Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Engine replacement on Inex-Adria DC-9
1985

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • January26
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Belgrade Airport completes terminal review to boost efficiency

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport has completed a review of its security and terminal operations in a bid to enhance efficiency and prepare for future growth. The airport contracted the UK-based EBEA Consulting, which specialises in airport planning and operations, to conduct a comprehensive operational review of its departing passenger processes throughout 2024 and 2025. The airport required a detailed assessment of the centralised passenger security area following recent terminal expansion, alongside its associated passenger flow management. Furthermore, the airport required strategic recommendations to enhance operational efficiency, improve the passenger experience and prepare for future growth within its development timeline.

EBEA developed a comprehensive operational review methodology encompassing passenger security screening, check-in processes and terminal management functions. The approach included detailed site visits, operational shadowing, stakeholder interviews with security management teams, operations personnel and terminal management staff. Extensive data collection and analysis was conducted covering queue time performance, equipment capacity assessment, staffing deployment models, forecast accuracy and system capabilities. Throughout the project, EBEA worked closely with airport operational teams, examining over twenty key operational areas from security lane performance to terminal flow management.

Detailed security process optimisation recommendations were made for Belgrade Airport, covering queue management, staffing efficiency, data utilisation and technology enhancement focused on maximising throughput of existing facilities. A strategic recommendations portfolio with initiatives covering infrastructure optimisation, process improvements, staff development and technology integration was also produced. Iain Cochrane, Senior Manager for Optimisation at operator VINCI Airports, noted, “EBEA conducted a very professional, thorough and detailed assessment of the existing landside security and check-in processors, identifying multiple areas for significant operational and service improvement”.

January 09, 2026
Belgrade Newsflash serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous16:54

    Good

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous17:07

    Bravo BEG 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous17:47

    One good thing that can be said about BEG is that passport and security controls will never take more than 15 minutes total, regardless of how many pax are travelling. Or at least if you have a passport eligible for eGates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous18:41

    EBEA has demonstrated it's ability to optimize LHR and LGA where chaos is a daily routine. So I suggest they leave Belgrade alone. To me this is just a waste of money, consultants charge large sums and the uotput is often questionable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PIR14:47

      I agree with you generally on "consulting" companies. They are part of buerocratic corporate BS and in most of cases are waste of time and money, and very often subject to corruptive deals. Anyhow, Heathrow and Gatwick with their volumes of traffic can't be compared to any airport in our region, even the biggest one. And just btw LGA is La Guardia in New York, Gatwick is LGW

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  5. Anonymous19:27

    Any company that has worked with LHR or LGW should not be hired for anything given the mess over there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TCO20:06

      All that money and time could have been saved and processes improved if only they had asked people that are actually involved in those processes what had to be done when expansion was in progress. They had ground handling company with 50 years of experience but instead they had chosen to ditch them . They could have told them to make bigger sorting area, to ompement airside entry verification system, to implement direct bussing of transfer pax from OSS flights to gates, bigger apron areas where there is space for equipment, bigger deicing pads with several more positions, bigger security area or 2 more to speed up security screening of transfer pax from non OSS flights, gates with possibilities of 2 jet bridges bring simultaneously used for pax boarding....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Engine replacement on Inex-Adria DC-9
1985

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Winter weather disrupts EX-YU air traffic

Image

Skopje Airport prepares for unprecedented growth

Image

KLM scraps further 300 flights

Image

Dash and most legacy Airbuses to exit Croatia Airlines fleet

Image

Air Serbia outlines cautious approach to long-haul expansion

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026