Kazakhstan's SCAT Airlines inaugurated flights between Astana and Belgrade this morning, restoring air links between Central Asia and the Serbian capital for the first time in 21 years. The launch comes as Belgrade Airport looks to further expand its reach across the region. To mark the occasion, SCAT Airlines held a press conference in Belgrade today, attended by Talgat Lastev, Kazakhstan's Deputy Minister for Transport, as well as the airline's President, Vladimir Denisov. Flights between the two cities will operate twice per week using a 189-seat Boeing 737-800, although a B737 MAX 8 was deployed for the inaugural. There were 92 passengers on the inaugural flight, which the airline said it was “very pleased” with for a first service.
Prior to the service launch, Viktor Kortokov, Route Management Department Head at SCAT Airlines, said, "We want to offer passengers a comfortable travel experience. We are not only strengthening the link between Kazakhstan and Serbia, but also connecting Kazakhstan with the entire Balkans and Central Asia, as well as other countries we serve with direct flights." The Regional Manager of TAL Aviation, SCAT Airlines' General Sales Manager, Veljko Marković, noted, "There is potential, primarily in terms of business travel and cooperation between Serbia and Kazakhstan. There will also be efforts to develop the potential of our people traveling to Kazakhstan for tourism. Kazakhstan has a lot to offer, especially in relation to other countries such as Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan."
The last time Belgrade was linked to Central Asia with a scheduled air service was in 2004, when Uzbekistan Airways operated flights between Tashkent, Belgrade and New York with its Boeing 767 aircraft. There are now efforts to restore flights to the country. State officials recently noted that Air Serbia is undertaking feasibility studies into launching services either to Tashkent or Samarkand. Belgrade Airport's revised incentive scheme, introduced last year, also targets routes from the region.
Kazakhstan is the second-largest republic of the former Soviet Union, after Russia, and the ninth-largest country in the world by territory. Demand for travel from the central Asian nation has increased significantly over the years with a growing middle class and two strong carriers - Air Astana and SCAT. "We are still in talks with the Serbian national airline to have them involved in this route as well. Unfortunately, Kazakhstan hasn't been talked about much until now, but we are working to change that," Abzal Imankulov, Kazakhstan's Consul General to Serbia, noted. Serbia has also recorded a strong increase in immigration from the Central Asian republics in recent years, as workers who previously sought job opportunities in Russia are now moving to Serbia in greater numbers instead.




Good luck!
ReplyDeleteSuch a unique route. Hope it works.
ReplyDeleteKazakhstan is a huge country with growing demand and money. People always underestimate it. It’s not as exotic or random as some think. This actually has potential.
DeleteBeautiful country. Glad BEG is now linked with it. And yep there are many more opportunities for BEG waiting in that region
DeleteGreat news! Always good to see BEG expanding into new markets, especially something as unique as Central Asia. This could open up some interesting connections.
ReplyDeleteFingers crossed this works
ReplyDeleteThis is exactly the type of diversification Belgrade needs. Not just EU, not just diaspora-heavy routes. New markets, new flows, new opportunities.
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteThat is also the diversification ASL needs. It should get into that market too.
DeleteLet’s see how this performs.
ReplyDeleteUzbekistan Airways in 2004… that was a very different era. Nice to see Central Asia back.
ReplyDeleteChina, Georgia, soon Azerbaijan and now Kazakhstan… this is how hubs are built.
ReplyDeleteCentral Asia might actually become a small but meaningful market for BEG.
DeleteIf there is one region with massive growth potential that Belgrade hasn’t tapped yet, it’s Central Asia. This could be the start of a bigger wave.
DeleteIf BEG wants to continue growing, this is the type of market it needs to play in. Underserved, long-thin routes where there is room to develop.
ReplyDeleteI hope SCAT sticks with it. Too many niche routes launch and then collapse after 1–2 seasons because no one markets them properly.
ReplyDeleteAir Serbia definitely has the network to feed this into the Balkans and region. If they codeshare or interline, this could really take off.
ReplyDeleteAnd this middle of the night schedule they have could actually work. It can feed passengers to Air Serbia's morning wave and can get passengers from Air Serbia's arrival wave at 11pm-12am.
DeleteBut do these flights connect onto anything in Astana?
DeleteConnecting at 02:45am onto the morning flights with JU sounds exhausting. But aviation and passengers in central asia is quite used to night time operations . But i cant see much connecting traffic outbound via BG on this. But a very welcome link even so!
DeleteI especially would not like to spend a few hours at BEG between 3-5am when I don't think anything works at the airport either.
DeleteKazakhstan has a big diaspora in Germany and the Baltics.
DeleteKazakhs don’t need visas for Serbia, right? But they do need for EU?
ReplyDeleteThey do need a visa for E.U. travel.
DeleteLOL this will not end well.
ReplyDeletePeople were laughing at the idea of Belgrade-Guangzhou too, and now look where we are.
DeleteYou have no clue, as usual lol
DeleteFunny how Belgrade keeps getting more and more long haul, mid haul and exotic routes.
DeleteJust imagine number of Russian citizens living and working in both countries. Then add transfers from central Asia to Europe/North American and than add tourists that can visit both and nearby countries growing as route develops. And your LOL slowly fade…
DeleteNot every new route needs to have 200,000 passengers to be meaningful. Some routes exist for diplomatic, investment or supply chain reasons. This might be one of them.
DeleteWhy do they no longer do water cannon salutes at BEG for new routes?
ReplyDeleteIt is a VINCI policy to conserve water (I kid you not).
DeleteHaha ridiculous
DeleteThey are actually proud of it
Delete"To save water, VINCI Airports for example called on its entities to discontinue water salutes, a practice in which an arch is formed by plumes of water over the aircraft shot from fire truck water cannons. VINCI Airports is the world’s first airport operator to discontinue this practice."
https://www.vinci.com/publi/vinci/a11y/2021/vinci-urd/article/229/
Pathetic!
DeleteClassic greenwashing. Meanwhile we still clean streets in Belgrade with drinking water.
DeleteBrainless green agenda
DeleteIf they use rainwater for toilet washing why don't they use rainwater for water salute? It's rainwater after all one way or another it ends up in the air and soil.
DeleteWould have been better if it was Air Astana.
ReplyDeleteAgree! Good for SCAT, but I still think Air Astana would do a much better job here in terms of product quality and brand.
DeleteSCAT could be useful for both Air Astana and Air Serbia, if they have any doubts on potential flights. Let SCAT test the route first.
DeleteSounds cool but is there actually demand?
ReplyDelete@ExYu admin
ReplyDeleteIs there any info on loads on this inaugural flights?
Thanks
There were 92 passengers.
DeleteWhy does BEG show Nursultan as a destination?
ReplyDeleteThe website shows Astana Nursultan, while timetable screens at the airport last night showed only Nur-Sultan (written like that) - what I read now, Astana is still the official name, Nursultan was used for a brief period of time only.
5 hour 40 minute flight on the 737!
ReplyDeleteand on a 737 with 189 seats.
DeleteThey are a ULCC
Delete@09:44 without ULCC prices lol
DeleteIt's a 6 hour flight. Don't know what people expect.
Delete@17:10 Well for ULCC service 440 euros return (without luggage) as the entry price is steep even for such a long flight.
DeleteThey could easily build this into a small “Silk Road” corridor if they partner with tourism boards and push packages.
ReplyDelete6 hour flight for tourism....hmm ?
DeleteWhy? Tourists don't travel anywhere over 2 hours or what?
DeleteNot for Kazahstan or Serbia.
Delete^How wrong you are
DeleteI wonder what their connecting banks look like in Astana. If someone can easily get to Urumqi, Bishkek or or other cities this could become a neat transfer link.
ReplyDeletehow many times have you needed to go to Urumqi? Just asking :)
DeleteNeither destination are likely to have vast demand for Belgrade to be honest..
DeleteGrowing number of workers from Kirgystan in Serbia, better conditions for them than in Russia.
DeleteIf Air Serbia enters Central Asia, they’ll likely choose Tashkent over Samarkand. Tashkent has bigger diaspora and stronger business links.
ReplyDeleteIts a long old flight between Belgrade and Tashkent...and there is probably a reason that only one European Airline other than TK operate there (LOT) - Its very hard to turn a significant profit on such a long rotation. If Lufthansa can't make TAS work, I'm suspicious that JU would fare any better.
DeleteI hope SCAT does a full marketing push in Serbia. People barely know anything about Kazakhstan.
ReplyDeleteThey have actually done a campaign on Instagram. I have been getting sponsored adds for their flights to Kazakhstan.
DeleteTalks about potential Astana flights began in 2017 but it is good to see it actually happened.
ReplyDeleteI just hope they don’t cancel after one winter. Routes like this need at least 2–3 years of nurturing to grow into something sustainable.
ReplyDeleteWith so many Russians in both countries and around them, shouldn’t be a problem. If the war stops and things get back to normal, there might be slight problems
DeleteThis route is mainly for Kazakhs
DeleteI read many comments about Russians, but still don't get it.
DeleteWhy would Russians living in Serbia want/need to fly to Kazakhstan only because there are other Russians living there?
I honestly don't see any connection.
Because their choices of travelling elsewhere are limited. They can also transfer on flights to/from Russia as options are limited and expensive.
DeleteAnon 13.33
DeleteFamilies that escaped Russia didn't all necessarily go to the same destinations. Russians from Belgrade have Russian friends & family across Tbilisi, Astana, Dubai and other Russian emigrations centres. These people still have the need to see & visit each other. We're talking hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of emigrants.
Actually, tens of thousands of Russian companies are moved abroad completely with their employees and their families. So it's quite normal to see also business trips between Tbilisi, Tashkent, Astana, Yerevan, Baku, Belgrade, Podgorica, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Istanbul etc.
DeleteNice addition.
ReplyDelete50% load factor is not great but I guess it will take some time for these flights to start working.
ReplyDeleteЗначи , Ви на основу једног лета односите неке закључке? Ма браво!
DeleteI took a look at the prices at whilst they certainly aren't going to attract the casual Serbian tourist in search of a Wizzair style break. Return fares begin at over 440euros without luggage. These prices are, however, competitive against the connecting options on such a route, and cheaper than flying Turkish or Pegasus which was the fastest way of getting between the two cities.
ReplyDeleteConnections to Almaty seem quite ok to the Belgrade flights which is good.
All in all a very very niche route.
Lets hope someone does a trip report soon!
Would love to see a trip report!
DeleteHow can you see the prices, the website offers nothing in destination drop-down for me?
DeleteInteresting
ReplyDelete"Serbia has also recorded a strong increase in immigration from the Central Asian republics in recent years, as workers who previously sought job opportunities in Russia are now moving to Serbia in greater numbers instead."
This is correct. Its common to meet people from Central Asia working in Belgrade now.
DeleteYes, they are going in much fewer numbers to Russia to work over fears of being conscripted as well as being targeted due to issues in Chechnya in recent years.
DeleteBEG's route network is getting impressive. Now they need more destinations in Middle Easr and North Africa.
ReplyDeleteMiddle East is the biggest bet JU could take, Aegean is thriving in the region and offers great connections via ATH.
DeleteThese are exactly the kind of routes that differentiate BEG from the rest of the region.
DeletePolitical route
ReplyDeleteSure...
Delete92 passengers for the first flight is actually a solid start for a totally new market.
ReplyDeleteThey should utilise E190/195 for winter at least
DeleteSCAT don't operate the E190.
DeleteI know, I am saying that they need them
DeleteFor serving Belgrade? They're a private business that should do whats profitable
DeleteGood to see Central Asia making a comeback after 21 years. I really hope Uzbekistan returns as well. Samarkand would be amazing.
ReplyDeleteKazakhstan is a huge untapped market. Most people underestimate how developed and wealthy Astana actually is.
ReplyDeleteI agree that Kazakhstan has huge potential, and being essentially a new city, Astana is very developed with an urban infrastructure that is certainly better than Belgrade's.
DeleteThe airport incentives seem to be paying off. We’ve had a number of interesting niche launches since they changed the scheme.
ReplyDeleteIs it the same crew that is operating both sectors? If it is that would be 14h duty for them.
ReplyDeleteDifferent crew
DeleteI assume the outbound crew then deadhead back rather than do a long layover?
DeleteWith prices such as they are I really don't imagine this route is going to appeal to many Serbs - especially during the winter (it can drop to minus 20 in Astana during January and Feb)
But this is indeed a welcome and exotic night time visitor to Belgrade.
I don't know if they dead head or not, but it would be just a three day layover. It's not that much
Delete@16:59 a three day layover would seem excessive given the cost of housing 2 pilots and at 4 crew members on what will likely be a low-yielding route. I'd be sure they return right away for the sake of efficiency.
DeleteThats too much for the crew then. Maybe in Kazakhstan there is different law then in Europe-EASA where the crew is legal for 12 hours only, even that is too much. The plane is spending 80mins in BEG before the return flight which makes me think that they have a layover here, but three days is also too much for them so idk.
DeleteGruesome loadfactor but probably still a success if you think about all the adverse conditions fot that flight.
ReplyDeleteWinter time, the destination not as attractive as Almaty etc etc.
We have to wait for end of summer next year.
Maybe they turn the flight seasonal.
Better LF than on most OU routes.
DeleteIf that makes you happy...
DeleteIt makes me happy that yet another new route has launched regardless of all the naysers who said it would never happen.
Delete