Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May22
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Austrian Airlines assessing Ljubljana potential

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Austrian Airlines is considering operations between Vienna and Ljubljana, three and a half years since services between the two cities were last maintained. The Austrian capital is one of the destinations the Slovenian government will subsidise for an airline that is willing to launch operations from either Ljubljana, Maribor or Portorož. “We continue to assess Ljubljana as a potential destination within our network. Currently, we offer our Ljubljana passengers an alternative to Vienna through Klagenfurt”, the Austrian carrier said. Following the demise of Adria Airways in September 2019, and the discontinuation of flights to Vienna as a result, Ljubljana Airport said it anticipated for services to the Austrian capital to be restored during the 2020 summer season, however, the pandemic altered those plans.

The Lufthansa Group was quick to respond to the collapse of Adria Airways in 2019 by covering key routes served by the former Slovenian flag carrier and ensuring the continued flow of transfer passengers through its hubs. Lufthansa commenced operations from Munich and Frankfurt, Brussels Airlines from the Belgian capital and Swiss from Zurich. However, Austrian Airlines has notably skipped the opportunity to introduce services between Vienna and Ljubljana, despite passenger figures indicating there is solid demand. Services to the Austrian capital were one of Adria’s better performing routes, with double daily flights maintained over the summer months and an average of around 60.000 passengers per year.

Ljubljana - Vienna route passenger performance


Adria Airways relied on transfer passengers between the two, both those headed or originating from regional markets such as Kosovo, Albania, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as those originating or heading to Ljubljana from other destinations in Europe and North America. However, a sizable number of travellers were still point-to-point. Notably an additional 10.925 people flew indirectly between the two capital cities in 2019, although this was mostly generated in the third and fourth quarters when Adria was cancelling a number of flights before ultimately declaring bankruptcy. Austrian Airlines had previously operated its own flights to Ljubljana, discontinuing its daily service at the end of the 2005 summer season. Adria Airways then increased its operations to the Austrian capital, maintaining four daily rotations until the 2009 global financial crisis. In its final summer season of 2019, Adria Airways served Vienna twice a day.



April 11, 2023
Feature Ljubljana slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:03

    Crazy there are no flights between Ljubljana and Vienna.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      If 60k pax is not enough for them, than i don't know what is

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:53

      Yields are most important, not necessarily passenger numbers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Sam15:57

      It's OS's stupid idea of thinking that people from Slovenia will just drive to Klagenfurt to use their flights. Austria has been always treating Slovenia as a 3rd world country.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:25

      Perhaps if SLO stopped acting like one our neighbours might begin to treat us as such, too!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:56

      Unfortunately, what I have noticed is that Slovenians are very much willing to fly from neighboring airports. Even when there is a nonstop flight from Ljubljana many will drive to another airport to save a few euros a fare.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous20:40

      If you have 1h drive to LJU and 1h drive to ZAG/TRS or a bit more to Venice/Treviso and tickets are way cheaper than in LJU, then the choice is clearly visible.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous21:22

      I'm trying to figure this and it could be a thing of mentality that amuses me: Slovenians prefer to drive 1-2 hours (it's not like they have a choice but usually they do save money) rather than paying some debts of national company through some collective fund that is filled by all Slovenians (state budget)? Would that be bottom line general public opinion on this matter?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous21:52

      Correct me if I am wrong but i think Klagenfurt is even less connected to the rest of Europe than Lljubljana. How on earth, OS ithinks that someone who wishes to fly for example to the US will choose Klagenfurt over Ljubljana??? First of all, you have to drive for 1 hour or more depending on the traffic. You have to pay for the parking. You still have to take at least 2-3 flights to get anywhere in the US or Canada. How is this convenient? Not to mention the prices they charge. OS has been playing some protectionist game with Klagenfurt and avoiding Ljubljana on purpose. I am so happy to see JU getting stronger and taking away their market in the region, including Slovenia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Really hope they will start flights to Ljubljana but I'm wondering if Vienna was put in there for Ryanair.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      Or Wizz Air

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:53

      You think an A320 would work on this route?!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:24

      VIE was out there with Austrian in mind. See the selection criteria.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:28

      An 09:53 well Adria flew 2 times a day usually one eith crj900 and one with A319 and you see that the passenger numbers aren’t low. However I still think that daily E195 is perfect for this route but if there are wizz A320 flights I think that they wouldn’t be empty

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:54

      Agree completely with last anon.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    From 60,000+ passengers per year to 0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      And not just Vienna but many routes. And then people argue we don't need a national airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:09

      And LJU did nothing to find alternatives.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:14

      Typical...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:15

      What alternative could you find for a nonstop Vienna flight? Austrian obviously did not want to fly to Vienna. The only alternative is either Lauda or Wizz which have bases in Vienna and both have made their reasons vocal why they don't fly to Ljubljana.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:55

      Even if those two or at least one flew to LJU I doubt we would see them on this route as they don't have the right aircraft. The A320 is too big for just P2P pax.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:04

    Their Dash 8s would have been perfect for this route. Now their smallest plane is Embreaer which still ahs 120 seats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:06

      Surely an Embraer could work at least a couple of days per week.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:09

      Yes, but sometimes customers want more frequency vs capacity.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:27

      Embraer is much cheaper to operate than Dash despite having more seats.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:05

    Does anyone remember what aircraft they used when they flew to Ljubljana in the early 2000s?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      Fokkers

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:18

      Thanks. Forgot they had Fokkers in the fleet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:25

      They had Fokker 50s, 70s and 100s but to LJU they flew with F70s.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:25

      Former Tyrolean planes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:54

      Austrian used to have an excellent feeder fleet and was able to fly to places like Mostar and Banja Luka because of it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous17:56

      Perfect fleet of gas guzzlers. There is a reason they got rid of them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:08

    If Adria flew twice a day with CRJs then there is no excuse for not having at least daily E195 flight between Ljubljana and Vienna.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:55

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. JU520 BEGLAX10:07

      It's not about the 62K but about the p2p passengers, how many did JP have? If 50%, than LJUVIELJU would be 85 per day. Thats not enough for an Embraer 195

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Visit Kosovo10:26

      If Adria flew twice a day *with a loss*... then there are a lot of excuses for not flying. Remember, costs and air fares are fixed. I could sell 1 million seats from PRN to JFK for 100 USD each but that does not make the route sustainable or profitable simply because I sell 1 million seats.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:40

      Fast train would be more helpful..financially and environmentally friendlier.
      of course let the Austrians run it and do the job..ministry of transport Slovenia too slow with evrrything

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:08

    With the green politics dominating in Austria, I doubt we will see them start Ljubljana,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:22

      The goverment does not tell OS where to fly- OS is a private company.
      And you also may wanna update your file: Austrian politics is dominated by conservative parties.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:24

      They fly to Klagenfurt which is closer than LJU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:37

      It isnt that close...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous23:33

      They have flights from Vienna to Graz, so much for Greens dominating.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:10

    Vienna transfer network is much different from FRA/MUC, more oriented to the east and it was a great added value.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:56

      Can't you just use JU now? They also have a pretty good network in Eastern Europe.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:23

      The east is not just the Eastern Europe.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:42

      "pretty good" debatable when you compare it to TK

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:32

      JU is the best in ex yu judging by connections but nowhere near TK or OS and the others

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:16

      Austrian is becoming smaller and smaller. Unfortunate impact of being a Lufthansa stepchild.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:11

    I think LH has imposed this on OS so they can remain the more dominant German airline in the airport.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:43

      lol indeed. the conspiracy lovers

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:17

    The reason Austrian didn't start flights to Ljubljana when Adria collapsed is because they had no spare capacity and their winter scheduled for 2019/20 was already set and they didn't have additional aircraft. Then came corona and they never came around to starting Ljubljana. With these discounts it is possible that they add LJU or at least, like they say, asses it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:34

      Then why didn't they add the flights this summer?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:44

      Why would they if the government was announcing they would subsidize flights through a tender, which, thanks to the government was 6 months too late.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:19

    There is any Austrian Airlines bus from Klagenfurt to Ljubljana too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:34

      There is no OS bus. You have Alpe Adria line conneting Klagenfurt and Ljubljana (via Ljubljana airport), but schedule doesn't fit OS flights to VIE.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:20

    LJU-VIE only worked because JP flew the route at a loss.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:21

      Well now the government will cover 50% of the costs so it could be profitable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:22

      50% of the airport tax is far from 50% of costs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:12

      True, my mistake

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:20

    Maybe its too early for them too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous09:21

    As I am no aviation expert can someone please explain to me how come ZAG can handle 2 daily flights to VIE per day, and LJU 0 at the moment?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:38

      Because its a much larger city and the drive to Vienna is far.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. pozdrav iz Rijeke10:49

      Drive to Vienna from Zagreb is three and a half hours. It has to do with the size of the city and the distance, but main reason in my opinion is much more transfer passengers from Zagreb to other cities in OS network, which OU failed to take care of

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:23

    Would love to see them back in Ljubljana! Minimum connex time in VIE is 30min. The airport is not too big. That makes VIE very attractive to transfer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:25

    “We continue to assess Ljubljana as a potential destination within our network. Currently, we offer our Ljubljana passengers an alternative to Vienna through Klagenfurt”
    In other words:
    We will not further diminish the viability of Klagenfurt by introducing flights to Ljubljana.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous09:27

    Its a huge pitty that VIE cant be used any more as a hub. AUA is also the star aliance member, so for those collecting miles, loss of link is surelly a loss.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:31

      You can connect the same miles with LH from LJU

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:33

      And as somebody said above: VIE is nice, clean, comfortable and easy to transfer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:12

      I agree that VIE is much more practical for transfers than the German LH hubs - especially Frankfurt.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous19:34

      Yes. Love MUC and VIE.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:42

      Fast train Vienna..Ljubljana..Trieste..like the times of K u K

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  18. Anonymous09:33

    I wonder if anyone from Ljubljana uses Klagenfurt to fly to Vienna.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:38

      I'm sure there are some passengers here and there

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:38

      In sure some do. I used to use Ryanir flights to London from Klagenfurt for access to Slovenia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:32

      I did a few times after Adria collapse. But from pandemic recovery I don't use it any more, mostly because Austrian discontinued the second morning flight to VIE (was departing 8:20 if I remember correctly). 6:00 is just to early and the road conditions are risky during the night in winter period. But I miss VIE hub a lot...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:11

      Interesting. I did notice that they have reduced flights. I remember there being triple daily flights in winter 2019/20. Now I think there are 2 daily or 10 weekly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:30

      I noticed just now that even the 6:00 KLU-VIE flight is gone.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:38

    Why isn't there some fast rail between Vienna and Ljubljana??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      Why isnt there a moonbase? I mean things take time. The road links are great and the railways follow Habsburg routes and wouldnt be used as much as roads are.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:57

      I know but considering Slovenia and Austria are in the EU, both countries are very developed and neighbor each other I would have thought there would be a good rail link between them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:47

      I dont think reations between them are that good tbh but I dont want to step into the field of politics now. And there is defo less demand for travel from AUT into Slovakia and Slovenia then to ITA and D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:26

      @ 11:47

      Definitely less? Care to provide some statistics? If you had actually done your research, you’d see that there are plenty of tourists travelling between AT and SI. Not to mention businesspeople!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  20. Anonymous09:43

    Hope the subsidies will convince them to start flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:55

      Fingers crossed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  21. Anonymous10:44

    P2P would have few pax, transit is well covered via FRA and MUC, I can't see that viable on a commercial profit bases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous10:59

    In 2018/19 only 18% pax were P2P. The strongest transfers were to SOF, TXL, KBP, PRG, OTP, TLV and LCA. So we need OS, not FR or W6 on that route to recover the network.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:10

      And it can still work. Notably none of those routes are included in the governmens subsidy program.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:17

      That 18% is ridiculous, when JP flew to VIE there was always between 40-50 % (depend on month) of PTP traffic. What was different from FRA/MUC/ZRH is that VIE did not have any long haul traffic, but on other hand there was higher percentage of short haul transfer passenger but still PTP share was much higher than 18%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:24

      Well, your feeling is wrong. 18% is the statistic from Jan18-Sep19. Be aware that not all pax traveling to VIE as final destination were P2P - there were many transfers from the Balkans as well (like PRN-LJU-VIE, TIA-LJU-VIE).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:32

      Adria was useless company without market. Hard to swallow.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:52

      Looking at how many passengers Ljubljana had when Adria was around and how many it has now, I would not say it is useless.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  23. Anonymous11:13

    I think the government put VIE on the list purely to attract Austrian.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:49

      and why not

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:55

      I don't see a problem. Lufthansa and Swiss also benefited from the subsidies. Hell, Swiss even got subsidies for flights it didn't operate.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:04

      OS info

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  24. Anonymous12:32

    OS is definitey not interested in operating VIE-LJU. So any hopes that OS will restore operations in near future are unnecessary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:24

      Elaborate this statement pls.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:04

      OS info

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  25. Boris16:45

    OS is not interested to fly to LJU because they are becoming smaller and smaller Airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous17:52

    It would be fantastic if they restored flights. Fingers crossed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  27. Anonymous17:53

    Who flies between Klagenfurt and Vienna? Is there really demand but none from Ljubljana?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:58

      Um it is a domestic route so there certainly is demand.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  28. Anonymous17:57

    If you compare these figures from the past with the figures the Vienna route has from other ex-Yu cities, it is still the lowest
    https://www.exyuaviation.com/2023/04/two-ex-yu-capitals-see-complete.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:04

      Take into consideration that Ljubljana is the closest to Vienna out of the lot of them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous21:50

      and well connected via highway and for the longest period with no border.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Riyadh Air launches first recruitment drive in region

Image

Kraljevo Airport registers record passenger growth as it eyes new routes

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025