Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May66
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Slovenia seeks solution for one of EX-YU’s least busy airports

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

The Slovenian government is seeking a solution to what has become one of the former Yugoslavia’s least busy airports - Maribor. In 2024 it handled just 2.330 passengers. While Maribor does not have commercial flights, neither does Portorož on the country’s coast, however, it managed to welcome almost 22.782 travellers last year despite a smaller catchment area. The majority of Maribor Airport’s passenger traffic is generated through charters carrying sports teams. Efforts to find a concessionaire for Maribor Airport in 2023 were unsuccessful, despite a promising joint proposal from SIDrone aviation school and locksmith Ključavničarstvo Kunc.

SiDrone is making another bid to manage Maribor Airport, having recently presented its strategy to the National Assembly last month. The plan includes setting up a maintenance hub for both passenger and cargo planes and collaborating with neighbouring airports. SIDrone has expressed a desire for a long-term commitment to Maribor Airport, aiming for a partnership of at least ten years. In recent years, discussions have taken place between the Slovenian government and representatives from the leisure giant TUI Group, who showed interest in establishing a maintenance base at the airport.

Since 2019, Maribor Airport has been under the management of DRI, a state-owned consulting and engineering firm, following the early termination of a fifteen-year lease by Chinese investors in 2017. A significant hurdle for potential investors has been the absence of a spatial plan that would allow for airport expansion. The former Chinese concessionaire criticised the government for not fulfilling promises regarding this plan. Post-pandemic, the Slovenian government held talks with budget airlines such as Ryanair, Wizz Air, and easyJet, encouraging them to consider Maribor as an alternative to Ljubljana, which has been criticised for its high fees. However, none of these carriers have committed to Maribor under the current terms, although Ryanair briefly operated there fifteen years ago.


March 02, 2025
Feature Maribor slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    Had locals in Maribor continued giving subsidies to Ryanair who knows where the airport would be now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      Could have done wonders for that part of Slovenia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:13

      Yes, everyone knows that drunk British tourists that spend 7€ per night in a hostel bring prosperity to a region.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:18

      Stupid comment at 0913

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:02

      I feel like Maribor could have attracted LCCs if they made a bit of an effort.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:20

      I'm British and have stayed several times in Maribor, but didn't get drunk nor could I find anywhere for €7 per night... Keep on with your lazy stereotypes if you wish, but in reality you are talking about a very small percentage of Brits who couldn't spell Maribor, let alone find it on a map. The culture of the city not to mention Pohorje would attract the curious and respectful, not the Benidorm crowd.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous16:36

      Slovenia is a high income country. It's not an cheap holdiday destination. Average net salary is €1800 which is very similair to Spain and Italy

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous05:54

      I remember fondly the Ryanair stewardess announcing that we would shortly be landing in Haribo.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous08:12

      😂

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous02:04

      🤣🤣

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    First of all they need to establish LJU airport... Maribor and Portoroz are wet dreams!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:06

    So the talks with TUI have failed?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous09:08

    Quite literally just ask Fraport if they are willing to oay 1€ of consession per year, and give it to them

    Fraport is terrible in Ljubljana, but if you give them the airport some MRO will be established and we might get 3 weekly flights to Frankfurt

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:08

    For anyone wondering what the real problems are: The ministry for infrastructure says you need a new DPN (spatial plan) before allowing any new investment into new infrastructure on the airport but they will only start thinking about the new DPN once a new airport operator is found. The tender for the new airport operator has not been put out and only the ministry knows why. To add spice, the last tender had such strict requirements that basically only Fraport and Vinci could apply. Even FWAG that manages Vienna, Malta and Košice did not meet the requirements to apply.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      Why did they do that? That's crazy

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:16

      The current minister for infrastructure is in place to block any serious infrastructure development. The same can be seen on railways and roads where there are plenty of projects prepared with fully completed paperwork and guaranteed financing in the national budget and yet the tenders are not being published.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:02

      Shame :(

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:03

      Bratušek destroyed Slovenian aviation during her previous tenure and now that she's Minister of Transport she's doing it again. Nothing new

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:49

      It's quite disappointing to see such a lack of progress at Maribor Airport. The government really needs to step up its game.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:19

    Why not give subsidies for JU to launch two weekly flights?

    Otherwise MBX should be shut down if there is no real demand. Slovenia is too small to make it with so many airports. Portoroz makes sense because of high yielding private flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:46

      Subsidies are available via the tender. JU did not apply. The only way for it to happen would be if the Serbian Government pushed JU to do so

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:15

      JU is not eligible as an airline coming from outside the EU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:34

    Such a sad outcome for this airport. Hopefully they manage to find a partner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:34

    Pity. Nice terminal and infrastructure

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:52

      True. It's a shame that such a nice terminal is going to waste.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:37

    Ryanair or Wizz would really be the only option for this airport in terms of passenger flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous09:39

    I remember reading here back in 2017 the Chinese wanted to land wide bodies in Maribor ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:37

      It’s a pity that the government and previous concessionaires couldn't fulfill their promises regarding the expansion plans. While wide bodies were a pipe dream, the Chinese did actually have solid plans to expand the airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous10:02

    They may as well shut it down. An airport for 2,000 passengers...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:36

      Something drastic needs to be done to make better use of the infrastructure.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:56

      You cannot just shut up the airport thinking you solved the problem. The infrastructure is there and it costs money to keep it, but also to demolish it. Outing a chains on the door would mean all is collapsing in couple of years, so you have to pay the guard as to secure iz etc... Repurposing it would be necessary but no matter the costs airport is best as an airport.
      Or we should get Berane 2.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  12. Anonymous10:36

    Hopefully, SIDrone’s new plan can revitalize the airport and attract more traffic

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:49

      Doubt anything will come of it. The government just holds talks with everyone but does not do anything.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous10:38

    There’s definitely potential there waiting to be unlocked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:46

      The strategic location of Maribor could be a major asset if managed correctly. It's all about finding the right niche or market to serve.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  14. Anonymous11:44

    If only Adria was still alive... They could fly to Southend

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous11:48

    If Maribor could tap into the cargo or charter markets more aggressively, it might just turn its fortunes around.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:48

      For that you would need to have someone run the airport with an actual intent of making something of the airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  16. Anonymous11:49

    tough situation for Maribor

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:48

      It has been tough at MBX since 1991.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous23:15

      And before 1991 it was amazing?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous00:19

      Wheather it was amazing I don't know but it had three airlines serving it and had scheduled domestic and international routes. Don't really understand why you are so triggered. Their pre 90s passenger statistics will tell you everything.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous07:10

      Times have changed. Move on.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous08:11

      Move on from what? I just said the airport has been constantly in trouble and underutilised since 1991, which is a fact. Still trying to figure out why are you so triggered by what I wrote...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  17. Anonymous11:59

    It should be a MRO base and an aircraft graveyard with occasional cargo flights

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:51

      Graveyards are normally in much drier regions (France / Spain, Nevada) - it makes no sense to build it in this region.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:47

      They were busiest during Covid when some airlines parked their planes there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  18. Anonymous14:26

    Slovenia in terms of crucial infrastructure is definitely not a success story and Maribor Airport is one of the examples, that proves it perfectly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:47

      True unfortunately. And not very understandable considering the country's relative wealth.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  19. Anonymous19:51

    I am British.. love Slovenia and use EasyJet to LJu often. Slovenian always tell me that Maribor doesn't need an airport because " yoh can drive to so many places for flights". Met 4 last week who drive to Venice to get long haul flights???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous22:47

    I think SiDrone is managed by former Adria crew manager.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines holds talks with Slovenia over network expansion

Image

Air Serbia: “Miami next logical US destination”

Image

LOT engages Slovenia on new route opportunities

Image

EX-YU capital airports set for strong June growth, Ryanair largest carrier

Image

Lufthansa to suspend Skopje service for part of winter

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025