Zagreb Airport is seeking models which would allow low cost carriers to increase their operations to the Croatian capital. However, it remains resolute in maintaining equal conditions for all airlines, both budget and full fare. Zagreb Airport's General Manager, Huseyin Bahadir Bedir, said, "We understand the principles by which low cost carriers do business and we are attempting to find ways to cooperate with them. However, as an airport that handles over two million passengers per year, we have certain obligations which are regulated by the European Union. The two main rules we have to abide by are transparency and a non-discriminatory policy for all airlines. Of course, if low cost carriers find some other ways to subsidise their arrival into Zagreb, we are fully prepared to cooperate".
Zagreb Airport is dominated by full service carriers, which account for over 90% of all seats, whereas LCCs have a share of just over 8%. Late last year, local media reported that Zagreb Airport International Company (ZAIC), which runs Zagreb Airport, was considering asking the Croatian government to lower its annual concession fee. The operator believes that as a result of the concession fee, it has been forced to increase its charges, which have in turn deterred low cost airlines from flying to Zagreb. Last winter season, only one low cost carrier, Eurowings, maintained services to the Croatian capital. However, it too noted that Zagreb Airport's charges are "significantly higher than most major European airports, making it less appealing for low cost carriers". Croatia's busiest airport hiked its fees following the opening of its new passenger terminal in 2017 by two euros per each international passenger for a total of seventeen euros. Similarly, it increased its fees by half a euro per every domestic passenger to seven and a half euros. Europe's busiest airline, Ryanair, held talks with the Croatian Minister for Tourism, Gari Cappelli, last November over the potential introduction of flights to Zagreb. Commenting on its absence in Zagreb, Wizz Air's CEO, Jozsef Varadi, said recently, "It is a high-priced airport environment with fluctuating demand. Should the costs come down, I think they would attract us".
Mr Bedir believes 2019 will be the year the airport consolidates its operations. "We anticipate for passenger numbers to grow over 5% this year and for flight movements to stand at around 3%. This is a consolidatory year for us compared to the previous two". During the first quarter, Zagreb Airport welcomed 605.329 passengers, representing an increase of 3.4%. Aircraft movements grew 4% to 9.227. "We cooperate with the world's leading consultancy firms. Their experts and studies show that Zagreb Airport can expect to handle five million passengers per year in 2026", Mr Bedir noted.
| Month | PAX | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| JAN | 191.197 | 0 |
| FEB | 181.154 | ▲ 6.2 |
| MAR | 232.978 | ▲ 4.2 |


Comments
Excuse me but if they are cooperating with consultancy companies then there really was no need for the airport conecssion. The government could have done the same... for less money probably. Also I don't like the fact the airport is run by Turks now and no longer the French.
That's their problem. They had years to become competitive and offer decent prices. For the service they offer their fares are high.
That's huge!
ex-Yu is a mix..compare ZAG to SKP...two parallel worlds...
Why can't MZLZ look at Tirana or Skopje or Sofia for inspiration!
CIA, AMS, MAD, BCN, FRA, ATH, SKG, VIE, TLV etc.
They tried to blackmail the airport operators to give them large discounts compared to the "fancy airlines" but the airports did not.
Yet they based aircraft and launched flights anyway.
But I am afraid ZAG is not that type of market.
FR's European network can function without offering ZAG as a destination so only with large subsidies/discounts they will came here.
+1
Of course they knew and they agreed to it, but now it seems they are making additional pressure to the Governnment in order to blackmail it LCC's to arrive to ZAG.
It looks like that leading of ZAG does not go as planned. No new airlines in summer 2019, just a few new frequencies, downgrading of EK being replaced by FZ during the winter, increasing gap between BEG and ZAG in passenger numbers, SPU overtaking ZAG, Norwegian cancelling winter flights to ZAG from ARN and CPH, begging for lower annual fee in order to bring LCC's etc...
We are not living in the Balkans of the 70s and 80s any more dude.
Their national airline was Balkan and it went bankrupt many years ago.
OU can survive too even if FR arrives.
I mean important destinations are already connected: SXF, CRL..
There will be a route overlap such as INI and SKP.
The Turkish management with the approval of course of the French are just sitting on their behinds collecting large fees from the present carriers.
Anyhow if FR continues to grow in BNX there is no doubt ZAG will feel it.
"Zagreb Airport’s new CEO Tonči Peović has announced that he will cut the cost of airport handling services in a bid to attract more low cost airlines to Croatia’s largest airport. New handling prices, which are a great deterrent for low cost airlines, will be revised within the next 10 days. Peović said that he is negotiating directly with easyJet and Ryanair for them to commence flights to Zagreb and offer a total of 10 new services from Zagreb to their European bases. Yesterday, Peović said that "Clearly, we should be careful not to lower our income through new, lower prices, but we should also encourage discount airlines by sharing with them the risk of new flights. However, at the same time, we should be careful not to harm airlines with which we have been cooperating for years". Peović added that the national carrier Croatia Airlines will not be receiving any pricing privileges from the airport authority."
I mean it was obvious they accepted the fees as soon as they started flying to ZAG but why they left? Poor loads?
It looks like they did not care about prestige at that time
So only ZAG in the whole EU has to apply those rules. Other EU airports seem to function well with LCC and legacy and those rules. So where's the problem?
8 years for traffic to be increased by 1, 63 million pax.
That is an increase of just over 200.000 per year.
SMFH
I read FB is a fully private company and there is no data regarding the financials. Surely they are strugling although I see they increased the absolute number of passangers transported to/from SOF in 2018 vs 2017 despite W6 and FR expanding like crazy.
ZAG clearly needs more LCC for the sake of its citizens, the diaspora and the tourist industry in the city.
ZAIC or Croatian Government?
What are you on about?
How the usage of an old terminal which is mostly empty would mean delays? The airline and its handling company would have no reason to delay. Only the airport operator through the control tower or the Croatian/European ATC can delay them from landing or taking off but that would be clearly illegal. Anon 09:37 is right that O'Leary would sue the shιt of the airport and probably the ministry too and get massive compensations from the EU court.
Maybe it was disagreement with one of them, but with both...
"'Oće centrala da pogriješi jednom ali ne sto puta" :-)
We can see the results
Is the price difference really so big?
Route is Eindhoven. Last year operated for 2 months only with 2 frequencies per week, this summer entire summer season with 2 per week plus up to 4 weekly in peak season.
- what is the price difference, do you know? Is it so big or couple of euro only?
- Main LCC customers in Balkans is BEG? Have you checked SOF maybe? Huge difference.
- Croatian diaspora is not smaller than Serbian especially after Croatia joined EU. Therefore calling BEG gasto market and ZAG not is, at least, not responsible.
- BEG is further than ZAG to western countries, but it can't be the argument. If someone wants to fly to London or Stockholm from BEG/ZAG it plays absolutely no role.
Led by this logic BUD should not have any LCC as it is located from the western countries same as ZAG. Last time I check BUD had many LCC's being at the same time central airport for Wizzair.
- Do not forget that LCC's mostly fly from RJK, PUY, ZAD only during the summer season. During the winter all these airports are almost dead while INI and TSR can offer year-round flights with W6 and FR as an alternative to BEG. Driving time from BEG to INI and TSR is 2,5 hours and from ZAG to ZAD or PUY 3 hours. Pointless argument.
- The size of the airport or the city does not play any role here as well. You can take for example TIA that is smaller than ZAG and has less passengers than ZAG but this summer they will have 4 Wizzair routes, 2 Ryanair Sun routes , 1 Pegasus route, 2 Norwegian route, 1 Transavia route and 3 Eurowings routes.
It looks like the reasons need to be looked for somewhere else.
People travel more in summer but not mostly. More than 50% of August ZAG traffic is covered in January. These passengers should not be ignored as they also pay full price of using ZAG airport.
INI has double more traffic than RJK and all RJK, PUY and ZAD have in total the same number of passengers like TSR (almost all of them year-round). And beside all these facts BEG managed to keep decent number of LCC's.
Coming up on Thursday 11th April 2019
Travel between 27th October ’19 – 28th March ‘20
- Winter school holidays
- Christmas and New Year 2019/20
- Valentine's Day
- February half term
Fingers crossed!
BSL - STN
BSL - PMI
BSL - DUB
Your post at 15:03
" ... INI which is the ONLY closer to BEG..."
Your post at 19:52
"...why I listed TSR and not listed INI..."
You did not mention TSR at all before I mentioned it. For you INI was the only alternative to BEG.
It is well known it is easier to drive from Hamburg to Zagreb than to fly. Maybe in your surrounding.
And I wonder why Serbs living in Austria fly to Belgrade making it "gasto airport" and Croats do not fly from Germany to ZAG just in order to avoid making ZAG gasto airport.The distance is more-less the same. Pointless.
All these arguments are saying that BEG is in worse position regarding to the surrounding airports and their LCC's, but still managed to have decent number on LCC' on its own apron while ZAG does not have such LCC competion (actually not having it at all during the winter) but still can't attract FR, W6 or U2.
You should really rest your case. Good decision.
The size of the airport or city indeed does not really mean anything.
ZAG being an EU capital for more than 6 years now has the lowest number of LCC connections in the entire 27+1 EU capitals.
LJU which is much smaller has W6, HV, U2 and even linked to 3 London airports. The number is highly likely to increase in the near future.
Many EU capitals much smaller than ZAG have been flying LCC for more than a decade:
TLL, RIX, VNO, BTS, LUX.
Other examples of non-EU: KIV, TGD, TIA.
Clearly, there is something fishy about it.
Anon 15.07 is right, if those from Ireland were returning then OSI-DUB would not have been such a massive disaster.
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2018/09/korean-air-takes-off-for-zagreb.html
If they were a bit cheaper, the LCCs would flock to Zagreb, no doubt about it. This way...yeah, it really is going to be 2025. - 2026. when ZAG finally reaches 5 mill pax. It simply means continuing the current growth rate, or slightly higher. Over the past 5 years since ZAIC took over, they added 1 million passengers and given all the legacies which make up 90% of the traffic, that's actually very good. Thing is, all along the strategy was supposed to be: bring in the legacies, bolster OU and then build on that foundation. They are increasing frequencies, but now's the time to bring the LCCs as well. And not by begging the state to lower your fee. OU isn't worth a mention, it's a communist atavism of corruption and nepotism.
P.S. It's possible that China flights will be announced on Thursday or Friday, during the Chinese prime minister visit to Zagreb and the 16+1 summit in Dubrovnik.