Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May23
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Former Yugoslav airports handle 28.9 million passengers

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Photo by Adam Radosavljević

Commercial airports across the former Yugoslavia handled a combined total of over 28.89 million passengers during the January - October period. Among them, Belgrade positioned itself within the top 75 busiest in Europe, with the remaining airports outside of the top 100. A total of twelve airports registered their best passenger performance on record during the ten-month period. They include Belgrade, Split, Zagreb, Pristina, Skopje, Podgorica, Zadar, Tuzla, Banja Luka, Niš, Osijek and Kraljevo. Notably, during October, Tuzla Airport continued to be impacted by Wizz Air’s base closure, and is now unlikely to surpass its passenger record from 2019.

Passenger performance by airport, January - October 2023


During the January - October period, Belgrade Airport ranked 73rd busiest on the continent, just behind Malta, Seville and Keflavik (Reykjavik), but ahead of Glasgow, Sofia and Thessaloniki. Split positioned itself as the 109th busiest, between Stavanger in Norway and Rome Ciampino, while Zagreb took 114th place. It was behind the likes of Trondheim, Wroclaw and Paphos but ahead of Tbilisi, Olbia and Santiago de Compostela. Pristina was 118th on the list, behind Verona but ahead of Kos, London City and Cluj. Skopje ranked 129h, trailing Poznan, Chisinau and Cork but immediately ahead of Memmingen, Dubrovnik and Ponta Delgada.

Passenger performance by airport, October 2023


During the first ten months of year, the Slovenian market saw the third-largest percentile decline in passenger figures in Europe (excluding Ukraine), behind only sanctioned-hit Belarus, as well as Finland, when compared to the pre-pandemic era with numbers down 29.6%. On the other hand, Albania recorded the fastest percentile growth, amounting to 111.8%, according to Airports Council International Europe, and was ahead of Armenia with a 66% increase. The market in Kosovo grew 44.3%, the Serbian market registered 25.3% growth, the market in Bosnia and Herzegovina was up 29.9%, Macedonian 15.6%, Croatian 1.8%, while the Montenegrin market saw its figures decline 7% on the same period in 2019. Notably, many markets in Europe are yet to recover their pre-pandemic figures with the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, Italy, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Moldova, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Russia and Switzerland all below pre-Covid levels. Overall, London Heathrow Airport was the busiest in Europe between January and September, handling 66.3 million passengers, ahead of Istanbul’s main gateway, which was second with 64.4 million travellers. They were followed by Paris Charles de Gaulle, Amsterdam, Madrid, Frankfurt, Barcelona, London Gatwick, Rome Fiumicino and Antalya.

Rank of select European airports by passenger numbers in the region


Largest airlines by scheduled seat capacity across the former Yugoslavia, October 2023





December 01, 2023
Belgrade bosnia and herzegovina Brač croatia Feature Kosovo Kraljevo macedonia montenegro Niš Ohrid podgorica Priština Results 2023 Rijeka sarajevo serbia Skopje slovenia zagreb
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    I’m astonished that Timisoara had more passengers in October than Sarajevo and Ljubljana!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      Big market, Wizz base

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:11

      Didn't know that. Will have a look. Thanks

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:38

      Yes but Wizz is slightly reducing TSR this winter

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous06:13

      You’ll be surprised by reductions happening next year. Wizz is hit bad by the PW issues.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:45

      TSR reductions were announced before engine issues

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:02

    So around 31-32 million pax in ex-Yu in 2023.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:18

      Sad

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:57

      Sad or not, 12 airports are having a record year. They should be congratulated.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    Finally Slovenia is no longer the second worst performing market in Europe! It is now third worst. Great success. Thanks Finland

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      What happened in Finland

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:16

      ^ the war in Ukraine and closure of Russian airspace. It impacted Finnair's Asian operations. They are now making money fron wetleasing planes to Qantas and operating Doha flights from Scandinavia for Qatar Aireays.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Nemjee09:40

      Finnair spent decades turning HEL into a transfer hub. We will have to wait and see what they do in the next 2-3 years as I doubt the airspace will open before then.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:18

      Some kind of consolidation is due in Scandinavia, which every country of 4-5million having their own carrier

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:28

      Well there is SAS which serves as national airline of 3 countries (but favours one of them 😀)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:23

      In theory, Finnair and Aegan can form some kind of a joint venture or partnership and try to direct far east passengers from HEL hub which is not functional anymore due to well known reasons to ATH hub. Both airlines are in similar size and have similarly developed hubs. ATH and Aegan are lucking long haul so Finnair in theory cloud fill the gap and base their long haul fleet there for far east routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous12:38

      Or link with AirSerbia and keep on flying through Russia?!
      Their government screwed them completely.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:41

      ^ What are you on about?? How can they "link with Air Serbia" and fly through Russia?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous16:02

      Funny because JU doesn't even use Russian airspace for their China flights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. maxi449216:51

      12:41 Well I guess they should fly wingtip to wingtip, and passengers should run from one plane to the other one?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous21:40

      Finland has chosen to be collateral instead of neutral in new cold war. So any kind of Russian frenzy inside of Finland is considered betrayal. But even for neutral countries like Serbia your lessor and insurer will not allow you to overfly Russia so no. But as is war will last for next 10 years and if they want to have far east market they will need to adapt by getting rid of part of the fleet (consolidate) or simply use other EU hub, and ATH fits perfect. But looks like Fins are stubborn, and eventually flying for other airlines will dry out.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous09:46

      JU has no reason with overflying Russia. They don't do it because it's not worth paying Siberian overflight rights to make the flight ten minutes shorter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:03

    Minsk is a similar case as LJU. Transfer airport lost their transfers. Now they are p2p airports.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      So you are claiming that embargo of all flights and operators from EU is similar case than Ljubljana? Nice try, but not the best excuse of bad LJU performance…

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:44

      No but they both lost transfers… one cuz of the war one cuz of collapse of airline

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:29

      Minsk was 3 million transfers and Ukrainian workers in Belarus. LJU had over 300,000 transfer passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:34

      Minsk has low local demand, p2p is about 2 million, it's always that much... European destinations are missing.
      LJU needs more European destinations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:40

      LJU needs MAD ASAP!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:45

      It's coming soon

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous01:23

      Hopefully

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:03

    Will be interesting to see how next year pans out with all these new routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:06

      We are in december last year Air Serbia announced a lot of new routes . Perhaps this year is different

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:09

      ^ I don't know how many times the CEO of the airline has to say that in 2024 focus will be on frequencies and not on new routes (they added over 40 in 2 years). Last year they announced new routes during December. Today is 1 Decenber so calm down.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:14

      New routes next year will mainly focus on transfer traffic since all P2P destinations with demand have been covered.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:51

      There will be no new routes in 2024 because many pilots left. You will see. Mark my words.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:59

      There are always wet lease alternatives.

      They might open few new routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:04

      They can't find affordable ones. Don't forget that they won't have two Lithuanian 738s in summer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous12:41

      OK, they will then go for some less affordable and problem solved.
      For pilots I don't worry at all as the market is absolutely global. With more money they can get je pilots over the night. Problem is to hire and train other crew, maintenance, ground stuff etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:44

      They are training new pilots as we speak. Yesterday one of Air Serbia's planes was flying circles around Belgrade as part of pilot training.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous12:56

      Problem is that other airlines are offering unreasonably high salaries for pilots.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous13:58

      Plus better work conditions

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous21:48

      Pegasus coming to ZAG, January 18th, 2pw! Finally!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:06

    7,6? Beg in 2023?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:13

      Yes, seems like it. Much better than the originally estimated 7 million

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:20

      I would say between 7,7 and 7,8 million

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:42

      I find Belgrade strange in November. It seems impossible to me that it had barely over 300,000?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:46

      Of course not.

      The point was that BEG had its 7 milionth passengers during the middle of the November, but the director was not present at that time so they made a photo and announced the news at the end of the month after he returned.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Nemjee09:52

      I think last November there were 456.000 passengers so this year numbers should be well over 500.000. BEG should not be below 7.2 by the end of November.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:26

      Definitely handled 7th millionth passenger much earlier than they took the photo promo. We will see the November result soon enough.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous10:36

      How much did BEG have in 2019 During Jan-Oct?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous10:41

      6.8

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous10:42

      ^ They had 6.1 million for whole of 2019 and you are claiming they had 6.8 until October 2019...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous10:52

      Oh I thought he meant this year

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:14

    I still don't get how OU is 12% below 2019 capacity. Literally all airlines are back to preCovid levels.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:40

      Obsession with OU goes on, and on, and on...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee09:44

      Because once COVID passed OU had to deal with FR. Ryanair has a much better cost structure so they are slowly eating them alive. The way I see it is like when a Komodo dragon attacks its prey with his dirty, infectious saliva. Day by day the prey becomes weaker until it's too weak to fight. By now it's obvious OU doesn't have an answer to FR.
      That is why OU struggles while ZAG grows.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:10

      @9.40 obsession? I'm just observing the table at the end of the article

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:23

      OU results are so terrible that he has no other answer except that pathetic one.

      Simply do not pay any attention on that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:49

      OU serves a different purpose that many here don't understand. Not all is about fleet size and PAX. no, whose is bigger, it has to do witj a bigger picture. Not surprised that people coming from a country with no tourism don't get it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:52

      Yes that is why OU's share is growing on the coast. Oh wait...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous10:53

      What is the bigger picture? It produces massive losses year after year . If your going to mention winter connectivity it does absolutely nothing. And don't bring your nationalistic assumptions into it. Not being able to argue your point without insulting based on what you assume is someone's background says a lot about you.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous10:58

      +100

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous11:53

      Let's see who dominates the coast next year. EW just announced a whole bunch of summer destinations but nothing in HR

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous13:01

      The bigger picture is, OU brings a lot of tax money for the state budget and pension funds, a lot more than they cost. Much more than they cost. Get it?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous13:04

      It would be interesting to see any proof to back up your claim. For example, how much in taxes did they pay last year and how much aid, PSOs and public money from state owned airports was given to them through various advertising deals, route incentive deals, tourism incentive deals etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous14:22

      Common sense. I know it's absent here. Just a bunch of haters that pretend to be aviation enthusiast. We got nothing to prove to you people.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous14:30

      Whenever you are presented with a question, you run for nationalistic insults because you have no answer. As I said before, says everything about you.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous15:45

      Anon 13:01 If OU brings a lot of tax money for the state budget and pension funds, a lot more than they cost, then imagine how much more tax money leading flag carrier of ex Yu region brings in. In other words, those who use this approach to justify OU's existence are actually supporting JU's existence even more!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Anonymous10:05

      I have no problem with JU. All I'm saying is that there is a lot of added value. Nothing nationalistic in my posts, just a point that to me JU is irrelevant. I prefer to draw comparisons with other EU member states.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:18

    Admin,
    In the text you have typo that BEG is on 75th position in Europe.

    It seems that 73rd position is correct as you have it in 2 spreadsheets below the text.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:14

      It's not a typo, it says it is within the top 75, which is from 1 to 75 since it is 73rd.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:28

    Impressive growth by most airports! Sarajevo and Ljubljana could do better though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous09:48

    Croatian airports have the most passengers in total, as always.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:06

      With terribly low OU market share.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:02

      Terrible, in your view or not, but still much more!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:15

      Terrible, terrible, terrible! Yet each year is a record for Croatian Airports. Because it has never been more than this. Yet some here speak as if there should be tens of millions flocking....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous15:54

      Total passenger traffic of CRO airports is often used to distract from every other failure of OU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:29

      No, every topic on this site is used to trash OU, even a good story like this. When the 15 arrive, many here will die from envy!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:50

    I think Ljubljana could reach 1.6 million next year, which is close to the Adria numbers. Which means that with Adria it could easily reach 2.5-2-8. A lot of destinations are still missing, and connections are gone, no idea if ANYONE connected through Ljubljana since Adria collapsed

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:17

      I doubt there is. What could people connect onto?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:17

      I agree LJU could reach 1.6 million next year. Don't I know why management thinks that figure will be achieved only in 2026.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:52

      Ljubljana is a lost case. Waiting on Godot.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:57

      Ljubljana - waiting on Godot.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  12. Nemjee09:55

    Very good result by Tesla. Hopefully this growth continues into 2024 so that we can be in the category 60 to 69 busiest European airports.
    Hopefully Wizz's pilot hiring spree in Belgrade is an indication that they plan on growing at BEG.

    Good news is that BEG is not relying so much on gasto traffic especially now when the EU economy is in stagflation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:13

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:23

      What is there left for Wizz to open? Literally everything has been covered. In their last expansion they opened all already existing routes from BEG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Nemjee10:31

      Wizz can start boosting frequencies on existing routes. Basically continue what they started this winter. We already got the first increase for 2024 (BGY from 5 to 7). I think they can still launch Madrid, Brussels, Prague, Athens...

      I would think BCN can go more than daily in summer, maybe 9 like FMM.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:46

      Athens is in need of an LCC alternative. Vienna too (although it ain't gonna happen)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:51

      Athens will be launched sooner or later from Wizz.. The thing is that it can be launched by Sky Express too which is the LCC of Greece or BlueBird Airways which recently opened a base in ATH as things in Israel where they had a base are bad. They launched PRG, BER, HER, BUD, VIE from ATH i can see them fly to BEG too.
      But I feel that BEG-ATH will soon get a third carrier.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:37

      BEG does not have a lot of shining examples of three carriers sustainably serving the same route. Learn from this fact.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:48

      Yes we really should learn from that fact.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous14:14

      I think now that you said it we all already learned from that fact!!! No third airlines for one route noted!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  13. Anonymous10:20

    In very curious in ZAG's numbers for next year considering the FR expansion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:21

      I'm pretty certain OU will expand next year too. It's interesting that FR didn't announce a singlrle route from the incentive destination list. So I think OU will open maybe Berlin and Prague from Zagreb in 2024.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:25

      Hope so but wouldn't bet on it. They said how they will put focus on DBV next year. That's not looking great after Ryanair's announcement.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:42

      ZAG being 114th in Europe is outright embarrassing and something needs to be done. Hopefully FR expansion changes that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:05

      New FR plane would have first to cover absence of Vueling and Finnair that were both flying last year and won't be returning to ZAG next year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:26

      How do you know that they won't be flying

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous14:34

      They would already have tickets on their website if they are going to fly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  14. Anonymous12:34

    Will Ljubljana overtake Sarajevo by the end of the year?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:38

      I guess not.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:48

      Definitely not, Sarajevo will be ahead of Ljubljana this year. Especially next year when Ryan starts.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous23:07

      Ljubljana has quite a few new routes too next year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  15. Anonymous12:35

    No recovery in sight for Tivat unfortunately.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23:06

      Worst impacted airport due to Ukraine war in our region.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  16. ilijabgc15:33

    This BEG Terminal view is clearly beautiful 😍

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:12

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  17. Anonymous23:06

    Pristina now extending difference over Skopje.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:39

      Not quite. Earlier this year the gap between the two was growing by some 50k monthly. In October PRN experienced a massive growth of 20% yet the gap with SKP grew by only 25k! This is an indicator that SKP is catching up, and fast.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:45

      Indeed they have added some 300k more then PRN

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:16

      More is expected with Visa liberalization and extension of the Terminal

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  18. Anonymous08:45

    Crazy how many passengers wizz flew from Tuzla and they pulled out lol 550k

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous12:55

    And what about Mali Lošinj and Portorož?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous13:04

    Why Athens is not in the graphic while Thessaloniki and Bucharest are?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Riyadh Air launches first recruitment drive in region

Image

Kraljevo Airport registers record passenger growth as it eyes new routes

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025