Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Portorož Airport, 1984

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Results 2026 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 Summer 2027 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • April81
  • March83
  • February77
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January30
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Croatia and Montenegro delay PSO funding, putting routes in limbo

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Croatia and Montenegro have both delayed funding for Public Service Obligation (PSO) flights, impacting airlines operating under the scheme, as well as airports which depend on them. PSOs allow for the allocation of state or European funding to support unprofitable routes deemed essential for the economic development of the regions they serve.

The Croatian government has yet to launch tender procedures for the renewal of domestic PSO flight contracts, despite the current four-year agreement with Croatia Airlines and Trade Air having expired in March. Under European Union rules, a call for tender for a new PSO period, together with the required information notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union, should be issued at least six months before the intended start date of the new concession. As a result, Trade Air has discontinued its domestic services and terminated the wet-lease of a Saab 340 aircraft that operated these flights. Croatia Airlines, however, has continued services and is expected to be retroactively compensated for maintaining domestic flights.

The delay in funding for domestic flight operations in Croatia has impacted airports such as Osijek and Rijeka, which rely heavily on PSO services. The expired four-year PSO contract was valued at a total of 78.7 million euros. “The Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure is preparing a new programme and procedure for the continuation of PSO services, with the timeline tied to alignment with European Union state aid rules. The Ministry emphasised this does not represent an abandonment of the programme, but rather a temporary suspension of some flights until the necessary procedure is completed”, Osijek Airport said in a statement.

Montenegro, which had been due to introduce PSO funding on six international routes from June 1, including services from Podgorica to Brussels, Frankfurt, Paris Charles de Gaulle, Amsterdam, Zagreb and Bari, will miss its deadline. The government has yet to begin tender procedures to award the contract, which is estimated to be worth 5.5 million euros per year. The Montenegrin Ministry of Transport, said, “In line with best practice and market testing principles, before introducing public support measures, the Ministry is conducting a market assessment procedure to determine whether there is interest among airlines to operate the routes in question on a commercial basis, without the need for state financial support. If this process confirms a lack of market interest in maintaining regular and sustainable services on these routes, the Ministry will proceed with a public tender for the establishment of public service obligation routes, in full accordance with the principles of transparency, competitiveness and non-discrimination”.

The PSO measures are seen as a means of supporting Air Montenegro, which is facing significant competition this year from Wizz Air, following the airline’s opening of a new base in Podgorica in March and the phased launch of seventeen new routes. “The Ministry of Transport is making every effort to ensure the entire process is carried out efficiently and within optimal timeframes, bearing in mind the importance of the timely establishment of public service obligation routes. In this regard, the goal is to ensure legal certainty, a high-quality selection of operators and the sustainability of the services introduced, which requires careful management of every step in the process”, the Ministry concluded.

April 29, 2026
Air Montenegro croatia croatia airlines Feature montenegro Osijek podgorica Rijeka Summer 2026 Trade Air
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    Could be worse... They could always say that they are going to do PSO and they end up releasing the 10th same tender

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:09

    Well I think they simply don't have the money. Unlike that one poster who claims otherwise, the EU is in deep financial crisis.

    Germany just announced their 2027 budget with major cuts to subsidies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:22

      I see it more as EU pressuring Croatia about this support. Remember the government just gave financial aid to OU and another tranche is coming next year. My guess is the EU said enough is enough.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:54

      Maybe the governments are quietly trying to reduce subsidy exposure without admitting it publicly. Delays can sometimes be policy by other means.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:14

      1. The EU is not in a deep financial crisis. It's not even in a small financial crisis - GDP is not falling.
      2. PSO funding comes from the Croatian state, not the EU.
      3. Croatia is awash with cash and is funding all sorts of stupid things, so lack of money is not the reason.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:07

      "Croatia is awash with cash". LOL. Ajme...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:35

      No, it's just negligence. Happened to them before too with more money in budgets.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:11

    The Croatian PSO will be another copy and paste from previous year. I don't understand why it is taking so long.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous09:12

    The Montenegrin government is only now having a look if these routes could be profitable without financial aid. Why name them then in the first place?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:48

      Ad hoc planning

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:12

    Love the ATR in OU colors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:32

      Hope there will be more

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:14

    "he expired four-year PSO contract was valued at a total of 78.7 million euros."

    WHAT!!?

    That's almost 20 million euros per year! For what?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      Cutting down OU losses

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:22

      Imagine if they gave this to Ryanair. Every village airport in Croatia would have flights for 20 euros.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:26

      ^ true

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:32

      Of course not!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:53

      Well, the islands are so poorly connected to the mainland that it hurts, but there is 20+ millions to spend on kradeze so called "aviation connectivity". This maddness should end and instead high speed railways should be put in place Europe wide. Can you imagine what collosal waste of resources is to fly few people from Pula to Split for instance? High speed boat line with several daily rotations should be operating instead. Cro is the only maritime country that is not using sea to larger extend to connect coastal cities.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:39

      I don't know if RJK is considered an island airport, so essentially PSO includes only one full scale island airport and there are weeks with 0 PSO flights. That just can't justify this money burning.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:16

    It's just incompetence from ministers in both governments

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:18

    The Croatian ministry only had 4 years to prepare for it....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:56

      why PSO contracts don't automatically roll over until a new tender is completed? It would avoid exactly this kind of disruption.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:51

      You do not understand word "proracun"?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:41

      @ 09.56 because the process has to be timely and transparent, at least on the paper.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:19

    Could it be that the EU is putting more heat on the government over these subsidies? That's how I read their response.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:22

      Most likely.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:14

      The EU allows Croatia to do far worse things than this.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:20

    PSOs should support regional development, not prop up inefficient airlines. There is a difference, and too often governments blur that line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous09:21

    The irony is both countries talk constantly about tourism and connectivity, yet struggle to fund the very routes that support access.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:15

      Osijek-Zagreb and Rijeka-Zadar have precisely zero impact on tourism.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:49

      A flight between Rijeka and Zadar is a crime against the environment.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:44

      Tourism is commercial non-essential thing, can't be part of PSO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:26

    Delays could make competition even tougher for Air Montenegro this summer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:30

      Don't worry, they will get state money either way.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:27

    Do I remember correctly that Ryanair called on the Croatian government to abolish PSO?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:28

      No

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:29

      They said

      "Significant funds are also being allocated to PSO routes with very low load factors, indicating that they do not correspond to the real needs of passengers”.

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2026/03/ryanair-warns-croatia-to-scrap-tax-and.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:31

      Thanks, knew they mentioned it recently.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:28

    This shows why airports dependent on PSO traffic need to diversify. If a subsidy delay can disrupt your traffic overnight, your business model has a problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:31

      If so called essential routes can be suspended due to administrative delays the system itself needs fixing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:58

      The bigger loser here may be regional economies, not airlines. Reduced connectivity affects business travel, healthcare access and tourism, not just passenger numbers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:16

      Are you all ok? Zagreb-Osijek flights had 2 or 3 passengers per day and you're talking about the impact on regional economies? Healthcare access??

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:54

      But it sounds professional, full of wisdom.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:00

      90% of people on here don't actually know what they are talking about.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous12:02

      :D:D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:30

    Great thing that Montenegrin govt. just now " conducting a market assessment procedure "

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous09:32

    How will this impact Trade Air? Do they make a lot from PSO once all costs are covered?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:38

      I am also very interested in how much they make from these operations. Keep in mind they wet lease a plane for it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:49

      I doubt it is too much. They are also paying a PSS just because of these flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:39

    Mess

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous09:53

    Maybe this is actually a sign the PSO model is outdated. Instead of repeatedly subsidising the same routes, governments should ask why they cannot stand on their own after years of support.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:16

      No, no one should ask that. The whole point of PSO is to support routes that cannot stand on their own.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:13

      Marxism at its best. Pump funds into bottomless funnels.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:50

      Yes it is, free education, universal healthcare, subsidized public transportation, social and pension scheme... But, for the regular normal average people, it's good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:01

      If ZAG-DBV or ZAG-SPU cannot be profitable you just need to look at the running of the airline on these monopoly routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:27

      Of course they can, it’s fake PSO. Although with not this much frequencies in winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. PIR13:13

      11.13
      Fully agree. Marxism at its best. Simultaneously praising and hypocritically advocating "free trade", "free market", "market economy", "democracy", "rule of the law" and similar BS, which does not exist even in traces, especially recently, with and after "pLandemic" - flu used as an excuse to reintroduce slavery or feudalism the best

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:53

    I am not convinced all Croatian domestic routes need subsidies in their current form. Some could perhaps be replaced by improved rail or road links at lower cost.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:53

    Montenegro may have overestimated demand for some of those planned routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:55

      Agree! I would not be surprised if Montenegro scales back the six proposed routes before any tender is issued. The original plan may prove too ambitious.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:57

      Maybe Wizz Air’s arrival has changed the whole equation in Montenegro. If the market is suddenly more competitive, the original PSO assumptions may no longer hold.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  21. Anonymous09:54

    This is bad timing for Air Montenegro. Just as Wizz Air expands aggressively.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:06

      But is this the best year to expand aggressively? We’ll see.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  22. Anonymous09:54

    Rijeka and Osijek deserve better

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:17

      Rijeka deserves new management, Osijek deserves closure.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  23. Anonymous09:55

    Perhaps this will force airlines to come up with more creative commercial models instead of relying on public money. Not necessarily a bad thing in the long run.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:02

      It's too early for Jasmin to be thinking outside the box

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:12

      Agree. Better to be caesious. Jasmin lion will take care. Dont be jealous on him and his knowledge.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. PIR13:15

      I love you 13.12 😍

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  24. Anonymous09:56

    aviation planning does not work on vague timelines. Airlines need certainty months in advance. Especially in this economic climate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous09:58

    subsidising flights to Paris and Amsterdam is nuts. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:49

      Couldn't agree more

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:29

      Why? Does someone wants to launch these routes?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  26. Anonymous09:59

    these PSOs were never economically justified in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:08

      Good, cause PSO is not economically justified by design.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  27. Anonymous10:15

    looks less like an aviation issue and more like administrative incompetence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:44

      Both.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  28. Anonymous10:30

    Recommendation for Jasmin. Cut now those pso routes. I wrote some time ago to cut specific routes and someone wrote that was pso routes and good income for OU. Now Jasmin can react to cut more losses and to stabilize company financing. Lion knows what is the best,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. Anonymous10:43

    1 more month and Croatian PSOs won't be able to restart until 2027

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  30. Anonymous10:44

    I'm guessing the Montenegrin and Croatian pso are not subject to the same rules from EU?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  31. Anonymous11:56

    wow Montenegro, 5.5m € yearly for six routes??

    and then you wonder how Air Montenegro is "profitable"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:11

      There’s still no PSO in MNE, it’s not OK to justify past results with future events.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Portorož Airport, 1984

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Turkish Airlines reduces operations across region

Image

Lufthansa seeks solution for suspended routes

Image

EX-YU capital city airports shed 82.000 seats in April, most still set to grow

Image

Lufthansa confirms suspension of Ljubljana, Rijeka and Tivat from Munich

Image

Wizz leads as most EX-YU capital airports set to grow in May

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026