Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • January64
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Zagreb Airport in talks over low cost flights

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Zagreb Airport is engaged in talks over securing additional low cost flights in order to stimulate growth as the pandemic continues to impact the industry. The airport, considered expensive by budget carriers, has launched a new subsidy scheme to stimulate the arrival of new airlines and the launch of new routes. In order to qualify for the discounts, which includes an 80% reduction in the passenger service charge that amounts to 17.5 euros, an airline must launch services from the Croatian capital to destinations that were not previously served in either the pre-pandemic 2019 or in 2020. The carrier must also maintain operations throughout the year.

The new policy is said to have generated interest among the major European no frills airlines. Zagreb Airport is dominated by full service carriers with Eurowings being the only low cost airline serving the city. Based on the existing summer season schedule, just 3.6% of all flights from Zagreb will be operated by no frills airlines, all of them by Eurowings. However, it too noted that its airport charges are "significantly higher than most major European airports, making it less appealing for low cost carriers". Croatia's busiest airport hiked its passenger service charge following the opening of its new passenger terminal in 2017 by two euros per each international passenger. Similarly, it increased its fees by half a euro per every domestic passenger to seven and a half euros.

Europe's busiest airline, Ryanair, held talks with the Croatian Ministry for Tourism in 2018 over the potential introduction of flights to Zagreb. Commenting on its absence in the Croatian capital, Wizz Air's CEO, Jozsef Varadi, previously said, "It is a high-priced airport environment with fluctuating demand. Should the costs come down, I think they would attract us". Zagreb Airport was previously served by the likes of Wizz Air, easyJet and Norwegian Air Shuttle, however, all terminated their operations from the Croatian capital, but continue to maintain a notable presence on the coast where fees are lower.


March 05, 2021
croatia Feature low cost airline zagreb
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

Anonymous said…
That's a big discount. Hopefully it attracts some LCCs.
09:01
Anonymous said…
LCCs in ZAG would kill OU
09:02
Anonymous said…
Finally! Hoping for a positive outcome.
09:03
Anonymous said…
LCCs haven't really killed any national airline in ex-Yu, so it won't kill OU either.
09:03
Anonymous said…
It would be fantastic for Ryan to base a plane in ZAG.
09:04
Anonymous said…
I always thought Eurowings would be the one to do that in ZAG.
09:04
Anonymous said…
This is bad news for OU
09:04
Anonymous said…
EW is fantastic and the best fit for a niche market like ZAG.
09:06
Anonymous said…
Eurowings prices are nowhere near LCC levels.
09:06
Anonymous said…
Any of those from the photo would be more than welcome :D
09:07
Anonymous said…
96.4% legacy? That's huge!
09:07
Anonymous said…
Years ago Croatia Airlines used to push the argument that low cost airlines should not fly to Zagreb because it would not make it a world class airport and would reduce its value LOL.
09:08
Anonymous said…
I really doubt it. More than a decade ago, when W6 followed by FR aggressively entered, let's say, OTP and SOF, their flag carriers still survived until today. The same with KIV and Air Moldova.
The biggest advantage for the Zagreb citizens and the tourists or business travellers will be the low fares.
ZAG remains an expensive destination from many parts of Europe so having LCCs will be just perfect!
09:11
Anonymous said…
Traffic would boom if they got an LCC to base a plane. Passenger numbers would grow by at least 300.000 within a year just from that.
09:12
Anonymous said…
ZAG has considerably small LCC presence comparing the other European capitals. Hope this gets sorted out
09:12
Anonymous said…
There are only two national airlines left in the ex-YU region and in pre-covid times massive amount of LCC presence across the region. So it could be said that LCC helped destroy Adria/Montenegro and limit Croatia Airlines operations from the coast and Air Serbia.
09:13
Anonymous said…
OU has not reformed itself unlike JU. JP and YM died.
09:13
Anonymous said…
If they come to Zagreb it will really impact Ljubljana negatively.
09:14
Anonymous said…
I'm all for LCCs coming to Zagreb BUT government should first offload Croatia Airlines.
09:15
Anonymous said…
Typical protectionism. When you have the government involved in a specific carrier, this is what happens. You increase the market share and prevent others from entering. You become a monopoly. Not to mention the subsidies on political routes for "prestige" and so on.
09:16
Anonymous said…
There is a rumor that talks are being held with Ryanair. Don't know if it's true though.
09:17
Anonymous said…
Not going to happen soon

https://www.exyuaviation.com/2021/03/croatia-airlines-privatisation-unlikely.html
09:17
Anonymous said…
Can't kill somebody with unlimited state aid.
09:19
pozdrav iz Rijeke said…

I think I 'm still sleeping and dreaming. Is something finally changing? Old terminal, perfect for LCC. Potential for at least 3 planes to be based and operate even domestic flights. But for the beginning it would be good to see at least some new destinations and routes.
09:24
Anonymous said…
And here I was told that ZAG does not need ultra LCCs and that the general travel public will never fly these airlines from Zagreb
09:24
Anonymous said…
What I find unfortunate is that both easy jet and Wizz Air used to fly to Zagreb but not anymore. Hope they come back.
09:30
Anonymous said…
+1
09:30
Anonymous said…
What is with the old terminal? Is it being used for anything?
09:30
Anonymous said…
I visited ZAG many years ago and the old terminal was not very modern but quite efficient and clean. Have they did any refurbs? What about the transport to the city centre, is it still by bus?
09:31
Anonymous said…
What was the reason they left?

I mean it was obvious they accepted the fees as soon as they started flying to ZAG but why they left?
09:37
Anonymous said…
Easy flew Dortmund, Paris and Gatwick. And Wizz also flew Dortmund.
09:42
Anonymous said…
Wizz also flew Luton in addition to Dortmund.
09:43
Anonymous said…
Exactly 10 years ago

"Zagreb Airport’s new CEO Tonči Peović has announced that he will cut the cost of airport handling services in a bid to attract more low cost airlines to Croatia’s largest airport. New handling prices, which are a great deterrent for low cost airlines, will be revised within the next 10 days. Peović said that he is negotiating directly with easyJet and Ryanair for them to commence flights to Zagreb and offer a total of 10 new services from Zagreb to their European bases. Yesterday, Peović said that "Clearly, we should be careful not to lower our income through new, lower prices, but we should also encourage discount airlines by sharing with them the risk of new flights. However, at the same time, we should be careful not to harm airlines with which we have been cooperating for years". Peović added that the national carrier Croatia Airlines will not be receiving any pricing privileges from the airport authority."
09:43
Anonymous said…
Zagreb-Dubrovnik with LCC would be great thank you :D
09:43
Anonymous said…
I wouldn't mind seeing Transavia and Volotea. Perhaps their demands on the airport would not be as big as say Ryan, Wizz or Easy jet.
09:46
Anonymous said…
Greater LCC presence would allow for significantly more passengrs.
09:51
Anonymous said…
I doubt they would activate the old terminal because the cost of running two buildings would be too much.
09:52
Anonymous said…
I can't get over the fact that we can attract Korean Air and Emirates but not Wizz or Easy.
09:52
Anonymous said…
They are probably trying to do something since they realized LCCs will be generating growth in the next couple of years.
09:53
Anonymous said…
No brainer
09:53
Anonymous said…
Well, you can't anymore.
09:53
Anonymous said…
Actually, it's easily explained.

The government offers benefits and subsidies to Korean and Emirates but not to Ryanair.

It's quite simple.
09:54
Anonymous said…
which routes could work?
10:02
Anonymous said…
@9.19 was about to post the same :D
10:08
Anonymous said…
not the easiest day for the prestigious fans :) (only joking)
10:11
Anonymous said…
Dortmund - Zagreb
10:19
Anonymous said…
Berlin, Malmo and Liverpool.
10:19
Anonymous said…
Do you really want OU to be on the level of Bulgaria Air?

I hope not.

KIV can't be compared as it is out of EU and Tarom even before pandemic was in quite bad situation as it had loss each year starting from 2009 and in 2019 it was -35.8 mil EUR.

In a sea coast country with population of 20 mil people and EU member they had almost the same number of passengers like Air Serbia with country population of 7 mil people.

So, no good news for national air carriers in these countries.
10:24
Anonymous said…
why use the old terminal for LCC when the new one is empty and has so much capacity? that only increases the costs for employees and electricity etc.
10:24
Anonymous said…
LOOOL
10:25
Anonymous said…
DUB
10:30
Anonymous said…
just look at Wizz network in ExYu (and add UK to it because of no visa restrictions)
10:30
Anonymous said…
What are the landing charges in ZAG?
10:47
Anonymous said…
@10:24 Nothing wrong with Bulgaria Air. Compared to many other carriers, they are not backed by the government and have not received aid but still survived. They have an okayish fleet and more conservative growth.
RO had a more turbulent past with some layoffs etc but still managed to renew their fleet and sustain their large domestic network.
KIV cannot be compared to EU but it is still has its national carrier and several others operating and Air Moldova´s network is pretty okay.
10:58
Anonymous said…
This is exciting. I really hope it results in the arrival of new airlines.
11:04
Anonymous said…
Everyone has realised that - even Sarajevo.
11:05
Anonymous said…
It depends but they certainly are not an ULCC.
11:05
Anonymous said…
Yes please!
11:06
Anonymous said…
Same other way around. Better to get in there before LJU.
11:06
Anonymous said…
That would be amazing
11:06
Anonymous said…
@9.30

I believe just offices. They used the terminal 2 yrs ago for a concert.
11:07
Anonymous said…
I still don't understand why all these flights failed.
11:07
Anonymous said…
@Anon 11:07:

More yield to be made on other routes, where you don't have to compete with state-backed airlines.
11:15
Anonymous said…
Any news from Osijek?
11:18
Anonymous said…
Ryanair at ZAG.. That's like a dream!
11:23
Anonymous said…
@9.19 I strongly agree
12:09
Anonymous said…
LJU didnt realise
12:16
Anonymous said…
Why LPL? I know there are a lot of serbs, but croatian?
12:27
Anonymous said…
Eurowings wont help much. Its not that cheap
12:30
Anonymous said…
The LCC tender just ended a few days ago so I think it's too early.
14:11
Anonymous said…
Some low cost airlines are much needed.
14:12
Anonymous said…
News from this sote from 2019
"both Eurowings and Laudamotion have expressed interest in stationing aircraft in the Croatian capital. The airport's higher fees would have been avoided with the reopening of its old terminal building, which would have been used exclusively by budget carriers. However, as EX-YU Aviation News learns, both Eurowings and Laudamotion have given up on their plans for the time being following strong objections from the Croatian carrier, expressed to both the state and the airport. The company is in the midst of a privatisation process."
16:54
Anonymous said…
Laudamotion (ie Ryanair) wanted to open a base in Zagreb 2 years ago. Croatia Airlines lobbied and blocked them.
16:55
Anonymous said…
^ True...
16:55
Anonymous said…
Yes but at what cost?
17:01
Anonymous said…
Doubt it will happen anytime soon :(
17:01
Anonymous said…
But how do LCCs manage to fly to BE, OTP or SOF where there are state backed airlines?
17:02
Anonymous said…
*BEG
17:03
Anonymous said…
Such a lost opportunity. Airport would be in a much better position today if this happened.
17:04
pozdrav iz Rijeke said…
I agree new terminal is empty at the moment and can handle all traffic, including potential LCC. However I expect corona crisis not to last forever and new terminal to start being busy (again). When situation is back to normal, it should be normal to expect rise in traffic. In addition to that, old terminal does not need to have buses to shuttle passengers between the plane and the terminal building - it is possible to walk. So no cost for buses, no need for bus drivers. For other ground staff, I don't see what's the difference if they work left or right, up or down. Electricity can be solved by sollar panels funded by EU renewable sources funds. More shops, more caffes, more money which covers bigger expenses. Not saying would happen, but should in my opinion, of course only if this LCC story starts, which I still doubt
17:08
pozdrav iz Rijeke said…
And yes, the bus from/to the city center is still driving old route, passing by the old terminal and not stopping. And old terminal was completely refurbished only couple of years before the new one was opened.
17:11
Anonymous said…
@17:02 RO is state backed but not FB. It is a private company.
17:19
pozdrav iz Rijeke said…
Glasgow or Edinburgh, London (any) , Manchester, Dublin, Gothenburg, Malmo, Oslo, Hannover, Berlin, Dortmund, Gdansk, Krakow, Kiev, Sofia or Varna, Beauvais, Lyon, Basel, Charleroi, Porto, Tenerife, Barcelona Gerona, Rome, Malta, Skopje, Split, Dubrovnik...
17:43
Anonymous said…
Forget about Kiev.
19:56
Anonymous said…
Then finally Croatia Airlines can go bancrupt .

Very much needed !
20:34
Anonymous said…
Good news for the public but bad news for Croatia Airlines. They have already been squeezed on the coast, now Zagreb.
22:57
Anonymous said…
Very good news, it seems that ZAG is on the right path.
22:57
Anonymous said…
Actually easy jet would make most sense seeing as they handle over 600,000 passengers per year to Croatia and have an extensive network in the country.
22:58
Anonymous said…
Since Zagreb is managed by a French company it makes sense to add more links to France.
22:59
Anonymous said…
@19.56 an LCC like SkyUp could launch Kiev.
22:59
Anonymous said…
Zagreb definitely needs more low cost airlines. I think Eurowings is a good fit for the airport. Somehow don't see ultra low cost airlines working out of ZAG.
22:59
Anonymous said…
Please no Ryanair or Wizz!
23:00
Anonymous said…
the bus services in Croatia are one of the best in Europe. You can travel to virtually anywhere withing the country in less than 4 hours.
23:01
Anonymous said…
I would love to see Pegasus start SAW-ZAG. It would end the Turkish Airlines monopoly on the route and would offer some great transfer options.
23:01
Anonymous said…
Didn't they fly to Zagreb before?
23:02
Anonymous said…
That's their problem. They had years to become competitive and offer decent prices. For the basic service they offer their fares are way too high.
23:02
Anonymous said…
Why?! You think the local population is too good for ultra LCC and would avoid them?
23:03
Anonymous said…
No they have never flown to Zagreb.
23:04
Anonymous said…
There is no money to be made on domestic flights. You can't ask Croatia Airlines about that. Those flights are filled with transfer passengers during the summer, while during the winter domestic routes are loss making and don't have too many passengers. For a LCC it is much better to fly direct from the west to the coast than to fly a short domestic flight.
23:05
Anonymous said…
Yes, tacky airlines bring an airport down .
Zagreb should not become a second Skopje .
Croatians deserve better then begging on their knees for Wizz or Ryanfall Air and their disgusting level of service .
00:28
Anonymous said…
And good so !
00:30
Anonymous said…
Brits, Germans, Swiss and others from high GDP countries are fine with Wizz and Ryan but somehow Croatians are above it and deserve better??? For your information both Wizz and Ryan already fly to Croatia. Some spoiled Zagreber is fine when Wizz and Ryan fly to Zadar, Split and other Croatian coastal airports but he does not want so called tacky airlines at his prestige airport? Some people are just nuts.
00:49
Anonymous said…
It would allow people who may not be able to pay full fare to fly for less.
01:49
Anonymous said…
You make it sound like Zagreb is full of spoiled brats.
01:55
pozdrav iz Rijeke said…
It is not full of but those few writing this BS definitely are
10:03
Michael said…
Yes, the old terminal is perfect for these flights and once the air traffic recovers it will be necessary too.
I remember our plane being parked in front of it on multiple occasions pre-crises, because all slots at the new terminal had been filled.
Fingers crossed this goes through!
10:48
Anonymous said…
Definitely also Amsterdam with easyjet or Eindhoven with ryanair/wizzair.
09:38
journo said…
Wizz used to have a perfect, affordable service more than a decade ago. Was sad to see it go. Hopefully the new circumstances will make it shift its decision🤞🤞🤞
11:17
Anonymous said…
Osijek tender for this summer? ��
18:18
Post a Comment

VINTAGE EX-YU


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Former Yugoslav airports handle 39 million passengers in 2025

Image

Air Serbia prepares for “very dynamic” 2027, plans specialised charters

Image

Podgorica aims to regain Tirana’s Montenegro passengers

Image

All EX-YU capital airports set for February growth as Wizz dominates

Image

Belgrade Airport registers busiest year on record

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026