
ZAD/SPU/ and DBV had great results in January, so was ZAGs.
It seems to be only case with ZAG. Or better to say justification of poor results.
So, their plan today and several years ago (when they were in huge green) are not same. For example they move from Asia, closing almost all Asian routes. You should know that before putting here some sort of serious comment.
Serious comment?
Hilarious
They have extremely low prices on many routes and fierce competition with legacy carriers too.
On the other hand, it seems that ZAG indeed is in a stagnation period. No new routes, now fewer DY frequencies. No OU expansion. Situation is becoming worrying for the figures.
INI - there is no doubt that INI-HEL will immediately work out. This way, this will be a direct competition with SKP-TKU.
SJJ - finally a new Euro route and not ME one.
SKP - absolutely no way of seeing DY anytime soon. Unless they consider SKP-PMI or SKP-ORY.
Btw, just because you call it justification, it is not a justification but an explantion.
Or would you call the negative growth in PRN this months because of Germania´s demise a justification for the poor results? or is it an EXPLANTION?
From the other side you are comparing withdrawal of air carrier Germania as of one of the biggest contributors to PRN results with organization of sports event in ZAG?
Priceless.
https://i.imgur.com/fgjAJU5.png
BEG is the biggest ex-yu airport, with the biggest passenger numbers and will always be, no doubt about it. But it's not "the most stable and succesful" for Norwegian. It's SPU , which has more Norwegian passengers compared to BEG, and the steadiest growth, year by year. Are all those passengers carried during 7 or 12 months, is irrelevant. And I really don't understand why some people have urge to point out BEG as the best even in the cases when it's not, like now. Is it some kind of complex of what?
Do you have any real numbers to support your claim that DY had more passengers to SPU than to BEG?
Norwegian time table from Split, summer 2019 :
Bergen 3 weekly
Copenhagen DAILY
Gothenburg 2 weekly
Helsinki 5 weekly
London Gatwick 2 weekly
Oslo DAILY plus 2 weekly (wed, fr)
Stavanger 1 weekly
Stockholm Arlanda DAILY
Trondheim 4 weekly
Do your maths :)
Long haul low cost doesn't seem to work well between Europe and North America.
Split-Bergen, 3 weekly
Stars: 18.06.2019
Ends: 08.08.2019
Split-Copanhagen
Stars: 03.04.2019
Ends: 26.10.2019
Until mid-June it's two weekly, then six weekly until August when it goes down to 2 weekly. So it's not even daily during the peak season.
Split-Gothenburg
Starts: 31.03.2019
Ends: 20.10.2019
Split-Helsinki
Stars: 02.04.2019
Ends: 26.10.2019
September it goes down from 6 to 5.
Split-Gatwick
Starts: 03.04.2019
Ends: 26.10.2019
Split-Oslo
Starts: 02.04.2019
Ends: 26.10.2019
4 weekly in May. 5 from June. 9 starts in the second half of June and ends in the last week of June, so for about two weeks. Then it goes back to daily and in September it's back at 4 weekly.
Split-Stavanger - 1 weekly
Stars: 22.06.2019
Ends: 10.08.2019
I was too lazy to do the last two but I saw that ARN is 5 or 6 outside the busiest periods.
So the numbers in Amadeus don't match yours. I still think BEG is ahead of SPU. ;)
Also once again you lie. Trondhein starts in May as one weekly. Four weekly happens end of June and in August it goes back to 1 weekly. Route ends on 26.10.
ARN ends as well on 26.10 and it's only 6 weekly during the peak period. Other times it's 4.
So you see, all the numbers you presented on here were wrong, totally wrong. You should be ashamed of yourself. I guess you hate of BEG and Serbia is making you disillusioned.
OSL 9 weekly, ARN daily... HA!
Then again, maybe DY has once again reduced Croatia and you didn't notice it. ;)
Later I found out that you had to order everything via the in flight entertainment system. Had no idea and would have if I was told.
Found it strange that this was not mentioned, not on the ticket, not during the flight. Noticed other passengers were confused too and wondered why some people were getting food and drinks and others weren’t but no one seemed to be able to ask anyone because all the flight attenednts seemed to always be MIA.