Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT adds “Welcome drink” on long-haul
December 25, 1982

TRIP REPORT: Air Serbia, Istanbul – Kraljevo

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
TRIP REPORT


Written by Oliver

Date of Travel: 12/7/25
Flight Number: JU2429
Check-in Counter: S
Gate: A1B
Load Factor: ~99%
Aircraft Type: ATR-72

This was my second time flying Air Serbia’s route from Istanbul to Kraljevo, having first taken the same flight two years ago. I decided to visit my cousin who lives in Kraljevo before continuing on to visit my parents in Paraćin.

Airport

Istanbul Airport (IST) has been my go-to airport since its inauguration. I’ve used it as a point of departure, arrival, and for transit. While it’s undeniably modern and well-equipped, its location is a major drawback. It’s situated far from the city centre, typically requiring at least an hour of travel from either the European or Asian side of Istanbul.

The sheer size of the terminal can be overwhelming and time-consuming to navigate, especially during tight layovers. While it offers a wide range of services and amenities, I still find myself missing the convenience and charm of the old Atatürk Airport. It was much more centrally located and efficient for quick access to the city.



Check-in & Boarding Experience


Check-in took place at the smallest check-in area at Istanbul Airport, counter/island S, usually used for small flights. Despite its “modest setup”, the check-in process was smooth and efficient.

The gate for this flight was A1B, which required a bus transfer to the aircraft. The flight was delayed by 30 minutes at departure, but to Air Serbia’s credit, we arrived in Kraljevo on time.



Flight & Onboard Service

The flight had a remarkably high load factor, around 99%, suggesting strong demand on this niche route. The majority of the passengers, I’d dare to say around 75-80%, were Turks either working in Serbia or with family ties to the country. Despite the full cabin, boarding and seating went smoothly.

The crew was made up of two young female flight attendants, both of whom were exceptionally professional and welcoming throughout the journey. They maintained a friendly, upbeat attitude and ensured that the short flight was a pleasant one for everyone onboard.


The in-flight snack included a bottle of Air Serbia-branded water and a 20-gram pack of Plazma biscuits. While it’s a culturally familiar and nostalgic choice for many Serbian passengers, the offering is minimal compared to another regional airline like Aegean, which I recently flew a few times both on short and medium haul routes and there the passengers are regularly served more substantial meals (such as breakfast, lunch, or dinner options). If they could make it work, I think Air Serbia could make it too…

Conclusion

Air Serbia continues to provide reliable service on its regional routes, and JU2429 is no exception. While the onboard catering remains very basic, the punctuality, smooth flight experience, and excellent cabin crew made this trip a positive one. This route is a convenient option for travellers heading from Istanbul to central Serbia.




Share your travel experience by submitting a trip report to exyu@exyuaviation.com


July 20, 2025
Air Serbia Kraljevo serbia Trip report
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:06

    Cool, glad you enjoyed your trip!

    Thanks for the report!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:13

    Thank you for your trip report, very interesting.
    It would be cool if you had some photos from the arrivals in KVO to share.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:21

    Bravo Air Serbia 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:13

      for what exactly?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:20

      Recimo za LF od 99%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous07:37

      Или рецимо за то што су уопште издвојили капацитет ради увођења ове линије.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  4. Nemjee10:00

    Nice trip report. Given how well KVO is performing this year, seems like people are starting to get used to flying from there. I hope as JU adds more E-jets to its fleet that they will spare some Atrs to add more flights from KVO; more flights to TIV and potentially adding ATH or maybe even HER or CFU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous10:36

    If fuel becames available, JU could base 1 E190 and 1 ATR in KVO to serve thé local market.
    The airport is conveniently located between several medium sized cities with strong economic growth
    BEG is just 1h30 drive but then the check in and boarding process will be lengthy.
    In KVO from the parking to the plane it would be a matter of minutes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:08

      2 planes in KVO? Lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:37

      2 planes based in KVO is definitely too much. I'd rather see one plane being 'based' or rather operating only INI and KVO flights. Also, BEG-KVO flights are a must, to follow the already existing route BEG-INI, even though I'd prefer a rail connection and a ban of domestic flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:43

      How difficult is it for a fuel truck to be at the airport once or twice a day with jet fuel to fill up an ATR?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:57

      It needs to be there only three times a week, based on current schedule. And yes, even one plane based in KVO would mean increase in capacity in several times, which is unrealisting. Even INI didn't yet deserve dedicated aircraft.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous21:05

      13:43 Very difficult. It's not only fuel truck that is needed, but better firefighters and their equipment, etc...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  6. Anonymous10:38

    Idemo dalje...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous11:14

    Od novog aerodroma do Iatanbula je pušten u rad metro M11 koji te za 30 minuta i 0.77€ doveze u grad. Druga stvar je što do historijskog dijela grada trebaš uzeti drugi metro, ali u biti je cijeli metro/tramvaj/voz/metrobus i ferry sistem vrlo dobro uvezan i odlično funkcioniše.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. JSG11:47

    I like such niche routes :) Following this route success I wonder if they may launch more routes from KVO?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:10

      Vienna, Ljubljana, Milan could work, maybe few destinations in Greece in summer. Zurich is I guess a little too stretched a flight, for there's lots of jet service from BEG. But also might work.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:42

      Whats the obsession with opening flights to random places with minimal frequency?
      Wouldnt it just be better if they were finally increasing their pathetic low frequency?!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:59

      All they need is refueling truck to serve charters to summer destinations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:05

      @anon 14:59
      Idk regulations but is enough only to sent a fuel truck to Morava on flight day or it should be a fuel tank at the airport for sustainable supply? And would it require more firefighters and fire vehicles?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  9. Miroslav Smederevo12:59

    Hopefully Morava Airport will grow as it seems to have good load factors so far.
    And please don't complain about AS catering. I'm flying two legs in the US today and will not even get a bottle of water.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:47

      WIth Spirit?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Miroslav Smederevo16:22

      American. We sat on the plane for three hours this morning before they told us to de-plane. No water. The flight was cancelled and now I'm stuck at the airport until a night flight. The least American Airlines can do is offer some of us waiting for later flights is a food voucher. Horrible. Unfortunately, I have to travel to the US twice a year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:26

      I flew spirit fll to ord a few years ago because it a had convenient schedule. If no other options are available i would rather drive than fly spirit again.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Kimasheen17:34

      I took the same flight 24.6. to IST and load factor was 10-15%.
      On the way back it was 90%+.

      Nothing bad, but it is not all the time 99%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  10. Anonymous17:37

    Lots of potential at this airport.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT adds “Welcome drink” on long-haul
December 25, 1982

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Belgrade’s Spain flights register record passenger numbers in H1

Image

AirAsia plans Gulf hub with focus on Eastern Europe

Image

Turkish Airlines trims planned operations on select EX-YU markets

Image

Air Serbia expected to start Miami flights in summer 2026

Image

Etihad and Air Arabia reviewing Wizz Air Abu Dhabi routes

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025