Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May54
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Macedonia rules out new national carrier

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

The Macedonian government has reaffirmed it has no plans to establish a new national airline, a decade on since the collapse of MAT Macedonian Airlines. The incumbent government mulled the possibility of establishing a new flag carrier at the start of its mandate several years ago but has decided against it. Instead, it inked a new three-year subsidy agreement with Wizz Air this January for the introduction of new routes. The financial support included a one-time payment of 40.000 euros for each new destination launched, as well as nine euros per passengers for each new route from Skopje for the first year, eight euros during the second year and seven during the third. On the other hand, the carrier is receiving thirteen euros per passenger during the first year of operations on each new destination out of Ohrid, twelve during the second and eleven euros per traveller in the third year.

The head of the North Macedonia Civil Aviation Agency, Tomislav Tuntev, said establishing a new national airline would be unviable. “I must reaffirm my personal opinion that that there is no economically viable justification for developing such an outdated concept at this time. Our expert research, analysis and feasibility studies, as well as comparative experiences from countries in the region, have shown that such an airline would find itself in operational difficulties, pose a financial burden on the state, and result in a lack of competitiveness on the aviation market due to the necessity for continued state interventionism, in spite of the existing European Union policies in support of fair competition”. However, Mr Tuntev noted the Agency would provide support if a private investor would be interested in registering aircraft in Macedonia or establish an airline in the form of a public - private partnership if the state saw an economic interest in such a venture.

Since the 1990s, Macedonia has had two national carriers, both of which subsequently declared bankruptcy. Palair Macedonian Airlines was founded in 1991 as the country’s national airline but was hit by local competition with the creation of MAT Macedonian Airlines in 1994. As a result, it ceased flying in 1996. MAT was formed in cooperation between JAT Yugoslav Airlines and local businessmen. In 2000, the Macedonian government declared MAT the country’s national carrier owned by two private stakeholders. However, mounting debt, as well as political wrangling, saw MAT cease operations in September 2009. MAT’s demise was followed by an attempt to relaunch the airline as Mat Airways several years later, however, it too failed. Based on its latest financial report, Air Serbia has a 100% stake in a company registered in Macedonia, named AeroMak, however, it is currently inactive. Its predecessor Jat Airways planned to establish an airline under the name in late 2009 but shelved them months later.




December 25, 2019
Feature macedonia Skopje
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    Thank goodness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    I actually think there is enough space for a national airline. LCC attract a completely different market. If they took out two regional jets I think a new national airline could work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:06

      Are you serious? Wizz has over 60% of the market. No one is going to be able to compete against that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:07

      +1000

      Many countries in the region can do it so why can't we? In Serbia you have JU and W6. In Bulgaria you have FB, FR and W6. In Greece you have A3 and FR... but not here, we only have W6 that controls 70%+ of the market and is constantly increasing prices.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:08

      Anon 09.06

      Now that JP is gone, Wizz monopoly in SKP is getting close to 75%

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Bel Cielo 09:42

      Merry Christmas to all! @ANONYMOUS 9:07am I think that there is a big difference from one market to the other. The presence of LCC depends on it. For example look at the network of FR from Athens and W6 from Belgrade, there is a big difference. Look at the numbers of LCC that serving Athens and Belgrade, again big difference. A3 is a private owned company but they have an excellent management. If JU hadn't the protection from the state, well I don't know if they could survive the same as A3.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:09

      Micro airline with 2 aircraft - yep, that will work.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:03

      anon 9.08: JP had only 2-2,5% of the market in SKP, so not a big deal. Their connecting pax are being taken over mostly by OS and to a less amount OU and JU

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous19:36

      @9.08 actually their passenger share for first Q1-Q3 was 62.2%.
      Source: https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/11/wizz-air-grows-dominance-in-skopje.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    It is such a pity that MAT was practically destroyed by the government even though it was a private airline but served the interests of the country. And for what? So space could be made for Wizz Air. As if it could not take MAT by itself without issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:06

      It was destroyed because it would have been difficult to explain to the public why subsidies and money was being given to a Hungarian company and not a Macedonian one whose entire staff was local and who paid taxes in the country. They waited for the 10 years national carrier certificate to expire and then the former general director of the aviation directorate did his work.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. vae10:25

      I doubt that Wizz Air existed at the time MAT was closed. I am happy that both current (SDSM) and former (VMRO) governments agree for at least one issue. The age of flag carriers has gone. Of course there are still legacy airlines that burn government money. And there is LH that owns (at least) flag carriers from (at least) 3 countries. What kind of flag carriers are Austrian ans Swiss? (FAOD They are fine airlines, and I like to travel with them, but they were not able to survive on their own as national carriers. Now was Adria, nor are (in aplhabetical order) Bosnian, Croatia, Monte Negro, Serbian...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:28

      Wizz Air has existed since 2003 and started flying from Skopje in 2011.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. vae10:48

      Thank you for information. So Wizzair did exist, but did not yet fly to Skopje.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:04

    We are stuck with Wizz.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:39

      It could be much worse. Wizz Air has generated significant growth for SKP & OHD. It's hardly a bad situation.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:08

    Good. Why waste tax payers money?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      Macedonia invested nothing in MAT as it was practically a private airline given a contract to act as a national carrier for 10 years (until 2010). Had our government invested 50% of the money it has given to Wizz Air it could have developed into a respectable company. It had a decent route network and service.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:47

      True, government didn’t spend a cent. Well, now tax payer money is going to a foreign company whose airline transport is looking a lot more like a budget bus transport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:10

    Still love that MAT livery :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      Yes! I loved MAT livery, Macedonian flag looked good on both B737 and CRJ900 tail.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:55

      It was based on JAT's 90s livery. Came from the same designers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:53

      MAT Macedonian Airlines livery resembles British Airways present livery, doesn't it?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:29

      @ 9.14 on the Embraer too :)

      https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SypRqaRDtDw/U8drEpuzc5I/AAAAAAAANQQ/hCyV9q6f0UA/s1600/mat.jpg

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:39

      Yes it looked really nice on all plane types. DC9 included.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:11

    So many European countries don't have national airlines and they are doing absolutely fine. Why would we need one?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:16

      I agree that Macedonia might not need a national carrier, but it certainly does need better connections to important hubs such as Frankfurt, London, Paris without the extra step of transferring through ZAG, LJU, BEG or VIE.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:25

      W6 have, very well, covered the most important destinations to DE, CH and Scandinavia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:25

      @9.16 LJU is definitely no longer a transfer option :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:17

      Because i need a connection via LHR and i dint have a UK visa😂.

      But besides that, trans Atlantic flights to destinations other than JFK, ORD, Logan, and Toronto are a complete mess and flying to second tier cities in the US and canada, and beyond is as well. After the indigo takeover of WOW failed, and norwegians boeing conundrum, i really cant see cheap connections overseas anytime soon.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:40

      There are a lot of destinations that should still be covered from SKP. In my opinion they are FCO, AMS, CDG, FRA, MUC, LHR and MAD.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:11

    I agree with Tuntev

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:16

      he seams the most reasonable CAA director we ever had

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:41

      True. Well said on his behalf.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:17

    Macedonia definitely does not needs a state carrier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 74710:46

      +100000000000000000000

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:18

    No need for national airline but please give subsidies to another LCC. Wizzair shouldn't be granted with this benefits anymore because of the monopoly danger.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:20

      I agree with you. I like Wizz Air, and I fly most with them, but Skopje just needs another player who bases plane/s in the city (Ryan, Easy, Vueling, Eurowings or Transavia).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:20

    Wizz is already connecting well Macedonia to the rest of Europe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous09:20

    Would love to see a Macedonian carrier in the sky again

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  13. Anonymous09:28

    What the government should do is force Wizz Air to get a Macedonian AOC!!! About time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:10

      And what benefit would it be to Macedonia?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:15

      benefits would be flights to Turkey, Switzerland (the two biggest markets from SKP) then Russia, Ukraine, Middle East ........... and Belgrade&Sarajevo :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:11

      The Turkish passengers use IST as a connection hub, not a destination, and Wizz already flies to Basel daily from SKP and Frequently from OHD.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:17

      "The Turkish passengers use IST as a connection hub not a destination" i dont get this sentence and what it has to do with MK

      Wizz could fly to Istanbul and the coast for a fraction of THY's fares (and cheaper then PG). They could finally start Geneva, one of the most obvious missing destinations from SKP due to not having flight rights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:11

      Who says Wizz Air would fly to all those airports even if they had Macedonian AOC?

      If they would be really interested, they could lobby for bi-lateral agreements.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous19:52

      They can't lobby to be included in bilateral agreements because they are a Hungarian company. As a Hungarian company they can't be added into a bilateral between Macedonia and Turkey or Macedonia and Russia or Macedonia and Israel.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous20:48

      That's an awful lot of hassle to enter into two markets that are already served.

      Currently Wizz Air has two AOCs, Hungarian (the original) and UK (due to Brexit), and soon UAE. I'm pretty sure opening a Macedonian to be able to operate two flights already flown by other airlines is extremely unlikely and costly. They haven't turned into one of Europe's leading LCCs by making such irrational decisions.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:29

    A flag carrier in Macedonia would be as profitable as Montenegro's or Bosnia's flag carriers are/were. So not at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:31

      I agree. A national airline would have ended up like Montenegro Airlines or BH Airlines. If it were so profitable a private company would have set up an airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:54

      @Anonymous 09.29. The same goes for Serbia's and Croatia's.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:08

      Those two can actually be profitable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous19:51

      That's questionable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:30

    I am not a fan of this national airline idea and am glad they have decided against these plans. But I also think that building growth for only one LCC is not a healthy strategy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:21

      We need a middle matket airline. One that has the no frills experience but can also provide connections. Someone like norwegian

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:51

      Well Norwegian is in financial problems so I don't think such a model would be much successful.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:31

    What needs to be done is attract full fare legacy airlines and stimulate them in some way. Not everyone in Macedonia wants to fly with Wizz Air and not everyone in Macedonia want to fly to villages 100km away from the cities being advertised by Wizz.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:36

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:30

      If there was a market, they would have already started operations

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous19:50

      Not necessarily. Many airlines, particularly legacy carriers, don't realize full potential of certain markets and don't want to take any risks whatsoever.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous23:34

      correct, as if there was a SKP-Malta or Växjo market before ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:36

    Good decision. Just hope they will attract one more LCC to base at least one plane in SKP and the state job is done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:49

      They may want to attract another LCC but Wizz Air has invested to much in SKP to let anyone on its turf. Remember what happened when Ryanair planned to start flights?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  18. Anonymous09:37

    Absolutely wise decision.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous09:44

    They should give private capital to open airline without any risk to Macedonia, no need to invest from Macedonia, and they can support that airline same way they support Wizz Air.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:49

    Adria this year was a good example of why you should not set up a national airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:54

      FYI Adria was a 100% privately owned airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:56

      One of Adria's mistakes was not opening a base in Skopje.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:12

      Adria was 99% government owned airline for decades of its loss-making history.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  21. Anonymous09:50

    Good news for Macedonia that this 'project' won't see the light of day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous09:50

    This is good news. We need european integration and more european carriers in SKP!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  23. Anonymous09:51

    Aeromak is a cool name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:53

      Their logo
      https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C4D0BAQFiDNMmfbknlw/company-logo_200_200/0?e=2159024400&v=beta&t=OpiIRmsDKe3Ef8HC46tQcQ5uhJf5pVoLSqa0Y8lBUnk

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  24. Anonymous10:09

    Macedonia is a small country with a small population. It doesn't need another airline. Why pay for a national airline and tax people money when Wizz Air flights are very good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:11

      I would understand your argument if the Macedonian government was not paying Wizz Air.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  25. Anonymous10:17

    Does Wizz Air have any plans for further growth in SKP? Will they base a sixth plane there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:26

      As long as they get more subsidies.... why not?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:55

      It is interesting that as soon as the subsidies were put in question last year, Wizz Air made some routes seasonal and made them year round after they were awarded new subsidies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:59

      It is a warning of what will happen when they don't get money.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:09

      @11.55 @11.59 conspiracy theories rulez

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:22

      Anon 11:59 Its just the reality of SKP, without W6 getting paid

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  26. Парти10:33

    Air Serbia should station a plane in Skopje and Podgorica.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:25

      will they have the rights to fly to the EU? they will surely have more pax in SKP then in INI. maybe that would be possible with in the Mini Shengen coming

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:55

      Since JU is not an EU carrier they could only establish a base and fly if they transferred planes to Aeromak which is registered in Macedonia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:09

      The best solution is that if Air Serbia would lunch a JV company with Macedonian government in order to become a member of Etihad group. Than it would be much better. To have 5-6 flts to and from BEG and also 5-6 flts to and from SKP to EU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:11

      but the mini-Schengen will also be a economic union so this might change

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  27. Anonymous11:54

    An option is to establish a subsidiary with/from another airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  28. Anonymous11:56

    What an absolute waste.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. Anonymous12:43

    Macedonia did a smart job.
    It managed to develop both of its airports and work well with W6.
    Why the hell does it need an expensive, useless flag carrier paid by the taxpayers?
    Besides, network is heavily German, Turkush and Swiss but this is what the market demands.
    Hoping to see FR step in soon and of course a bit more legacies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:46

      Wizz Air is also paid by taxpayers. But instead of paying local company, they pay a Hungarian one.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  30. Unknown13:48

    I can still vividly remember flying IN from VIE to BEG back then in YU's 733. They served a full meal (fish fingers) and were the last carrier in Europe where smoking was still allowed in the back cabin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  31. Anonymous14:31

    I don't think Macedonia needs a national airline but it would be interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  32. Anonymous14:33

    A national airline could offer destinations that aren’t covered by W6, for example AMS could be a great destination for connecting flights. Do you think this would be a viable option?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:43

      AMS used to be operated by MAT. I'm surprised Transavia has not launched Skopje.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  33. Anonymous15:09

    with W6 present
    a two Embraers fleet coud only fly these routes:

    feeding the big players in FRA, ZRH, VIE, AMS on daily basis
    2-3pw diaspora feeding: DUS, MUC, STR, GVA, LJU
    2-3pw places of interest: PRG, TLV, SVO, LED

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:44

      Agree. It could work out. Especially destinations that can't be covered by Wizz Air - Russia being one example.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  34. Anonymous19:42

    I'm not advocating the creation of a new national carrier but there is a reason Macedonia has the worse connectivity in Europe. Mainly because there are so few flights to hub airports. Something really has to be done about this. Primarily by TAV which seems to be enjoying the ride of Wizz Air being subsidized by the state and not doing much to attract major European airlines.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:47

      TAV tried to get Turkish Airlines to set up a base in Skopje at one point, but it never happened.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:49

      Turkish Airlines has had a string of disasters in the region - B&H Airlines and Albania Airlines isn't doing much better either.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous20:44

      Anon 19:49 Air Albania is doing just fine at the moment

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  35. Anonymous19:45

    The best thing would be for Wizz Air to set up Wizz Air Macedonia, register a few planes in Macedonia and this open up the opportunity for them to launch flights to markets like Russia and Israel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:45

      It will be interesting to see if the planned Wizz Air Abu Dhabi will fly to Skopje. I think they could really give Flydubai a run for their money.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  36. Rahul Iyer05:52

    I Wizz air dominates the market, why not co-brand or codeshare a North Macedonian airline, Eve if the Macedonian counterpart has no real aeroplanes?. ..just go and buy seats on other airline's planes. That is what Wings of the World Airline's did in the USA for nearly 15 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  37. Anonymous16:16

    Is the existing airline part of any alliance? If not, that should be pursued regardless. I'll be visiting in a few months and my employer only shops through Star or OW

    If/When the case, it will prove down the road that the gov't in North Macedonia is being wise about this - or better, not stupid/wasteful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

easyJet ups Belgrade operations to fend off Air Serbia

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Croatia Airlines holds talks with Slovenia over network expansion

Image

Montenegro to decide who takes over country’s airports next month

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025