Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May25
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Intra-EX-YU routes register strong passenger growth

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Connectivity within the former Yugoslavia reached its highest level in 2024 since the country’s dissolution, with all of the busiest routes recording year-on-year growth compared to 2023. However, some have still not recovered to their pre-pandemic passenger volumes. The busiest intra-EX-YU route in 2024 was Belgrade - Podgorica, followed by Belgrade - Tivat. These two remain the only ones within the former Yugoslavia operated by more than one carrier. Air Serbia and Air Montenegro jointly carried 642.927 passengers between Belgrade, Podgorica and Tivat. Notably, strong growth was seen on flights between Belgrade and Tivat compared to pre-pandemic 2019 levels, despite the launch of seasonal services from both Niš and Kraljevo to the Montenegrin coast.

Busiest intra-EX-YU routes, 2024


Two domestic routes in Croatia follow, operated by the country’s flag carrier Croatia Airlines. The Zagreb - Dubrovnik service and flights between Zagreb and Split, recorded year-on-year growth of over 6% and 5%, respectively. However, both still trail behind their 2019 pre-pandemic figures. Wizz Air’s route between Skopje and Ljubljana has performed strongly since its launch in September 2023, surpassing the figures recorded by Slovenia’s former flag carrier, Adria Airways, during the same period in 2019. Although Adria ceased operations in September 2019, Wizz Air transported more passengers on the route in the first half of 2024 than Adria did during the equivalent period in 2019. While Adria relied heavily on transfer traffic, Wizz Air primarily serves point-to-point travellers.

Performance for select intra-EX-YU routes, 2024


Travel patterns across the former Yugoslavia have changed considerably since the breakup of the federation. In 1990, the highest volume of passenger traffic between the republics was recorded between Serbia and Croatia, followed by domestic travel within Croatia. They were proceeded by Serbia - Slovenia, Serbia - Macedonia, Serbia - Montenegro, Croatia - Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia - Macedonia. In 1987, the busiest year for Yugoslav aviation, JAT Yugoslav Airlines handled 2.255.000 passengers on domestic services. Other domestic operators included Adria Airways and Aviogenex.


April 09, 2025
Air Serbia Belgrade bosnia and herzegovina croatia croatia airlines Dubrovnik Feature Ljubljana macedonia montenegro podgorica Results 2024 sarajevo serbia Skopje slovenia Split tivat Wizz Air zagreb
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Crazy that only two routes have more than one carrier operating.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      If it were possible there would be a third player on BEG-Montenegro flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee09:10

      I still think Wizz Air should try BEG-LJU, especially if they can time it Friday/Saturday-Sunday afternoon.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Nemjee09:11

      Sorry, Thursday not Saturday.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:15

      Yes, I also think they would do really well on the route. But would probably harm JU quite a bit.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Nemjee09:17

      I don't think so actually. JU has a lot of flights so it can offer its passengers something W6 can't: flexibility.

      I think Wizz Air would rather attract those who did not fly in the past. They would create a new market which did not exist before. Also, for the sake of BEG, if JU isn't willing to grow in LJU and meet this growing demand, then the airport management needs to do their own part.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:20

      Have you seen roads and railways between those two?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Nemjee09:40

      You mean BEG and LJU? From what I know there is a highway.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous10:09

      I mean serbia snd Montenegro

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous10:11

      Well, I drive to Montenegro regularly. No big deal.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous10:22

      Sure. Thats why most of ppl drive instead of flying, right

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous10:29

      Ex-yu is imaginary enough even without the intra.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous10:35

      @10:22 Lots of people do drive and there are also a number of buses operating, I`m not quite sure what your point is? The railroad on the other hand has been in awful state for years, albeit only in Serbia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Nemjee16:09

      If government taxes and surcharges (for airlines) were not as high, fares between Serbia and Montenegro would be lower. For the time being they will remain as they are.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:01

    wow Air Serbia had more passengers to Skopje than Croatia Airlines which has more weekly flights and much more capacity. And I remember reading comments here how Croatia Airlines is “killing” JU in Skopje.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nemjee09:09

      Interestingly enough, only routes to be below their 2019 levels are those operated by OU. I guess it's not the market but the airline serving it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:18

      Exactly why I love all these number articles. Puts a lot of things into perspective and a lot of conspiracies to rest.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:42

      I think LH has had an impact on OU's Skopje performance. Not that its performance was ever great but they used to have more passengers than JU. Obviously the tide is changing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:42

      Don't forget also that JU is constantly adding new routes and expanding its network including long haul providing more and more transfer options. OU is adding places like Berlin and Stockholm which have been available nonstop from Skopje for years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:12

      By wondering certain ANALyst, poor Serbs and Montegrins are flying a lot more than wealthy Croats? There must be some error in these numbers

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:21

      actually Adria had (positive impact) on OU's numbers to SKP in 2019 even only for Q3/Q4

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:31

      When did JU actually manage to surpass OU in Skopje?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous11:36

      post pandemic

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous13:08

      Well JU has a network designed to support its region routes, OU makes no such effort so until this changes, the gap will continue to grow. If Air Serbia commits to Split or Dubrovnik year round, we could even eventually see Split/Dubrovnik to Belgrade overtake Split/Dubrovnik to Zagreb.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous13:50

      OU made cuts to its ZAG network = less transfer pax

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous14:58

      By 100 pax, I still find it surprising how JU with a much better network isn't far more ahead

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous15:06

      OU will have to work really hard to fill those brand new shiny A220's. JU has the perfect turboprop plane for the regional routes, has decent network out of BEG unlike OU in ZAG. More E-jets would also be useful to step in to strong performing routes. Imagine OU sending 100+ seat A220 to ZAG-OMO once Dashes retired. Having that in mind, year round BEG-SPU with ATR 2-3 pw in the winter sounds realistic.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Nemjee16:13

      Anon 14.58
      I think OU has a lot more O&D passengers since Belgrade and Skopje are linked with a highway. The road to Belgrade is at least 360 km shorter than it is to Zagreb. Add to that the RS-HR border and you have flying as a very attractive option. I think this is what is keeping this route alive. I honestly don't know why would someone fly (and where) with OU from SKP. OU's offer is generally atrocious.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous18:53

      If WizzAir opens Skopje-Zagreb you will see that the market is there, just not for OU. If OU offered cheaper tickets i would consider visiting Zagreb, but giving 150 to 200 euros for one hour flight on an airline which doesnt even provide anything except water in economy? Definetly no. I would rather catch W6 to LJU and then a bus to Zagreb or i will give 150 euros but to Air Serbia or Turkish Airlines.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:02

    Good that there is growth year over year on all routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous09:02

    Interesting numbers to see

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:02

    I'm surprised at the strong growth on TIV route compared to 5 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      Anyone know the reason?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:05

      Lot more transfer passengers now for Tivat. Montenegro coast is more well known now compared to 5 years ago as word spreads from people visiting.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:06

      Russian transfers also had a role there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Nemjee09:08

      What about YM going bankrupt? Maybe a lot of their old passengers who flew non-stop to Europe ended up flying via BEG? On top of that add the Russians.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:04

    No numbers on the Skopje-Split flights?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Nemjee09:07

    Makes you wonder how much more growth there can be from BEG unless JU starts adding additional departures or capacity.
    LJU seems to be performing well for JU. Hopefully they bring back the E90/95 in the future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      LJU performance is impressive considering the increase competition from LJU with more nonstop flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:39

      Hahahaaha increase competition in LJU? What drugs are you on?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:07

    Nice! What is the LF on LJU - INI flights? Are those performing well?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:21

      LJU - INI LF is arround 44,5%. Was cca 14 900 awailable seats in 2024.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:40

      Thanks!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:27

      Are you sure this flight is operated with an A319? If so, then you're right. But as far as I know, it's usually operated with an ATR72, in this case the load factor would be around 91%. I really hope that's the case otherwise, I don’t understand why they wouldn't use a regional aircraft like that for this route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:34

      INI-LJU flight are operated by ATRs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:05

      Im am sure. 52 weeks , 4 flights in both way. is 208 flights x 72 sits is 14 976 sits. In 2024 was
      6 655 passenger. LF is then 44,4%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:10

    Trust OU to be responsible for the only red on the table lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:21

      Who else...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:12

    Admin, do we have LF for JU's flights to TIV and TGD?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous09:17

    I think there is much more potential for JU on the BEG-SJJ route. They just need to add more frequencies or operate it with a better schedule.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:20

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:28

      There is nothing wrong with the SJJ schedule. It just lacks more frequencies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:19

    BEG-INI?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:45

      Also INI to TIV and LJU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:24

      BEG-OHD?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:20

    We need more LCCs operating intra EX-YU flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:22

      Won't happen before more ex-Yu countries join EU because like this, they can't operate between two non EU nations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:28

      I'm sure an LCC would jump at an opportunity to operate BEG-TGD/TIV if it could.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:28

      Many people thought how airlines would jump at the opportunity to fly ZAG-DBV/SPU but as we see no one has shown even remote interest for over 10 years since this has been possible.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:32

      LCCs don't have appropriate aircraft for these routes to offer high frequency service.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:34

      ^ People said that for SKP-LJU with Wizz but look at how well it is performing on that route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:35

      The high density guy strikes again 😃

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:40

      Keep in mind SKP-LJU is subsidized.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous11:23

      @9.40 keep in mind that has nothing to do with the success of the route

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:22

    Any numbers for BEG-INI-BEG? I know it's a fery but it is an Intra-ExYU flight anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:13

      It is actually the only domestic flight in Serbia. And the data are well kept secret, I`d say. God knows why.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:43

      It shouldn't be a secret. Nobody expects wonders. Even 20-25 pax on the leg is amazing for a position flight. At least some costs are covered.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:47

      @ 10:13
      Technically, there is also BEG-KVO-BEG as domestic flight. But with no passengers though.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:31

    Funny in the end ljubljana has flights to almost all ex yu countries 😂

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:33

      I think it has the most flights to ex-Yu cities after BEG actually.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:36

      Ljubljana is a yugo melting plot

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:32

    What is the reason for Ryanair not operating Zagreb Dubrovnik and Zagreb Split?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:25

      no incentives. They could also smash 2-3 weekly to SKP

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:08

      Making profit is incentive enough for Ryanair. Esp in a market still down 11-12% from 2019, with single operator flying smaller capacity aircraft.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Nemjee16:17

      Could it be that an active PSO is preventing them from launching this route? Would be funny if FR actually introduces these flights once the contract expires. It would disqualify ZAG-DBV as a PSO service meaning OU would be left without a lot of money.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:44

      As an EU airline, Ryan could also apply for PSO, right?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:48

      There were some articles about it here last time. Ryanair said it asked for the terms of the PSO but in the end was not interested in applying.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Nemjee17:05

      I am sure the Croatian government made it in such a way so that OU ends up as the most convenient carrier. It wouldn't be unheard of.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:33

    Admin, some figures for BEG-ZAD?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous09:44

    Would love to see the Air Serbia-Air Montenegro duopoly broken up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:50

      And Croatia Airlines monopoly on busiest domestic routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee16:18

      Why? Outisde the busy summer season fares are really not high. Summer season is not an indicator since all flights out of BEG are expensive. As mentioned above, both Serbia and Montenegro have high charges from airlines so JU and 4O are really not to blame here.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:45

    The fares on all intra ex Yu routes are very high. Maybe only exception s SKP-LJU and INI-LJU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      They should not be high on Croatian domestic routes since it is PSO which means the state pays for them for the purpose for tickets to be low. But that has not stopped OU charging expensive fares.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:49

      In my opinion ZAG-DBV and ZAG-SPU should not PSO at all. I'm sure both routes are profitable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:27

      one way BEG-SKP are 120€ return, thats not too much.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  20. Anonymous09:50

    What are the numbers on SKP-SPU?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  21. Anonymous09:51

    "JAT Yugoslav Airlines handled 2.255.000 passengers on domestic services. Other domestic operators included Adria Airways and Aviogenex."

    wow. I remember reading somewhere that BEG-DBV was even busier than BEG-ZAG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:17

      Well of course. It took the fastest train only 4 hours to Zagreb, flights were not that popular. Much more people used to fly to Ljubljana, on two airlines. Actually, even from before WW2, Belgrade-Podgorica route was most of the time No 1. In the 1950s for instance, it carried one third of all Jat`s domestic traffic.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  22. Anonymous10:01

    Any news how the INI flights are going between Belgrade and Ljubljana?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:02

      Sorry just Belgrade flights*

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:57

      if the flights would be friday sunday there would be more traffic. LJU-INI

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  23. Treshnja10:57

    Increase in last 5-6 years is not really significant...Airline industry all over Europe experienced boom after Corona, especially from 2023...these numbers should be higher

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:00

      Some haven't increased but decreased.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:48

      +100

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  24. Anonymous11:05

    It’s strange how’s Serbia and Montenegro have a LOT
    more passengers than Croatia, despite a lot smaller touristic potential and worse economy. Oh, wait…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:25

      Montenegro has more passengers than Croatia?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:25

      Yes, on routes between Serbia and Montenegro. Or you think that Croats use those routes?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  25. Anonymous12:40

    Wizz just spawned 54k pax in ONE year, with 3 weekly flights.
    From Ljubljana too

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous13:21

    Even the difference between JU and OU on Sarajevo isn't that big of you take into account that OU has double the number of flights and more capacity per flight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  27. Anonymous14:51

    Why not post all the intra ex yu flight numbers. Would be super interesting to see where everthing stands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:12

      not all numbers have been published

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  28. Anonymous16:19

    Admin do you have numbers for SKP-SPU ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. Anonymous18:25

    Croatia Airlines should launch ZAG-TGD and ZAG-TZL, subsidised by Montenegro and Tuzla Canton respectively, and Wizz Air should consider SKP-SJJ or even better do SKP-SJJ-LJU-SJJ-SKP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:28

      Why wouldn't Zagreb subsidised those flights?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:19

      LCC don't do the stop routes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous07:45

      00:19 Not a stop route, just two separate routes using the same plane.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  30. Anonymous00:19

    What about Mostar? Where are ZAG-OMO, BEG-OMO?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Riyadh Air launches first recruitment drive in region

Image

Air Serbia registers busiest April on record

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025