Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • January64
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia expected to post 2018 profit

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Serbia's Finance Minister, Siniša Mali, has said the country's national carrier has operated with a profit over the past year and has not been a recipient of state subsidies. "Air Serbia has not been receiving subsidies for the past two years, and that is not down to me or the government but the European Commission which monitors state support", Mr Mali said, which is contrary to previous statements. Air Serbia's financial results for last year are expected to be made public in late June or early July by the Serbian Business Registers Agency, if the airline itself does not publicise its data beforehand.

Air Serbia has posted a profit since 2014 but has also received state funds. In 2014, the carrier's net profit stood at 2.7 million euros, which was followed by a 3.7 million euro profit in 2015. In 2016, upon launching its first long haul service, the airline's figures declined 77% with Air Serbia managing a 990.000 euro profit. However, in 2017 its profit soared to sixteen million euros. Those record results were achieved in part due to a significant reduction in expenditures and an increase in revenue. Furthermore, the state provided a twenty million euro subsidy, which is half of what the company used to receive from its majority shareholder, although the carrier was also granted twelve million euros for the "development of tourism". Late last year, Mr Mali said that the payment credited under tourism development is primarily for the support of the carrier's long haul service to New York. "As part of our tourism development strategy until 2025, the Serbian government has decided to extend its support to whatever contributes to tourism growth. In this case, it is flights to North America. Without that support there would be no service to the US. However, Air Serbia's financial performance would remain unchanged", Mr Mali said.

Air Serbia has been listed as one of several companies which will receive subsidies from the state budget this year as well, however, the Finance Minister noted this is in relation to debt accumulated by the airline's predecessor Jat Airways. "We did not have 380 million dollars to pay off the debt straight away. Instead, we will be making payments over a ten-year period. We process the loan a debt repayments either through Air Serbia or directly. However, none of the money goes into Air Serbia itself", Mr Mali said last week.

The Serbian Prime Minister, Ana Brnabić, recently noted, "The government of Serbia will maintain its strong support for Air Serbia. This support will be in line with European Union regulations, as it has been so far, however, no one can prevent us or limit our support for Air Serbia". The PM added, "Air Serbia plays an important role in the development of tourism, improves our economic ties with numerous countries and strengthens our country's brand. It has been an important driver of economic growth and I am certain that we will see even better results ahead since there are good prospects for further growth".




April 19, 2019
Air Serbia Feature Results 2019 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

Anonymous said…
I don't mind that they keep support. I mind that for that financial support service levels have gone down while ticket prices have stayed the same.
09:02
Anonymous said…
Seems like the consolidation measures worked. JU is growing again this year and we will probably get second long haul route in winter.
09:03
Anonymous said…
I do wonder how much the profit will be in 2018. Will it be over 16 mill or less?
09:04
Anonymous said…
Without state support, Air Serbia would go bust.
09:05
Anonymous said…
LOL, sure it did!
09:06
Anonymous said…
Toronto?
09:06
Anonymous said…
It's beyond me how Jat managed to make EUR380 million in debt!
09:06
Anonymous said…
And this year they will get subsidies from the Nis flights.
09:07
Anonymous said…
It would. But it has state support to keep it afloat and that is good.
09:07
Anonymous said…
It would be a disaster if they weren't profitable.
09:08
Anonymous said…
Yes
09:09
Anonymous said…
Because it was getting loans which were then (the money) taken by the government. It also didn't have control over it finances so cash shortages were extremely common so borrowing was the only way out. Over time that number reached 380 million.
The only issue here is that Etihad did not invest a single penny and it never contributed to improving Air Serbia's liquidity.
09:10
Happy taxpayer said…
They admit that they subsidize JU for thew JFK flights and "tourism development" but at the same time they say they do not give subsidies and the airline is actually profitable!
LOL, the absolute example of politicians telling us the biggest and most obvious lies with a straight face...
This is of course not just the Balkan way of politics, it is like that all over the world.
We just tend to be more obvious about it.
09:10
Anonymous said…
I think it's obvious by now that most of INI flights will go to Wizz Air.
09:10
Anonymous said…
How much money did they get for the A330 Serbia branding? Oh wait, that's not a subsidy. And this is just one of the many instances of state subsidies. But who are we to say that - just ignorant bystanders.
09:10
Anonymous said…
With the same mentality we hear from PM: "no one can prevent us or limit our support for Air Serbia"!
09:11
Anonymous said…
That is what all airlines across Europe are doing. Getting hidden incentives from their governments, airports, tourist boards, regions etc. I don't know if you people know that Airbus regularly gets a grants from the EU for the development of new aircraft programs. Even if the program goes bust like the A340 they do not require to return any of it. The US is complaining about it now since it is a hidden subsidy and unfair competition to Boeing.
09:11
Anonymous said…
So if they get a second long haul route more subventions will be needed to "support" it.
Got it!
09:12
Anonymous said…
Last year Serbia had the second highest tourism growth in Europe. I'm sure JU contributed to this.

https://i.postimg.cc/vHNLxs6v/screenshot-205.png
09:12
Anonymous said…
^Yes, most probably.
09:13
Anonymous said…
+1000
09:13
Anonymous said…
+1
09:14
Lima Zulu said…
Ok, they confirm JU is not receiving any aid but in the same time the government "strongly supports" them. There is a slight contradiction here. I am not sure if the EC can impose its rules on Serbia yet as it is still not an EU member.
By EU law it is forbidden to directly subsidise an airline, similar to what happened to Malév, back in 2012:

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-7_en.htm
09:14
Anonymous said…
Yes, that's 5 million euros per year for 5 years.
09:14
Anonymous said…
So what would be the alternative? Finance Wizz Air in Hungary or let foreign airlines come in who have no intention of registering in Serbia, no intention of paying taxes in Serbia and who only look after their own interests which are in no way related to Serbia.
09:15
Anonymous said…
Like with many things in Serbia, the problem is structural. They are throwing money at JU while its management is still clueless. With the money they got so far they could get five E75 for longer and thinner routes like STR, CPH, BRU... all of them could be operated daily in winter which would be better for connections. But noooo they would rather fly half empty 144 seat A319.
09:16
Anonymous said…
Oh please, everyone gets support either directly or indirectly. OU receives 7.4 million EUR each year just for PSO routes, according to EU. And that doesn't include all the "joint advertising" funds, city authorities like Dubrovnik buying out seats on planes etc.
09:16
Anonymous said…
of course it wasn't a subsidy. That atrocious livery is the flying ad of our PM's wet dream pet project.
09:17
Anonymous said…
easy to get a crude calculation. What was the growth in passengers of Air Serbia in 2018? What was the growth in tourists?
09:19
Anonymous said…
It's three years not five
09:21
Anonymous said…
The return on investment is worth it.
09:23
Anonymous said…
+1
09:23
Lima Zulu said…
Had no clue about OU, thanks. I think airlines are finding their ways in grabbing those sweet subsidies. Either way, I don't know why this EU law is still applied where every airline can easily skip it and find another alternative way.
09:23
Anonymous said…
It's applied so EU can kill airlines. Like they killed Malev to make way for Wizz to develop.
09:24
Anonymous said…
And it's highly doubtful Air Serbia will even apply. I don't see them flying to Friedrichshafen.
09:26
Anonymous said…
So SNS paid for it? ;)
09:26
Anonymous said…
A 09:16, so this reconfirms the theory of the prestige obsession, right?
Why would you fly a half empty A319 and lose money than leasing it to another warmer country in need just like many other European airlines do?
09:27
Anonymous said…
What goes around comes around. Now LO is in bed with the Hungarian government and no one knows if they are getting subsidies or not. All the while the mayor of Budapest is pushing for LCCs to be moved to Kecskemet so Wizz might be packing its bags soon.
09:28
Anonymous said…
I don't think it has anything to do with prestige otherwise they would still be flying 114 seat A319s. It has more to do with incompetence.
09:28
Anonymous said…
It is OK if they really learned to do it in a way which do not offend EU regulators.
09:28
Anonymous said…
At least state support is transparent in Serbia not covered under million different funds which have the same purpose just another name
09:29
Anonymous said…
Does OU receive PSO for ALL domestic flights?
09:30
Anonymous said…
Well said
09:30
Anonymous said…
And Serbia is not yet in EU.
09:31
Anonymous said…
YM is doing the same
09:33
Anonymous said…
It receives PSO funds for:
Zagreb-Split, Zagreb-Zadar-Pula, Zagreb-Brač, Zagreb-Dubrovnik, Osijek-Split, Osijek-Dubrovnik.

Yes all of them. Around 7.5 million per year. Will be increased next year when current PSO contract runs out.
09:34
Lima Zulu said…
Tbh, Malév was a brilliant airline. The biggest mistake was to give it to the Russians from Vnesheconombank with Ambramovic and Co. involved (currently EU sanctioned) in 2009. They surly muddled the airline.
But hey, József Váradi managed to escape the fiasco and cunningly took over W6.
09:34
Anonymous said…
How much has JU paid in tax in Serbia in the last 5 years or so compared to the subsidies?
09:35
Anonymous said…
JU last year stagnated and flew less pax than it did in 2017?
How exactly did they contributed to tourism growth?
If anything with the 7% cut in the number of flights they sabotaged tourism.
09:36
Anonymous said…
Thank you very much.
It is also way of financial support allowed by EU.
On the same way direcy financial support to JU by GoS is also legal as EU is not the member of EU. As we all know membership in EU has many advantages but also non membership could be good.
All in all, there is actually no difference between financial help OU received through PSO and financial help done by GoS to JU for tourism promotion
09:39
Anonymous said…
As Serbia is not the member of EU...
09:41
Anonymous said…
Me too. With all the savings they made you would expect a bigger profit.
09:46
Dusko said…
The money that is being thrown are paying the debts from jat era, it sats in the artikel that it Will be payed of Over a period of app. 10 years... 380m isnt little.
09:54
Anonymous said…
Words transparent and Serbia usually don't belong in the same sentence.
09:57
Anonymous said…
I do not mind state aid at all, on the contrary, I support it since when looking at the greater picture Air Serbia is indeed contributing a lot to Serbian economy. The money they get is nothing compared to what Serbia is getting in return.
10:02
Anonymous said…
I find it interesting that in Serbia people get peeved about subsidies for Air Serbia but not to the dozen of other state owned dinosaurs who get the same assistance or even more.
10:07
Anonymous said…
Not a single word can be trusted what this Mali guy says.
10:08
Anonymous said…
Oil prices and currency fluctuations won't help so I thinknit will be below 16 million.
10:08
Anonymous said…
Congratulations Air Serbia.
10:09
Anonymous said…
On what?
10:10
Anonymous said…
It's a question of how did they cook the books in 2018.
10:11
Anonymous said…
Probably because they were made to believe that after Etihad takes over there would be no more need for state assistance.
10:12
Anonymous said…
Much of the Serbian economy operates on subsidies. Much of the foreign investment in Serbia is attracted by subsidies which are provided for several years. Same as in Macedonia.
10:13
Anonymous said…
Yes I'm sure creative accounting is being done by a world renowned auditing firm (KPMG).
10:15
Anonymous said…
It certainly didn't go into JU's pockets. The livery had to be painted and paid for... in Abu Dhabi no less.
10:16
Nemjee said…
Let's not forget the welfare queen, Adria, and their own subsidies for LJU-BRU.
10:17
Anonymous said…
And what's worse they are 100% private.
10:18
Anonymous said…
Air Serbia is trolling everyone :D
10:20
Anonymous said…
The initial success of ASL was a result of a large investment from its shareholders. Unfortunately, this turns to be non sustainable.
10:22
Anonymous said…
not really

wizz air no longer receives subsidies from the n mac government. all routes are 100% operative.
10:24
Anonymous said…
You might have missed that Wizz Air is opening eight new routes thanks to new state subsidies.

https://www.exyuaviation.com/2018/12/wizz-air-to-launch-new-macedonia-flights.html
10:27
Anonymous said…
And I was not referring just to the aviation sector but the economy as a whole.
10:28
Anonymous said…
I will never understand why do people criticize Government for helping Air Serbia. I really think they did A LOT to improve aviation in Serbia. As it was mentioned before, JFK route is indeed important and when you have a look at the big picture, those flights are (indirectly) profitable. I would not mind state aid for Toronto route.
10:29
Anonymous said…
Exactly anon 10.07
JU's subsidies are nothing compared to what they give foreign investors or other failing government businesses.
10:32
Anonymous said…
Congratulations to JU. Seems like things are looking up .
10:36
Anonymous said…
Oh yes KPMG and other auditing companies always do things by the book ;)
10:37
Anonymous said…
I don't understand webby they don't release their results instead we have to wait for APR to publish them. I mean since they are going to post a profit, wouldn't it be good PR to publicize it?
10:51
Anonymous said…
They don't want to draw top much attention so people wouldn't start asking questions.
10:55
Anonymous said…
Interesting that state aid halved.
10:56
Anonymous said…
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2018/08/30/kpmg-is-caught-up-in-scandals-but-its-woes-are-not-existential
10:57
Anonymous said…
Bravo Serbia!
11:01
Anonymous said…
The state subsidies are going down. They still made a loss in 2017 (4 million without subsidies) but everything is looking they made an actual profit in 2018 when state subsidies are removed. Good work Air Serbia.
11:02
Anonymous said…
I don't know why are people so upset by the government's aid. It's ok when it's given to Wizz or other LCC, but it's wrong when it's given to a national carrier which employs 2500 people in Serbia. I for one am happy my tax money goes to support a Serbian business and not a Hungarian registered, Swiss based company.
11:05
Anonymous said…
Thank goodness the government supports it otherwise it would have been the 5th failed Etihad project, now that Jet Airways is gone.
11:09
Anonymous said…
Amen.
11:09
Anonymous said…
But that Hungarian company actually gives people the chance to go somewhere as their prices are actually affordable.
11:10
Anonymous said…
Yes it gives gastos the chance to fly home cheap.
11:18
Anonymous said…
Lepa slika,nadam se da će ih sledećeg leta biti 2 komada u bojama AS😃
11:20
Anonymous said…
Etihad had nothing to do with Jet's collapse and they were not a major shareholder. As far as I can see Alitalia is still flying while Darwin collapsed while under Adria's ownership. Air Berlin's demise is Etihad's doing.
11:20
Anonymous said…
I suggest you read up on the Jet Airways, Alitalia and WOW cases here: https://wolfstreet.com/2019/04/17/more-airlines-collapse-jet-airways-india-alitalia-wow/
They write, among others:
'Last year, Jet Airways “suddenly” discovered serious financial issues, which led to a highly dramatic rescue effort by the main creditors (chiefly state-owned State Bank of India and private-sector ICICI Bank) and minority shareholder Etihad under the new Sashakt legislation introduced by the Indian government to deal with the chronic “sudden liquidity problems” of the giant Indian economy.'
12:00
Anonymous said…
APR results are much better because it gives you a detailed look into how much money they made and how much they received.
12:27
Anonymous said…
Even with the subsidies they waste much less money than Jat and at least they have a decent network, frequent flyer program, crew, online check in...
12:37
Anonymous said…
Big difference is what OU gets is an earmarked fund to explicitly help operating domestic routes where most of the routes would not be sustainable on its own. Of course if OU i.e. should manage to spend only 6 million on these routes then they'd "earn" 1.5 million, doubt they'd pay back a difference. Nevertheless there are rules for PSO in EU and the 7.5 mill will be audited/approved by the respective EU authority otherwise any airline could operate pseudo PSOs and earn unlimited amounts in EU.
14:39
Anonymous said…
Yeah and the US is doing better with Boeing?... LMFAO
14:44
Anonymous said…
Really???

Care to read the article attentively?
14:54
Anonymous said…
Anon 9h16 - you are comparing apples and oranges!
14:57
Anonymous said…
Wizz Air prices are anything but affordable unless you think paying 300 Euros with no luggage to Beauvais is affordable?
15:12
Anonymous said…
happy balkan taxpayer, this is all legal according to EC. just because you started paying taxes in the balkans, it does not mean you get to decide how to use it.
17:18
Q400 said…
Is there a question mark over their current A330 now that Jet Airways might completely go bust?
04:53
Tyrone Biggums said…
Why cant they just run the airline without subsidies, run the airline properly and you wont need subsidies. -_-
05:15
Nemjee said…
It all depends on who owns the aircraft, if it's a lessor then nothing changes if it's Jet then who knows.
07:11
Post a Comment

VINTAGE EX-YU


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Air Serbia prepares for “very dynamic” 2027, plans specialised charters

Image

Former Yugoslav airports handle 39 million passengers in 2025

Image

Podgorica aims to regain Tirana’s Montenegro passengers

Image

All EX-YU capital airports set for February growth as Wizz dominates

Image

Belgrade Airport registers busiest year on record

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026