December will mark the first time in 25 years that British Airways will not operate a single flight to any market in the former Yugoslavia. It also represents the first time in a quarter of a century that the Oneworld member will have no year-round service in the region. Today, British Airways will operate its final flight of the season to Dubrovnik. The airline will return to the coastal city in early March, with services to Ljubljana and Zagreb scheduled to resume at the start of the 2026 summer timetable later that month.
The Slovenian capital was initially served only during the summer season. In 2023/24, British Airways upgraded Ljubljana to year-round operations, offering several weekly flights from Heathrow. Yet, only a few months later, the airline reversed course, discontinuing winter service and returning to a summer-only operation from 2024 onwards. Zagreb, considered the airline’s most stable route in the region over the past decade, has followed the same trajectory. British Airways resumed year-round Heathrow flights to Croatia’s capital in 2012 and built up strong frequencies during peak periods. However, this year the airline has shifted Zagreb entirely to seasonal operations. On the other hand, operations to Pula were discontinued at the end of the 2024 summer season.
After a thirteen-year absence, British Airways restored flights between London Heathrow and Belgrade in late October 2023, branding its return as an important link for both point-to-point and transfer traffic. However, the carrier announced the route’s suspension less than a year later, with the final service operating in September 2024. The carrier also exited Pristina after operating just two summer seasons from Heathrow, despite post-pandemic efforts to diversify its network. Planned year-round services to Podgorica were announced on more than one occasion but never materialised, while upcoming flights to Tivat in 2026 mark a renewed attempt in Montenegro.
British Airways has also altered its approach in Dubrovnik multiple times. The coastal city saw flights throughout the winter reinstated as recently as 2022/23, only for them to be withdrawn again after a single season. The carrier will maintain a limited seasonal presence, but its inconsistency has opened opportunities for competing airlines that have steadily strengthened their winter offering this year.
During the 21st century, British Airways has served Belgrade, Dubrovnik, Pristina, Pula, Sarajevo, Skopje, Split and Zagreb. Recently, the airline announced the suspension of several European routes, including Cologne, Riga and Stuttgart.
Shame. They used to be an important airline in ex-Yu. Now not so much.
ReplyDeleteThey launch, they withdraw, they flip seasonal/winter… zero strategy.
ReplyDeleteThis is all about slots at Heathrow, not demand.
ReplyDeleteThey have enough slots to fly 4-5 daily over the summer to LCA but not 4 times a week to BEG?
DeleteLCA has historical links with UK, as well as two UK military bases.
DeleteYes, Cyprus is a popular tourist destination, it is a former British colony and there is a huge Cypriot diaspora in the UK.
DeleteOf course they have 4-5 daily flights to LCA.
Delete1. Cyprus used to be a British colony until 1960.
2. There are roughly 250.000 Cypriots living in the UK with most of them being in London.
3. Brits are number 1 tourists in Cyprus. For example, in June 2025 alone, 181.610 British tourists visited Cyprus (36.4% of all arrivals).
4. They have a monopoly on LHR-LCA with both Cyprus Airways and Aegean terminating flights.
Meanwhile Serbia and the UK have frigid, unfriendly relations (a long-standing tradition established in 1865). On top of that, BEG-LON is well covered by both Air Serbia and Wizz Air.
If BA wanted to make it big in Belgrade, then they should have copied what KL did.
"Meanwhile Serbia and the UK have frigid, unfriendly relations (a long-standing tradition established in 1865)"
DeleteRather overly dramatic reading of history mate.
But yep, Belgrade is not high yielding enough for BA
Hi Nemjee
DeleteDont forget the military bases. That's quite some government sponsored often good yield travel. Around 3500 soldiers and 7000 civillians working there. (Civilians probl most locals)
But guess what: I prefer not to be occupied and have no foreign military base in my country and I would not even trade it for 50 flights a day during winter timetable period 😉
BEG was an absolute waste of a prime LHR slot pair. Much better to fly to a more higher yielding destination.
Delete^ have Cologne, Stuttgart, Riga and City Airport-Frankfurt also been low yielding waste of slots?
DeleteZagreb and Ljubljana have also been low yielding waste of slots in winter it seems.
DeleteBA are in business to make money, so obviously that cut the weak routes that do not deliver a ROI. OU could step in and fly from SPU and DBV in the winter if it was a cash cow.
Delete@"^" 10:23 clearly enough to be cut so yes. IAG is in the business of making money. Given Heathrow (and LCY's) congestion they have to be ruthless. Flights to the EXYU region are best served with local carriers or low cost carriers.
DeleteAnon 10:30, OU flies from Split to LHR until January
DeleteOur region just doesn't have enough premium traffic to North America for BA to be interested in serving.
ReplyDeleteThat is their main business over the last 20 years.
True dat.
DeleteBritish Airways has cut or reduced several routes in the West. From what I remember they recently terminated LHR-CGN, LHR-STR and LCY-FRA.
DeleteThese cuts go beyond our region.
BA seams not to see much value on this market, therefore there is no strategy for it. That's why LH and especially KLM lately are capitalising on it.
ReplyDeleteBig win for Star Alliance!
ReplyDelete❤️🇩🇪
DeleteYet the ex-YU region will have winter flights to London (LHR, LTN and STN).
ReplyDeleteSo in reality it's not so much about the market as it is about the airline. Before someone jumps and says how we are a low yielding market, airlines such as KLM or Lufthansa maintain a considerable presence over the winter.
I think British Airways failed because they are slot restricted at LHR but also because their service no longer justifies the prices they are charging.
Yes, Lufthansa has also deteriorated their product but at least they have multiple daily flights to key ex-YU cities so they benefit from the convenience factor.
That said, British Airways has recently terminated some high profile routes such as LCY-FRA. This is a good indicator of the current state of the economy in the West.
Go big or go home. British Airways refused to go big (like KL did) so market dynamics forced them to go home.
You can't really compare LH and BA's circumstances in our region. There's a massive Ex-Yu diaspora in all LH-group countries, unlike the UK. On top of that, the majority of our region needs expensive and humiliating visas for the UK. This results in a very different playing field for these two flag carriers.
DeleteLHG airlines loving this!
ReplyDeleteGo 🇨🇭🇩🇪🇦🇹!
I hope the LHG 🇮🇹 airline will start soon to connect the region again. A shame AZ is not in BEG anymore. But not just BEG. They should be in LJU ZAG SPU DBV TGD TIV PRN SKP too
DeleteAt least SLO have their AZ TRS departures
It is well known that the Balkan market at BA is handled by their Sofia office and their only priority is to keep Sofia flights and for nothing to risk their Sofia flights. And this has been the case for decades.
ReplyDelete🙄
DeleteYou can roll your eyes all you want. It is true.
Delete👀
DeleteBritish tourists are not interested visiting our region in the eintery.
ReplyDeleteAnd during summer they just want to go to the coast.
Ljubljana is very popular with UK tourists.
Delete@09:13 untrue.
DeleteThey do visit EX-YU, but they prefer LCC, especially Ryanair.
DeleteThe visa issue needs to be resolved.
ReplyDeleteBA flew to most of the region when visa requirements were even worse and stricter than today.
DeleteThat was pre-wizzair and pre-Ryanair. Back in 2000s getting between Belgrade and London often meant Alitalia via Milan or Swiss for me.
DeleteRegardless of network, British Airways is without doubt one of the worst legacy carriers in Europe service wise. Both on the ground and onboard.
ReplyDeletedespite some of BA's failings, which I don't disagree on, they remain a far superior carrier both in terms of hard and soft than anything emanating from the EXYU region.
Delete^ disagree. Especially in terms of short haul business class service.
Delete@"^" BA's short haul business class which I've used several times this year and I agree it isn't always great. That being said it is no worse than JU which I've also used twice this year and both the ground offering in Belgrade and onboard product is lacking. Best not to mention OU at all...
DeleteIn terms of on the ground I fail to see how Terminal 5 is "bad", certainly in comparison to the EXYU region's offerings. I guess its all personal experience of the terminal and how often one flies etc.
JU offers a printed menu, 3 hot meal options and multiple drink refills in short haul business class. British Airways offers pitch worse than easyjet.
Delete^ you need to learn that nothing from your country is good and everything from Western Europe is superior. That's the mindset of many people. If they served a pile of s**t on a plate in BA they would tell you it's better and that you are being served that for tour own good.
DeleteBA are defiantly not great and defiantly not worth paying for. But lets not kid ourselves that JU is amazing. Both on the ground and service wise its mediocre at best.
Delete@"^" your vile and sad comments are not for this platform.
Delete