Croatia Airlines plans continuous network expansion over three years


Croatia Airlines’ CEO, jasmin Bajić, has said the carrier plans to add new routes on a continuous basis over the next three years as it takes delivery of new Airbus A220 aircraft. With the jet operating its first commercial service between Zagreb and Split yesterday, and its first international flight today, between the Croatian capital and Frankfurt, Mr Bajić, said, “We are currently analysing twenty routes, which will be progressively introduced as new aircraft join the fleet. I can’t specifically say which ones due to the competition”. He added, “Foreign leasing companies purchased these aircraft for half a billion dollars and gave them to us to develop a business utilsing them, and that is exactly what we will do”. The airline will take delivery of a further fourteen A220s from late this year through to 2027.

Croatia Airlines previously said the majority of the new routes it plans to introduce over the next three years will be in Europe and the Mediterranean region. Although the carrier has ruled out long-haul flights, it plans to commence new intercontinental operations, making north Africa and the Middle East likely options for its future network expansion. As previously reported, an emphasis will be put on year-round connectivity and reducing the carrier’s high summer seasonality. “The acquisition of new aircraft was a strategic decision made by the Croatian government and the management of Croatia Airlines because the carrier fulfills a very important strategic role, which isn’t purely commercial, and that is connecting Croatia to Europe and the world year-round, in contrast to many others who fly to Croatia seasonally. This will be further evident in the upcoming years”, the Croatian Minister for Tourism and Sport, Tonči Glavina, said.

This summer, Croatia Airlines introduced new flights between Split and Istanbul, as well as from Zagreb to Berlin, Stockholm, and Tirana. All the new destinations it added from the Croatian capital this year were previously part of its network. Since the coronavirus pandemic, the airline is yet to restore flights from Zagreb to Helsinki, Milan, Oslo, and Bucharest. Despite the resumption of services between Zagreb and Dublin, the route has since been discontinued by the airline as it faced strong competition from Ryanair. In 2020, Croatia Airlines also scheduled new services from Zagreb to Podgorica and Sofia, but they were never launched due to the pandemic.


Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    And this could not have been done before the A220?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      A220 is more cost effective than current A319/A320s in the fleet. So it gives them more opportunities to open new routes.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:19

      No, it doesn’t. Leasing price is so much higher than the benefit of reduced fuel consumption

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:22

      Do You have the calculations?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:23

      09:19
      You should notify every airline in the world that it's more cost effective to fly 20 year old aircraft instead of new efficient ones! 😆

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:25

      Should get MD80s. They are probaby so cheap to operate and there is hundreds of them.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous09:25

      It is not just for "reduced fuel consumption"... Stop copy/pasting anything you once read on the internet as the expert`s opinion... There must be some reason airlines tend to operate new aircraft.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous09:29

      I wonder why JU retired the Boeing 737s since they weren't paying any leasing for them. They would be money printing machines.
      Instead they are paying leases for A320s
      🤔🤔🤔

      Delete
    8. Anonymous09:52

      They would or they would not done it before A220 - totally irrelevant at the moment. The most important thing is that they are planning to open new routes, only important thing to discuss.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous10:07

      The A220 has the same capacity as an A319-100 and consumes around 60% as much fuel as the A320s (and around 80% as much as the neos)

      Delete
    10. Anonymous10:16

      Croatia Airlines OWNS its Airbus A320 family aircraft so the lease cost is 0. The lease cost for the A220 is astronomical.

      Why on earth did they need to wait for the A220 to arrive before launching new routes? Where is the logic in that?

      Delete
    11. Anonymous10:44

      Croatia doesn't own anything anymore, my friend...

      Delete
    12. Anonymous11:19

      Croatia owns the company, majority owner. By the way, ownership over assets does not guarantee positive business results.

      Delete
    13. Anonymous11:22

      Having old aircraft in the fleet can be very expensive, once aircraft exceeds 15 years of age, efficiency and utilization of passenger jet drops significantly, buy the time aircraft is 20 years old, annual C checks must be performed for every year of operation and D checks every 24 months. Suffice to say C check takes aircraft out of service for at least several weeks, D check for several months. D checks are also very expensive for the entire passenger jet needs to be checked, its engines disassembled, checked and carefully cleaned. D check can cost in the region of €3-4 million each time it is performed.

      C Check are slightly cheaper @€1-1.5 million each time they're performed. Suffice to say keeping an aircraft that is over 20 years old, from financial stand point is far more expensive than wet leasing entire aircraft and the crew, by a significant margin. Leasing an aircraft on 10 year operational lease is rather cheep in comparison, also cheaper then buying a new aircraft, again by a significant margin.

      Brand new A 220 300 is around €55-57 million, paying it off over 10 years will cost an airline around €5.7-6 million per year, whilst leasing an A220 over 10 years is around €2.8-3.2 million per aircraft. So it is far cheaper to lease an aircraft then own it, and owning an aircraft has diminishing return, so ideally leasing would be best option for a small airline.

      Croatian Airlines still has loads of assets and engines will be bought brand new, each costing around €7-8 million.

      Delete
    14. Anonymous11:32

      "C check takes aircraft out of service for at least several weeks"

      Not if you gradually do all the C check work cards you can on A and B checks and whenever appropriate section is opened for servicing.

      Gustav Floberka

      Delete
    15. Anonymous11:37

      @Gustav Floberka

      On 20 year old passenger jet aircraft, you need to perform C checks on an annual basis, including A and B checks. D checks will still take an passenger aircraft out of commission for several months and they need to be performed every 2 years once the aircraft is 20 years old or older.

      Delete
    16. Anonymous11:39

      P.S.
      C & D checks are actually inexpensive as far as routine C & D task cards are concerned - it's just orings and filters basically; what can be expensive are the additional non-routine tasks... But those are done on C or D only for convenience, they're not C & D related cost.

      Delete
    17. Anonymous11:58

      @ anon 11:37

      A & B & C & D and basically all the routine maintenance tasks are done based on flt hours/cycles, (some systems are on calendar limit regardless if the aircraft age, like fire extings, oxygen, batteries...) nothing to do with aircraft's age.

      There are added tasks for aging aircraft, like corrosion prevention, lap joint modification etc. However, when talking cost, bear in mind the price difference of spare parts needed for older and new aircrafts. Old parts are dirt cheap and abundant, new parts are beyond any comparison ( CSD for 737 classic is, say, 6-7 thousand USD; Generatos are even cheaper; overhaul of both is a couple thousand.... In comparison, IDGs do the same work but go for over $100K each, shop visits are correspondingly high too...

      Also, you can probably have 10 older aircraft for the price of 1 new - which you won't even be able to purchase directly from the OEM, without waiting forever for delivery, but even then you won't be receiving AirAsia price.


      Delete
    18. OU's equipment is constantly breaking down and yet some people are still arguing in favor of operating old aircraft, lol!
      I guess all the airlines in the world are just plain wrong, you know better.
      Armchair experts always know best, that's the rule of thumb.
      Welp, nobody's stopping you from investing your own money into this "brilliant" business idea. Or go to your bank and request a business line of credit based on a super cost-effective bizz-wizz plan involving flying junkyard planes.
      You should name your business venture Krstić Air! 😂

      Delete
    19. Anonymous12:48

      Anon 11:22 check your math. You are saying that when leasing airplane will cost airline around 3 million per year. Price od aircraft is 55 millions. So let me get this straight, 10 year lease will cost around 30 millions, after which aircraft price will be around 20 millions or less. So what are you saying somebody will buy aircraft for 55-57 millions, lease it for 30 and sell for less than 20. Do you see where am I going with this or you need further explanation.

      Delete
    20. Anonymous14:34

      It is a shame that OU hasn't taken significant share of leisure market from Croatian coast. Older aircraft are perfect fit for seasonal markets like the Croatian. You take old jet, fly it for 3 to 6 months, and after that you get rid of it or simply put it in storage and service it for another season.

      Delete
    21. Anonymous17:48

      Croatia Airlines Airbus fleet is out of service almost all winter anyway. They can perform all checks from A to Z every year.

      Delete
    22. Anonymous20:28

      For all anons which have no clue about aviation and Michael. New planes are good for large companies which have developed network, high load factor, high profit and certain number of passenger to whom they may present good quality hardware and which are ready to pay for it. Small companies should use mid age air crafts, which have a lot smaller leasing price, but still pretty good quality. That will give them opportunity to develop the network, gain passengers and grow gradually for relatively small price, so one day may buy new planes freely. Just like JU is doing. But OU have no worries, while government is behind them.

      Delete
    23. Anonymous07:57

      Yea, but goverment is not behind JU all the time, got it!

      Delete
    24. Anonymous09:05

      Anon 28

      So JU doesnt have high LF and high profits?

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:08

    Well at least they finally have some ambitions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      +1

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:27

      Flew the A220 to SPU yesterday- amazing :)

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:52

      Yes we saw your report on your analytic blog, thank you

      Delete
    4. About time! I'll probably book a flight to Skopje. Always wanted to visit that city anyhow and now I finally have an excuse!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous16:22

      @09.27 write a trip report. I'm sure people would love to see

      Delete
    6. Anonymous00:08

      Yes, please do

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:09

    Congrats on the A220s but I really hope they try to explore some new regions with them. Ryanair has shown leisure flights from Zagreb can work. OU could have done this over the last 35 years. Why not try flights to Egypt, Morocco, Middle East.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yup. Tunisia too. Israel and Lebanon would also definitely work once peace is restored...hopefully soon. Fingers crossed!

      Delete
  4. Anonymous09:13

    Finally they might add something from Zagreb. Knowing them it will probably be 2 weekly, while they will reduce something else in order to launch it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:20

      5th daily flight to Frankfurt and Munich.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:53

      They plan big expansion out of ZAG

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:19

      They will reduce one Zagreb-Zurich and one Zagreb-Munich flight to launch 2 weekly flights to Madrid for four months. And we Croatian taxpayers will give them a million euros for that.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous13:46

      You Croatian taxpayers won't be paying for anything. It is the Tourist paying from the Tourist taxes.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous17:50

      The Croatian taxpayers are paying. Every purchase in the supermarket, every salary payment, every company that makes a profit, every investor that withdraws their money and makes a profit, everyone who orders items from outside of the EU, etc etc.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous09:13

    I'm wondering which are these 20 routes. Any guesses?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:56

      Most of the routes are out of ZAG - LIS, OTP, PRG, HEL, PRN, CAI, GYD, RIX, VNO, OSL, NCE

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:59

      ATH directly, TLV, summer seasonal LCA.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:08

      Those would be decent choices.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:14

      Potentially Rome, Athens, Milan (with FCO and Linate soon to become Star Alliance hubs, it'd make sense). Moreover, Lisbon, Geneva and Oslo are big ones that are also missing. Cairo seasonally would probs work if done in cooperation with reiseburos

      Delete
    5. Anonymous00:24

      Rome nonstop after 35 years is long overdue. I mean which European airline flies to Rome with a bloody stop.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous02:45

      Same with ATH.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:18

    hmm let's see. Will they start from this winter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:09

      Don't think they will have enough aircraft to start new routes this winter. What they will probably do is extend one of the newly launched Zagreb routes into winter.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous00:24

      They mentioned a while ago they might start some winter routes from DBV. But that probably depends if the city tourist board will pay them. And the city tourist board in DBV does not like Croatia Airlines.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:19

    So this could mean potentially some destination in Middle East?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:20

      I hope so. No use in starting Dubai since it is already covered by Flydubai but maybe they could go for Abu Dhabi.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:20

      They could launch Split-Dubai in summer. Would be full.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:27

      Abu Dhabi with Etihad code share year round could work.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:37

      Don't hold your breath. They won't go beyond Turkey.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:43

      I wouldn't be surprised if it includes Hurghada or Monastir. They are operating some charters to Monastir this summer. So maybe they located it on the map.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous10:14

      Maybe we get Cairo seasonal and Tel-Aviv year round, or at least some winter capacity

      Delete
    7. Yes, I think Tel Aviv would work both for pilgrims and regular tourists. Hurghada and Monastir have decent prices.
      Also, given how well the Greek islands have been working for Ryanair, why not try some that aren't yet covered? Lord knows there are "quite a few" Agaean islands. Western coast of Turkey should be taken as an option as well.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous00:23

      Why did they stop serving Tel Aviv as a scheduled destination? I think it was served normally till covid. Then it turned into a charter destination.

      Delete
    9. Eh, just as covid was finished and the traffic had begun to normalize, the regular biannual cycle of violence exploded yet again...and this time it's been going on for almost a year now, at a level unseen in decades.
      It's the sad reality of that part of the world.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous09:21

    Bravo Hrvatska!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous09:21

    “The acquisition of new aircraft was a strategic decision made by the Croatian government and the management of Croatia Airlines "

    I thought the government never inteferes in Croatia Airlines operations. At least based on the comments here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:20

      It doesn't. The comment is a shameless promotion.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:23

      GoC is the majority owner. Majority owners manage, they don't interfere.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:28

      Sure, story changes depending on article and country.

      Delete
    4. If you somehow interpret
      the constant whining about taxpayer money keeping OU afloat in the comments as the government never interfering, then yes. Smh.
      Btw those are legit concerns but if we at least get something in return, the situation becomes marginally more tolerable.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous09:34

    Has OU ever flown beyond Tel Aviv? Is/was this their furthest route?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:37

      No

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:58

      They flew Montreal - Copenhagen 1 week ago

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:18

      They flew to Beijing as a one off during COVID.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:19

      Tianjin actually
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2020/07/croatia-airlines-touches-down-in-tianjin.html?m=1

      Delete
    5. Anonymous14:44

      That's impressive, didn't know that

      Delete
    6. Anonymous17:51

      Also Afghanistan

      Delete
    7. Anonymous00:22

      These were all one off charters, we are talking about scheduled flights.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous08:02

      Yes. And we all were totally serious about the answers.

      Delete
  11. Anonymous09:38

    They should expand to Portugal before Ryanair starts it. There is no hope for Spain anymore since Ryanair has taken that market.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:21

      Ryanair needs to launch Porto quickly and Agadir

      Delete
    2. Anonymous00:22

      Yes, both would be good options.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous08:03

      They could finally bring back BCN to year round.

      Delete
  12. Anonymous09:42

    Zagreb Airport need to give the same incentives to OU as they give Ryanair if they want OU to expand there

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:59

      There is already incentives that Croatia is using for opening new routes - connection unserveed capital cities with Zagreb

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:09

      Which is not the same as the discounts Ryanair got.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:11

      They can use same discounts with same conditions as Ryanair if they want. Incentives are there published and ready.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:22

      Anyone can get the incentives. Croatia Airlines chose not to apply.

      Delete
  13. Anonymous09:50

    I would love to see this list of destinations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:30

      https://youtu.be/BNDmaJwDmeo?si=r3yj2JAOpN2COK9U

      From time 2:15

      Delete
  14. Anonymous09:50

    They should first fix their European network and the way many European destinations miss regional connections.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:07

      Yes, it is a complete mystery to me why they don't do it. If they just moved some of their flights by 15 minutes they would be able to create much more connections and probably generate more passengers.

      Delete
  15. Anonymous09:51

    They are talking about decreasing seasonality yet every new route they have launched since 2016 has been seasonal, with exception to Mostar which is paid.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous10:17

    Is A220-300 more efficient than what Ryanair has in their fleet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:24

      Ryanair has much much much lower costs, bigger aircraft, shorter turnarounds, more flights, cheaper tickets, a better route network.

      Croatia Airlines has a Star Alliance membership but 0 meaningful codeshares, barely any destinations, expensive tickets, an unproductive workforce with clueless management and delays.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:38

      If that's true, the only way for Croatia Airlines to beat Ryan in Zagreb is to count on ZAG airport removing all discounts to Ryan.

      Delete
    3. Ryanair does have lower costs but not due to the type of aircraft in their fleet.
      The answer to the question posed is: yes, A220-300 is more efficient than what Ryanair has in its fleet.
      That of course doesn't mean that OU's prices will ever get as low as FR's, but they could and should be lower than they currently are.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:52

      The A220 family is objectively more efficient than the A320 family. However, keep in mind, Ryanair is very much optimised to lower costs, from cheaper seats, higher density, cheaper workforce, etc.

      Delete
  17. Anonymous10:28

    Was there any hint on a new base in Ljubljana?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:29

      They are not going to open Ljubljana. They asked the Slovenian government for money to do it 2 years ago and got rejected.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:56

      There was another meeting about a year ago with Bajić himself present, offering A220 base in LJU. This is still not off the table.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous00:06

      Hope so but doubtful anything will come out of it.

      Delete
  18. Anonymous11:35

    "Foreign leasing companies purchased these aircraft for half a billion dollars and gave them to us to develop a business utilsing them, and that is exactly what we will do"

    You my friend are paying 300k per month for each unit, they didn't give it to you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:54

      300k per month = 3.6 mil per year

      A new A220-300 costs 91 million. If they wanted to pay that off over 15 years, it'd cost 500k per month or 6 mil per year. They only needed to pay for the cabin

      Delete
    2. Vlad15:06

      You're quoting the list price. The actual price of the aircraft is a lot lower, otherwise no leasing company in their right mind would finance such deals.

      Delete
  19. Anonymous22:41

    CA needs to be privatised ASAP and every day I pray to God for that . Jasmin Bajic is by far the biggest uhljeb in Croatia

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous00:06

    Good. Finally time to spread their wings!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous00:06

    The new aircraft looks very sleek

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous01:10

    Really nice.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.