The Slovenian government still hasn’t made a decision on whether to form a new flag carrier despite plans to do so by the end of November. The Slovenian Prime Minister, Marjan Šarec, said this week, “A decision is yet to be made as experts are still examining the matter. If a company is to be established in any shape or form, it will be impossible without a foreign partner. A potential new airline would initially operate with a loss. However, when we determine the exact numbers, we will have to decide whether we are prepared to go ahead and form a new carrier. The airline business is very risky”.
The Slovenian Minister for Economic Development and Technology, Zdravko Počivalšek, who has backed the creation of a new national airline since the collapse of Adria Airways in late September, is believed to be increasingly isolated in his pursuit to form a new flag carrier. Mr Počivalšek noted that talks with a regional carrier, as a potential part-owner in the company, have come “a long way”. “We are working on establishing a new company, a new Adria. The government has two options. One is to let the aviation market take its own course and the other is to try and re-establish a national airline in cooperation with a foreign strategic partner. I support the latter because I am convinced that Slovenia’s connectivity will never be as good without our own airline”, Mr Počivalšek said recently.
Earlier this month, the Slovenian state-owned Bank Assets Management Company (BAMC) drafted a business plan for the country’s potential new national airline. Under the proposal, the carrier would reportedly operate a fleet of five Bombardier aircraft and count some 200 employees. Based on the Assets Management Company’s calculations, the airline would record a twenty million euro loss in its first year of operations. Meanwhile, former Adria Airways employees received their August wages this week, after the Public Scholarship, Development, Disability and Maintenance Fund paid out 1.83 million euros. The Fund noted this was one of the biggest payoffs in the past few years covering workers’ insolvency rights. The next payment will be made in late December.

Comments
Feel sorry for former Adria employees :(
Major airlines are already lining up for such an amazing opportunity.
Most of what is wrote is whataboutism. So if government wastes 500 million on failed projects, they should waste another 100m on Adria 2 rather than improving or getting rid of existing projects?
Loss-making routes for former CEOs to Balkan and PRN/TIA/SKP transfer via LJU isn't, as it wouldn't benefit Slovenians anyway.
If Slovenia would be connected so well then why 80% of politicians are travelling out of ZAG?
Fleet should be selected based on the route network and estimated number of pax. Just because Adria operated CRJ for 2 decades and there are couple of pilots on the market with the rating doesn't make it the best aircraft for the job.
Why couldn't Adria 2.0 offer commutable roster? 14/7 or 14/14 with decent money, and you'll get plenty of applicants, given Slovenia is in Europe and a nice place to love/work in. Lease ATR72 or Q400 instead of CRJ and spend difference in fuel on salaries, if needed.
I though that was obvious.
BRU was an EU/EP/EC/Ex route anyway, not for connections.
True! BRU was for EU/EP/EC but only in the past. With this schedule they are only getting students and VFR onboard. Government is taking OU flights at 07:00 in ZAG with evening flight back to ZAG.
Both mr Plenkovic and ms Brnabic said that national carrier is very important for economy of the state. And they say that Slovenians are smart.
OTP, SOF, TSR, CLJ, SBZ, KRK, KTW, WRO,...
All of these airports have early morning departures by LH to MUC and/or FRA. Why would LJU be an exception?
Overnights are costs of business if you operate a hub model.
Look at Slovakia. No national carrier, booming economy and BTS had 400k more pax last year than LJU and that's with VIE right at their doorstep.
BTS is attractive to many LCC due to lower airport cost in comparison with VIE (huge market as AT is only one additional reason for LCC to place A/C in BTS). Do you think that LJU has same possibility to bring all those LCC in such small country as Slovenia? I don't think so...
This government is clearly incompetent. However, the alternative is much worse ...
but want to create successful an airline)
Add attractive destinations could be the case to expand routes.
Cashflow is key. Even LCCs need to convince providers of finance their business model is credible and durable and management has sufficient experience and ability to execute.
If government gets involved cash will flow mostly from taxpayer's pockets.