Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June18
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Iberia schedules Ljubljana service

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Spain’s national carrier Iberia will commence seasonal flights between Madrid and Ljubljana next summer. As previously reported, the airline applied for Slovenian state subsidies in return of commencing operations. The carrier will maintain two weekly flights between the Spanish and Slovenian capitals from July 29 until September 5, with the 100-seat CRJ1000 aircraft. It will provide 2.500 seats each way between the two next summer. The airline previously served Ljubljana for a short period during the summer of 2021. Further flight details can be found here. Tickets are now available for purchase through the airline's website. 

December 13, 2023
Ljubljana Newsflash slovenia Summer 2024
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous15:07

    What a disappointment. One month of flights with CRJ1000.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:31

      LJU has been a disappointment for many years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:10

      What’s wrong with CRJ1000? I think it’s a great machine.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous07:18

      It's a very low capacity plane that'll be operating on low frequency flights for a short period of time

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:44

      Yes, I agree with your observation. But you have to start (or re-start) somewhere. Especially in Ljubljana, which is a very complicated airport in a very complicated situation and a very competitive market. From my point of view this is great news!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  2. Anonymous15:32

    lame.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous15:35

    This means that either they failed at applying for subsidies, or that they'll extend the service once the tender results are public.
    My guess is that 1st option is more likely


    Also 2022 saw Iberia operating A320s for the same period, now we'll have CRJ1Xs, so "maybe" the aircraft is meant to operate in winter months as well

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:37

      A) They didn't fail. They will get money for their month long flights. Rules have never been of much importance to the Slovenian government or the tender commission. They gave millions to Swiss for almost two years even though it was not operating any flights to Ljubljana, in clear breach of the tender rules.
      B) Iberia flew to LJU in 2021 not 2022.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:43

      A. The rules say that the flights need to be year-around or the airline gives back all the money received. Regulated by EU; they can't possibly accept an application for a month worth of flights
      B. Fair enough, my bad

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:18

      Rules in previous tender stated that airline needed to fly to Ljubljana in previous 6 months. SWISS did not fly for 2 years and still got money. So rules are selective.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:19

      Swiss entered Slovenian market in 2019 and was there since (bar covid restrictions)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:21

      Yes, but LX had a code share. In the tender there was no specification about actual flying and this was actually eligible. Now the tender is specific about a year-around operations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous18:36

      There is no such requirement about year-round operations in the current tender. Airliners are free to specify the period.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  4. Anonymous15:50

    The only smart suggestion about Slovenian aviation I heard is that airport should never be privatized, and should be joint together with Adria. Airport profits would cover Adria losses (which weren't bad when it was a gov company). If we had that now, Slovenian aviation would be thriving

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:11

      Yes. That would have been great! That way we would have had 2 failing businesses instead of one and Slovenian aviation would indeed be thriving - NOT. No country’s aviation can “thrive” when so few of its people travel by plane.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:15

      So sad what a poor memory people have. LJU made a couple of millions in profit each year when it was state owned, while Adria needed 100+ million every few years. And you suggest to use the airport’s profit to cover these huge losses? I hope you never run a business with math like that. Also, where do you expect the airport to then find the money to invest? Get a loan and pay interest, further burdening the company? Ay, yay, yay.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:31

      Average operating profit of the airport in the last 10 years was 6.5mio
      Average net loss of adria was 4.3

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:39

      Average net loss of Adria, after all the state aid.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:41

      All adria got in last years is officials buying their tickets.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  5. Anonymous16:00

    So much for Fraport "wanting" flights to Spain (and also to other airports) and their "talks" with airlines. According to Sierra5 they had zero talks with both Iberia and Norwegian. I also doubt that they had talks with Luxair, AirBaltic... Without those barely any subsidies we would get nothing for next year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:37

      Feel like it should be obvious by now that Fraport has less than zero interest in developing LJU, they're happy with their flights to Zurich, Frankfurt anf Munich and that's the end of it

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous16:00

    Technically speaking the route will be operated by Air Nostrum, which operates the regional division of Iberia. On the Iberia website it already says that. It also seems they are still not ready 100% with the fares because they are currently too high for instance to Tenerife via Barajas:

    lun., 2 sep Logo AIR NOSTRUM
    15:30 18:05
    Ljubljana Joze Pucnik(LJU) - Madrid Adolfo Suarez-Barajas(MAD) T4
    IB8667 . Canadair (Bombardier) Regional Jet 1000
    Operado por AIR NOSTRUM
    2h 35min.
    Escala en Madrid Adolfo Suarez-Barajas MAD - Tiempo largo de conexión: 2h 45min.
    Logo Iberia Express
    20:50 22:45
    Madrid Adolfo Suarez-Barajas(MAD) T4 - Tenerife Norte Los Rodeos(TFN)
    IB3938 . Airbus A320 (Sharklets)
    Operado por Iberia Express

    Asegúrate el mejor precio


    Básica
    918€
    Avios
    Obtén un mínimo de 4.410 Avios

    Equipaje de mano
    Incluida 1 pieza hasta 10 kg (56x40x25cm).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:06

      I think they are still adding Ljubljana to the system

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:09

      Yes, some flights are selling for 85€, some for 178€ one way. So it's not finalized yet

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:16

      Schedule and frequency are finalised.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:03

      16:16, yes indeed but not the fares yet. The Latin American connections are not showing up yet, nor the Spanish domestic routes (all of them). The schedule is very good because it also securing many connections via Barajas especially the late evening flights to South America.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  7. Anonymous16:07

    2020: planned 4 weekly for one month with A320/A321, cancelled
    2021: 2 weekly for one month with A320
    2022: nothing
    2023: nothing (despite Fraport saying they would be back)
    2024: 2 weekly for one month with CRJ1000
    2030: 1 weekly for two weeks with Cessna 172

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:06

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  8. Anonymous16:21

    Slovenia keeps on winning! ☠️

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous16:28

    Thats literally nothing lol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous16:35

    I was hoping for an A320. What is happening with the national carrier, sorry I didn't follow the processes? This seems to be the solution to develop new markets…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous16:39

    As soon as I send CRJ, it means that the search is only touristic to Spain. Why not just Trade Air? Barcelona are doing fantastic this summer. Although these are charters. Let's hope IB increase the flights in 2025, or else extend the flights to year-round.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:40


      They*

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:44

      Tenerife also works with C3. Looks like the A320 is big for IB. If they think so….

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:57

      " Too big" lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous19:42

      ^Big for LJU

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:47

      Ah yes interesting that in 2020 they even upgraded some flights from A320 to A321 but now everything is too big. Just excuses as always.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  12. Anonymous17:33

    This is just pathetic...Fraport keeps doing their absolute best at keeping LJU down

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:42

      Yes, they want as low traffic as possible and as low income as possible. There is a bigger picture behind their intentions since they are not interested at all in profit.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous18:25

    This is extremely disappointing, I was really looking forward to year-round flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous22:00

    I'm still hoping they will pull a British Airways move and increase flights in the coming years, but needless to say I was hoping for more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous22:06

    The geography is very bad for LJU. It is not well connected to the rest of the country especially by public transportation. By public transportation from south of Ljubljana to the airport it takes 1h30 or more. From Maribor, Celje, Koper, Novo Mesto 2h30-3h. Add to be there 90 min before the flight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23:06

      @Anonymous 22:06 This has nothing to do with geography. It would be hard to find a better position for the airport. Public transport is another thing, here I agree with you it should be better connected. Considering the low traffic at the airport the timetables should be aligned with departures and arrivals, for Ljubljana at least, and from there to the rest of the country.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous06:36

      It does not take 1h30m from ljubljana to lju, some direct buses are 30 mins flat, while other non-direct can take up to an hour.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:02

      I said from the south of Ljubljana all by the bus it does take. I have done that because taxi is more expensive than here in Germany. From the bus station it is less, but the direct bus goes every now and then.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  16. Anonymous05:22

    Just wondering why here it's listed as a CRJ while the Iberia press release says A320neo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. EX-YU Aviation08:14

      The English language press release is full of errors, including the wrong operating days and equipment. The Spanish language press release is correct and reflects information in the GDS.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous08:37

      The English press release is copied from 2021 one lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:41

      On Simple flying they said that the destination LJU was chosen because of people interest on social media, and that it's going to be operated by an A320neo

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. EX-YU Aviation12:43

      Because it is copy pasted from the English language press release which is incorrect, as explained.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  17. Anonymous14:17

    Is this still not finalized yet? Some days ago, it was said that the two airlines that applied for subsidies hadn't even talked with the government yet, and the results are still not public/ The Slovenian government hasn't published them yet (if they successfully applied and stuff..)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. EX-YU Aviation14:19

      Flights are in the system and bookable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:54

      The tender says that airline can put flights on the route on sale after the tender is closed, my guess is that they put the flights on sale for the dates where they'll operate them no matter the results of the tender

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:01

      Not correct, the tender says that airline can put flights on sale after SUBMISSION of the application. So they are free to sale anything.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Air Serbia outlines Europe, Middle East and long-haul plans

Image

Emirates: No plans for Zagreb or Belgrade service

Image

PHOTOS: Belgrade Airport construction update

Image

Two North African carriers considering scheduled Belgrade flights

Image

Ljubljana Airport gains momentum as more new routes expected

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025