![]() |
| Turkish will focus on adding frequencies over new routes in EX-YU |
Turkish Airlines has ruled out the possibility of introducing new routes in the former Yugoslavia, but will focus on adding extra frequencies on existing services instead. Speaking to EX-YU Aviation News, Turkish Airlines’ Media Relations Officer, Serhan Yucel, said the airline has good coverage in the region, “Currently there are no plans to add new routes, but maybe in the future. Furthermore, increasing frequencies to points in the former Yugoslavia is being evaluated. The former Yugoslav market is important for Turkish Airlines, making a contribution to the airline’s global network”. Turkish Airlines has been rapidly expanding its operations across the former Yugoslavia in recent years. It currently operates two daily flights to Belgrade, Pristina, Skopje and Zagreb, ten weekly services to Ljubljana and Podgorica and up to eighteen weekly flights to Sarajevo.
In the spring of 2014, Turkish Airlines planned to add Dubrovnik to its route network with three weekly flights, however, despite guarantees from the Mayor of Dubrovnik and the Turkish Foreign Minister, the service did not materialise. “Turkish Airlines always gives crucial importance to the former Yugoslav market, considering its contribution to our global network. The mentioned routes have great potential and feed Turkish’s European points, as well as points in the United States” Mr Yucel said. Over the past year, Turkish Airlines has become the carrier of choice for many in the former Yugoslavia. In 2014, Turkish was the second busiest carrier flying out of Skopje and the third busiest in Pristina. So far in 2015, the Turkish carrier has positioned itself as the second busiest airline operating out of Ljubljana and the fourth busiest in Belgrade, despite a 12% decline in the number of operated flights.
Discussing potential takeovers in the region, Mr Yucel neither confirmed nor denied Turkish’s interest in other carriers at a time when Adria Airways, Croatia Airlines and Montenegro Airlines are all up for privatisation. “Major decisions such as joint ventures or acquisitions require a board decision and we also inform the Stock Exchange to inform our shareholders”. However, Mehmet Baspinar, Turkish Airlines’ Vice President for Marketing and Sales in Eastern Europe and the Balkans says strict European Union laws and regulations, which are enforced across the region, forbid the Turkish carrier from becoming a majority shareholder. As a result, it cannot effectively enforce its strategy, as was the case at B&H Airlines.

Comments
One advantage TK has is that its based in a 17 million city which is also extremely popular as a tourist destination.
Especiallly since Erdogan and the AKP fight liberalism and hedonism even in Istanbul.
There are a lot of liberal and open minded Turks (Gezi-Park),
who will have to find alternatives
Why isn't INI shown on fr24? Flights have commenced more than a month ago :(
ExYU residents who travel for tourism fly from their capitals where TK is strongly present. Can you name any non-capital city in exYU that could provide enough tourists and business travelers for at least 3x weekly flights? That is the problem.
If there were such cities in exYU, Pegasus would have been there by now. But the exYU market yields too low even for Pegasus.
- much cheaper place than Istanbul
- close and easy to reach (plenty of flights)
- no visas required
- easy to have fun
Turks generally like Belgrade and consider it 'the gate to the west'. For those who live in Istanbul and don't have a fortune to spend it is a perfect city break destination.
almost 360.000 passengers
between Butmir and AtatĂźrk/Sabiha (better then ZAG-FRA or BEG-SVO).
On days 1-3-5-7 there are 4 daily flights mostly with B737-800 or A321 (morning TK flight). Load factor was 78%.
And I'm sure that ether Air Serbia or Turkish would add more frequencies from BEG to IST.
Cheers
INN-NS
Anyhow, TK would not consider INI because there is NO tourist demand there to fill 2 weekly flights. There is hardly ANY demand over there outside of the summer season when they use charters. You may have asked yourselves how come Wizz did not open any tourist routes from INI but instead relied on two heavy duty "gastarbajter" locations. Well, the answer to that question is also the answer to your dreams of some huge demand in southern Serbia for O&D flights INI-IST.
Your comment is stupid because we are rightfully blaming Air Serbia, not only because they were involved but because it's also an aviation matter... unlike bad weather or sports results.
Strange that they consider DBV and SPU not to work from Istanbul during summer due to visa issues but ZAG is working. Sounds more like Turkish are not interested in seasonal flights.
Should be a lot of transit to DBV I guess thru Istanbul
Jedino da ASL ima flotu od 400 Aviona pa da pobedi a ovako nista ne vredi ugovor.
INN-NS
So why should an institution which is extremely liberal push for additional restrictions? Also, these restrictions appeared the moment Air Serbia started to expand. So yes, this was all about Etihad/Air Serbia lobbying.
I guess when you can't compete otherwise, use similar tactics.
Your attitude is polar opposite of startup thinking. If it was up to you, there would never be Ryanair, Google or Apple.
BEG-TIV 48 flghts per week
BEG-TGD 35 flights per week
ZAG-SPU 33 flights per week (4-6 per day)BEG-VIE 32 flights per week
ZAG-VIE 32 flights per week (4-5 per day)
ZAG-DBV 30 flights per week (4-6 per day)
BEG-SVO 28 flights per week
ZAG-FRA 28 flights per week (4 per day)
ZAG-MUC 28 flights per week (4 per day)
SJJ-IST 26 flights per week (3-4 per day)
Anyway, this whole issue was resolved by Davutoglu which only goes to show that it had big political backing, on both sides.
Air Serbia from 25OCT15 is adjusting operations on Belgrade – Bucharest route. 3 of 7 weekly flights will move from daytime to night-time hours, while the remainder 4 weekly flights sees Airbus A319 operating, instead of ATR72.
JU646 BEG0030 – 0250OTP AT7 356
JU642 BEG1320 – 1520OTP 319 x245
JU647 OTP0500 – 0530BEG AT7 356
JU643 OTP1610 – 1620BEG 319 x245
Source: http://airlineroute.net/2015/07/28/ju-otp-w15/
This does not depend on frequencies. Right?
OU/JU/EY problem is that they sell 2 stop options which they can only sell at ridiculously low levels, considering increased capacity of other 1 stop airlines to East,namely QR. But, definitely always good to have one more option as a customer!