Air Serbia had added the most new routes to its destination network among Europe's flag carriers this summer season according to the data and analytics company Cirium, previously known as FlighGlobal, which analyses trends within aviation and the wider travel industry. Air Serbia has added nine new routes so far with a further twelve to launch between mid-July and early August. It is followed closely by Aeroflot, with eighteen new routes and Turkish Airlines with a net gain of fourteen routes. The Serbian carrier is also one of the few national carriers in Europe not to have dropped any destinations compared to last summer season, joining the likes of Swiss, TAROM, Croatia Airlines and airBaltic, according to Cirium, which analysed data up until September.
Commenting on its network growth, Air Serbia said, "The first few days of June were marked with the introduction of direct flights to Helsinki, Barcelona, Madrid, Kiev, Krasnodar, Rijeka, Nice and Cairo, with Zadar included in our schedule later. However, the biggest expansion in the history of our company does not end there. Constantine the Great Airport in Niš will become the second base for our aircraft, alongside Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport, as early as this month. We intend to make an important regional hub there where roads lead from the centre of the Balkans to all four sides of the world". It added, "We are connecting Serbia's former capital with twelve European cities. We are proud to be able to work on the promotion of our beautiful land and to present Niš to tourists and businesspeople".
On the other hand, Czech Airlines has discontinued the most routes when compared to last summer season, with up to fifteen services cancelled. This is due to a number of flights being transferred to its parent company Smartwings. It is followed by Adria Airways, which retained only one of the eight new routes introduced in its network last summer, while discontinuing some long-running destinations such as Moscow and Warsaw. The list is topped off by Icelandair, which has cancelled five routes from its Keflavik hub due to the grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, as well as transatlantic oversupply.


Comments
Let's wait and see how October, November and December perform. That will be the real indicator
OU is getting money for all domestic routes (PSO)
Wizz air is getting money for destinations like SJJ or TGD from BUD
The way how Slovenian Government protects JP despite all the debts is scandalous.
The Government of Montenegro pays the debts of YM
N.Macedonian Government pays W6 to fly from N.Macedonia
And Air Serbia is a problem because they get money from Serbian Government to open so many new destinations and not from BEG but from secondary airport like INI.
Yeah, right.
Of course that traffic in November for example can't be compared with July. From the other side I expect they will make some promotions for connecting flights (for example special price for HEL-BEG-CAI) and on that way try to fill the planes during low season
Luckily for Serbia it is still not an EU member. Otherwise, back to the classic 737 era...
Official data. Barcelona and Zadar are also performing well, Helsinki, Kiev and Nice so and so, Cairo and Krasnodar rather weakly. Kiev (most) and Helsinki (half) are operated by CR9.
With what equipment and where? Regional airline should stay exactly what it is, a regional airline. Otherwise, by chasing megalomanic projects, that all know how will end, it could end very poorly for the entire company and have a severe impact on business overall... Give it a rest already because AS will never be old JAT, nor will BEG or ZAG be BEG or ZAG from the 1980s
"Well" means that CLF is higher than 85%, "bad" that CLF is well below 50%. And yes, there are many transfer passengers from MXP via BEG to CAI, this direction so far only.
But saying that the result is positive is not easily forgiven in Serbia or accepted in the neghbourhood
At the time when they were employed in Serbian national carrier passengers were flying with Bulgarian B733's in sardine configuration with holes in the tanks, but anyhow they keep convincing us that Air Serbia is bad, very bad.
for me, true measure of how good the airport is towards customers, would be delays of more than 15 mins caused by airport.
It has nothing to do with air carrier and it happened to me on almost every fllight I took in last 6 months.
But, hey, why wouldn't we blame Air Serbia? It feel sooo good...
Selling transfer tickets well below cost does not mean that a route is doing good let alone fantastic. But exactly the opposite.
JU is just subsidizing the travel needs of people who neither originate or are destined for Serbia.
KRR-BEG 116-3
BEG-ZAD 60
BEG-RJK 34
ZAD-BEG 51
RJK-BEG 35
BEG-CAI 132
Overall, flights are pretty full throughout the day with BEY,ZRH,ARN,CPH,ATH and SVO going above 160 pax :) On the other hand, my today`s favourite is 10 business class pax on LHR-BEG route :)
Either give proof that JU is dumping prices for transfers or stop spreading fake news on here. Transfer business can be successful if done right and since JU didn't cut those routes (like BUD, WAW, VAR...) it must mean it does well.
or is google translate to blame?
From a dying airline to one of the best in the region and with Etihad as a back up?
Just crazy...
Nis airport needs to be refurbished from inside. I do not understand why the GoS is not doing it? Its interior is embarrassing.
For normal carriers it is of course but for state owned national projects profitability is irrelevant.
As long as the state covers the loses they can fly wherever with little regard for profitability.
Just my2cents
*YU-AND hasnt flown since 16.09.2018
* YU-ANK hasnt flown since 12.03.2019
Im guessing its becoming harder and more expensive to keep them flying. Replace the 3 with A319's would be ideal, cheaper maintenance and better fuel efficiency combined with streamlining the fleet. Shouldnt be too hard finding some decent ac as carriers move to the A320neo.
Another 2 aircraft and 3 destinations I believe is ideal.
With 9W out of the picture, Indian tourist numbers increasing, DEL or BOM would be ideal for JU. Indigo has previously approached JU offering to assist in filling tourists to Serbia. Combined with transfers especially to North America, this could help boost numbers JU needs to up their frequencies.
YYZ has been talked alot. Again, same argument above.
PVG would be ideal for the amount of pax travelling between the 2 as well as the increasing business, tourism and trade between Serbia and China, not to mention transfer options via BEG.
At 4 p/w each and JFK boosted to daily, it will allow for better utilisation in the slower months when freqiencies are down and ac on scheduled maintenace. With EY grounding many A330's Im sure theyll be more than happy to offload them to JU.
Yes, JU334 never leaves on time as it does not get permission to do it from Eurocontrol.In the most cases (not always) it is the only reason why JU334 is delayed.
From the other side JU335 is losing its slot at FRA and then needs to wait for new slot together with new Eurocontrol permission to depart to BEG.
The same problem has Lufthansa with their late evening (LH1410) departure to BEG - their on time performance on that flight is only 54% while Air Serbia on the flight nr. JU334 to FRA has 47% on time performance.
So everybody is affected with Eurocontrol, Mr. Gold Status
There is some work happening at the airport. A couple weeks back I did notice construction vehicles by the C apron. Another smoking section has opened by gate C4 and small duty free retails in the C and A concourses. Renovating the A gates and additional bus gates should give some additional capacity, as well as the plan to seperate arriving and departing pax.
The biggest challenge would be to expand the arrivals hall in my opinion.
I wouldnt say one of the best. EY wasted alot of JU resources on ideas that just costed ALOT of money in the end with nothing but losses to show for it. Now its cost cutting with a half glass of water and some salty fish shapped biscuits. Not even Jat had this!
https://www.blic.rs/vesti/tema-dana/sa-jatovog-aviona-otpadali-srafovi/nq0wk29
http://www.rts.rs/page/stories/sr/story/135/hronika/204051/jatov-avion-skliznuo-sa-piste-u-istanbulu.html
http://akademediasrbija.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7322:za-boing-kreve-daemo-25-miliona-&catid=47:vesti&Itemid=71
2. Glass of water and biscuits is a standard among European flag carriers. “Кагњеће под сачем” can be found on “Ибарска магистрала”.
3. The company posts profit, as shown on their annual reports.
4. Even if it didnt make the profit, which is still just a accusation with no grounds among haters, all I can say that this has to be the best tax payers money spent in the last 70 years.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190626/8e52c2e1f742e9effc1dbeba3f779d20.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190626/e002877f98ba54ae2c3241373fa4f7eb.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190626/e002877f98ba54ae2c3241373fa4f7eb.jpg
Speaking of Chernobyl, Vinci was able to create new shelter and put in place above exploded reactor in only six years. That was stupendous feat of engineering on a global scale. So Vinci gets a credit for Chernobyl but not (yet) for Belgrade airport.
Euro standard is a full bar at least, as well with a snack. A3 and RO both offer a sandwich and a snack on top of a full bar service. TK no need to comment. Jat was at least having a full bar service and a pathetic sandwhich in its last days, on top of the other extras that ASL today charges.
Profit has been proven every year to come from some form of government subsidy and there are many posts on here showing this. However, the losses are reducing but they are still not profitable. This is why there has been a massive reduction in everything, even to the point of serving business class food in a cardboard box and items from the economy buy on board service.
I agree that money should be spent on the national carrier, but soo much resources have been wasted. For that money, JU could of bought a fleet of brand new ATR's and double that they currently have (at least!).
Air Serbia is one of better airlines Ive been flying in last 5 years, taking in consideration punctuality, service, legroom etc...
Yes theres airlines with better overall service, but we are talkin Turkish witch is among worlds best airlines.
Sorry, cant take your opinion as relevant since your comments are based on personal/political grounds.
All these destinations - these frequencies - people at AS probably sat down and thought what would we do if we were Wizz Air ?
Also opening flights to new destinations twice a week is typical Wizz Air strategy as seen with Lyon.
A whole can of opportunities opens up for AS with destinations like Malaga, Palma de Mallorca, Palermo , Catania, Bologna .
Just to freshen the memory, 2017 'profit' of 16 million € came after subsidies of:
-21mil€ state subsidies
-12mil€ of state aid used to lower expense
-9mil€ exchchange rate differences
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2018/07/air-serbia-posts-record-2017-profit.html?m=1
Its all facts used to make an opinion, articles published here. As I said, I am all for supporting the national airline, however ALOT has been wasted on unnecessary crap that have only inflated losses. Where are these blankets and pillows in Y, the metal cutlery and 3 course meals, onboard wifi, elevate play IFE? This was not free, while JU needs more, newer ATR's resources were wasted. Just as an example.
BA I have never flown and cannot judge. AZ I have however over 2 years ago and all I remember was them losing my luggage and their unprofessional and rude 'I dont give a shit' attitude from their staff (both onboard and on ground).
I have flown both A3 and OS in the last month and its the A3 service JU should be following.
Regarding the boxes in business, I know it has since been changed but an airline making 'profit' would not need to make this drastic change and this is my point. Cuts in catering was to allow JU to save on cost and overall it hasnt done much (I believe only 1.5 million €). Coffee, tea and a couple non alcoholic drinks are not expensive!
Air Serbia already serves Palma de Mallorca, Palermo and Catania as charters this summer. They also serve AHO and SUF in the neighbourhood.
Nothing wrong with buy on board, its a great source of additional revenue. I think theyve cut back too much on their onboard service which isnt good either. QF for example have their onboard service and sell alcohol. JU should bring back a limited bar service, this isnt a major expense. JU reduced 1.5 million going from full catering to practically nothing. A bar/snack service wouldnt cost much but would improve customer satisfaction.
Onboard sale could go for alcohol, preordered hot meals, snacks such as chips and chocolates etc. Onboard duty free is a great source of revenue especially since all flights are extra Schengen.
https://www.danas.rs/naslovna/naslovna-za-5-jul-2019/
Azores Islands, Lisabon, Capo Verde, so many destinations, that you cannot find flights with reasonable prices at the moment.
They don't need to stick only with some strange destinations in Europe.