Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT sales office in downtown Split
1976

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • February9
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Croatia's domestic routes in limbo amid PSO tender delay

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

The Croatian government has yet to launch tender procedures for the renewal of Public Service Obligation (PSO) flight contracts, despite the current four-year agreement with Croatia Airlines and Trade Air expiring in late March. PSOs enable the allocation of European funds to support unprofitable, primarily domestic routes that are considered vital for the economic development of the regions they serve.

Under European Union rules, a call for tender for a new PSO period, along with the required information notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union, must be issued at least six months prior to the intended start date of the new concession.

Trade Air has not placed tickets on sale beyond March 28. Four years ago, the carrier was forced to suspend its domestic operations due to a similar delay in the government’s launch of the tender process. Croatia Airlines, on the other hand, continued operating most of its domestic services at the time and was later retroactively compensated for the associated costs.

Routes which are currently compensated and maintained as PSO are: Dubrovnik - Zagreb - Dubrovnik, Split - Zagreb - Split, Zagreb - Zadar - Pula - Zadar - Zagreb, Zagreb - Brač - Zagreb, Osijek - Dubrovnik - Osijek, Osijek - Split - Osijek, Osijek - Zagreb - Osijek, Rijeka - Split - Dubrovnik - Split - Rijeka, Osijek - Pula - Split - Pula - Osijek, Rijeka - Zadar - Rijeka and Osijek - Zadar - Osijek. There have been calls to reform the list of PSO routes, with Rijeka Airport arguing that its limited inclusion in the current scheme undermines regional connectivity and limits its potential to develop year-round air services.

According to data published by the EU, the current PSO contracts in Croatia are approximately valued at just over sixteen million euros per year in total, with Croatia Airlines receiving some 14.7 million euros. The exact amount varies annually, depending on the number of passengers carried. The highest compensation per passenger is recorded on Trade Air’s Rijeka - Zadar service, at 1.350 euros, followed by the Osijek - Zagreb route at 1.000 euros per passenger. However, due to relatively low traffic volumes on these services, the overall annual compensation remains modest. In contrast, the highest total annual compensation is allocated to the Zagreb - Dubrovnik route, amounting to over six million euros per year, reflecting the significantly higher passenger throughput on the service.


February 03, 2026
croatia croatia airlines Feature Trade Air
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    This is just crazy. I don't know what the government is playing here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:13

      They are not playing anything. They are just a useless bunch of do-nothing career politicians.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:34

      Hear, hear! Just like in the rest of ex-Yu I might add.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:01

    They did exactly the same 4 years ago when they also injected money into OU like this year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:02

    Trying to find a way where Ryabair can't apply

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:14

      Ryanair never flies PSO routes (except I think one somewhere in Italy?) and it certainly would not bother with this stupid process for one or two routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:09

      Instead, they should just apply to fly split and Dubrovnik from Zagreb on commercial basis and totally screw OU

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:03

    I feel like giving 6mil euros to Ryanair annually would get us way more than just 21pw ZAG-DBV

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      Without doubt

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:41

      I doubt Croatian government would select a foreign airline and give them money to fly domestic routes. No way.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:19

      The thing is, and what politicians in the exyu area don't understand, is that Ryanair and other airlines in the EU aren't really "foreign". ZAG-DBV is a domestic route for Ryanair, Wizz Air or Lufthansa just like it is for OU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:03

    Irresponsible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:20

      True. Domestic routes are extremely important for a country and contribute heavily to its economy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:37

      Domestic routes with two weekly rotations in the middle of the day, with one stop, and most of them are like that, are important for nothing and contribute to nothing. They are senseless and useless

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:06

    OSI could be particularly impacted by this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      These PSOs seem to be working out quite well for Trade Air since they have been able to add several aircraft to their fleet since they got their first PSO contracts. The lack of a new contract could have a negative impact on them too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:56

      what a stupid comment. lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:08

    But why? Why hasn't the government started PSO tender? It's not like the money would come from their pockets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:15

      I actually think these delays are on purpose. They have started happening ever since Ryanair opened a base in ZAG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:30

      I don't understand it too. Not sure what they are doing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:36

      OMG what a ridiculous comment. The Government is incompetent and has always been incompetent with PSO contracts.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:12

    What does this government do all day so they forget this important way to give OU money?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:19

      I don't understand it too. Not sure what they are doing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:37

      There is nothing to understand. The Ministry is full of party-appointed useless career climbers who do nothing but take a salary and vote for the ruling party.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:13

    Is there any requirement to prove that a route is not commercially viable? If the idea is to connect cities that would otherwise not be connected then some justification should be made.

    Subsidizing ZAG-DBV route is a bit crazy as a route is definitely commercially viable given the amount of frequencies and passengers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:38

      The number of passengers is not relevant. In fact, the logic is the opposite: the PSO is necessary because connectivity is so vital for all these passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:20

    What's more worrying that no one seems to care. Where are the airports and airlines to put pressure on the government?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:21

      You think OU is in a position to pressure the government? They just got over 100 million from that same government. They are counting their lucky starts. Certainly won't complain.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:24

      Airport directors are mostly from ruling party. They are not going to do anything.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:39

      Airport directors don't care because the number of passengers is completely irrelevant to them. Zadar, Split and Dubrovnik have millions of passengers. Rijeka and Pula both have useless management so they don't care anyway. Osijek is the only one that should care but they are too unimportant for their voice to matter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:20

    I hope they do revise the PSO contracts because I think some route are unnecessary while others not included would be really beneficial.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous09:20

    Hopefully they work it out. These routes are important.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  13. Anonymous09:21

    How is the PSO budget set for each country?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous09:21

    "The highest compensation per passenger is recorded on Trade Air’s Rijeka - Zadar service, at 1.350 euros, followed by the Osijek - Zagreb route at 1.000 euros per passenger."

    That's a lot of money for a 150 km flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:51

      No shot there isn't a provider who could fly that route for even a fifth of that

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:05

      Could they just hire a biz-jet for like 8 passengers? Kad se troši, neka bude sa stilom.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:22

    Wow 1,300 euros per pax between Zadar and Rijeka!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:15

      It's a complete scam because there are many busses per day and tickets are under 15 euros.

      Plus the bus is faster and will take you from city center to city center.

      Just another way to funnel taxpayer money into the failing airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:40

      Inform yourself before having an opinion. Croatia Airlines does not operate these flights, Trade Air does.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:28

      Oh that makes it much better. It's always good when taxpayer money goes to a private company so they can fly empty planes around.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:22

    This has really become a mess.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous09:26

    I'm assuming that Trade Air's wet lease of the Saab also ends at the end of March?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      I have a feeling they will wet lease the ETF ATR72 next.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:42

      Or OU will wet lease it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:30

      Excellent timing....
      But putting an ATR72 instead a Saab340 would increase the costs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:11

      @anon 11:30
      Higher capacity means more PSO money ;-)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  18. Anonymous09:27

    Butkovic too busy to deal with this...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous09:30

    That's how politics work in all Eastern European countries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:39

    Can non-Croatian registered airlines participate in this tender?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:41

      I believe any EU-registered airline can apply for PSO flights inside the EU. In essence they are domestic airlines.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:32

      Any EU airlines can bid for a PSO route.
      After local politics will put some clauses in the PSO tender to favour local operators.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  21. Anonymous09:40

    This is not good

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous09:40

    Good luck Croatia Airlines and Trade Air.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  23. Anonymous09:40

    So basically this means all domestic services in Croatia will likely be terminated at the end of March?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:41

      Read the article. OU will keep flying and the government will pay them retroactively after the tender. As for Trade Air, they will stop flying.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:49

      What if OU doesn't win the tender?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:56

      But they will, that is a given in Croatia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous19:42

      Not only in Croatia...almost all tenders won by non local airlines have somehow been cancelled and replayed with small clauses that made the choice "obvious".

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  24. Anonymous09:41

    Start the tender ASAP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:51

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  25. Anonymous09:42

    What a waste of resources to fund Osijek-Zagreb route. There is a perfectly fine highway connecting both cities.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:51

      Especially since the distance is short.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:51

      Indeed. Its enviromentally criminal too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:51

      I hope they do revise the PSO contracts because I think some route are unnecessary while others not included would be really beneficial.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:15

      Such as?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  26. Anonymous09:42

    16 million for PSO? Quite a bit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:51

      One of the lower amounts in Europe for PSO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:34

      But don't forget Croatia is a small country.
      Can't compare Italy with Croatia for example.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  27. Anonymous09:58

    What are generally the loads on these domestic Croatian flights?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:16

      A bit better than on OU's international but still low.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  28. Anonymous09:58

    Would love to see this Saab in full Trade Air livery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:16

      The plane is likely being returned to the lessor at the end of next month so we won't see it in full livery.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  29. Anonymous10:22

    If they started the tender this month, new PSO routes could start by mid August.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:23

      Doubt they will start PSO tender any time soon.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  30. Anonymous10:24

    And Croatian airports were hoping how PSO funding would be increased an more routes introduced. So much for that...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  31. Anonymous10:29

    They haven't started it because of pure ignorance. That's why.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  32. Anonymous11:00

    This is ridiculous giving as PSO main domestic routes ! It's like the Greek goverment giving as PSO routes like ATH-SKG-ATH or ATH-HER-ATH !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:39

      It's PSO to protect OU, isn't that quite obvious? Also it's questionable how many commercial flights they would have in this part of year, for example...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  33. Anonymous16:49

    Someone should be responsible for this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  34. Anonymous16:49

    ZAG-DBV and ZAG-SPU is really unnecessary. I'm sure these can be profit making.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:02

      The planes might be full but can they make a profit?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:02

      PSO for DBV and SPU is just an excuse to give some money to Croatia Airlines.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:29

      And?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:32

      OU also gets some subsidies from local city authorities on these flights too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:51

      PSO routes in EU exists to ensure that areas receive the same air service during the whole year enabling connectivity for local people with the capital for example.
      Someone can from SPU or DBV go to Zagreb for some admistrative purposes or extremely important for medical reasons.
      On PSO flights you see a lot of people going for medical treatments or people visiting those on treatments in the major cities.
      Not only about injecting cash or some kind of corruption but PSO are also important for the living of ordinary people.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous20:23

      How is Rijeka-Osijek going to save lives or help with administation?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT sales office in downtown Split
1976

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Belgrade Airport rail link construction advances

Image

Belgrade Airport to put focus on further long-haul growth

Image

Eurowings to launch new Belgrade service

Image

ETF Airways 737 grounded in Argentina after hailstorm damage

Image

Wizz Air unveils additional new routes

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026