Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Portorož Airport, 1984

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Results 2026 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 Summer 2027 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • April81
  • March83
  • February77
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January30
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


TAROM delays Belgrade service resumption

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


TAROM has postponed the resumption of flights between Bucharest and Belgrade. The carrier, which suspended the three weekly route on April 9, had been due to resume operations on May 10. It now plans to restore services on May 12 but will run just one additional flight during the month, on May 19, after which services will again be suspended until June 2, when the route is due to return to its regular schedule.

TAROM codeshares with Air Serbia on flights between the two capitals. Air Serbia will maintain eleven weekly services on the route in May and is deploying the larger Embraer E190 aircraft on an average of five weekly rotations, while the remaining flights will be operated by the ATR 72-600. TAROM also uses an ATR 72-600 on the service.

April 29, 2026
Belgrade Newsflash serbia Summer 2026
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:41

    I think they won't resume it in the end

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:12

      Agree

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  2. Anonymous10:53

    Good for JU, bad for passengers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:54

      Why? Tarom will just rebook their passengers on JU which has more flights so there is more flexibility.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:41

      Because passengers will have less options to choose from.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  3. Anonymous10:53

    They should just give up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Miroslav M.11:04

    I really hope they won't quit Belgrade completely. Serbia is awfully connected to Romania in general.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:12

      Yeah, especially when you compare to Croatia and especially if you take into account that it is a much bigger and less seasonal market.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:18

      I think once more E95s arrive, they will replace some of the Atr routes.
      That's when JU could and should focus on Romania a lot more.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:31

      Romania absolutely deserves more focus. Adding Cluj to Air Serbia's network is a nobrainer.

      Romania, including Cluj (the second largest city in Romanian), is an underdeveloped market with growth opportunities to feed into Belgrade's hub and expand Air Serbia's regional network.

      Growing travel and trade between Serbia and Romania support the route, with potential for both direct passengers and transfers via Belgrade. Cluj-Napoca's role as a business and tech hub in Transylvania aligns well with Air Serbia's strategy for regional connectivity. And Cluj is in one of the wealthier regions of Romania.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:58

      But it is also a market Serbia has no ties to, no historical ties, no diaspora, no tourism and with very limited economic ties. Just saying, P2P demand is very weak

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:02

      Trade between Romania and Serbia is around 2.5 bn EUR, I was surprised with roaming data with Romania when I worked at a mobile operator.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous12:17

      JU is now going after markets with no strong ties so Romania should be among first to look into. And overall Serbia-Romania relations could and should go up.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:19

      There is also Iasi which is a no-brainer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous13:25

      Air Serbia has the right airplane type for routes such as Iasi and Cluj with its fleet of ATRs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  5. Anonymous11:11

    ASL should definitely be more proactive on the Romanian market.

    Once again, you don't only meet the existing demand, but you can also create it.

    That said, it is a real pity for Tarom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:18

      Exactly, look at what LO did in Romania in just a few years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:18

      I’m not aware of that case, it goes good for them?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  6. Anonymous11:15

    atp, just give up and file bankruptcy 💀

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:11

      A lot will have to do that. Ascend just declared bankruptcy, 8 planes and 161 employees..

      They were a UK ACMI operator.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  7. ko pita ne skita12:05

    why dont they just switch to ZAG (where they have zero competition)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:11

      Because there isn't enough demand, OU tried this route

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:22

      For OU it’s hard to find demand anywhere. But it’s obviously not easier for Tarom too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:30

      OU nije mjerilo za nešto

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:31

      Tarom is not old Tarom.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:38

      i hope its not old Tarom

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Portorož Airport, 1984

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Turkish Airlines reduces operations across region

Image

Lufthansa seeks solution for suspended routes

Image

EX-YU capital city airports shed 82.000 seats in April, most still set to grow

Image

Lufthansa confirms suspension of Ljubljana, Rijeka and Tivat from Munich

Image

Wizz leads as most EX-YU capital airports set to grow in May

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026