Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May25
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Hainan Airlines sees solid results on Belgrade service

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Hainan Airlines handled 49.345 passengers on its flights between Beijing and Belgrade in 2024 with an average cabin load factor of 80.6% for the duration of the year. The carrier runs two weekly flights between the two capitals. Almost all flights were maintained with the Airbus A330-300 aircraft with a mixd configuration of either 281 seats or 292 seats due to a different business class configuration. The airline also deployed its Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner on seven rotations with the capacity to seat 287 passengers.


April 09, 2025
Belgrade Newsflash Results 2024 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous13:44

    Good results, but is there a place for JU to jump in with two extra weekly rotations?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:50

      Did you check if JU has approval for flights to Beijing? Does it make more sense to ensure success of new routes to Guangzhou and Shanghai, expanding PVG if possible?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:52

      It's up to Chinese authorities to issue permission to JU. If they want to.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Nemjee16:02

      Well, the Chinese can only issue it if JU applies to receive it. It's up to Air Serbia to make the first move.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:24

      Yes, I checked. It is not a problem to receive reciprocity flights, once the Chinese company already have a route. It's up to JU to apply for them

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:36

      Going after established route operated by a strong carrier since 2019 or focusing on new routes where JU has been operating for less than a year? No brainer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous21:21

      And keep extra capacity unused? Def, no brains

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous00:19

      Better used to expand frequency on existing routes or open new routes than compete with Hainan.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Nemjee07:11

      Only existing routes which could maybe use extra flights are PVG and JFK.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous13:27

      PEK is excellent choice for JU, because a lot of Euro connections is possible. More and more European airlines are closing Chinese routes, which may boost this route from the very beginning

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  2. Anonymous15:15

    Could they add a third weekly?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23:01

      Definitely yes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Anonymous15:32

    Please add more flights, ok?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous15:39

    Quite stable solid figures, especially considering that during winter months, the figures are acceptable too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Nemjee16:06

    I remember last winter and summer they requested to operate a third weekly flight but each time their plans fell through. I guess they redirected this capacity elsewhere.

    With the US-China trade war in full swing, I expect both cargo and passenger demand to drop. Maybe they will redirect some of this capacity towards BEG.
    With more flights to PEK they could become more competitive when it comes to transfers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous00:36

    80% lf is not great, especially for route that is operated few years already. That should be better

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:37

      No. It is actually a fair load factor for a long haul route that has seasonal shifts. Some people here truly are clueless when it comes to aviation.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  7. Anonymous15:18

    Would the operate more dreamliner flights to Belgrade or just A330-330?🤔

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous21:07

    I hope this continues to grow along with increased trade

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous16:30

    LF 80.6 Hainan sees as 'solid'. Wtf!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Riyadh Air launches first recruitment drive in region

Image

Air Serbia registers busiest April on record

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025