Croatia Airlines is utilising its Dash 8 Q400 turboprops on 71.6% of its flights this January as the coronavirus pandemic continues to crush demand for air travel. The aircraft is being utilised on 486 flights this month (both directions included), compared to the Airbus A319 used on 189 flights (or 27.8% of the time) or the A320, scheduled on just four flights during the month. Based on its current schedule, the Croatian carrier has deployed the 76-seat aircraft on almost all of its routes out of Zagreb and Split, many of which are operating with a mix of aircraft types throughout the month. The only exception is its service between Zagreb and London Heathrow which is served exclusively by the A319, while the A320 has been used once to Brussels and once to Frankfurt.
Croatia Airlines has six Q400s in its fleet which have come as a useful asset during the ongoing period of reduced demand. The carrier previously noted, “As we continue to reduce costs, we have decreased capacity on many routes by deploying our Dash fleet. This winter, we will utilise the Dash aircraft much more than in previous years compared to the Airbuses”. It added, “The existing capacity we have is far too much under the current circumstances. During the first half of 2021 we expect to be using the Dashes more than before”. The usage of the Dash fleet peaked in November of last year when almost 80% of flights were served by the turboprops.
Croatia Airlines recently said it would undertake rigorous cost cutting measures in order to safeguard jobs and preserve its liquidity. The state injected 91.4 million euros into the company over the past two months, 46.5 million of which through recapitalisation, 33.2 million as an equity loan and 11.7 million euros in direct aid. The Croatian carrier has so far introduced a number of measures to bring down costs and plans to maintain them in the coming months. In January, Croatia Airlines is operating 679 flights (both directions included) and has 64.848 seats on sale. It represents a 64.4% decline in capacity compared to the same month last year.


Comments
Shame that they are broke otherwise they should start thinking about switching to E-jets. ATR has killed the Q400 program.
When did OU expressed interst in buying brand new Q400s from Bombardier?
Sorry if that upsets you! ;)
"Longview says De Havilland and Viking will continue to fully support customers and provide technical service for in-service De Havilland and Viking Aircraft"
Source:
https://www.flightglobal.com/air-transport/longview-halts-production-of-q400s-and-twin-otters/137449.article
Bravo!
I 'm far away from being OU fan boy, quite opposite. But if you comment on the aviation portal, you should be at least aware of degree of dangerous situations in aviation, so we have incident, accident, emergency landing and crash landing. OU situation in ZRH was an accident. Using crash landing term for incident or accident just show you have no clue what you are talking about or doing it deliberately
Besides, everyone can pop those cheap ear plugs for a trip or have headsets for music:)
The only downside is they only served a small bottle of water on 1h45m flight.. shame and the ticket was actually expensive..
Bombardier Q400 continues to risk human lives
https://www.aerotime.aero/20720-opinion-bombardier-q400-continues-to-risk-human-lives
"Swiss Confederation
Swiss Transportation Safety Investigation Board STSB
Final Report Number 2245
Concerning the ACCIDENT involving the Bombardier DHC-8-402 aircraft, registration 9A-CQC, operated by Croatia Airlines under flight plan call sign CTN 464, on 27 September 2013... "
But always good to know you know better than Swiss Aviation Authorities
Not true Wizz has the lowest prices. Ryanair is absolute champion in low prices. Of course if one knows how to travel and sticks to the rules. And yes, continental Croatia Slavonija, Lika, are poor and relatively small and undeveloped markets but ZAG, and here we were talking ZAG, is the richest part of Croatia. And if Sofia can have Ryanair, and Wizz, and much others I don't see why ZAG couldn't, of course once corona sh.t is over and if protectionist policy comes to an end
As for costs, from a few years ago Wizz Air has the lowest costs in aviation.
It was nothing but pure lack that nobody got hurt. Try to read once again the article (where OU indcident in ZRH was not even mentioned) and than conclude what a "big pleasure" is to fly with that plane.
ZAG does not handle less passengers than SOF because lack of demand, but because of lack of offer, because of protectionist policy. If LCC were not literally chased away from ZAG, it would have had much more passengers. And "Wizzair has the lowest costs in aviation", frankly speaking I don't understand what you meant, I just know I travelled a lot on both, and Ryanair was always cheaper
@An.20.50
I agree absolutely, based on all facts you provided to back up your claim, LOL
Not going to get into OU incident but it you want detailed report please read this link
http://avherald.com/h?article=46918e03&opt=0