Transavia suspends Ljubljana flights until summer 2023

NEWS FLASH


Transavia has cancelled its flights between Amsterdam and Ljubljana for the remainder of the 2022/23 winter season, from January 8, when it will operate its last service on the route. Operations are scheduled to be restored on March 26, with four weekly rotations. Transavia has been cancelling select services to the Slovenian capital throughout this winter due to capacity and staffing restraints at Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport. The low cost carrier initially planned to suspend its flights to Slovenia from early January until February 2. At one point this winter, select flights from Ljubljana operated to Rotterdam instead.

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:30

    Makes sense with so many flights from Zagreb

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:48

      ZAG doesn't have any effect on AMS flights. Those flights from LJU are always packed so the issue has to be by the company, not LJU.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous10:32

    LJU keeps winning!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous10:32

    Well done Fraport. Another win.*facepalm*

    ReplyDelete
  4. notLufthansa10:42

    Fraport, at least in this case, has nothing to do with. This is just one of many proofs how insignificant LJU is and how stupid the idea to sell it was. Plus, very strong argument for Adria 2.0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:51

      Concerned taxpayers brigade begs to differ.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:42

      Concerned taxpayers brigade should be quiet as they don't spend a penny on connectivity but are the loudest ones

      Delete
    3. Anonymous13:01

      Adria 2.0. Dare put it to a referendum? Then I’m all up for it!

      Delete
    4. Anonymous13:07

      The problem with referendum of that sorts is that about 80% of population does not feel the loss of adria, but coincidentally those 80% of population result in 20% of overall GDP.

      National airline is not something you put to a referendum, it's something that every developed country should have

      Delete
    5. Anonymous19:33

      Slovenia is developed country by all means (first world country) unlike other ex-yu countries, including those with national airlines.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous19:54

      True but also small and with a small population so sadly it is not very significant no matter how cute it might be …

      Delete
    7. @19.33
      Hahahahahahahaha
      Signed by Josko Joras and Zmago Jelincic
      The same mindset as Austrian "malomescani" who consider Slovenia the same you consider "other ex-yu countries". But statistics are not the mirror of the real life. And do me a favour and don't patronize "other ex-yu countries" because you are exactly the same as them. You have slightly bigger salaries and slightly bigger costs and prices, you have crime and corruption, you have political influence on everything, you have the largest percentage of state owned business, and so on and so on. First World country, maybe like Luxembourg or Norway, hahahahahahahaha



      Delete
  5. Anonymous12:56

    Neva liked this airline. Such a sterile product and insignificant LCC in Europe. Used to admire Netherlands, but lately their politics are quite absurd.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:12

      buying off farms, so they don't produce co2 is my fav so far!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous15:38

      yeah bro and what about this absurd policy with reducing air traffic in Schiphol:

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2022/09/amsterdam-airport-widens-daily-traffic.html

      I mean nothing wrong to be leftist but not that much. And yes, this buying off farms policy is pure evil and antinatural tbh.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous20:33

      Technically, they are buying them out beacuse of Nitrogen depositions not CO2.. And farming is all nice and good until you see the numbers in the Netherlands per capita and in absolute numbers, they will drown in their own livestock shit if it goes on like this.
      The reduction in flights is an issue regarding noise pollution which if you look at their reasoning is absurd. But, they are already backpeddalling on the issue, especially because the EU commission has the final say in this and they are not amused.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous20:57

      Noise pollution. Why didn't Lisbon complain having its airport literally within the city centre limits? The Netherlands is just a small, insignificant country with complex issues. Not to mention the cocaine capital scandal.And now they are playing games on the Balkans.
      Transavia will never succeed in the region because they have no vision, no clue of the region and know that Eindhoven is already very strong Wizzair airport. Eindhoven has an extremely strong O&D traffic and an Amsterdam cheap alternative. It is time for LJU-EIN flights.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous22:35

      I don’t know why, but in 2019 you have to know that Lisbon had less than 50% of the number of flights Amsterdam had. I wouldn’t exactly say that the seventh economy in Europe is insignificant and small but everyone has their own perspective I guess. As to the Balkans, within 5 years KLM went from almost zero to double daily ZAG, double daily BEG and Split year-round so I guess they are playing it pretty good.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous10:11

      Seventh largest economy based on what? Corrupt ports, agressive "green" policy, lack of policy. NL role in the Balkans is close to zero. Dictating a lot and not giving in return.
      Look at what Austria and Germany are doing in the Balkans. We love to hate them but at least they are giving also a lot. NL and France and their "groupe" are lagging way behind.

      Delete
    7. I agree about the Netherlands - they are on wrong track, weird and deformed. But I don't agree about Transavia - in my opinion they are the best LCC in Europe. Not the biggest, but far far far from insignificant, with something like 100 aircraft in both branches, Dutch and French, and absolutely reliable and with good product

      Delete
  6. Anonymous15:21

    Why on earth are they still flying to LJU, get the KLM on track with daily E190 flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:36

      Cityhopper at the moment has no aircraft or staff to spare so they are looking at more profitable routes (Katowice, Aarhus, Southampton etc.). Unfortunately, LJU has become an insignificant player in the region 🤷🏼‍♂️

      Delete
  7. Anonymous16:40

    Sad čekamo da JU odreaguje i da povoljne cene karata za AMS preko BEG😝

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:12

      I would rather just go to ZAG and fly out of there to Amsterdam

      Delete
    2. Anonymous17:27

      Srećan Vam put. Ali ima i onih kojima je cimanje da kombinuju automobil i avion.

      Delete
  8. Noob question, JU as non EU carrier cannot just open base in LJU? It needs to go through agreement?

    ReplyDelete
  9. JU520 BEGLAX23:59

    For all our business travel we have two embargo airports: AMS and LHR
    FRA to avoid too whenever possible
    I am sure we are not the only ones who think and behave that way.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.