Croatia Airlines to temporarily reduce operations in February


Croatia Airlines will temporarily reduce frequencies on a handful of routes during February, which is considered the slowest month in the aviation industry, compared to its original plan. The reductions will only impact the carrier’s services from Zagreb, with a total of seven routes to see cuts. They include Vienna, Brussels, Sarajevo, Frankfurt, Munich, Skopje, and Zurich. The carrier has removed twelve weekly flights from its schedule, or around 7% of its weekly Zagreb operations. Vienna and Brussels will see the biggest reduction in flights with both to loose three weekly rotations. Sarajevo will be cut by two weekly frequencies in February, while all of the other abovementioned routes will see a reduction of one weekly flight. Changes remain possible.

February network reduction


All other routes remain unaffected. For some of the abovementioned destinations with more than one weekly frequency cut from the schedule, the reductions will be gradually introduced during the month. 

Overall, during February, Croatia Airlines has removed a total of 47 departing flights out of Zagreb. However, it will still boast more operations than in February of last year, with a 3.6% increase in flights. During the month, it will run the greatest number of services to Split, followed by Dubrovnik, Frankfurt, Zurich and Munich. The reductions are not expected to have a major impact on Zagreb Airport itself, as it will see a 15.5% increase in the number of flights and a 19.6% increase in capacity this February when compared to last year’s record, following Croatia Airlines'  network revision.

Croatia Airlines has begun wet-leasing a Trade Air Airbus A320 aircraft as of last week. In line with previous reports, the jet, registered 9A-BTH, which is 22 years old, will initially be based in Zagreb, and will be relocated to Split for the summer. The aircraft will operate on behalf of Croatia Airlines until the end of the year. The Croatian carrier is also eyeing a second A320 wet-lease for the 2024 summer season. A wet-lease is a leasing arrangement whereby the lessor provides an aircraft, complete crew, maintenance and insurance to another airline.


Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    I'm sure getting wifi and usb plugs will help them fill a 130 seater instead of the 80 seater in February 2025!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      +1

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:29

      Why worry.. It's a government run airline.. Paid by its citizens... Its not a big deal.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:00

      Again, this is what Governments do. They implement their policies using public funds. That in a nutshell is what politics is all about. It is completely legitimate, especially because OU brings added value in tourism. The problem is, people like you don't get it and instead keep themselves focused on growth and numbers is really not my problem.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:03

      easyJet brings more value to tourism than OU.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous11:23

      It does not. Easy does not pay taxes in Croatia and does not pay pension and medical for their employees in Croatia. It does not buy fuel in Croatia either.

      Delete
    6. Vlad11:38

      Why are you switching the discussion to taxes, pension and medical? The argument was that OU brings added value in tourism. Something that is patently untrue considering their pathetic market share on the coast in the summer.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous12:04

      Because, OU not only brings added value to tourism, but also brings added value to overall economy. So, if your point is that I was not precise enough, I stand corrected. My point is, they take home more than what they cost.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous12:05

      Pathetic is a relative term, only goes to show that people using it are nasty and lack basic understanding of macroeconomics.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous13:27

      Lol OU doesn't pay net taxes in Croatia either because much more government money is wasted on it than any taxes it will ever pay

      Delete
    10. Anonymous13:27

      >It is completely legitimate, especially because OU brings added value in tourism

      Not true. If it was, Malev would still be around. Malev also brought added value in tourism but it didn't matter.

      Delete
    11. Anonymous13:54

      Unfortunately OU does not bring added value with tourism. The tourists that actually visit Croatia all arrive to Croatia with any other airline. that's why RyanAir will overtake OU as Croatias largest airline. Easyjet and RyanAir bring tourists to croatia with cheap tickets from western europe.The rest get their with LH group flights or TK.

      Delete
    12. Vlad14:03

      @anon 12.05

      I say "pathetic" because it's my qualification of the company's management and the results they are producing, nothing to do with macroeconomics. OU has been around for more than 30 years, and after all that time, they haven't managed to capture more than 15% of the total inbound tourist traffic to the coast by air. That is pathetic by any stretch of the imagination and in a functional country the whole management would be immediately sacked over it.

      Delete
    13. Anonymous20:01

      And a certqin analiticar said this would never happe

      Delete
    14. Hahahahahahahaha, uhljebi sa clanskom iskaznicom pravomocno osudjene zlocinacke organizacije na aparatima, pokusavaju obraniti neobranjivo 😃

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Can someone tell me what is the rationale of selling your own plane and then wet leasing a 22 years old dinosaur?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      If it was close to a B/C check then it makes sense

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:40

      Financial, it's a financial rationale. Google it, instead of asking other people to tell you.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous16:20

      Try to buy and fly a 22 years old dinosaur by yourself, instead of talking so much about it ;)
      Btw, when you’re changing fleet and factory does not comply with the dates… then you have to lease a dinosaur🤫

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:03

    Why are so many airline reducing flights compared to what they planned? Is demand lower than what they expected it would be?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      Obviously

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:08

      I was watching Simply Aviation yesterday and they flew on LH A321 FRA-LYS, the flight was empty. Scary.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:09

      The post-Covid effect is over. People have spent all the money they saved during the pandemic and with inflation everywhere there will be less demand.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:12

      Years ago I was told by a hotel manager in Busapest that they are always thinking of closing the hotel from mid January to Easter. It is just such a period.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:17

      We will have to see how German demand performs in the future, it's not looking great:

      https://www.ft.com/content/b81fff40-eee3-481c-9cde-f39282070c0e

      Delete
    6. Anonymous09:40

      Funny enough I was in Germany not too long ago on holiday. Everything was full, flights to and from, too.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous09:46

      Yet Germany is slow to reach its 2019 levels. Your flight was full but others are obviously not my good old Anonymous friend.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous10:14

      @9.09 just stop it pls

      Delete
    9. Anonymous10:28

      Germany keeps adding and increasing taxes. Airlines are moving capacity elsewhere. It is the most expensive major market to fly from.

      Delete
    10. Anonymous11:03

      FR made another threat to Germany the other day.

      Anon 10.14
      You are like an ostrich with head in sand.

      Delete
    11. Anonymous12:25

      Anon 9:09.

      I was think this too, this year could see some major stagnation in terms of passenger numbers if the economic situation starts to bite. (and I am talking everywhere).

      Time will tell I guess...... Could also be another record year lol

      Delete
    12. Anonymous18:26

      @09:09 huh? People travel more and more every day, its not that they did till now because they have saved money when we were all home. What are you talking about?
      February and November are always the slowest months for every bussines, we spend money for the holiday celebrations at home, for traveling somewhere for the holidays, buying new clotes and furniture and many other things which are on discound for these kind of periods and of course most of us try to spend less in February and November cause we spend a little to much in the period before these months. But there are still people who can afford to travel in this period and people who need to travel for other purposes.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous09:05

    I find all type of Croatia Airlines news painfully boring. Everything they say are false promises, their actions are divorced from reason and for years it's all a one step forward, two steps back dance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:40

      Don't read it.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous09:05

    Reduction is not that big, but like someone mentioned above, what will they do when they no longer have Q400s and have to fil A220s to Skopje and Sarajevo in winter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      SKP is a massive problem for OU because we read here that LH affected them big time. Then there is also Wizz to LJU which is slowly strangling them.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:14

      I wouldn't say the reduction is so small considering it involves over 50% of its international network from ZAG.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:29

      Not just tat but their offer is already pathetic and they managed to make it worse.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:19

      Maybe OU should consider the ATR42/72, maybe operate a mixed fleet. The ATR42-500 could really improve their domestic and regional offering along along with the ATR-72 using this aircraft where the ATR42 might be too small. 6 ATR types along with an initial fleet of 15 220's would finally be somewhat of a positive move by the airline but they would really have to get over this spat with Zagreb airport and turn Zagreb into a mini hub for the airline to have any real chance to survive if they want to remain as a "traditional" airline.

      Ryanair is not going anywhere anytime soon so they really need to put their big pants on and learn to deal with competition and not look to retreat whenever something does not go there way.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous15:41

      They took the chance to survive by feeding Lufthansa, I don't see them changing that strategy anytime soon... So - no ATRs in OU fleet and no mini hub at ZAG.

      Delete
    6. @12.19
      15.41 is absolutely right. They will not put their big pants on. You should understand that they are deliberately shrinking and deliberately remaining pathetic feeder. They are controlled by Mafia and local Mafia chiefs have debts to main Bosses/Godfathers, which is preventing their growth and change of feeder role, so.....

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:11

    Putting aside the reductions, it is impressive OU serves all these routes with so many frequencies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      OU 13x weekly to MUC, while JU does it 0 times. Clearly OU>JU lolol

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:18

      It would be better for OU to have the same number of frequencies to MUC like JU. They are not making any money flying there. They are forced to by their German overlord.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:41

      Source??

      Delete
    4. Impressive frequencies, two daily on major routes on turboprops? Impressive my ass. In which century are you stuck? Airlines operate 5, 6, 7 frequencies daily on their main routes, on jets with much bigger capacity, sometimes even every hour or two. Or you simply have an impressive Party duty to write it, rewarded with sandwiches?

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:19

    Seems to be happening across the board.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:41

      Where is it happening? Which airlines?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:48

      Wizz, Ryan, JU...

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:08

      KLM too

      Delete
  8. Anonymous09:24

    Still fewer cuts than JU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      9:24, and still fewer routes.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:29

      And less perspective.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:41

      OU could cut their whole network and it would still be fewer cuts than JU. It's not a long way to the bottom when you're already halfway there.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:42

      LMAO!!!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous16:17

      OU could stop their operation and guess what? Nothing would happen

      Delete
  9. Anonymous09:25

    All their routes outside Zagreb in winter are subsidized so of course they will not reduce it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous09:26

    "The reductions are not expected to have a major impact on Zagreb Airport itself, as it will see a 15.5% increase in the number of flights and a 19.6% increase in capacity this February when compared to last year’s record, following Croatia Airlines' network revision."

    This is pretty good news. February will be very strong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:30

      Is this growth mostly thanks to Ryanair - Croatia's new national carrier?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:41

      There was a table recently about who is growing at ZAG in the first quarter
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2024/01/zagreb-targets-over-four-million.html

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:11

      Love it when there is growth!

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:08

      09:30,trying to be funny but only being nasty and limited.

      Delete
  11. Anonymous09:26

    So this will only be during February?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous09:28

    Airlines do this all the time in quiet periods of the year. No surprise.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous09:34

    Does anyone have any news about the new livery? Is it still on, or did they cancel that project too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:38

      It's not cancelled. It will likely be on the first A220s.

      Delete
    2. Wrong address. They have serious Uhljeb position for what you are asking - Corporate Design Manager. That's where you should ask.

      Delete
  14. Anonymous09:43

    Will the other plane they wet lease also be from Trade Air?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:44

      No, all their other planes are contracted.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:50

      Probably the likes of Smartlynx

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:54

      I don't know. Most likely they still don't know either.

      Delete
    4. Of course they don't know. It's too early

      Delete
  15. Anonymous09:59

    it's just the slowest part of the year and some routes are reduced

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous09:59

    Better than losing money

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:07

      Agree.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:12

      From what we read here OU loses more money when they are flying.

      Delete
  17. Anonymous10:09

    Ouch

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous10:24

    Minken Vrankvurt, Vrankvurt Minken

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous10:40

    Seems like many airlines overestimated the demand for this winter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:50

      It is normal. You schedule flights and then based on demand you modify the schedule.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:51

      Actually OU has almost never done this. So it is concerning.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous00:19

      Maybe it shows that they realize they can't burn money like before.

      Delete
  20. Anonymous10:50

    I don't know why people are complaining. What would you rather? For them to fly empty?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:56

      I would rather they do something to increase demand. They have one of the lowest load factors in Europe on an annual basis.

      Delete
    2. Evo sa'ce to Jasmin, docim ispije kahvu...

      Delete
  21. Anonymous10:51

    They could try by decreasing their overinflated fares for the less than basic service they offer and many demand would grow.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous10:53

    Losses are smaller if you fly less. Easy as that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:44

      As long as everyone in Buzin gets their salary...

      Delete
    2. @10.53
      Are you telling us OU shouldn't exist and shouldn't fly at all, because only in that case they would make no losses? Easy as that?

      Delete
  23. Anonymous11:14

    Interestingly, there was no year in which OU operated 14 weakly flights to BRU.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous19:39

    They achieve the best results when they don't fly...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:18

      Well it's kind of true. They had best results during Covid pandemic.

      Delete
  25. notLufthansa21:34

    some wise men knew that long time ago.....“Ko leti, vrijedi, ko vrijedi, leti, ko ne leti, ne vrijedi.” “Tko izgubi dobitak dobije gubitak!”

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous22:51

    Bravo OU, smart business decision. You will shine with world class A220!! Svaka Cast!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahahahahahahaha, hahahahahahahaha, hahahahahahahaha, LOL, LOL, LOL, LOL, LOL!!!!!

      Delete
    2. E hvala ti Jasmine ka bratu sta me 'vako od srca nasmija. Ocemo li po kahvu? 😃😃😃😃😃

      Delete
    3. Anonymous16:19

      Tell us again about the WiFi and built in USB charges.

      Delete
  27. Anonymous00:18

    How many planes do they have now with he wetlease?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:43

      12

      Delete
    2. Yes, 12, compared to just for example 45 of Air Baltic, coming from double smaller country, with similar economic strength, smaller diaspora, no tourism, and unfavourable transfer position. Miserable. Pathetic. Shameful. Sad. Painful. Disastrous. But some here, either uhljebs, or on Party duty, or simply blinded and brainwashed, will continue hailing Bravo to the misery, and crime and corruption which led to that misery.

      Delete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.