Competition between Wizz Air, Norwegian Air Shuttle and Air Serbia is heating up over the Serbia - Norway market just days before the three carriers begin progressively linking the two countries. It all began two weeks ago, when Wizz Air announced its major network and capacity expansion from Belgrade would include two weekly services to Sandefjord Airport from mid-July, to fill the void left by Norwegian Air Shuttle which suspended operations between Oslo’s main airport – Gardermoen - and the Serbian capital due to the coronavirus pandemic. Just a day later, Norwegian shortlisted Belgrade as part of its new limited network of destinations, to resume this Saturday, albeit at a reduced volume of one flight per week. This was followed by Air Serbia, which announced it too was launching two weekly flights to Gardermoen Airport in mid-July. The three airlines have since continued trying to one-up each other, with Wizz Air rescheduling its service from Belgrade to Sandefjord, which is 120 kilometres from Oslo, in order to operate on exactly the same days as Air Serbia’s Norway service. Not to be outdone, Norwegian Air Shuttle has since scheduled four weekly flights from its Oslo hub to the Serbian capital from the start of the 2020/2021 winter season in late October.
Last year a total of 50.000 two-way point to point passengers flew between Belgrade and Oslo. In addition, a further 7.000 travellers flew indirectly between the two cities. Air Serbia is hoping to attract transfer passengers on its flights from Oslo, with services to Sarajevo, Tivat, Tirana, Podgorica, Skopje, Bucharest, Sofia and Thessaloniki timed to connect onto operations from the Norwegian capital. Collectively, the eight cities saw around 95.000 passengers to/from Oslo last year.
By mid-July, there will be a total of 934 weekly seats available each way between Belgrade, Oslo and Sandefjord. Wizz Air will offer 460 one-way seats per week on its Airbus A321 aircraft, Air Serbia will have a capacity of 288 one-way seats on board its Airbus A319 jet, while Norwegian Air Shuttle will offer 186 one-way seats on its Boeing 737-800 aircraft. All three airlines have previously operated these flights. Norwegian Air Shuttle launched the Oslo - Belgrade route in 2007 and maintained the service until the start of the coronavirus crisis in March. In 2008, Air Serbia’s predecessor, Jat Airways, launched short-lived operations between the two capital cities. In 2014, Wizz Air commenced operations between Sandefjord and Belgrade, but the service lasted just five months before it was terminated.


Comments
The things you will read on here.....
JU's costs are much much higher that W6 and DY. Both airlines are strong in the Oslo market and passengers know them.
JU will need to come very close to their prices and that means offering loss making fares.
JU is wayyyyyy overstaffed for its size and it also flies much older and thus expensive to fuel and maintain aircraft than the LCCs.
I am afraid this route will be another case of you snooze you lose!
How can you compete with that.
+1
Also Wizz will have 1.3 million with INI, in BEG they will be around 900.000 seats
I wuz thinkin da same, bro. GVA den suddenly disappeared. Tink da same ll happen wit Berlin and Western Germany village airports already damn saturated. I getcha point tho...
JU isnt as overstaffed as it once was. While it probably could still cut back, they still have a lower count per aircraft (65) than other competitors around such as OS (85), OU (83), RO (71).
@ 09,31
Would you mind sharing the numbers and a link to them.
People who opt to give extra 40-50 euro to Air Serbia and fly with them consider factors that have absolutely nothing to do with "cacanski chips". Your understanding of air travel is inversely proportional to the amount of cynicism and hate you spread on this blog on daily basis.
Air Serbia employees:
2016: 1.601
2017: 1.466
2018: 1.370
There was outrage last month when Ryan Air gave an ultimatum for 850€ crew salaries or the VIE base closure.
850€ is a decent salary in Serbia.
As for opening OSL last year, I dont think that would of mattered that much, as seen with BCN where W6 have jumped in. I think it was a bad move on JU temporarily suspending HEL.
https://www.aviontourism.com/en/airport/oslo-sandefjord-torp-TRF
We need flights to warm destinations not Oslo or Turku!!
Albania and Turkey not yet.
Primary market for Wizz is East Europe to diaspora areas of West Europe. Typical diaspora used traditional airlines to visit families and relatives once or twice a year. Goal for Wizz is for them to go back home 3,4,5 times a year. Reduction in emissions per seat of 30% is more than offset by increase of travel by 200-300%.
While Wizz offers newer aircraft with low emissions per seat it contibutes far more overall to airline polution growth by marketing and promoting unnecessary travel.
Does it mean that if some gastos comes back home for say for a funeral, wedding, anniversary and some other celebration that is considered necessary travel? But if another gasto comes home four times in a year for no other reason than than to spend a few weeks, or even long weekend at home, that is considered unnecessary travel? What's the difference? Same rate of emissions for both travelers.
You make it sound like the NEOs cause more pollution than older planes.
Global polluters also claim they are operating within regulations with a goal of making a profit. That's not good enough. Earth can't survive their increased activity so regulations will have to curb expanding consumption in industries that have no available low/no carbon alternatives. LCCs are key drivers of carbon emission growth in Europe. City breaks based on 19EUR ticket will have to become thing of the past.
"Croatia will still maintain some minor restrictions on all citizens of non-EU countries, the Interior Ministry in Zagreb told BIRN. Visitors must state their purpose of entry, for business or tourism-related reasons. All European Union and European Economic Area nationals, on the other hand, may enter Croatia freely from Wednesday without restrictions."