Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May60
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia plans new regional routes this winter

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia plans to launch new short regional routes and extend a select number of existing summer seasonal destinations during the upcoming 2024/25 winter, which begins on October 27. Speaking to the “TangoSix” portal, Air Serbia’s CEO, Jiri Marek, said, “We are currently analysing how to deploy the additional ATRs during the winter season. I can't reveal yet, but there will be some positive surprises when we decide to keep some summer routes over the winter. We also plan to introduce new shorter destinations during the winter, which are ideal for ATR aircraft to explore”. The airline will shortly take delivery of its tenth ATR72-600 aircraft, completing its turboprop fleet expansion. Over the ongoing summer, two will be used as back-up to avoid operational disruptions.

Mr Marek noted the carrier is looking to standardise its cabins across the fleet in order for each type to have the same number of seats in its category. “Some of the ATRs came with seventy and some with 72 seats. The number of seats on all ATR72-600s will be 72. All of the Airbus A319s will have 144 seats, while the A320s will have 180 seats. We are looking at different seat manufacturers to reduce their weight, which can also affect overall fuel consumption and consequently reduce CO2 emissions”, the CEO said. The aircraft reconfiguration will take place in the coming months.

As previously reported, apart from exploring new regional routes, Air Serbia is also gearing up for its long-haul expansion, with the carrier to introduce flights to Shanghai and Guangzhou this year. According to Mr Marek, one will be launched in October, while the other in December, although the carrier will subsequently decide which one will commence in which month. We expect "Romeo Delta", as we currently call it internally, to arrive in Belgrade by the end of July, beginning of August. I cannot give a more precise date at the moment because it depends on the work required to prepare the aircraft for service. We certainly know that the plane is entering the hangar for maintenance on July 1. The most complex part will be work on the landing gear. The company from which we are leasing the aircraft has reserved a slot with Lufthansa Technik to carry out this work, however, as we saw last season, anything can happen, so it's never good to talk about fixed dates. The second A330 should arrive in October, or November this year at the latest”, the CEO noted.


June 05, 2024
Air Serbia Belgrade Feature serbia Winter 2024/2025
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Dubrovnik maybe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:02

      I just hope it won't be SPU as that airport is dead during the winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:13

      Split is logical, because of transfer passengers. It’s a second largest city in Croatia

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:18

      and Tivat is close to Dubrovnik. So Split most probably

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:19

      If it were logical many other legacy carriers would fly to SPU.

      No LH, no OS, no LX, no AF, no BA...in SPU during winter.

      Let's not forget that KL reduced SPU only to 1 weekly last winter and next winter SPU is not in their schedule. I wonder why.

      The only legacy carrier that flies to SPU during thr winter is heavily PSO subsidized OU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:23

      klm is going 3xper week this winter

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:25

      Yes, but SPU is not in ATR range by other legacies, except JU. That makes route a lot less cheaper

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:27

      Yes, you are right. They recently changed it.

      Still they are only legacy beside OU that will fly to SPU during the winter. It does not sound well to me.

      I am sure JU could choose better destinations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Vlad11:05

      You guys are obviously unaware of how big the P2P market is between BEG and SPU. They would be able to fill an ATR 2x per week easily.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous11:18

      Please hurry up to inform JU about it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Vlad11:28

      Well apparently they are already aware, and this year they have the capacity for it as well, so...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous16:47

      JU should launch ZAD and not SPU in winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous19:21

      Does anyone know why is Air Serbia so afraid of Iasi?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous19:41

      Absolutely needed. Iasi or Chisnau, or even both

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous20:25

      If they start Chisinau they should rather choose Suceava.

      Also Kosice is a no-brainer, long overdue destination.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Anonymous09:24

      Maybe Maribor as well, could serve both the Slovenian and south Austrian diaspora

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Anonymous11:47

      I think Graz is more likely

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. Anonymous12:11

      Like Grz idea but doubt

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    18. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:02

    Split most likely

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:02

    Maybe they extend Mostar considering it is performing well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      I think OMO is the first candidate for winter flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:12

      Mostar is not operated by ATR

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:16

      So? He mentions they will extend certain routes (he didn't specify which aircraft type). He specified they will launch new regional routes with ATR.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:27

      Read again. He spoke about winter utilization of turboprop fleet. But I also think that OMO should became year round route

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:55

      Well, they can replace Embraer with ATR on some routes, and use freed Embraer for Mostar.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:02

    Well said Marek!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:24

      This is part of their marketing. They say something but nothing. The same message will come 10 times before any new route is announced.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:25

      Well no, they never said until now that they plan to extend certain seasonal routes this winter or that they will launch new short haul routes this winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:03

    MBX incoming

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      I do not think so.

      It is more realistic CLJ to be added to JU network.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:03

    Bravo Air Serbia 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous09:03

    Well the possibilities are Dubrovnik, Mostar, Ohrid, Pula, Rijeka, Split, Varna or Zadar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      There could be some new cities added.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:09

      ^ Yes he says there will be some new routes added. I'm just saying in regards to the seasonal routes they may extended.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:04

    OK! New routes, where to?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      Maybe read the article.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:09

      Well, Cluj is certain I think. Further may be Iasi, Debrecin, maybe Burgas. Naples may become all seasonal

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:03

      Winter means winter sport destinations. :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous15:36

      Naples is already there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous15:45

      Naples was recently extended to year round
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2024/05/air-serbia-upgrades-three-routes.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous06:52

      Air Serbia should strongly consider ZAD.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:06

    The arrival of the A330s is being pushed back every time he speaks.
    Is there really so difficult to find airplanes in acceptable condition? They have been looking for years!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      The last plane they booked was scrapped as the owner changed his mind.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:08

      @9.06 you literally have to read what he said in the article as to why they can't say precisely what day the A330 will arrive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:40

      @Anon 9:06 Exactly what I am saying. They are making this way too difficult for themselves.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:01

      They are sure not and they are very smart about it. No destination or ticket are put on sale as they are well aware how hard to schedule heavy maintenance on jets lately. Stop talking non sense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:53

      Ok smart of you!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous16:30

      Both A330s are assigned to ASL on planespotters.com, as well as two Embraers 195.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous21:06

      @Anon 16:30 How are you seeing this? I have tried searching both Air Serbia and the registration codes of the planes and the two new ones are not assigned to JU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous16:31

      Plainspotters.net. One A330-200 (Etihad, Altavair, Air Belgium) now leased for JU, the other A330-200 the same (age 10.5 and 10.1 years). And two Embraers 195, now leased for JU, formerly for Marathon airlines (age 15.8 and 16 years). Also, the last ATR 72 is listed for JU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:08

    Did they not swap out their 2013/2014 seats in 2016/2017 when they went all hybrid and got rid of proper business class on narrow bodies. The current seats are already very light slim back Recaros. The old seats were much more comfortable. If he is serious about reducing CO2 emissions he should invest in a newer fleet of A320neos and A220s. Oops - they cancelled the 10 A320neos - which would have been really handing right now in reducing CO2 emissions as he claims.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      He didn't cancel A320neos, it was the previous management team. They are talking about seats from a number of aircraft that they have brought in since, some of which have completely different seats than the rest of the fleet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:36

      Those Recaro seats are truly awful.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:41

      ^ Almost all European carriers use the same recaro seats on narrow body aircraft.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:41

      @Anon 9:08 Well those A320 Neos would have been great right now but Marek exclusively only buys planes that have 10-15 years on them and are falling apart!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:46

      They are not falling apart. You obviously haven't flown them. His main concern is profitability and his strategy is working well.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:44

      @09:41 The state of the aircraft has nothing to do with how old it is. It can be 30+ years old and in perfect condition inside and for flying, it can also be 5 years old and in bad condition if maintenance is avoided.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous12:31

      @10:44
      LOL!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:58

      @10:44 It's true. Newer Air India aircraft are already filthy and have broken panels, while those almost 30 year old Lufthansa A319s are in pretty much same condition as their A320neos.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:08

    They will probably target Romania, it is an ideal destination for ATR deployment, they just need to work on brand awareness in Romania.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous09:12

    I thought that YU-ARD and YU-ARE were in good flying condition given that they operated until recently with Air Belgium. Why would maintenance be taking so long if they are not doing much with the cabin? Are they waiting for spare parts?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:15

      One aircraft has issues with landing gear (during time flying for Air Belgium).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:23

      Are these planes ex OE-LCL and OE-LAC?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:48

      Yes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:10

      They were both flying only 1,5 months ago. How come they didn't have gear problems at that time?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:15

      We are talking about the first plane, and yes it has a gear problem. Do some research.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:47

      @10:10 On of them did. I know a youtuber who flew on one of those recently and they were flying with extended landing gear some time after take-off cause the pilots couldnt retract them immediately after take-off.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:20

      So, Air Belgium operated a plane that is not technically ok?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous19:56

      @10,47

      Landing gear being lowered for longer after take off probably means that the tires have overheated, not common but not unheard of either. It has nothing to do with the maintenance of the aircraft.

      @10,10
      It is possible that it would need replacement in the next few months anyway so it would be better to bring it forward while at a facility where it can be done rather than unnecessarily ferrying the aircraft back and forth for no reason.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:22

    My guess, among surprising routes, will be KVO-VIE, INI-FCO and INI- BVA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:24

      They fly from INI and KVO only PSO routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:10

      I would try and get some routes from KVO, INI, and get some Croatian coastal cities over the winter as well.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:59

      @anon 10:10
      No way Cro coast will work from both. Sutomore/Paralia could.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous21:21

      INI - ZAG would make sense

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:35

    Very interesting to see which destinations they will do and happy to see they are going back to growth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:48

      Not announcing new routes doesnt mean that they dont grow.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:06

      I meant network growth.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:36

    Burgas is definitely a future option. The airport is seasonal, but receives much more flights in summer. Even Dreamliners from UK. Also many Russians own houses and can fly via BEG due to the sanctions. They should also keep Varna year-round because it is a larger city. The ATR takes 1h30min, from BEG, which is nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:49

      Bulgarian Black Sea too cold in winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. JSG09:50

      Bulgaria is in Schengen now (aur abd see border) , so how Russian can fly there?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. JSG09:51

      * air and see border

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:03

      Burgas next summer, but Varna has traffic in winter. OS and TK already fly there for years so why not JU? W6 have 2 planes based there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:45

      JSG 09:50 the same way Russians fly to every other Schengen destination via BEG. Visa in passport and they travel. Lots of them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. JSG10:55

      I am.not sure if this is as easy as you say.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:06

      It's not as easy to get visa, but there are many Russians already having residence across the EU for example.
      Also, the fact there are sanctions, doesn't mean there's no exceptions. Look at gas and oui trade from Russia to the EU

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:40

    SPU, CLJ, OMO, MBX

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:13

      For MBX they could get subsidies. But I really hope for CLJ since it is a real hustle to travel there after LH cancelled FRA and RO is just hopeless.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. JSG10:45

      Maybe WRO or GDN?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:03

      @10:45 Those would be great for network development.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:54

      Wroclaw may be in a range for AT72, but no way for Gdansk. Prague and Krakow are already near limit

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous23:00

      WRO was mentioned as likely being the second route in Poland but I wouldn't want to imagine doing that on an ATR. CLJ, yes. KSC I think would be an interesting addition.

      ROM was supposed to be launched prior to Covid, perhaps that is also on the list.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous00:25

      What is ROM?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:40

    Like ok you are about to get two old ahh planes that are in bad condition to fly to China. Maybe don’t go plane shopping at the flea market and fix your cabins so people aren’t getting off a 9 hour flight with their whole body aching.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:51

      They are lot new than ARB and ARC. They were one of the youngest EY birds delivered new in 2014. EY went through that phase of getting rid of anything that was good in its race to get big by going for A380s, 777s and 787s

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:56

      And they were parked for 2-3 years. So they are actually 7 years old

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  18. Anonymous11:46

    SPU, CLJ, MBX all need to be available

    Innsbruck would be an interesting choice too

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous11:48

    Interesting that both OE-LCL and OE-LAC are still flying today? Are we sure that those are the ones designated for JU?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:50

      OO-ABG got released from AirBelgium in March, would be a huge play if AirSerbia managed to secure 330-900 instead of 330-200, did Marek explicitly state that 330-200s are coming?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:05

      Yes, and he said they formerly operated for Etihad before Air Belgium.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  20. Anonymous13:09

    Why not try with two BNX daily connections per week? Current schedule is useless for business travelers and short stay P2P, and exactly that is the main profile of passengers between Banja Luka and Belgrade. Just add one flight on already existing schedule (there are already flights on Monday and Friday) and adjust it a bit....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:11

      Agree, but probably won't happen without subsidies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  21. Anonymous13:24

    Dubrovnik, possibly Split, Cluj and maybe another destination in Poland.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous14:10

    Many articles have said that in the winter or summer next year they are starting flights to Miami. When will we get updates on that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:19

      Thanks. So they are just awaiting aircraft. Also nice to see that they want to refit ARB and ARC to achieve commonality. They said North American expansion so could that mean they expand to more than just Miami? Maybe Toronto or another destination?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  23. Anonymous14:32

    When will LA commence?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:36

      Not part of their current plans apparently because someone on this forum said it is too far. That is really surprising given that SoCal has the second largest Serbian community in the US after Chicago.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:38

      Apparently not part of any current plans.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:41

      That would be good if they introduced flights eventually. After Toronto they should consider it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:56

      They need proper plane for LAX. A350 or A339 at least

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  24. Anonymous14:33

    Great to hear!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous15:31

    I think Split, for sure. Maybe Mostar. Cluj. Sarajevo twice daily? Salzburg is already scheduled. What about Trieste, Florence or Graz? Warsaw?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:52

      Warsaw probably next spring with Embraer. This winter probably Split (2pw), Mostar (3pw), Cluj (3pw) and Sarajevo (10pw).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:52

      Salzburg may be upgraded to nonstop destination. A lot of diaspora live there

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:25

      SZG failed already once as year round destination.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  26. Anonymous18:30

    Given that JU has managed to recover a notable part of the market share that it lost in the 90s (let's say it is at 50%), it would be a good idea for the government to invest in a couple of other airports that have still not recovered enough for passenger traffic, like Bor and Vrsac, at least for seasonal ATR trips. It creates jobs and the government (municipalities?) still own those airports. It would certainly improve the quality of life index in the nearby municipalities.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:42

      Bor could work with Belgrade flights connecting to China, but I think the airport is due to be moved to another location, due to mining.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:14

      Bor and Vršac, are you serious?

      Better invest in connecting all parts of Serbia with high-speed railway, instead of building airports left and right.

      Don't you read news about KVO pax? It can't get past 2k mark.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:01

      Bor..LOL

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  27. Anonymous23:18

    In my opinion it doesnt make much sense to open another new destinations while their already existing destinations suffer from low frequencies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:05

      LCCs don't follow your thinking and rightfully so. Air Serbia should seize the opportunity and grow within region. Many of their existing ATR regional destinations already have double-digit weekly frequency that works for some transfers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous05:37

      LCCs work because they operate from secondary airports using jets not turboprops, provide direct point to point flights and don't direct passengers through hubs. Realistically INI is the only place where LCCs would operate to, other than BEG. I don't think you will see them in LYVR or LYBO or KVO for that matter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

easyJet ups Belgrade operations to fend off Air Serbia

Image

Croatia Airlines holds talks with Slovenia over network expansion

Image

Air Serbia: “Miami next logical US destination”

Image

Montenegro to decide who takes over country’s airports next month

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025