Air Serbia has said it is optimistic and hopeful it will overcome upcoming challenges by adapting and evolving its business. The carrier’s CEO, Duncan Naysmith, noted, “Since the gradual restoration of air traffic in May last year, we have monitored all changes in travel restrictions on a daily basis and adapted our network accordingly. We are re-establishing flights to all destinations where possible and are increasing frequencies in accordance to demand. Our strategic planning, flexible and agile approach, as well as quick adaption to changes in the market, have yielded results. During the previous year, we have managed to accomplish a good passenger load factor on a large number of routes. Not only have we recommenced and reinforced flights to many existing destinations, we have even introduced new ones during the most challenging period for our industry. At our home base, Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport, we have significantly increased our market share, transporting more than half of all passengers in January”.
Air Serbia recently removed eleven routes previously planned to operate this coming summer, although some may be reintroduced if circumstances permit. Furthermore, the airline has reduced its fleet over the past year, with its Boeing jets recently retired. On the other hand, it added a new destination to its network last week and plans to substitute its existing Airbus A330-200 jet with another of the same type, reinforcing its commitment to its sole long haul route. “Now, exactly a year after the changes that shook even the largest giants in the global aviation industry, we will continue to adapt, evolve and ensure we are agile to market demands and customer needs. We have proven that we can deal with challenges and turn them into opportunities. That gives us the right to be optimistic and have faith that we will successfully adapt and overcome everything ahead of us”, Mr Naysmith noted.
As part of its plan to better adapt to new market conditions, Air Serbia’s General Manager for Commercial and Strategy, Jiri Marek, said the airline is seeking new commercial partnerships. “We recently renewed our codeshare agreement with Etihad and basically we are maintaining connectivity via the main, let’s say, Etihad gateways in Europe. Being a smaller regional player, any codeshare agreement is important to us because it gives us access to a more global network and also gives us extra feed for our regional network. So, we are maintaining strong cooperation with Etihad. The codeshare has been expanded but, of course, there will most likely be less demand since the nonstop Etihad flights are, let’s say, currently suspended. We are developing other codeshare partnerships to cover that part of the world. Last year, during the pandemic, we signed the codeshare partnership with Turkish Airlines, we fly daily to Istanbul and we have wide access to their network. We will further be expanding that codeshare cooperation as well. Basically, we are open to working with any airline partner that is helping us add additional feed to our network to enlarge our footprint”.


Comments
Which ones?
Fly Dubai and Qatar are having a pretty strong presence in BEG with no sign of withdrawing like in some other cities and yet JU is idle in that Gulf region??
Can someone explain?
It's the busiest airport in Europe in 2020 in terms of passenger numbers.
Air Serbia carries a lot of transfer passengers to/from IST apart from the locals.
So Marek should better stay quiet because these statements are embarrassing. Maybe he can share with us how many passengers flew on these highly fantastic JU-EY codeshares.
YYZ will be successful.
Hahahaha:)))
https://www.moodiedavittreport.com/serbias-jat-airways-joins-list-of-airline-clients-at-abu-dhabi-international-airport-060509/
Also let's see what becomes of this airline.
At the moment, their aircraft are barely operating a rotation a day.
- operational expenses: fuel, taxes, crew expenses.
- acquisition costs: livery, interior.
- employment: additional pilots, cabin crew as well as their training expences.
- marketing expenses to advertise the new route.
Just to name a few things. Also:
- JU's frequencies are down.
- ARA is still operating 2 pw most of the winter with little to no improvement in frequencies the past couple of years, imagine YYZ.
Guliv have an advantage of being an EU airline, allowing them to operate freely in the EU territory (as seen in OTP). However, they also have disadvantages of being an unknown airline, with little known information about them and no network. BH Air also dabbled the idea of TATL ops and backed down. SOF never really adequately connected to JU's JFK flights for them to be a threat.
To bring YYZ to the table, JU will definitely need a second A330. Now that ARB has arrived, they should definitely consider ARC when ARA's contract expires in May if I am not mistaken. It seems that getting a 10-15 year old A330 todays is quite affordable.
Yes, the current US-EU open skies agreement actually is quite beneficial for many EU carriers such as DY, LO (BUD-US flights) and will most likely be such if W6 consider deploying their A321XLR in the future.
As for G2, they will definitely need more on marketing and advertising to be recognised. Their website is still amateurish but do have a good logo and decent fleet for a start-up. They seem to have quickly gained popularity in Romania with their charters to MLE, PUJ and soon MBA.
When launching SOF in 2014, JU actually had 9 frequencies to SOF with 2 early morning flights that lined with the JFK flights and always competitive prices but they were later dropped guess they were not commercially viable.
Buyer's market for aviation management jobs is not going to end any time soon.
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2011/10/jats-ceo-nightmare.html
To make profit the idea was not. Hmmmmmm.
Then to have to make new image and new organization of things was result of original bad idea.
Hmmmmm...
n't be going down any time soon
What remains a mystery is how is it possible for so many people to forget dozens of positive changes that occurred after rebranding. Neuralizer from Man in Black movies?