Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Belgrade Airport, 1988

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • January28
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia handles 4.57 million passengers as loads average 78%

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia handled 4.57 million passengers in 2025, marking its highest number on record. The figure represents a 3% increase on the year before. The number of operated flights grew by 4% to 48.925. The average cabin load factor across the year amounted to 78%, increasing 2.5 points and marking another high for the company. The airline maintained operations with its own fleet of 29 aircraft. During the year, the network expanded with the addition of six new routes, as well as the arrival of additional aircraft, including the Airbus A330-200 and Embraer E195s. The airline welcomed 253 new employees and internally promoted a further 184 personnel. The economic impact of Air Serbia on the total GDP of the country in 2025 amounted to about 1.4%.

During 2025, Air Serbia maintained operations to a total of 103 destinations. This included 90 scheduled services and thirteen charter destinations in 34 countries across four continents. The airline has announced the addition of six new routes for 2026, including Baku, Seville, Santorini, Tenerife, Toronto and Tromso. Among the fifteen most popular destinations in 2025, based on the number of passengers carried, were Tivat, Podgorica, Paris, Zurich, Istanbul, Larnaca, Athens, Barcelona, Frankfurt, Milan, London, Vienna, Rome, Amsterdam and Ljubljana, Air Serbia noted.

The Serbian carrier is expected to report its financial performance by May of this year when it files its annual report. Speaking to EX-YU Aviation News in December, Air Serbia’s CEO, Jiri Marek, said, “From a financial perspective, the year [2025] will certainly be profitable, although we do not yet know the final result. Performance is better than originally budgeted. That said, cost pressures that emerged from June onwards require careful management. This is something we have also observed across the industry, as third-quarter results from multiple airlines have shown a decline in profitability. While our revenue performance has been very strong, costs remain an area where additional efficiencies are needed”. For 2026, the CEO added, “A lot of things are in the pipeline which are not visible but it will be coming soon”.

January 10, 2026
Air Serbia Feature Results 2025 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    Well done Air Serbia!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:02

    Congratulations Air Serbia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:02

    Sounds interesting

    “A lot of things are in the pipeline which are not visible but it will be coming soon”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      Bravo JU 🇷🇸 🎉🎈🎊

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:24

      Is thew new lounge about to be opened?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:42

      Hell no. Work has not even started yet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous15:28

      @13:42
      Why have they not? Do they need permission even to start the construction? I thought the hold up was no permission for opening it. 😔

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. EX-YU Aviation16:01

      The airline is awaiting for the airport to obtain the necessary permit to begin construction. Even though a permit reqest has been filed months ago, the Ministry has not issued one yet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous17:03

      Don't know if true, but I heard request was made more than a year ago.

      It was published here Air Serbia initially wanted to open new lounge by the end of 2024.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:07

    Bravo Air Serbia 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:10

    Good to see load factor improving. I hope in 2026 that number can go beyond 80%.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:40

      Fleet adjustments and modernisation will change things. For example 4 wet lease A320's are being replaced by 3 dry lease A320's, however 4 wet lease A220's will be in the fleet so overall smaller capacity.

      E-jets entering the fleet is also allowing for better allocation of capacity. 100 pax on the A319 is 69% CLF while on the E195 it's 84%. The E-jets are allowing for frequency increases previously not possible which in turn should attract more pax through improved connectivity via BEG. For example, ATH will see a 3rd daily flight which allows better connectivity to not only the long haul network but also the entire regional network where competition is not really existent if at all.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Mario09:20

    Wow, pretty high load. Good job done JU!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous09:25

    Now, those are some serious numbers, especially in regional context!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:27

    Idemo dalje...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous09:44

    I am certain that Moscow was among the top ten busiest but Air Serbia does not want to list it :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:57

      Why? They were never shy about flying to Russia

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:13

      They avoid mentioning it because there are mental cases threatening their aircraft and passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:34

      That sounds like conspiracy theory..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:40

      ^ stop being an idiot.

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2022/03/air-serbia-sustains-further-bomb.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:50

      Not denying there are some crazy ones in the wild, that article is from 2022. SVO numbers have been published here several times afterwards

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:53

      They have been published by this site but not by the airline. Air Serbia has not mentioned Russia since then. They didn't even publicise the launch of Kazan flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:18

      Svo, Led are their main cash cows, bragging that AMS where they fly less times per week with a smaller aircraft (often Bulgaria) is better compared to SVO that is operated mostly by A320 18 times per week is just NOT true.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous14:45

      The only reason why they dont publish bomb threats is because before each flight to russia they do the bomb check so even if the bomb is reported they dissmis it since aircraft was checked already

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous19:23

      The number of flights to Russia are limited because of mental cases in the EU that are threatening Serbia with sanctions if JU increases the number of flights beyond the bare minimum. Turkish airlines is making a huge profit on these flights, as they have exponentially more flights to Russia. Yes, JU is making a solid profit on flights to Russia because the tickets are very expensive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous09:29

      When you call them crazy you’re giving them benefit of doubt, this was well organized thing…

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:53

    Solid numbers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous09:54

    People forget how small Air Serbia was just ten years ago. For a carrier operating out of a relatively small market, 103 destinations is actually quite impressive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:59

      True dat.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:32

      It pretty much doubled it’s pax numbers since 2014

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:18

      Well BEG has also grown so JU followed that trend

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:06

      Some people having a difficult day today.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:32

      😂

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:17

      Agree

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  12. Anonymous10:03

    The best results JU ever had!
    Well done Marek!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:14

      Well done to the whole JU team not just Marek

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:26

      You are right.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:19

      Exactly JU was growing long before Marek came

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:03

      Actually it wasn't. In 2017 and 2018 they had a decline in passenger numbers. Growth began in 2019 when Marek became CCO nad launched many new routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:25

      JU was at the edge for a number of years. Turnaround and rebranding was planned from the end of 2012. Sustained growth years were 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 when long-haul was launched. In 2017 they had only 0.2% drop in passengers. Those five years fundamentally changed the airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  13. Anonymous10:04

    @admin: how is the LF calculated?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. EX-YU Aviation10:12

      Number of passengers carried versus number of seats offered.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:35

      Does the 4% increase in the number of flights mean that vs 2024 JU had relatively more flights with ATRs and in general smaller aircraft? Or am I missing it completely?
      I'm curious how we had a 3% increase in pax with 4% more flights and load factor increasing by 2.5%.
      Many thanks for any info.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:41

      Passenger growth depends not just on flight numbers and load factor but also on average aircraft size. Despite more flights and a higher load factor, the modest 3% passenger increase indicates the airline operated smaller aircraft on average, reducing seats per flight. And the load factor increased 2.5 points, not 2.5%

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:50

      ^ Thank you, I thought so that was the reason but I wasn't sure.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:05

      Ok so not the standard LF calculation.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous13:07

      That IS the standard load factor calculation. Some of you people truly need help, trying to spin any positive news into some disaster because it does not fit your worldview. Using standard load factor calculation is not something that suits you so you are now implying the figure is not correct. You must have graduated from the Zama school of business. The lunatic running that one also likes to insinuate that figures from BEG and JU are incorrect because it does not suit him.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  14. JU520 BEGLAX12:08

    2027 we look forward to 100 yrs JU and 100 regular schedule destinations with 5 mio passengers and a 80% cabin load factor. But in the meantime we say congratulations to JU. 💐🥂
    Nice performance in 2025, especially the increased load factor and THANK YOU for connecting the region, especially ex YU with the world so well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:23

      With 100 yrs anniversary and 100 destinations I would also like to see 100% LF.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:50

      There is not an airline in the world with 100% LF.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:54

      Indeed. Ryanair is at 92%

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  15. Anonymous13:40

    Great results indeed. Are in these numbers included pax from Kraljevo and Niš? Does anyone know LF on those routes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:42

      Of course it includes passengers from KVO and INI

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:19

      @Anon 13:42 Those flights are paid in advance, PSO, so LF it is not important at all

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:31

      But it influences total LF not in a good way, although the INI and KVO share in JU pax is low…

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  16. Anonymous15:20

    Good for them but 3% is really not much. It's tiny bit over stagnation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:30

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:04

      Disaster lol. Some people... Btw load factor in 2014 was 67%. Good growth.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:39

      For some people glass is not even half full, it is almost empty. Good thing we have numbers to show glass is actually almost full:

      In 2012, last full year before rebranding, JU carried 1.3 million passengers, less than Croatia Airlines. In 2025 Air Serbia carried all-time record of 4.57 million passengers, increase of over 3.5 times. OU had only 1.84 million passengers in 2024 (2025 results not yet available). Congratulations go to Air Serbia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous00:00

      ^glass is not even half empty...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:33

      3% is more than Serbian economy grew in 2025 so it’s above average result. You must put the numbers in some context to make conclusions.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  17. Anonymous16:18

    A Question for informed...
    Why Air Baltic wet lease is better than keeping old A319 dry lease?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:22

      Because an old A319 needs to go for a D check which costs enormous amounts of money only for it to be retired a few years later. it does not make financial sense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:59

      Air Baltic brand new A220's with Starlink wifi connectivity replaced Getjet ~20 year old A320's at a more competitive price to be more precise.

      JU is currently replacing the A319's with E-jets and A320's as part of its fleet modernisation. Airlines are moving away from the A319 with the A319neo not selling well as part of fleet modernisation programs. JU will need at some point to order new aircraft. The wet lease with Air Baltic allows them to not only test the A220's compatibility with JU but also Starlink wifi.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:18

      JU will never go for A220. Non comfortable, stuck between the sizes, too small for classic cargo bundle, completely different type rating of the crew, awfully unreliable engines, with only Airbus name common with other planes in the fleet. Even better to order A319 neo then to go for A220.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous19:51

      ^ SMFH

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:56

      @18:18
      A220 not comfortable? Tell me you haven't flown A220 without telling it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous19:56

      It was almost certain that LOT would order the E2 and then the surprise came with a large A220 order.

      Whats also interesting to see is that airlines are going for larger aircraft and ditching smaller models, OS being the latest. JU ditching the ATR for an E2/A220, A320neo and A330 fleet wouldn't surprise me especially with it's growth and factoring in the need to remain competitive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous21:14

      3+2 seating is far less comfortable than 2+2 in Ejets or E2. LO and OS are blackmailed by EU, doing suicidal moves under pressure. And then OS end up permanently wetleasing same already retired planes. LO will have to do the same. JU won't, of course. We will rather see ATR fleet expansion, then retiring it

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  18. Anonymous16:51

    Just searched, a 319 have parts value 10-15 mil., probably same as aircraft value...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous17:44

    Congrats to Air Serbia and BEG airport for their numbers in 2025. Used Air Serbia BEG-LJU and thoroughly enjoyed it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous18:12

    How they calculated economic impact on the total GDP in 2025 if they do not yet know the final financial result?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:25

      It's an estimate most likely.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:42

      They know it, each company can tell on 1st of January their result for previous year… It’s reported later because there is a form and procedures to do it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  21. Anonymous21:45

    So, what is Decemeber pax number? What is the difference YoY?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:49

      Oh you are so clucthing to the hope that it would be negative so you could have something to be happy about.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:00

      No, I am very happy to see new all time record. But regarding JU December pax no, I could estimate BEG numbers and see if we hit 9 mil last year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  22. Anonymous03:19

    Yesss AirSERBIA!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  23. Anonymous03:46

    2027 with Expo passangers coming in is going to be crazy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:24

      Wouldn’t bet on that and it looks so far JU doesn’t bet on that which is good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:02

      Same old theories, that EXPO is village festival for soccermoms and grandparents

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  24. Anonymous09:27

    Great LF, more than decent results in the very challenging year. Good luck in 2026!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous10:15

    The new record for #pax with an LF of 78% is a respectable achievement for a company in Southeast Europe, particularly in a country still affected by post-war and post-communist legacies, as well as barriers to EU entry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:26

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

New comments are not allowed.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Belgrade Airport, 1988

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

KLM scraps further 300 flights

Image

Winter weather disrupts EX-YU air traffic

Image

Belgrade Airport completes terminal review to boost efficiency

Image

Dash and most legacy Airbuses to exit Croatia Airlines fleet

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026