Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June17
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


LOT tipped for Budapest - Zagreb service

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

LOT Polish Airlines is believed to be considering flights between Budapest and Zagreb as it attempts to build a hub in the Hungarian capital. According to Poland's "Pasazer" portal, the airline is also likely to introduce, as previously reported, services to Belgrade, Seoul, Prague and Sofia, in addition to the previously scheduled Brussels and Bucharest. LOT will hold a press conference in Budapest on Wednesday where it is expected to announce its network expansion. The new routes are set to launch in September. LOT will become one of the main hub airlines at Budapest Airport, with the investment also opening new connection opportunities for other European markets, which in turn will advance passenger flows through Budapest.

The launch of the potential new service would mark the resumption of flights between Budapest and Zagreb after five years. Qatar Airways previously maintained services between Doha and the Croatian capital via Budapest with fifth freedom rights to sell tickets between Hungary and Zagreb. The former Hungarian national carrier Malev maintained up to eighteen weekly flights between the two cities prior to its demise in 2012. LOT is ultimately targeting business passengers wanting to travel between European capital cities, as well as vital onward connections, including the carrier’s pivotal long haul routes from Budapest to New York and Chicago. LOT currently serves Zagreb from Warsaw twice per day.

Wizz Air, which is Budapest's busiest airline and has received subsidies to maintain services from Budapest to a number of capital city airports in the former Yugoslavia, warned last week of LOT's financial state and noted it is ready to rescue passengers should the Polish carrier collapse. LOT's CEO, Rafał Milczarski, responded by saying, "The information provided by Mr Jozsef Varadi [Wizz Air CEO] concerning alleged problems at LOT Polish Airlines is very out of date, as it was relevant four years ago. LOT is the most dynamically growing airline in Europe, which, in the last four years, has profitably increased its number of destinations from 41 to 111".




July 29, 2019
croatia Feature Summer 2019 zagreb
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Makes sense. We will see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    If they launch Seoul, they could provide good connections to ZAG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      But they offer ZAG-ICN today already via Warsaw. So whats the use? Reduce WAW?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:04

      They can provide good connections to Chicago and New York too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:04

      But you already have nonstop flight from Seoul to Zagreb.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:06

      LOT offers ORD, NYC, ICN and many other today with excellent connection twice daily via Warsaw. Why the hell do they want to route the passengers via BUD instead?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:10

      If Hungary pay their presence in BUD, why not to make another hub?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:21

      I think ICN-ZAG market is big enough for both flights via WAV and BUD, along existing KE flights. If anything, ICN-BUD-ZAG flights could further complicate things for EK/FZ connections via DXB.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. 4U11:44

      LOT does not have capacity at Warsaw. They ordered planes (787) and need to place them somewhere.
      Budapest might be interim solution before the new airport is built (2027-2029), which LOT wants to be main hub not for Poland but for whole Central Eastern Europe. The first phace capacity is estimated at 46mln passangers.
      Then the "Budapest hub" would be liquidated.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous11:54

      Have they started building the new airport or is it still in the planning stages?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. 4U13:47

      Still planning. They unofficially change opening from 2027 to 2029. There were plans to increase capacity at Okęcie but currently stopped.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Michael10:21

      I doubt that they lack capacity in Warsaw, but it could have something to do with corporate tax rate which is ridiculously low in Hungary. It's only 9% I believe.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. 4U15:26

      LOT is state owned company. CEO and CFO would be sacked for doing such tax optimisation.
      Okecie is using max no of slots in certain key hours. They can not add any new slots in theses hours. Additionally Okecie is very close to city centre so night operations are not allowed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    Malev used to fly BUD-ZAG 3 times a day. There is definetely demand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      I would assume mostly got transfer passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:05

      What equipment did they use?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:06

      Probably EMB, I doubt they will base Q400 in BUD?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:08

      Sorry I meant what equipment did Malev use on ZAG route back in the day.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:09

      They used Saab2000 operated by Moldavian and their own CRJ200.

      https://flugzeugbilder.de/v3/show.php?id=327647

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:11

      Thanks. Good aircraft types for this sort of route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:13

      I think Q400 woulb be perfect for ZAG and BEG routes, but we will see soon.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous09:15

      Е-120 was used by Malev.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Sasa12:06

      They used Jumbolino too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous14:07

      Malev never operated the Jumbolino (Bae 146) unless you are confusing it with F70.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:03

    I think they will fail in Budapest

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      Why?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:03

    I don't understand why Wizz Air sees LOT as a competitor in BUD. It's not as if they transport the same passengers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      Wizz generally dislikes all competition.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:07

    If they can offer good connections to New York, it could work. Makes more sense then going all the way eastwards to Warsaw.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous09:08

    Can they launch all those European routes with a single Embraer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:09

    Nisam siguran da znaju sta rade. Izgeda su zagrizli veci zalogaj nego sto mogu da progutaju. Nabavili su i porucili veliki broj sirokotrupaca pa sad ne znaju sta ce s njima.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      LOT's official explanation for growing from BUD is that they have no space anymore at Warsaw.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:14

      nonsense..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:17

      Sta je glupost?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:20

      official explanation is nonsense

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:27

      Sta je besmisleno,argumenti? Da su znali sta rade mislis da bi otvarali bazu u Budimpesti bez razvijene regionalne mreze?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:41

      I highly doubt they don't have space anymore at Warsaw. With BUD is another story, and if Hungary gov. pay some costs to cover looses, they dont need regional network at the moment. Btw, BUD is actually big market and can sustain some long haul by itself.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:50

      Sa 50% LF na sirokotrupcima trebace malo vece subvencije:) I da,jel ono beose zabranjene subvencije u EU ili to vazi samo za AS?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous09:52

      Who is talking about AS? :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous09:54

      A da bas i neznaju sta rade evo informacije koja se pojavila danas
      https://www.aviatica.rs/za-sada-nista-od-letova-izmedju-beograda-i-budimpeste/

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous10:06

      Ti si spomenuo subvencije a na svim forumima AS je sinonim za subvencije pa ih zato spomenuh. A da,da ne zaboravim i gladne poreske oveznike:)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous10:24

      I don't know what is the source of that information, as LOT will have a press conference on Wednesday, where they will announce their expansion. Aviatica hasn't given any explanation on how they got to that information, as far as we know. Furthermore, the route is still shown on BEG seasonal timetable on their website.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:13

    I'm surprised no airline has stepped in to fly this route for so long.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      But which airline could?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:15

      AirCroatia flew on this route :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:15

      OU for example.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:19

      OU is not able to experiment too much. Wizz 320´s are too big. So there is no business case. It can be flown twice daily with Q400 or smaller. But there is no airline able to do that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:34

      @9.15 for like a day :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:35

      True they operated just one single flight.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:41

      What about the little airline that flies OSI ZAG, why didn't they fly to BUD? Their capacity is quite good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:42

      I agree with thw anove statement. Trade Air is using the Let 410 on its Osi-Zag flights. I also see that it also utilizes the L410 on some Osi to some coastal cities. But then I think that this aircraft type wouldn't be able to handle some of the luggage people carry from the long haul flights. The L410 may be too small for that then. Any thoughts?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:22

    OU and LO could cooperate seeing as they are both Star members.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:26

      LO could buy OU the way things are going.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:38

      They said last year they would focus on Balkan cities which are hubs for Star Alliance members.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:00

      ATH is a big Star Alliance hub in the Balkans but LO doesn't fly there at all.
      I think LO with their predatory tactics is trying to bite more than it can chew and it might end in tears...

      Just my2cents

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:00

      So, ZAG-BUD makes more sense than BEG-BUD.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:10

      If LO has enough money to burn both ZAG and BEG make sense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:16

      Last anon, based on what have you concluded that?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous10:23

      I'm anon 10:16, my comment was referring to anon 10:00.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous10:26

      ^^
      I am basing my assumption on the fact that if you do not have to worry about things like load factors and yields most routes start to make sense. LO in BUD apparently is little concerned about these things so both BEG and ZAG flights do make sense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous08:11

      DBV-BUD would be good, seasonally!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:25

    This would be good!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous09:26

    Hope it's daily. An evening departure from Budapest and morning departure from Zagreb would be ideal, also for business.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  13. Anonymous09:30

    Good airline. If they launch this flight and it is daily, we would see LOT planes in ZAG three times per day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous09:31

    LOT has grown enormously in Croatia over the past few years (from Poland of course). Would be nice to see them from Budapest as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. OjOj09:34

    Linija tramvajka ispod 2x dnevno je promasaj u startu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous09:36

    I'm quite interested to see if these will be announced. So many rumors about their BUD flights. Announcement finally on Wednesday so let's see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous09:38

    What about Ljubljana?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:05

      What about SPU

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. OjOj11:24

      Vrsar?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  18. Anonymous09:43

    If they keep growing in Budapest then it will be really bad news for OS. They are already struggling financially.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:47

      Nobody cares about OS, they got more than enough in ex-yu in last 20 years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous23:49

      That was my point, that OS will suffer because of this.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:56

    The more the merrier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:57

    Would be nice to see this route from Zagreb. Hope it happens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:00

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  21. Anonymous10:00

    Bravo Hrvatska!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous10:16

    Tend to agree with Wizz with about LOT, unrelated to this route but just in general.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:43

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  23. Anonymous10:19

    How did QR perform on BID-ZAG?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:20

      That sector really wasn't a priority for them. They flew 3 times per week at unfavorable times - middle of the day.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:31

      They used the A320 right?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:36

      Yes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:37

      Actually it was mix of A320 and A321.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:50

      No, it was exclusively A320.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:45

      Must have been the shorted inter European flight with a luxurious product :D
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uMt49hrb3I

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  24. Anonymous10:21

    Lets wait until we hear ir on Wednesday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:29

      Exactly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  25. Anonymous10:41

    Encouraging news for Zagreb, hope they launch it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous10:44

    Does anyone know how LOT is doing financially? Can;t find their figures anywhere

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:47

      Profit in 2017 PLN 354 million.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:51

      That's about 85 million euros.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:06

      Not bad at all.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. 4U11:51

      In 2018 just PLN 209 mln so around EUR 50 mln. In 2019 it might be worse as MAXes can't be used and some 787 still issues with engines.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Dejan12:11

      True dat.
      The 737 MAX issue is definitely going to drag on in 2020.
      LO will either have to scale back expansion or lease (very expensive) interim capacity from ACMI providers. And at the same time continue to fly older, less fuel efficient aircraft while their competitors fly A320NEOs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous13:45

      LOT has (half) of ACMI provider Regional Jet which is currently hiring Embraer pilots and plans to lease more CRJ and ATR (for SAS in Stockholm) as well

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous16:55

      Isn't LOT going to sue Boeing for the MAX?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. 4U09:21

      Even if they do it does not help much. They are fixed to Boeing. If Max will be out of the market (more issues were found lately) LOT would have to switch to 737 (less efficient) or move to Airbus (wait very long for deliveries and overpay as many airlines might want to switch to Airbus). They can further develop with ACMI but prices went up and quality of these planes is terrible.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  27. Anonymous11:06

    Hope it's daily.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  28. Anonymous11:21

    ZAG really needs these flights to keep growth alive in winter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. Anonymous11:30

    What is the flying time between BUD and ZAG?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:55

      Qatar Airways had it scheduled at 55 minutes duration.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  30. Anonymous12:01

    If they do launch these ZAG and BEG flights from BUD, I do hope they stick. I just don't see how it will work, especially if it's daily.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  31. Anonymous12:39

    Fingers crossed for Wednesday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  32. Anonymous13:23

    A onda B92 izmiksa 2 vesti i nastane ovo:
    https://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/svet.php?yyyy=2019&mm=07&dd=29&nav_id=1571521

    :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  33. Anonymous13:39

    Don't know concerning BUD-ZAG flights, but LOT won't fly from BUD to BEG any sooner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:08

      https://beg.aero/eng/seasonal
      Look for Budapest

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:31

      LOT still needs to confirm if BUD-BEG is cancelled. If true, it could mean Air Serbia will finally grow long haul network and LOT might not need that competition right now. Normal airlines are starting to firm up and publish their schedule for next summer long haul services but JU doesn't seem to be in rush to be in that league.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:04

      Cancelled? You Cant cancel something that Was not scheduled.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:57

      But you can cancel something that was planned.
      just got burned buddy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous20:25

      We'll just have to wait for Wednesday and LOT press conference.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous20:43

      True dat.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Unknown19:01

      New routes have already been published, Belgrade, Sofia, Prague ( weird move as ryanair and CSA do plenty of flights daily) Bucharest, brussels, Seoul and stuttgart.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  34. Anonymous15:44

    They just put Budapest-Seoul on sale.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lyngbyvej16:16

      Indeed. Three times per week. Replaces ORD.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:54

      ORD is cancelled_

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:34

      ORD is not cancelled (yet), just became summer seasonal.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous22:27

      With PRG-ICN year round just up the Danube BUD-ICN doesn't make much sense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous23:35

      This whole thing don't make much sense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous23:45

      You mean just down the Danube. But you are aware that Prague is not on the Danube, right?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Unknown18:55

      Ord became seasonal not cancelled and prague is not on danube and way way away to have any impact on these routes that's like comparing cdg and lhr routes. Budapest is one of the most visited cities in EU plus thousands of expats living there from all round the world. LOT better move in before someone else.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  35. lyngbyvej16:15

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Emirates: No plans for Zagreb or Belgrade service

Image

Royal Jordanian plans Belgrade service

Image

Two North African carriers considering scheduled Belgrade flights

Image

Ljubljana Airport gains momentum as more new routes expected

Image

airBaltic schedules new Ljubljana winter service

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025