The Serbian government has approved a draft of the country’s state budget for 2020 which foresees subsidies for Air Serbia. Although the exact amount of funds has not been specified, the national carrier is one of 63 companies “of special importance“ which will share eighty million euros in subsidies among themselves. The airline was the beneficiary of 20.8 million euros "from premiums, subsidies, grants and donations" both last year and in 2017. The figure has been significantly decreased from 41.8 million euros in 2016 and is in line with the transaction agreement between the Serbian government and Air Serbia’s minority shareholder Etihad Airways.
The Serbian government maintains these funds are being used to pay off old debt owed by Air Serbia's predecessor Jat Airways, however, the accuracy of these claims has been contested. In August, the Serbian Prime Minister, Ana Brnabić, noted, "The Government of the Republic of Serbia did not give a single dinar, euro, dollar or any other currency to subsidise Air Serbia. What you see as income from premiums is to pay off the debt accumulated by Jat, which we have taken upon ourselves. Their [Air Serbia's] financial reports will display these payments until 2023 because this is debt owed by Jat".
This summer, the now-bankrupt Adria Airways filed a complaint against Air Serbia with relevant European institutions over what it sees as illegal state aid provided by the Serbian government to its national carrier. The Serbian Finance Minister, Siniša Mali, noted that Jat's debt amounts to 380 million dollars, which was taken over by the state in 2013 and will take a decade to pay off. "We did not have 380 million dollars to pay off Jat's debt straight away. Instead, we will be making payments over a ten-year period. We process the loan as debt repayments either through Air Serbia or directly. However, none of the money goes into Air Serbia itself", Mr Mali, who previously headed the company's Supervisory Board, said.
The Prime Minister has vowed the government would stand by the carrier in the years to come. "The government of Serbia will maintain its strong support for Air Serbia. This support will be in line with European Union regulations, as it has been so far, however, no one can prevent us or limit our support for Air Serbia", Ms Brnabić said. She added, "Air Serbia plays an important role in the development of tourism, improves our economic ties with numerous countries and strengthens our country's brand. It has been an important driver of economic growth and I am certain that we will see even better results ahead since there are good prospects for further growth". Air Serbia has justified the support by noting it gives back one billion dollars to the Serbian economy each year and that it plays an instrumental role in the country's economy. "The contribution that Air Serbia makes to the national economy and the job market in Serbia cannot be overstated. We support thousands of jobs directly, through our airline operations, and indirectly, through the powerful domino effect that Air Serbia has on stimulating economic activity throughout the country”, the airline previously said.

Comments
I don't think it would be a waste of many adding more subsidies if it is pushing the company in the right direction.
Hopefully government gives guarantees for fleet renewal, because the fleet is trully in horrible state and it needs immedisim action in order for airline to go through anoth summer season like the one in 2019
It practially means that Air Serbia management correctly judged that Nis routes will bring nothing but losses if not supported by Government. Let's not forget that GoS insisted these flights to happen in order to provide to the people from south convinient way of transportation from Nis airport.
So, if Government wants to do it they can but therefore they need to pay for it. Air Serbia simply delivers the service they got money for (with exception of Budapest that might be replaced with another destination) .It has nothing to do with "financial help".
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/10/croatia-airlines-gets-first-135-million.html
Today we have the fleet consisted mostly of Airbuses (319+320+330) which enterior does not look bad at all. It is true that YU-ANI, YU-AND annd YU-ANK are not in a good shape as well as 3 oldest ATR72-200 but due to these 5-6 planes you can not generalize and talk about whole fleet.
I fly with JU at least 15 times in a year so I know what I am talking about.
They got half the company with the other owner continuously pumping millions to it while they do not have to contribute a single dinar.
They did it already with Malev, Cyprus Airways, Estonian Air etc - all the companies similiar to OU by their size.
- TK, SU, EK, EY, QR receive huge subsidies and all have flights to ex-Yu region
- OU receives PSO for all domestic flights and there a lot of them
- OU receives illegal Government's help
In that surrounding talking that JU destorts the market is actuallly funny.
Let jU get subsidies, at least they are a convenient option when travelling abroad.
API and APJ are constantly broken, APF was out of service for almost a month, usually one of A320's is out...
I am not comparing cabin layout to JAT, six years is enough time to forget about the past and start comparing ourselves to other competitors.
State of fleet is increasing operstional cost and limiting future growth.
YU-APF had an accident and it is normally it must be checked properly before returned to the traffic. Now it flies again.
Honestly speaking I have not seen any difference between JU A319's cabin and major European competitors including LCC's (comparing to especially FR JU cabin looks more than decent).
I think we can't expect JU to buy or lease brand new planes, but the last one that joined the fleet (YU-APK) loos very nice inside.
I believe Air Serbia should further develop in that direction, but finally needs to decide what to do with ancinet B733 fleet. I personally like them and I know they do not have to pay leasing costs for B737-300s, but their engines as well as big maintenance costs make them expensive to fly with.
TIA is currently the jewel of the south.
INI is a small market that can be postponed...
Also JU paid them a lot of money for "expert" advisers and services from Abu Dhabi.
If only EY had made similar deals with the rest of the airlines she invested in it would have been n much better shape.
It was either to accept EY offer and make a decent company with necessary investments or not to have national airline at all.
I always vote for first option
EY offered their brilliant advise about boutique airline concept!!!
- Without EY it would be much more difficult pilots to be trained to fly on Airbus fleet
- Without EY it would not have been possible route to JFK to be opened
- Without EY it would not have been possible Jat's deposit to Airbus to be returned
- Without EY JU would not have decent FF program
- Without EY JU would not have so wide codeshare network with south east Asia and Australia
- Without EY establishing new company after Jat Airways would not have been possible (no matter how much money invested) knowing how politically appointed "managers" were running Jat Airways
And yes, it costs money. No free lunch.
Rescue fares are more than normal in the in the industry and in situations certain company goes belly up. It is not Air Serbia's invention, they just reacted as they supposed to do. And they did it very well
Air Serbia had so many promotion actions to allmost all the cities in last few months including the biggest one "ponuda koja se vidi sa meseca" where almost all the cities from their network were offered with extra low prices.
But, it is always easier to complain - why don't they offer 100 EUR for tomorrow's flight to CDG?
Because of mismanagement at JU BEG suffered from slower growth in recent times. This year BEG is already catching up to SOF which recorded passenger decline in both September and October. I think the difference between the two is less than a million now compared to 1.320.935 at the beginning of the year. BEG will most likely boom in November and December so the diference will fall to below one million. Who would have thought? But that's aviation, things change every day.
What can be wrong wih that?
Could you please explain why you erased twice posts of Anonymous asking does Air Serbia still has debts belonging to its predecessor and my posts in response about the difference between JAT and Jat? I mean yes, this is your blog and technically you have right to do it, I just wonder why, because there is absolutely nothing offensive, discriminating, vulgar, provocative, alltogether 4 totally normal posts which you erased. I would really appreciate if you tell me why. Thanks!
The west insists that everyone adheres to free market because they benefit greatly from it. The moment that there is a trade deficit or that the situation doesn't benefit them any longer they will shut it down just like the United States is now having a trade war with China.
I'm not against market capitalism but don't be a fool. The big 3 airlines in America benefited from over 70 billion in bailouts since the turn of the millennium. When will they ever pay that back? How about British, Lufthansa, or Air France, when will they ever pay back the billions and billions of value they got from the decades of state-ownership?
Please don't be a fool. We all know who benefits from "free market" and who pays. There is a reason why the west insists on it.
No demand for AMS but huge capacity to EIN.
Plus, MUC airport already drafted their masterplan for SOF and is looking pretty decent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc93BSVPc4k
You seem to have missed my point.
As for BEG, so far for next year this is what we have:
7x LO from BUD
5x LX from ZRH
3x EW from STR
1x JU to BCN
So today, months before summer season starts, we are already at an additional 16 weekly flights! Isn't that impressive? Aren't we looking at 6.6 million, at least, at BEG next year?!
Also W6 is increasing BEG-FKB from 2 to 3 weekly so that's 17 new flights. Also I am sure Red Wings is considering more flights next year since the number of Russian tourists keeps on booming. Let's wait and see what happens, there are still month before summer.
STN - up to 17 weekly for summer
EW - 5 weekly also extended
LO - daily
RO - increase to 16 weekly (+5 new flights)
A3 - 9 weekly (+1)
Roughly around 20 new flights not operated in summer 2020.
Not to mention that LO are sending 734 on some days and BA + U2 sending A321 neo.
Inspite of the weaker 2019 and all the new additions in BEG, there is still a significant gap of nearly 3/4 of a million.
So roughly 20 new flights minus 3 that they are losing from Transavia's departure means that so far they have the same number of flight additions as BEG. Only difference is that BEG has a much stronger H1 2020 and the rest of 2019.
So overall BEG is in a much better position. Its BEG's time to shine, SOF had its moment.
Oh and btw, Lauda will destroy OS so most likely next winter they will reduce flights like they did in TIA, SKG and ATH ;)
No way will OS give up easily.
BEG also shined when the new JU was born in 2013 and overpassed SOF.
In 2016-2017, FR arrived and made a revolution.
2019 was very good for BEG thanks to the summer frequency boosts and JU expansion.
That said, lets see if Vinci keep their promise of generating a traffic of 12 million...
Malev similar by size to OU? Malev was twice the size of OU my dear friend.