The Slovenian government has dropped plans to establish a new national carrier using European Union funds. The Ministry for Economic Development and Technology confirmed the draft of Slovenia’s Recovery and Resilience Plan, which must be approved by the European Commission in order for it to allocate the country 1.6 billion euros in grants and 3.6 billion in repayable funds to soften the economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic, no longer contains a proposal to co-finance a new flag carrier. European officials previously expressed concerns over plans to allocate 76 million euros towards the creation of a new national airline.
The Ministry noted that plans to finance a new airline were not in line with the European Union’s green policies. "As aviation has not yet switched to renewable energy sources and predominately uses fossil fuels, this principle could not be met. As a result, we have withdrawn the proposal and we are currently trying to find a solution to obtain an alternative source of funding", the Ministry told the “Delo” daily. Slovenia saw the greatest decline in commercial flights in Europe last year after Georgia, impacted both by the coronavirus pandemic and also the collapse of former national airline Adria Airways in late 2019.
Meanwhile, the Minister for Economic Development and Technology, Zdravko Počivalšek, has held talks with Air Serbia’s General Manager for Commercial and Strategy, Jiri Marek. “They discussed possibilities to cooperate in improving Slovenia’s connectivity with the world. Due to the disclosure of confidential business information, we cannot comment on this matter”, the Ministry told “Delo”. According to the daily, Air Serbia has expressed interest in establishing a base in Ljubljana.
Air Serbia was the third busiest transfer airline in the Slovenian capital in 2020, improving its position on 2019, when it was the eighth busiest. The Serbian carrier managed to increase its transfer market share in Ljubljana from 4% in 2019 to 10% in 2020. Contributing to its improved performance was the collapse of Adria Airways, as well as it being one of the few carriers to have maintained operations to Ljubljana for the majority of last year, with most airlines temporarily suspending operations. In 2020, some 51% of all travellers on Air Serbia’s Ljubljana route were transfers. In 2019, they made up some 22.4% of all passengers. Last year, inbound and outbound travellers from Ljubljana flying with Air Serbia connected most onto flights to or from Skopje, while in 2019 Athens was most popular.


Comments
What about Open Skies?
The Croatian carrier recently said, “Croatia Airlines is potentially interested in establishing flights from Ljubljana Airport in order to enable passengers from Slovenia to connect to European destinations”.
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2020/06/croatia-airlines-to-submit-ljubljana.html
In my opinion there are two logical scenarios:
1. JU gets money to boost the number of frequencies in LJU and in such a way offer greater connectivity via BEG.
2. Slovenia looks at the list of JU destinations from INI from which JU could operate LJU flights as part of a W pattern.
Don't forget that JU performed really well in LJU before COVID. They didn't struggle and they had 19 weekly flights which is a more than respectable number. The Slovenian government is entering negotiations with someone who was well established on their market and who would appreciate it more than a global conglomerate such as LH Group or AF-KL.
They hope to collect another billion Euros. I think they are close to 15 billion in additional debt by now.
https://www.aero.de/news-39061/Lufthansa-will-2021-Tafelsilber-verkaufen.html
lol
i must admit I giggled at number 2 because all of INI's JU destinations have been a failure
jokes aside this is news I cannot take seriously somehow
It's nice to giggle but once you are done with it could you please share with us some numbers or facts to back your claim? Yes there were utter failures like Rome or Budapest but routes like GOT, TIV or HHN performed quite well. Heck even LJU performed ok but only in summer.
maybe you should share us numbers since you are so optimistic. we have the german numbers incl HHN which is everything but not quiete well and its their "best" performing route
If they can fly 3 weekly to Malta ...
As for INI, LF is summer is around 60% which isn't bad given the fact that it's a newly launched flight. Issue is winter when demand collapses and it drags down the overall performance of a certain route.
Fully agree with you!
1. Air Serbia boost frequencies to 5-6 daily with combination of ATRs and Airbuses, to catch all BEG waves and to offer enough flexibility to "go out of airport and drink coffee with friends downtown" OR
2. Air Serbia opens "virtual airline" with basing of two ATRs or one ATR and one A319 maybe(that they need in BEG right now) and offer direct flights to Western Europe while, at the same time, offer transfers to East via BEG.
For example starting from early morning LJU-BEG-LJU-FRA-LJU-MUC-LJU-BEG-LJU-FRA-LJU???
I mean, where they can fly? Frankfurt, Munich, Rome, Zurich, Paris? And thats it? Where do Slovenes usually go or where they went before pandemic?
Bravo Croatia Airlines!
Congratulations on another missed opportunity!
Yes, some airplanes are sent back or retired, but they still have more planes than they need.
Reaching some agreement with LJU or SLO Government where JU would increase frequencies and Slovenian side would partially cover the costs would be in this case win-win situation.
I don't think so...
BEG-LJU
00.30-01.50
07.30-08.50
13.00-14.20
18.30-19.50
But they can also keep three weekly and increase some flights to A319 like they did when JP died.
Kind of appropriate for this new situation in LJU. They made a full circle and are back at relying on JU.
It does however open the question that, if JU ever opens a base in LJU, the same logic could be used to open a base in other Balkan cities like; Sarajevo, Podgorica, Skopje, Sofia etc.
With two dailies flights to BEG to coincide with the waves from BEG. And 1-2 flights from these cities directly to a third city that does not compete with the destinations from BEG.
For example, if there is a demand from SOF to Riga, (and no current flights) JU could operate a direct flight, on top of 2-3 daily flights to BEG.
Of course this is all very long term, as JU does not have the spare aircraft, but perhaps something to think about for future development.
It's precisely what I said. It is called sarcasm. It is even further explained "congratulating" OU on another missed opportunity. I really don't get the point of your comment. Believe everybody else understood what I meant, except you
of course I do not have anything against Air Serbia but even if they have 10 flights per day, they can not provide good connectivity to EU hubs. So it is stone age compared to what LJU had when JP was around. On other hand that would be much better than situation we have nowadays...
Maybe it is for the best.
Catch 22.
high % of diaspora or with low % of diaspora