Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May81
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Minister: Turkish Airlines destroyed B&H

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
Worsening state in B&H Airlines blamed on Turkish

Bosnia and Herzegovina's Federal Minister for Transport and Communication, Enver Bijedić, has blamed Turkish Airlines for the current state of its national carrier B&H Airlines which has fewer aircraft, routes and passengers than two years ago when the Turks relinquished their 49% stake, citing problems with the government. Speaking recently in an interview to Federal Television, Minister Bijedić said, “B&H was used a gunnie pig by Turkish to test the market. In early 2012 the Turkish management ceased payments on loans for the financial lease of two ATR72 aircraft”. Subsequently, the outstanding loans would see B&H grounded for several months last year and its bank accounts blocked.

Mr. Bijedić also notes that Turkish Airlines’ intentions were not all that noble when it came to B&H. “They launched the wrong routes. A total of ten new services were launched and ten were cancelled. As a result, B&H incurred a loss of some half a million euros. The Turks lied to us”. Under Turkish Airlines’ control, B&H Airlines was subleased a jet engine aircraft, first a Boeing 737-400, which was later replaced with an Airbus A319. However, the Turks did not deliver on their promise of providing two jet engine aircraft which would simultaneously operate on behalf of B&H by the end of 2010, as outlined in the takeover agreement.

Following its acquisition by Turkish Airlines, the Bosnian carrier launched a handful of new routes and became the busiest carrier operating out of Sarajevo with a market share of 26%. Today, that share has dwindled to only 4%. In 2012, B&H Airlines ended the year with a profit of almost half a million euros. Last year, the airline recorded a loss of two million euros. Furthermore, the carrier faces significant problems. Minister Bijedić explains the previous government administration signed a damaging deal for the financial lease of two ATR72 aircraft which will likely be returned to its owner, the Hypo Group, in 2016. In addition, over the past year, seven pilots have left the carrier, creating a major operational headache for the small airline which counts only 104 employees. Turkish Airlines has refused to respond to the criticism.

Late last year B&H Airlines, which almost exclusively relied on its service to Istanbul, refocused its attention to nearby Belgrade and closer ties with Air Serbia. Acting CEO Amir Jažić says B&H cannot compete against the likes of Turkish Airlines on their route to Istanbul. However, the CEO notes that bilateral aviation agreements between Bosnia and Turkey, drafted more than a decade ago, give Turkey an unfair advantage in commercial operations. Turkish Airlines will run up to four daily flights between Istanbul and Sarajevo on selected days this summer season. On the other hand, B&H operates only four weekly flights between the two cities. The Bosnian carrier has had a bumpy start to its new service to Belgrade which now operates on a daily basis, however, passenger numbers have significantly improved over the past few months. In March, B&H carried 785 passengers on its flights to and from the Serbian capital. Minister Bijedić remains optimistic that B&H Airlines will find a new part owner which will provide better treatment and conditions than its previous partner Turkish Airlines. However, the airline’s CEO recently warned the situation in the company was “alarming” and that each day was more “distressing”.
April 16, 2014
BH Airlines bosnia and herzegovina Privatisation
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:45

    "carried 785 passengers on its flights to and from the Serbian capital"

    So that is 12,7 passenger per flight, or catastrophic load factor of just 19,2%.

    And some people here try to tell us that this route is making progress and is not so bad now! What is bad for you if 19% LF is not bad?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:03

      Your calculation is wrong. March was still winter season with four weekly flights. LF was around 35%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:42

      I'm not surprised if this is their best route. My flight with BH last week an, I only flew with them because I had to go urgently back to Sarajevo I counted 7 passengers on board including myself. I will see how it is on the return flight in 10 days.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:51

      *and

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:30

      And 35% is also DISASTER!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Nemjee21:34

      It actually is not a disaster if you know that they started out with 2, 3 passengers. ;)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous22:01

      Still it is. Far, far away from profitability. With prices of those tickets LF should be 95% to make it profitable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Nemjee07:45

      Calculating profitability of a route is not a simple thing. There are many factors to be taken into consideration. For example most of SN Brussels' half-empty flights to Africa are more profitable than their packed flight to Washington D.C. ;)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  2. Anonymous10:05

    Typical reasoning of Balkan politicians who consider public corporations their family heritage. It is always 'those other guys' who are to blame, god forbid our divine politicians did anything wrong...

    I also love the way they interpreted TK's superior coverage of SJJ as 'unfair advantage' (Serbian authorities often suffer from similar 'logic'). They sign a billateral with Turkey that allows both parties certain number of flights. Then TK use that allowance 100%, poor Balkan airlines prove themselves incapable of utilizing more than 20% and they of course blame TK. I guess TK should reduce their frequencies to those pathetic levels so that our poor local giants don't feel disadvantaged. Great thinking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:37

      Agree with you except the last bit. TK uses over the allowed limit as outlined by the bilateral but no one cares.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Purger10:10

    E sad, ovi kao da su učili kod naše aktualne političke garniture, pa im je vjerovatno još i Aeroput kriv što oni danas imaju tek 4% udjela na SJJ. Turkish je zasigurno kriv i što im dan danas jedan avion stoji nezaposlen na stajanci, a istovrmeno OMO žudi za linijom prema FCO i IST, ili prema SJJ koju je lokalna vlast voljna financirati, nema letova prema nizu mogućih ruta gdje bi ATR bio više nego dovoljan (MPX, PRG, DUS, FRA, ATH, FCO). Istovremeno avion leti za CPH, najdužu ATR liniju na svijetu, što je demotivirajuće za putnike i svakako neisplativo. Isto tako letjeti sa ATR prema CPH kao konkurencija jetovima Norwegiana, i prema Istanbulu kao konkurencija jetovima Pegasusa i Turkisha i to sa 4 tjedna leta u usporedbi sa njihovih 4 dnevna je više nego smješno. Nije ni čudo da kompanija propada.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:42

      Realno gledano, sa 2 ATR-a oni i ne mogu biti ništa više od mikro regionalne kompanije koja služi kao feeder većim regionalnim kompanijama.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:46

      Koliko dugo će moći uopće opstati na tržištu? Sprema li se i njima privatizacija? Želim im sve najbolje!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Miroslav Milosevic11:57

    Problem is with common peoples sense who thinks there are brothers among world powers (The Group 20 members) who might be out patrons and protect us in diplomatic and economic way: Croats - Germany, Bosniaks - Turkey, Serbs - Rossia. The fact is in each of their respective states "patron state" investors are the worst. Lufthansa destroyed OU, Turkish destroyed JA. Russians did not mess with JAT but i see how "good" they invest in NIS they got for practically free. Forget about "brotherhood" with superpowers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SM13:38

      Now we are going of the aviation topic but I don't see what's wrong with Gasprom's investmant into NIS. They did get it cheep but the price reflected the condition it was in. After that they invested lot more then they were contractually obligated, expanded throughout the region etc. They are making money these days and government is complaining that they keep reinvesting dividends, they would like to see them paid out. #shorttermthinking

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Miroslav Milosevic15:49

      It is about aviation, i remember how Bosnians were convinced that Turkish will make their carrier a leader in Ex Yu. However, a good chance for JU to take over JA and YM

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  5. Anonymous13:09

    Air serbia should overtake BH airlines and start new base in banja luka or Sarajevo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SM13:40

      Might be a good choice (along wiht Montenegro Airllines) but they should get their house in order and start making money first before they look at acquisitions

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Pera Kojot15:53

      come on guys, two bases in 300km range? Ain't gonna work. JU should take over markets and let YM and JA be absorbed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:15

      So one airline on the verge of bankrupcy should take over another two, in even worse state, and all of that on borrowed money?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. aleksandar18:40

      I doubt Air Serbia is opening any new bases soon. They don't even want to start flights from Nis to anywhere also. This would take away from their hub strategy.

      Perhaps JU would take over B&H and have them become a feeder with these routes and cancel all other routes.
      BEG-SJJ
      BEG-BNX
      BEG-OMO (Mostar)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  6. Anonymous19:05

    NERAZUMEM DA BH AIRLINES NEMOZE UZETI 1 BOEING 737-800 ILI JEDAN AIRBUS A 320 NA LEASING.
    TO BISE ISPLATILO POSTO U SKANDINAVIJI ZIVI DOSTA BOSANACA.
    NS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous19:33

    GOSPODINE PURGER JEL BI HTELI DA OSTAVITE LINK OVDE KAKO PRICATE NA AL JAZEERA KANALU AKO IMA VIDEO.
    NS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:09

      Ako misliš na video koji i nije baš nov, taj video je bio objavljen na ovom blogu, netko je bio postavio link. Još nešto, isključi, molim te, "caps lock" na kompjuteru jer ovako pokazuješ koliko si primitivan i informatički nepismen, a za to ti nije kriva ni Austrija ni škola u koju ideš!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:14

      http://balkans.aljazeera.net/video/kontekst-dominacija-bliskoistocnih-aviokompanija

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  8. Anonymous20:20

    KO SI TI UOPSTE DA ODREDJUJES DALI JE NEKO PRIMITIVAN ILI NE ILI DALI CE PISATI SVE VELIKIM ILI MALIM SLOVIMA I KO KOLKO PRAVI GRESAKA.
    NS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:09

      It is really just a question of very simple rules that we all should follow. Writing in all caps is like shouting. And that's simply not polite.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. BA88822:42

    Here here!

    Not to mention that "nemože" is written as two words!

    SRAMOTA ME JE PRIJATELJU ŠTO MI BLATIŠ SVOJIM POTPISOM NOVI SAD.

    SRAMOTA!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Spale23:06

      Sta se deres bre Englez?

      Nemoj sad ti nas, Britanske gastarbajtere, da brukas :) ;)

      JEL JASNO BREEE hi hi hi

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:31

      А о томе што обоје будале пишете латиницом, нећемо ни причати...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  10. Парти23:23

    Ово је блог о авијацији а не граматици. То што се велика слова сматрају викањем НЕ ЗНАЧИ ДА ЛИК СТВАРНО ВИЧЕ!

    @purger

    -Када да очекујемо летове за Загреб? Мени је лично врло чудно што та линија није у овом првом таласу проширења...
    -Да ли мислиш да је стратегија OU о прикључивању алијанси била погрешна, и да ли је то разлог што OU није напредовала даље од feedera LF?
    -Има ли икаквих назнака да би компанија могла у неку врсту фузије са Adriom?

    Да будем искрен, сама помисао да држава као што је Хрватска има компанију која је на издисају, представља једну од највећих енигми EXYU. Иако подржавам твој став о лошој управљачкој политици, ипак је то превелики fail да не видим намеру LF да уништи ту компанију....

    Сматрам те најупућенијим у материју, па зато питања теби. Ако неко други има билу какву информацију нек подели.

    Позз

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Purger00:37

      Penetracijska strategija Air Serbie ima neke zakonitosti. Nije pameto istovremeno pucati na toliko frontova. I tu Air Serbia ekstremno pametno igra igru:

      1. Udarac na slabijeg igrača: Adriju. Svakodnevne frekvencije, dumping, bolja usluga. Rezultat: iznenađujuće brzo povlačenje Adrije sa linije. Air Serbija sada može postaviti isplativu cijenu (još uvijek ne onu pravu koju će postaviti kad osvoji tržište i to radi potrebe konektiranih putnika), LF je bitno bolji jer preuzimaju i Adrijine putnike koji moraju putovati na ovoj liniji. Rezultat 2: Adrija smanjuje letove ka linijama gdje je konkurencija JU, a povečava PRN i TIA gdje JU neće u dogledno vrijeme letjeti.

      2. Najbolji mogući deal sa B&H Airlinesom. Kompanija nije aposlutno nikakva opasnost, jadni su i očajni. Nemaju snage za udarac na Banja Luku, imaju samo 4% u SJJ. I zato im se nudi code-share za BEG. Logično, koristi se jeftini prijevozik (troškovi niži nego čak i u jeftinoj Srbiji), njegova logistika, prodajna mreža, lokalni image, nema konkurencije, odbija se bilo kakva suradnja JA sa potencijalnim protivnicima (LH, OU, JP, OS, TK). Kada se uvidjelo da jedan let za BEG nije dovoljan i da je kompanija na izdisaju, nudi im se da za JU lete neke linije iz BEG. Win-win kombinacija za sve. JA tako dobiva linije koje inače ne bi mogla letjeti zbog premalog broja putnika, a sada sa 1stop via BEG može (npr. SJJ-BEG-SKP, SJJ-BEG-TGD). Air Serbia dobiva jeftine kapacitet koji im i te kako trebaju. Na isti način spriječava suradnju JA sa drugima jer više namaju slobodnih kapaciteta (do sada je jedan avion nezaposleno čučao na stajanci, sa leti za JU), a i održavaju ih na životu. Jer sa jednim nezaposlenim avioniom jure ka bankrotu. Ovako će životariti, ali JU i ne treba u SJJ ništa drugo nego da JA životari i feeda ih.

      3. Istoremeno takav deal se ne nudi Montenegru, što bi možda izgledalo i logično. No, JU ovdje želi uništiti slabašnu kompaniju i vrlo vjerovatno je preuzeti. Pa potom feedati svoje linije uz pokoji visokoprofitabilni let i pokoji charter. Za to trebaju ne više od tri aviona u Crnoj Gori.


      4. I sad dolazimo do Croatie. Ona je najjači igrač, neće sa njom ići lako kao sa Adrijom. Profitabilna je, ima novu flotu (daleko noviju i od Air Serbie), daleko najviše putnika (a tako će biti još bar godinu dana, vjerovatno i dvije), ima potencijala, tek 2015. izlazi iz restrukturacije i kreće se širiti. I tu se vidi kvaliteta strategije. Pustiti ih još godinu dana da se sami urušuju. Istovremeno Air Serbija jača. I potom udara kad je najjača, a dok je Croatia najslabija (ljeto 2015.), tj. prije nego što kreće Croatijina ekspanzija. Vrijeme nije na Croatijinoj strani, ali svakako radi za Air Serbiju. No, predradnje su već postavljene. Povečan je broj polazaka za DBV i SPU, to je penetracija na mala vrata. Kada se Air Serbija odluči za udarac (a to ovisi o stanju u Croatiji) budite sigurni da će to značiti dva dnevna leta za DBV, SPU i ZAG, te po jedan dnevni let za ZAD, RJK i PUY. U tom kontekstu vrlo je vjerovatno zadržavanje i zimskih letova sa bar tri frekvencije za DBV koji je u ovom trenu slaba točka CTN-ova rezanja troškova.

      5. I to bi trebao biti odlučujući udarac na CTN koji bi rezultirao povlačenjem iz SJJ, SKP i PRN, te daljim smanjenjem letova za SPU, DBV, PUY i ZAD. Naravno, isto znači i smanjenje letova iz ZAG za druge destinacije zbog smanjenog broja konektiranih putnika, ali i odvlačenja dijela putnika u BEG. To će značiti i povečanje putnika na liniji BNX-BEG koji više neće imati ZAG kao primarnu zračnu luku radi manjeg broja letova.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Purger00:38

      6. JU neće uspjeti u ovladavanju ovog tržišta ako ovo ne napravi do ljeta 2015. jer za JU i OU nema mjesta na ovom tržištu. Netko mora otpasti, JP već jest. Konačno ovo je jedino ozbiljno tržište za bilo koga, pa i za JU. Realnih 9 dnevnih letova jest više od 300.000 potencijalnih putnika Air Serbije. A ako to uspiju onda prestaju dumping cijene i kreće ozbiljan posao, sa kvalitetnim LF i daleko višim cijenama nego danas (vjerujte, onda ćete urlati zašto je Wizz pokupio krpice). Sve se zapravo svodi na to ima li Air Serbia dovoljno sredstava za ovu penetracijsku strategiju i da li sve teče po planu (ako se gubitak gomila brže od plana onda neće biti sredstava za dogotavljanje plana, a to znači i rezanje planova ekspanzije, prvenstveno u Hrvatskoj). Jer ako ne uspiju isfinancirati ovaj projekt, ako ne postanu profitabilni do kraja 2015. onda počinju problemi i rezanja od strane Etihada. Toviše što uz Alitaliju Etihad više ne treba Air Serbiu toliko jaku kao prije mjesec dana. Sada imaju i drugog igrača za ovo tržište, koji im je daleko važniji.

      7. Jedini mogući odgovor CTN-a je ubrzana ekspanzija prije kraja restrukturacije ili kupovina od nekog ozbiljnog igrača. Za prvo vjerovatno nema sredstava, a potencijalnih kupaca ima jako jako malo.

      No, CEO CTN-a tvrdi da nema nikakve opasnosti od Air Serbije. Bravo majstore. I da stvar bude to tragikomičnija, ja sam 2010. prezentirao plan Predsjedniku RH, tadašnjem ministru i svim direktorima CTN-a u kojem su identičnu priču trebali napraviti da ekstremno brzo dotuku Jat (uz razliku da se sa Montenegrom trebalo uči u deal kao i sa B&H Airlinesom, a ne da se ide na uništenje, te uz davanje franšize Trade airu za neke linije), te time preuzmu vodeču ulogu u regiji. Da se to napravilo danas ne bi bilo Air Serbije jer Etihad ne bi imao što kupiti.

      Priključivanje alijansi prije 10 godina bilo je odličan potez koji je mogao CTN izbaciti daleko iznad konkurencije. Konačno Adrija je također ušla i to je mogla biti prekretnica koja bi koštala CTN. No, ulazak u Star Alliance je bila totalna glupost. I SkyTeam i oneworld bi bili daleko bolje opcije jer na ovom prostoru nisu imali partnera (Malev je tek kasnije ušao u oneworld). Prvo Star ima dva igrača ovdje (daleko jači Austrijan na kojem sve temelji, i Adriju), a i sama Lufthansa je blizu sa nemalo linija. Naravno i Turkish je sveprisutan (iako se to 2003. nije moglo znati pošto je Turkish tek tada krenuo u ekpanziju). Drugo, već tada je bilo vidljivo da Lufthansa proždire svoju djecu (scenarij Eurowingsa, Dolomita, Austrijana, Brusselsa, Swissa). Sad je samo pitanje jesu li SkyTeam i oneworld uopće htjeli CTN ili je Star bio jedina opcija. Ako jest, i ja bih tada tako odlučio. No, čak i ako je to istina, nije mi jasno zašto OU nije izašla iz Stara 2008-2010. I prešla u neku drugu alijansu, toviše što to košta samo 2 milijuna EUR. Izgovor managementa je da bi Lufthasina odmazda bila okrutna i pogubna za OU. A ovako? Onako možeš dobiti zaštitu Air France/Delte ili British/Americana ako pametno odigraš igru. Ovako sigurno umireš. Nešto polakše, ali sigurno. Što je i vidljivo.

      Lufthansa ne kani uništiti Croatiju, ona je samo kani izmusti do krajnjih granica. Cilj: Croatia ukida linije prema LHR, LGW, CDG, AMS, CPH, IST, BCN, PRN, SKP, ali povečava prema FRA, MUC, VIE, ZRH, BRU. To sam rekao još 2009. i javno naglasio da će se desiti, tj. da će Croatia doživjeti sudbinu Dolomita koji lete iz svakog talijanskog sela prema Munchenu, čak im je i baza u Munchenu, ne više u Veroni. I što se desilo u samo tri godine? Ukinuo se IST, sve ostalo se smanjilo i to ozbiljno. No, povečao se broj polazaka prema FRA, MUC, VIE, ZRH, BRU i to ne samo iz ZAG. Za LH hubove leti se čak i iz ZAD.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. aleksandar03:22

      +1 to Purger. Great analysis.
      In my opinion, Croatia is the golden egg for JU. If JU could somehow manage to break into that market, and become a serious force there, it would be the biggest accomplishment for JU so far.

      Another front where we might see JU attempt to capture in the future is Romania/Moldova Market. There are a few airports there that could possibly sustain daily ATR 72 flights. Breaking into the Romanian market might be done at the same time as launching flights to Spain.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. SM07:35

      @purger

      Jako zanimljive observacije.

      Rekoste da ste prezentirali plan predsjedniku, direktorima itd. U 2010. Zanima me, ako nije tajna naravno, u kojem svojstvu ste to radili tj. ko vas je pozvao (politicari ili struka) i kakva je bila njihova reakcija na sve to? Ovo pitam jer mi sadasnj OU rukovodstvo izgleda jako pasivno, zanima me dali je tada bilo ista drugacije. Hvala jos jednom.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Purger08:58

      Analiza od nekih 200 stranica (apsolutno svi segmenti poslovanja CTN-a) naručena je od HSPP-a (Hrvatskih sindikata prometnih pilota, tj. sindikata pilota CTN-a), koji su shvatili ozbiljnost situacije i željeli inicirati promjene.

      Predsjednik Republike i ministar vrlo su pozitivno ocjenili Analizu, generalni direktor (tada je bio Srećko Šimunović) hrabro je odslušao tih 25 sati pa čak neke stvari i nahvalio, ali njegovi podređeni direktori su smatrali da ih se napada i da im se na nos nabija nesposobnost, pa su se svih 25 sati trudili diskreditirati svaku stavku (tu ih je Šimunović višekratno morao lupiti po prstima, jer se jako trudio sa pilotima napraviti atmosferu "svi ćemo zajedno izgraditi bolju CTN"). Pokoji puta to je bilo čak i tragikomično, pa su tako jednom prilikom (2. dan prezentacije) naveli kako CTN drži 50% prometa u SKP, što sam ja već idući dan demantirao e-mailom generalnog direktora TAV Skopje koji mi je napisao da je udio samo 8% (neznatno više od Jata, daleko manje od Austriana, Turkisha...).

      Pozitivna stvar je da su već u idućem redu letenja neke stvari iskoristili (sastavni dio analize je bio konkretan red letenja sa postojećim potencijalima), no, nažalost, puno premalo, ne više od 5%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Nemjee08:59

      The fact that Air Serbia is increasing its presence in Dubrovnik the moment OU is downsizing there clearly shows that people in Belgrade are following what is happening in Zagreb.
      I also like the schedule they are proposing for Croatia this summer. It's an early afternoon departure which is perfect for O&D people while those who would connect in Belgrade don't really care if they arrive late in the evening to various European cities (I am referring to the 17 o'clock wave of departures) as they are mostly holidaymakers or VFR.

      There is also another thing which I found very interesting. When it comes to Air Serbia's regional routes, some of them such as Banja Luka or Sofia have 50% of their loads made up of O&D passengers. This is a very good thing as this kind of passengers drive the yields up.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  11. Парти09:50

    +1 Purger

    Хвала за анализу! Можда ми Nemjee одговори за линију за Загреб.... Просто ми је невероватно да таква линија није приоритет.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aэrologic14:57

      Etihad plans on serving Zagreb through Rome with Alitalia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:04

      Is that unofficial or official news? Thanks anyway!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Nemjee16:45

      Разлог је једноставан, нема довољно Атрова да бих се покренуле све регионалне линије од једном. Бања Лука је пуштена међу првим зато што је то била лична жеља извршног директора, то јест Кондића.

      Мени је јако драго што Будимпешта има солидну попуњеност, знатно бољу него Софија. Занимљиво је то да Софија има доста путника са регионалних линија као што су Будимпешта или Љубљана.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Air Serbia considering new mid-haul markets

Image

Air Serbia gains access to Trans-Siberian air corridor

Image

Lufthansa to suspend Skopje service for part of winter

Image

Belgrade Airport activates new rapid exit taxiways

Image

Ljubljana Airport targets growth of over 5%, eyes new routes

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025