Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May28
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Belgrade - Istanbul route sees unprecedented passenger growth

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia, Turkish Airlines and Pegasus Airlines welcomed close to half a million passengers on flights between Belgrade and Istanbul last year, with the route continuing to grow into 2023 as well. The big increase in passenger numbers, up almost 90% on the pre-pandemic 2019, comes as a result of a revised Air Service Agreement between Serbia and Turkey, favouring the flag carriers, and enabling more frequencies, as well as close cooperation between Air Serbia and Turkish Airlines, which has resulted in a wide-ranging codeshare agreement. Furthermore, tourism exchange between the two countries has significantly increased, there is a notable rise in Turkish workers in Serbia, while a larger amount of Russian travellers transferring on the route also generated more traffic. Last year, in addition to Istanbul, charter flights to Antalya saw a significant number of passengers.

Air Serbia and Turkish Airlines handled a total of 380.004 passengers between Belgrade and Istanbul’s main gateway last year. In addition, Pegasus carried a further 81.730 travellers between its Sabiha Gokcen hub and the Serbian capital for a total of 461.734 passengers between the two cities. During 2022, Air Serbia accounted for around 30% of the capacity on the route to Istanbul’s main airport, while Turkish Airlines held 70%. However, this year, Air Serbia holds 43% of total capacity between the two cities. During this year, there are a total of 617.986 seats between the two airports, up 32.7% on 2022 and an increase of 144.6% on 2019.

Belgrade - Turkey passenger performance in 2022


Air Serbia commenced operations from both Niš and Kraljevo to Istanbul’s main airport last year, in addition to flights from Belgrade, while Turkish Airlines’ lower cost unit, AnadoluJet, launched flights from Ankara during the last week of 2021. This year, both expanded their route networks between the two countries, with Air Serbia introducing services from Belgrade to both Ankara and Izmir, while AnadoluJet added its own service from Izmir to Belgrade. Turkish Airlines has been lobbying for the introduction of scheduled year-round flights from Antalya to Belgrade, which generates significant traffic, however, an agreement with Air Serbia will be required first for the service to commence.



October 15, 2023
Air Serbia Belgrade Feature Results 2022 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:05

    Impressive!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:12

    Antalya numbers are crazy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      No wonder JU does not want to allow TK to fly it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:22

      Thing is that these passengers are there because of tour operators. JU is afraid that they might switch to TK because they offer everything better, from planes, onboard experience, frequent flier miles, timing, flexibility...

      While JU is not cheap and you end up flying on some random Romanian or Lithuanian plane.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:13

      @anonymous 09:22
      +1000

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:54

      My experience with TK was AWFUL. Average food, missed TK plane bc of first TK flight late, left my lagguage outside on the rain overnight etc.. Onboard experience? PR and propaganda.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:04

      My Turkish Airlines experience; cabin crews usually work hard and do what they can, but on the ground, TK is a total mess 🙄 Be prepared for delays, last-minute aircraft swaps, missed connections, outright lies about what happens/happened... Transiting in IST involves kilometers of walking/running, and baggage carts have to be paid for!! TK = 👎

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous02:01

      Worst airline ever! Worst food, worst service! Never again!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:14

    Wow

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous09:15

    Wish Pegasus was allowed more flights

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      And SkyExpress to launch flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:02

      At least Pegasus has been able to increase capacity and now uses A321 on Belgrade flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:09

      I'm surprised a third Turkish carrier has not been allowed on the market. I remember that Atlasglobal was allowed to fly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:30

      They were allowed to fly because JU allowed it because they made a deal. That is what the Air Service Agreement was like. Then Atlasglobal went bankrupt and JU later decided to make a deal with Turkish

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous20:57

      Remember that at the time Air Serbia let Atlasglobal fly, Air Serbia didn't operate to IST.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous00:38

      I remember. AS has come a long way since than.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:19

    Is BEG now ahead of Bucharest in terms of passenger numbers from IST? I know it was third in the region behind ATH and OTP but ahead of airports like BUD, SOF, SJJ, ZAG etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MVR13:12

      Bucharest is ahead of Belgrade in terms of passenger to/from Türkiye. OTP-IST-OTP: 473.889 pax, OTP-SAW-OTP: 108.649 pax, OTP-AYT-OTP: 218.992 pax. Source: EUROSTAT - 2022

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:10

      Could this be because people from Moldova and Pridnestrovie don't have any more flights from KIV to Russia, so they have to transit? Bus/train/car--->OTP--->IST--->Russia? 🤔 KIV->Russia was of course not a huge market like Armenia to Russia, but anyway? I remember like 10 years ago there were nonstop flights from KIV to places like Surgut...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:20

      Sure. All residents of Transnistria travelled 3 times.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Nemjee14:36

      Demand from Romania to Turkey was always high. Before covid, TK was the main carrier for passengers heading to China. That's why they used to deploy the A333 to OTP.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:28

      One million Moldovan citizen work or worked in Russia.
      Moldovas government prohibited flying to Russia because these gastarbeiters preferred voting in elections for the pro-russian opposition..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. MVR18:28

      Anonymous 14:10 - there are daily a lot of flights from KIV to IST - (Turkish, HiSky, FlyOne), moldovans prefer to fly to Istanbul from KIV or IAS, they do not go down to OTP.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous00:16

      Anonymous14:20 Could it be because Romania has three times the population of Serbia?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:41

    Am not surprised about those results, Serbian biggest economical and political partner in so called "region" it's Turkey. Open more to the east countries will be more beneficial for Serbia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Slav.Man11:34

      TK is to JU what Lufthansa is to OU. feels like were back in 1910.

      Hopefull both JU and OU can grow more independently. The long haul routes by JU should help with that when they open those eastern routes themselves. hopefully after 2-3 years they will open more african and latin america also.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:48

      ^ This is such nonsense. JU will carry 4 million passengers this year, meaning Istanbul accounts for less than 3% of its total passenger numbers. Air Serbia flies to 80 destinations - yes 80 including long haul. Some of you really don't think before you comment.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:57

      JU next year might have close 100 destinations, while BEG will have in coming years more passangers than susjedi airports all together. JU has growth, while OU don't.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:01

      Slav.man usually speaks nonsense so I'm not surprised.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:03

      How can it be the same when OU only flies to LH hubs while JU launched Izmir and Ankara and arranges IST flights to fit their own connections and not TK's.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Slav.Man13:40

      as usual peopl like to be just reactionary without reading and understanding. Turkey has the most passanger numbers from Serbia or its 2nd. and now relying on TK for for its MRO set up. My comment was about the post which highlighted "there is a notable rise in Turkish workers in Serbia" and the original comment "Serbian biggest economical and political partner in so called region it's Turkey".
      Try to have a bit more understanding when reading a comment.

      so again. when JU can set up and rely on its own independent MRO and has its on connection to eastern destinations. hopefully starting with Yerevan and Tbilisi then epand to New Dehli etc. That would be great.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Nemjee14:32

      Well your thinking is still off. Air Serbia launched flights to China when they could have easily shuttled everything via IST.

      Then JU launched TLV where TK is the busiest foreign carrier. Then they went ahead and resumed Cairo where TK-MS offer multiple daily connections.
      Air Serbia then expanded in Turkey by adding Ankara and Izmir.

      OU on the other hand is afraid to launch Berlin or Dusseldorf as that would anger its German overlord. I won't even speak of long-haul.

      When it comes to the LH-OU relationship it's best described as Stockholm syndrome. JU and TK on the other hand have a mutually benefiting relationship which came as a result of growing political ties between the two countries. TK is in no ways limiting JU's growth while LH is restricting what OU can do. Actually this deranged relationship has reached new highs so LH doesn't even have to bother anymore, OU management does everything themselves. Launching OSI-MUC without first securing a LH code-share is a good example of this.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous15:33

      @anon 09.41
      No thank you. Were good like this.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  7. Anonymous10:15

    JU going from such a small share to this much is amazing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous11:01

    I think Turkish tourists are number 1 in Serbia at the moment by visits.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:58

      Yes they are. But this has been the case for several years

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. Anonymous11:02

    Is IST now the busiest route from Belgrade? Or are Tivat and/or Zurich ahead?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:03

      It's been yhr busiest for a while

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Anonymous11:05

    And all those Antalya passengers are flying with Air Serbia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:06

      Scheduled flights are needed on this route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:59

      Not going to happen. For Air Serbia to get scheduled flights they would need to offer the same to TK and they don't want to share the cake.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  11. Anonymous11:06

    Since Air Serbia flies Kraljevo and Nis to Istanbul, is it possible that any other carrier start Nis?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:25

      No other carrier can start IST-INI because of PSO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:04

      Thanks, I forgot about that

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:08

      In all honesty neither of the two should be on the PSO list anymore as both routes are profitable and busy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous00:27

      Then JU should increase frequencies from there..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  12. Anonymous16:05

    In summer JU could use A330 from Belgrade to Antalya without a problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:08

      They could use it to Hurghada too but they don't have enough widebodies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous17:33

    Pegasus should at least be allowed to go daily.
    If there ever was discrimination and unfair competition then it has to be in this case!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:26

      It is [art of the bilateral. Unfortunately, very common between Turkey and many countries. Not to mention that Pegasus Airlines isn't on good terms with the ruling AK party in Turkey, so they are often being sabotaged.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:01

      * part

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  14. Anonymous20:50

    Some really impressive figures there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous20:50

    This year there will be even more passegers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:22

      * passengers

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  16. Anonymous21:46

    Why are prices extorshinatley high Moscow to Belgrade surely restricts profit on the route.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:47

      What you mean? If prices are sky high, and aeroplanes full, than profit is high.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  17. Anonymous11:46

    First of all congrats to whoever is running this blog/site it is very well made and with lots of contents. I didn't want to write but since I have seen the debates about TK I decided to give me 2 cents: October 2023, business class: SOF-IST-AUH. Crazy long taxi when you get to IST, stuff inside airport not even interested in giving you basic info, not able to use lounges in IST during both legs as we had to run to connect as the airport is massive and made in idiotic way. Food only OK, at around 3 AM on the flight to EAU (was late) cabin crew just started toying and making noises with the galleys part and talking loud like people are not wanting to sleep at 3 AM. A321neo sucks for a 4/5 hours flight. Connections at IST are absurd, you need at least 4-5 hours between flights to feel safe and not rush. Final verdict: Nunca mas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:19

      Thanks for sharing bro.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Ljubljana tipped for new Tirana and Las Palmas service

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025