Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May49
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Ljubljana Airport’s sharp decline continues

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Ljubljana Airport saw its passenger numbers plummet 27.1% in January to 75.495 as it continues to feel the effects of Adria Airways’ collapse. The number of aircraft movements stood at 1.746, down 30.3%. Ljubljana’s operator Fraport previously said it would take a year-and-a-half for the airport to fully recover following Adria’s bankruptcy on September 30, 2019. The airport will welcome new carriers Iberia and Windrose Airlines this summer, while the majority of other airlines serving the Slovenian capital will boost their frequencies.

February 13, 2020
Ljubljana Newsflash Results 2020 slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous11:41

    Some comments here are just ... no words. Adria transported 50% of the passengers, even more in winter, so of course it's gonna be at least -25% till the summer season. And even the summer season will still be negative. It's not realistic to expect any huge improvements till 2021. So are we gonna have to read stupid sarcastic comments every month till then?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:59

      What happens in 2022 when EU presidency is over?
      Do you think that the traffic will magically stay at the levels of 2021?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:35

      In 2021 traffic should be 30% higher than year before and it is not a success to stay on same level when Adria was operating. This situation is really a shame for Slovenia!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. idnas 13:06

      @anon 11.41: completely agree with you.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous15:21

      @idnas:
      I disagree with both of you.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous22:29

      I disagree with everybody, while agreeing with all.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  2. Anonymous12:53

    It would be informative to have a breakdown on transfer passengers vs end destination/origination passengers.

    If Ljubljana loses transfer passengers, that's negative for the airport but not connectivity which is typically the argument for setting up a flag carrier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:29

      It's enough if you just check morning flight list out of LJU and you can easily realize that list if quite empty. There is not a single flight in the morning to depart to major hub (FRA, MUC, ZRH). You can also see same picture with the evening inbound flights. If you don't have outbound morning flights and inbound evening flights it's impossible to have good connectivity.

      Situation will slightly change with S20 schedule as LH will introduce morning outbound and evening inbound flights. But still it's far away from what we had in the past.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:01

      With Adria's bankruptcy LJU lost ALL the passengers transfering via LJU. Now it's only O&D traffic. Taking that into account figures are actually not so bad - meaning more Slovenians are now flying from LJU. But connectivity still lacks due to no morning/evening flights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:16

      Anon 16:01

      It is not true that now more Slovenians are now flying from LJU. Most govrnment and business travelers are using flights from ZAG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:35

      One has to know that connecting passengers were counted double in the statistics. Put simple ADR carried half of traffic but only 30 percent of passenger names. So.. LJU's been down by about 25% since ADR had gone and that's the number since. LJU are putting pink glasses on people and flattening it out by reporting yearly spreads but the truth will come out. They (LJU owners) are holding the whole Slovenian tourism hostage. Go figure why.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous00:26

      @Anon 18:35: So, you are trying to say that Adria in fact carried only 30% of the passengers in LJU and that's the decline LJU is seeing now. Like nothing else changed?
      Well, statistics work in the same way everywhere around the world and Adria had 50% share. And according to your math, where does the 40% pax increase by foreign carriers add up then?
      Let's not bury LJU just yet - we are only 4 months in since Adria's collapse and still in the W19. Check traffic statistics for airports in other similar cases - It takes a year or two to recover, but some people just think LJU should have growth next month after.
      LJU has done nothing groundbreaking, but is aiming for a constant, slow but sustainable development - and S20 looks quite optimistic as well

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  3. notLufthansa14:39

    this picture says it all (via tangosix.rs)
    https://media.tangosix.rs/2020/02/Screenshot-2020-02-10-at-21.28.38.png

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Ingvarsson15:19

    LJU is screwed. LX is rescheduling its one daily from ZRH to 18:40 arrival to LJU and 20:00 departure. Difficult to imagine who, in his/hers right mind, would be interested in such a connection. I've travelled with LX from LJU on several occasions in the past few months and at least 2/3 of passangers were connecting in ZRH to other outbound flights. LH has done little to nothing for 2020 SUTT. I don't care about 2xdaily to Moscow, AF has a crappy schedule with even crappier hub. Most of the trips from LJU are still towards Western Europe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous15:26

    Apart from idnas and Anonymous13 February 2020 at 11:41, where have all the Adria haters gone? Weren't they saying that LJU (the whole country, actually) is better off without Adria and their underworked, overpaid workforce? They went so far as to say that with Adria gone, things like health care and pension would dramatically improve. I have yet to see that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:45

      We didn't say health care and pension would suddenly improve, but it is better to invest any spare money in those rather than in the black hole that was Adria Airways.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:05

      Yes, it definitely is, but it won't happen :).

      So it would be wiser to have Adria, than to have nothing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous23:48

      Everybody calling Adria a black whole. The second track of Ljubljana Trieste is at its price tag of 1,7 billion and the construction has not even started yet. Wait till it gets finished!!! This my dear people is the price of 17 fully burdened Adrias or 425 mortgage guarantees that JP was asking. Use your fingers to count the zeros. The only black hole is in between your ears.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous00:41

      The best comment of the month - you simply nailed it!!
      LJU will be all so fine without JP and the taxpayer will contribute to the economy, schools and pension and not to a failed, retro airline that was a mix of ancient scrap and fuel guzzling inefficient aircraft pretending to be a Star Alliance feeder.
      JP deserves all the respect but was not designed to a modern EU country like Slovenia.
      Slovenia now needs less monopoly, more connections to London and Europe and a good traffic to fill this new terminal yet to be constructed. Arrivederci Adria e grazie mille di tutto!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous07:14

      @Anonymous 13 February 2020 at 23:48:

      Don't worry, it's just typical Slovenian jealousy. It has nothing to do with common sense. Those who are the loudest are those who never travel. It's the same as me claiming we don't need hospitals just because I never needed one.

      @Anonymous14 February 2020 at 00:41:
      Which taxpayers? Those who are unemployed due to bankruptcy? You really believe that whatever money Adria got from the state would contribute to a better lifestyle? Here's an idea, trying dividing the difference between all the money Adria got from the state and the taxes paid by the employees with all the schools, hospitals, pensioners and you'll see how much better the lifestyle would have been. Zero!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  6. Anonymous17:55

    LJU is in negative because we are comparing the same period last year but what happens September afterwards? Guess what? Growth!
    And guess who is getting a new terminal next year, guess whooo? Ljubljana!
    Guess who was struggling for legacy carriers and who is now adding them to their list.
    Guess who will get the best prices to/from LJU from now on due to lack of MONOPOLY? Ljubljana!
    Guess how much the fares dropped to/from LJU because of the new LH Group vs AF/KL competition? Around 20%.. guess who will benefit? Everybody!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:22

      Dude, in September the truth is coming out. There will be no growth. The whole year drop (minus) is going to become evident and expose that the LJU management has done nothing but BS the media. Guess who is going to feel like an....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:31

      Guess who will have less passenger in Sep20 than in Sep18? Ljubljana (real success)
      Guess where LH group is flying once per day? Ljubljana (real success again)
      Guess which airport will have less passengers even with totally new terminal? Ljubljana

      Do you really think that LH group would have cheap prices if their flights are so full? It's obvious that most passengers are not using flights from/to LJU due to connectivity issues.

      If you have a meeting in BRU/FRA/MUC in the morning it doesn't help even if you get a free ticket for LH flights which are in afternoon.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous23:56

    Ljubljana Airport Management, especially Mr. JK and Mr. ZS are so incompetent that at an incompetence competition they'd come out incompetently second.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Kazakhstan’s SCAT Airlines to launch Belgrade service

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

easyJet ups Belgrade operations to fend off Air Serbia

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025