Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May52
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Turkish sees strong Zagreb results with Lufthansa yet to recover

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Several destinations within Zagreb Airport’s top ten busiest surpassed their pre-Covid passenger performance during the first two months of the year, data provided by the European Statistical Office shows. During the first two months, Frankfurt remained the airport’s busiest route, with 35.500 passengers handled jointly by Croatia Airlines and Lufthansa, although figures were still down 20.8% on the same period in 2020. Notably, the Lufthansa Group’s hubs within the top ten busiest - Frankfurt, Munich and Vienna - all failed to reach their pre-pandemic passenger figures. However, during this time, both Frankfurt and Munich were hit by industrial action, forcing the cancellation of a number of flights from Zagreb to the two German cities in February.

Zagreb Airport's busiest routes, January - February 2023


Turkish Airlines performed strongly during the first two months, establishing Istanbul as Zagreb’s second busiest route and improving its performance by a notable 34.2% on three years ago. Several other destinations within Zagreb Airport’s top ten busiest also surpassed their pre-Covid passenger performance during the first two months of the year including Amsterdam, operated by Croatia Airlines and KLM. Ryanair outperformed both Croatia Airlines and British Airways on flights to London. The budget carrier handled 18.695 travellers between the Croatian capital and Stansted Airport, while the two national airlines welcomed a joint total of 15.658 passengers on board their aircraft to and from Heathrow. Stansted is also Ryanair’s busiest Zagreb route with the carrier maintaining daily flights between the two.

During the first two months of the year, Zagreb Airport handled 430.216 travellers through its doors, representing its busiest start to the year on record. Much of the growth was fuelled by Ryanair, which opened a base in the city in 2021. Zagreb Airport recently said, “We expect continual growth due to solid demand and a return to pre-pandemic capacity levels by most airlines. Our network currently counts 22 airlines which link Zagreb to 59 destinations, which is a record for the airport”.



April 21, 2023
croatia Feature Results 2023 zagreb
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Well done TK!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      What type of equipment is TK currently using to Zagreb?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:12

      The same equipment like last XYZ years, A320 and B737 family.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:19

      Majority of the flights are operated by 321s, followed by Maxs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:22

      Any chance we could see them send widebodies to ZAG?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:05

      No, other than some one off.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:02

    This shows two things:

    ZAG's growth is being generated Ryanair
    OU didn't have any meaningful recovery

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      Also that FR is impacting many airlines/routes in ZAG

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:32

      I do wonder what the result would be without FR.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:28

      I assume that if there were no FR, Croatia Airlines would not have retreated so much from Zagreb.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:02

    Interesting. I wonder if the US transfers have shifted from Lufthansa.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      A portion probably has. Turkish Airlines keeps expending its US network while Lufthansa has severely decreased the quality of service on board.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:03

    You have to wonder why Croatia Airlines never introduced flights to IST

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      TK and OU need to cooperate more. I don't see why they don't. Why doesn't OU have a codeshare on TK's routes from Istanbul? Especially to more distant markets.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:16

      If only Turkish hires Misetic as a board member :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:35

      They used to fly IST with Dash, about 10 years ago.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:48

      They used to do a lot of things 10 years ago that they don't anymore but their results are worse then they were 10 years ago.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. pozdrav iz Rijeke11:34

      They used to fly to IST with B737 as well. It was one of their first destinations. Very profitable service, always full. It was deliberately stopped, the same case with MAN, MAD, ARN, SVO, WAW, PRG, BUD, TIA, MLA, STR, BER, DUS, in order for LH to take over the market, and Misetic to get his position in the Star Alliance Board of Directors. The same reason why long haul was never introduced, despite initial plans and already published flights to JFK, ORD and YYZ

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:04

    TK seems to be doing a pretty good job in the region

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous09:07

    I hope we eventually see a third daily flight on some days by TK.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous09:08

    Especially since Ryanair only carries P2P passengers while BA and OU have transfers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:09

    wow Munich not even near pre Covid numbers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      MUC has lost a lot of its transfer appeal since Covid.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:28

      Is FMM launched meanwhile?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:37

      Yes, there are flights to Memmingen and it is one of Ryanair's best performing routes from ZAG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:39

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2023/03/ryanair-sees-strong-zagreb-results.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:27

      Munich is mostly affected by the fact that it was decimated by Lufthansa. Remember that the flights didn't even resume until last year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:14

    Nothing surprising, considering how reluctant British Airways was to increase frequency on the route (should have gone double daily as soon as Croatia Airlines sold its LHR slots). Good job by Ryanair!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous09:19

    That's the Ryanair effect. Turkish is the only airline that doesn't compete with FR because Istanbul is the only destination that Ryanair doesn't fly to on that list.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:20

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:19

    TK should really start Split, at least seasonally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:21

      Yes 100%

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:27

    Ryanair is doing very well on that Stansted route.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  13. Anonymous09:27

    Price is king in our region.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous09:28

    ZAG has not reached its full potential yet

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pozdrav iz Rijeke11:43

      And it never will with criminals leading the country and apparatchiks in charge of the flag carrier. The first and foremost condition for serious growth of any airport is serious and strong hub carrier based there. Croatia deliberately handed over its air traffic market to LH group. Croatia has no strategy for several fields of its economy, civil aviation being one of them. I fully agree ZAG has potentials for much more, but without strategy, without strong home based carrier, with hub synergy with it, those potentials will never be realised, especially with foreigners completely taking over the summer season coastal traffic and with JU growing immensely in the nearest neighborhood and taking care of the Balkans and behind

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:56

      Criminals are not leading the country. They are people who the population voted in. All governments of every country in the world, no matter which political party are corrupt to some extent! I'm sure pozdrav you aren't whiter them white and have done some dodgy things in your life!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. pozdrav iz Rijeke18:41

      First, those leading Croatia are not those population voted. Their majority is constructed by post-electoral engineering, thanks to so-called "zetoncici". Second, major Party in control of the construct is fully verdicted criminal organization. Third, Constitutional Court ruled election results not to be valid because of another construction, of electoral units, with diferrent votes values. Fourth, only blind or stupid person is not able to see crime and corruption, modus operandi of each and every single Kradeze government. And finally fifth, not being in posession of Kradeze Party booklet, if I had slightest "dodgy thing in my life", I would have been in prison long ago

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:28

    Surprised Munich is struggling. Full credit to Turkish Airlines though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous09:28

    Air France-KLM is doing rather well in Zagreb based on those numbers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:31

      They offer good connections and schedule.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:31

    Interesting to see busiest routes. No major surprises among them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous09:32

    I would think that Split route would have more passengers than Dubrovnik.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:41

      Split has more flights to Europe during winter and it has highway.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:26

      True, makes sense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:33

    Not that you get much more in terms of service on BA or OU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:35

    I think many of the P2P passengers migrated to Ryanair on this route

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  21. Anonymous09:36

    Ryanair offers a daily service, so it is easier to buy a return ticket with them than it is with Croatia Airlines who flies three times weekly. There is more flexibility with Ryanair.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous09:37

    Having in mind the recent intentions of TK and recent serious plan of significantly expanding in the upcoming 2033 and reaching a fleet of 435, there will be hardly any legacy carrier close to them especially when it comes to geographical coverage.
    TK is not only a great product, but very hard work has been done to reach where they are at the moment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  23. Anonymous09:37

    This is probably because of Aisa market. 2020 is not good year to compare because most of Aisa was closed down with COVID restrictions

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. EX-YU Aviation09:40

      January and February 2020 were the busiest on record for Zagreb Airport until 2023, and all routes within the top ten achieved their best results during the first two months of 2020, excluding London Stansted which was not served at the time.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:41

      No, Asia was not much recovered in JAN and FEB and didn't have much impact.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:25

      Comparing JAN and FEB of 2023 only makes sense when compared to JAN and FEB 2020 as these were not affected by Covid at all in Europe. In fact almost all airport had record numbers then.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous20:27

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  24. Anonymous09:39

    I wonder why Pegasus or AnadoluJet haven't launched ZAG from SAW.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:41

      Because Turkish people need visas to enter Croatia while Turkish Airlines is being used primarily by transfers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:53

      And no outbound p2p demand from Croatia as usual.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:25

      The outbound transfer demand is by Croatians.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous22:23

      Guy daid p2p

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  25. fil09:48

    Lets not forget - as per their Strategy announced 10 days ago: by 2033, Turkish Airlines expects to have a fleet of approximately 800 planes, to serve 170 million passengers / year, and to grow their passenger network to 400 destinations:

    https://investor.turkishairlines.com/en/announcements/public-disclosures/13042023-turkish-airlines-strategy-and-targets-for-2023-2033-period

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:59

      I see them covering more secondary airports in the region: INI, SPU, MBX, TZL, TSR, PDV, ZAD.
      They are also missing more French and Spanish connections.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  26. Anonymous10:05

    With exception to FRA, all the numbers are very close.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. frishki10:20

      Frankfurt, Munich, Vienna and London all have more than 20% less pax. How are those numbers very close?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:34

      I meant they are close as in all these destinations have similar passenger numbers, around 20,000.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  27. Anonymous10:07

    It's crazy that these 10 cities accounted for 86% of Zagreb Airport's total passenger numbers in January-February.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:35

      It's not surprising in slow months like January and February.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  28. Anonymous10:32

    I am pretty sure STN will be increased to 2 daily at some point similar to many other EU capitals. Especially the evening flights where there is usually demand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. Anonymous10:34

    What happened with JU in ZAG? How are they performing? BEG is not even appearing on the top 10 list. Maybe we can see the numbers grow in ZAG following the future expansion this summer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:36

      How do you expect to see them in top 10 when they operate with ATR72 aircraft, during winter one daily? Look at the capacity the last city in the top ten has.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:24

      JU was never in the top 10 to begin with.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  30. Anonymous10:39

    These numbers show in a big way what impact Ryanair is having on the main network carriers at ZAG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:24

      Definitely. Now the question is, is that a good or bad thing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:26

      Well it isn't good. The result is airlines like Air France cutting their second daily flight.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  31. Anonymous11:24

    Not surprised Turkish is doing so well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  32. Anonymous11:28

    Is Stansted more centrally located in London than Heathrow?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. frishki11:38

      Stansted is more than 50 kms away from central London. London City airport is the most central one, located in East London. Whish I could use it more since I live next to it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:39

      Thanks. I remember BA used to fly City - Split. Not sure if those flights are still ongoing after Covid.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. frishki11:44

      Last summer BA flew to both Split and Dubrovnik, so I'm guessing they will have flights this summer as well. They are trying to diversify City Airport and serve more leisure destinations and are lobbying to get approval to extend working hours, since they are restricted to fly between 6.30AM and 10.30PM. There are also no flights Saturday 12.30PM until 12.30PM Sunday.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:28

      Would be nice if we got London City - Zagreb flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. pozdrav iz Rijeke16:08

      I am absolutely sure once "brand new shiny A220 fleet" joins OU, London City will be one of their first moves from ZAG. They are famous for their out of the box thinking, innovations, quick response to market changes and demand and profitability boosts. Hahahahahahahaha

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous20:26

      😂😂😂

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous00:25

      I wasn't counting on Croatia Airlines for the London City route to start with :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  33. Anonymous11:29

    Should be mentioned that Turkish has benefited a lot from Gulf airlines reducing their operations to ZAG since the pandemic. In 2019, Doha was one of the top ten destinations from Zagreb (due to double daily flights) but I assume it is far down the list now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:29

      They definitely profited from QR's lower number of flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:34

      Flydubai too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  34. Anonymous11:48

    Anyone know how those Athens flights are performing?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:29

      They just resumed a few weeks ago.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  35. Anonymous13:09

    for the fans of stats some german numbers (LF) for the month of Feb :)

    ZAG-FRA 80.6% (all)
    HHN 82.5% (FR, for comparison W6 to SKP 97.2%, TZL 94.7%)
    FKB 89.6%, FR
    CGN 84,5% (Eurowings)
    FMM 86%, FR




    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:10

      Any info on Munich?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:16

      yes sorry forgot MUC: ZAG-MUC 79,9% (all)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:17

      (actually its the other way round, MUC-ZAG, all numebrs are for one way flights D->HR as usual)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:24

      That's not a bad figure, especially in February but question is what were the LFs from Zagreb.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:28

      probably around the same

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous00:24

      That Hahn load factor is not great for an ULCC like Ryanair.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous00:24

      To add to my last comment, compare the Ryanair load factor to that of Wizz in Skopje and Tuzla.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  36. Anonymous13:23

    The reason there is such a big decline to Frankfurt, Munich and Vienna is because there are a lot less flights than there used to be before Corona.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:45

      There are "a lot less flights" because there is "a lot less demand."

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:23

      @16:45
      +100

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous00:34

      Or maybe because a lot of p2p passengers switched to Memmingen, Hahn and Bratislava. The last one is seasonal though so not relevant for this article.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  37. Anonymous00:34

    These figures mean Croatia Airlines is nowhere near to getting close to pre Covid passenger numbers which is a disaster considering most airlines have surpassed those figures.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

easyJet ups Belgrade operations to fend off Air Serbia

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Montenegro to decide who takes over country’s airports next month

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025