The 2017 summer season begins on Sunday March 26, with Air Serbia set to make cuts to its network. The Serbian carrier will reverse a number of frequency upgrades made last summer season. The move will coincide with a change in the airline's business strategy later this year, more on which you will be able to read in the weeks to come. This summer, the carrier will discontinue its seasonal flights to Varna and Kiev, while operations to Istanbul were terminated on March 14 and have since been replaced by AtlasGlobal, with which Air Serbia has concluded a codeshare agreement. Furthermore, flights to Warsaw will not resume following their suspension at the start of the 2016/17 winter season last October. Tivat will sustain the biggest reduction in frequencies, with the Serbian airline to slash nine of its flights on the route during most of the summer season - from thirty to 21 weekly. It comes as a result of a new codeshare agreement between Air Serbia and Montenegro Airlines, with the latter also to maintain three daily flights between the two cities.
Moscow and Zagreb will see a four weekly reduction in flights, while two return services will be cut to Ljubljana. Sofia will be maintained once per day, as was the case during the 2015 summer season, while Amsterdam, Brussels, Bucharest, Copenhagen, Dubrovnik, Dusseldorf, Paris, Pula and Stockholm will sustain a reduction of one weekly flight. On the other hand, services to Ohrid will see an additional weekly service, while the airline will launch a new four weekly route to Venice from June 1. Seasonal flights to Malta, which usually commenced in June, will now resume from the start of the summer season, ahead of Wizz Air's planned launch of the same route.
Please note that the changes listed below are preliminary and based on current availability in the GDS (Global Distribution System). Air Serbia is prone to making additional changes mid-way through the season. The airline has expressed interest in introducing services to Tehran, Krasnodar and Pristina. Furthermore, the table below displays the peak weekly frequency on each route during the course of the summer season. Increases in frequencies to a number of destinations do not come into effect until mid-June. Seasonal flights to Split, Dubrovnik and Malta will run until the end of the summer season, while services to Pula and Ohrid will operate until mid-September. EX-YU Aviation News will also bring you summer season changes for Croatia Airlines and Montenegro Airlines during the course of the week. Meanwhile, you can review modifications Adria Airways will be making to its network this summer here.
| Destination | Frequency S2016 | Frequency S2017 | Change | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abu Dhabi | 7 | 7 | - | - |
| Amsterdam | 11 | 10 | ▼ 1 | - |
| Athens | 14 | 14 | - | - |
| Banja Luka | 5 | 5 | - | - |
| Beirut | 7 | 7 | - | - |
| Berlin | 8 | 8 | - | - |
| Brussels | 5 | 4 | ▼ 1 | - |
| Bucharest | 9 | 8 | ▼ 1 | - |
| Copenhagen | 7 | 6 | ▼ 1 | - |
| Dubrovnik | 7 | 6 | ▼ 1 | resumes MAY15 |
| Dusseldorf | 8 | 7 | ▼ 1 | - |
| Frankfurt | 7 | 7 | - | - |
| Hamburg | 4 | 4 | - | - |
| Istanbul | 7 | 0 | ▼ 7 | - |
| Kiev | 6 | 0 | ▼ 6 | - |
| Larnaca | 7 | 7 | - | - |
| Ljubljana | 14 | 12 | ▼ 2 | - |
| London Heathrow | 9 | 9 | - | - |
| Malta | 3 | 3 | - | - |
| Milan | 7 | 7 | - | - |
| Moscow | 14 | 10 | ▼ 4 | - |
| New York | 5 | 5 | - | - |
| Ohrid | 3 | 4 | ▲ 1 | resumes JUN16 |
| Paris | 14 | 13 | ▼ 1 | - |
| Podgorica | 21 | 21 | - | - |
| Pula | 5 | 4 | ▼ 1 | resumes JUN12 |
| Prague | 10 | 10 | - | - |
| Rome | 7 | 7 | - | - |
| Sarajevo | 7 | 7 | - | - |
| Sofia | 9 | 7 | ▼ 2 | - |
| Split | 6 | 6 | - | resumes MAY12 |
| Skopje | 14 | 14 | - | - |
| Stockholm | 7 | 6 | ▼ 1 | - |
| St. Petersburg | 3 | 3 | - | resumes APR04 |
| Stuttgart | 7 | 7 | - | - |
| Tel Aviv | 5 | 5 | - | - |
| Tirana | 9 | 9 | - | - |
| Tivat | 30 | 21 | ▼ 9 | - |
| Thessaloniki | 14 | 14 | - | - |
| Varna | 4 | 0 | ▼ 4 | - |
| Venice | 0 | 4 | ▲ 4 | starts JUN01 |
| Vienna | 14 | 14 | - | - |
| Warsaw | 4 | 0 | ▼ 4 | - |
| Zagreb | 14 | 10 | ▼ 4 | - |
| Zurich | 14 | 14 | - | - |

Comments
And that is just a begging. Just wait for some other bad news I wrote.
Air Serbia -46 flights
Croatia + 21 flights
Not good, not good at all
It doesn't look optimistic must say.
That is -11,6%. Huge decrease!
- there would be delay in A320neo delivery
- cuts everywhere
- savings will be top priority!
- even more cuts in winter season
Looks like the situation at Etihad is definitely having an effect on all their interests including Air Serbia.
Concerning other measures they will forced I presume Air Serbia is changing business strategy.
In one of my articles I said that they should tray and if they see it is not working they should adopt and change business model. So, we should wait and see what measures they will do in near future.
382 weekly flights Croatia Airlines
351 weekly flights Air Serbia
Who would say that can happen?
I don't think, I know it will be announced in few days.
"The move will coincide with a change in the airline's business strategy later this year, more on which you will be able to read in the weeks to come".
what could that be?
hybrid airline as Adria?
are they giving up the hub strategy and focusing on O&D from Serbia?
joining an Alliance?
Takodje imace malo obimniji carter saobracaj nego prosle godine, tako da nece moci da racunaju na b733, medju kojima ce dva da odu u istoriju na samom pocetku sezone.
Prije dvije godine smo imali slicnu situaciju, kada su sjekli linije, s prosle pojacavali.
Ne treba da cudi ni rezanje linije za TIV zbog sporazuma sa MA.
Mislim da je flota najveci problem u ovoj godini. Budite strpljivi i ocekujte 2 nove linije od juna.
Jos jedana podrska za Daneta Kondica i upravni tim.
Siguran sam da ce se sruciti mnoge "kletve" na moj tekst. Zao mi je. Tuff luck.
Rodney & Son
Kraljevo + Sydney
Nice schedule, just missing Spain. But probl not enough eqpmt around or not real good slots avbl
After all, Dane predicted this last year when he told the world that long haul with help grow the short haul network. Credit goes to our genius PM for his vision. What a team!
OU is very lucky.
Also known as Jatovanje. :~(
Yes, they need to get rid of the A330. Even BH Air have dropped their plans for NY service and returned their A330 to the lessor. I think that only only ATH beside IST can sustain year-round services to the US in the region.
Greetings from Sofia!
the map of destinations is wrong. There is no more Istanbul.
a330 is already severely underutilized for known reasons of JFK route negative profitability.
sure, there is a cut based on adria's crj, but as I see this will leave some atr's and a319 less utilized as well.
if we don't see some new routes inked in the following weeks (krasnodar, finally zadar and something new) this will mean that they have for the time being ran out of ideas where to strike next and that they probably plateaud with the current approach. ok, they have big switch to sabre in the following couple of months, which is taking much of the company resources, but they need something new.
if i was them, i would be looking for a way to profitability, and as it is they are tens of millions € far from it.
after they switch to SABRE and live through this summer i expect to see some major changes in the business strategy.
let's hope for that!
biggest cuts are:
Tivat - this will most likely the outcome of their CS agreement with MGX. i would love to see the RPK for summer 2017 vs summer 2016. my guess is that cash cow will just get fatter.
Istanbul - ok, this codeshare with Turks could actually be a wise move
Kiev - there is no more adrias crj
zagreb cut is an interesting one. it would be interesting to see if they will give up on zagreb completly.
Varna, Warszav - thanks god for that
Not good, not good at all
Why is this bad news?
Са друге стране резове па још у шпицу сезоне праве они који праве и губитке. Судећи по овим редукцијама биће да су губици већи него што се овде и помињу, али док је год тупавог народа да прогута политикантске приче биће овако
are you sure about all you said? Is that bad the situation? Why they will be delay with the NEO's? What will happen to JFK service? Will it survive or they will kill it?
+widebody koji van sezone leti 2 dana
Pravicete vi svi JAT od blata.
Yes, I am sure, as I was for those cuts.
Situation is not good at all. There is shortage of money for long period now. But it is not catastrophic and with restructuring there is possible exit from bad situation.
Delay for new NEO will be because of simple reason: Air Serbia can not afford expensive new plane leasing in this moment. penalties for delay are less damage than the huge financial expenses that company can not afford which would increase debt out of real proportion for restructuration.
JFK is not possible to kill because of leasing contract and strong will of PM Vučić to have that money burning route.
wasn't the NEO's deal going via Etihad? Isn't Etihad supposed to get those planes and lease them to Air Serbia? Why ASL needs to pay penalties to Etihad?
Also, what is going on with AUH route? Will they drop in favor of Etihad?
There would be no less charters this year than last. Exempt if JU will be forced to do so because of shortage of fleet. But that means even more cuts than from this time-table, so 46 less flights on JU + cuts on AvioLet.
Pa navodno je popunjenost sve bolja, kompanija je profitabilna, znači da stvar pare, znači da je popunjenost dovoljno dobra.
Što ovde ne valja. Ili je profitabilnost lažna, ili je LF netačan. Jer ako nije što režu 12 odsto? Netko ovde laže Radovane!
U isto vreme JU ima 9 aviona više od OU. Trebala bi da ima 40% više letova i duplov više putnika. Ako staviš da OU i JU ima isto turbopropa i A320. Onda ostaje 4 više A319, 4 više 737-300 i 1 više A330. Moralo bi da bude duplo više putnika. Što nije?
Really?
Although it is only 10% or so reduction, which could end up being less with potential introduction of new routes in the summer, we can not ignore the fact that things are not progressing in the past 6months or more, but are in fact stagnating or dare I say - reversing.
It's not all gloom and doom but how the airline end up here after only 3 years?
Well it all comes down to people who are running the business. See, if an employee is responsible for his/her performance, why should some manager be exempt. Because he's backed up by political friends who also show no accountability for their actions? I don't think that is fair, do you agree?
See, when you turn your back and close the doors to your main asset, employees, you are bound to make mistakes and achieve less then desirable results.
Employees feel less appreciated, motivated and in some way cheated. But more importantly, when you disregard the numbers and continue to dig the hole, your only option in order to survive is to make cuts and reduce expenses. Which is probably a smart move at this moment.
Then you overhire and you continue to mix business and politics. Party appointed employees or those paying to get a job are destructive for any business and airline is no different. This airline employs more pilots, flight attendants but even worse office staff than it needs for its size of 21 aircraft. You have front line flighdeck employees who have been completely ignored but are the main people who actually make the business "fly". You create an atmosphere where any office worker is more important than an pilot or a mechanic. You don't communicate, you ignore them and you punish and instill fear. That's not good for morale... Numbers don't lie, except accounting can do miracles when you need them. Other regional carriers are no different. When the government keeps pumping money in the budget you have a management who doesn't care or feel obligation to perform and offten times you have people who are not adequate for the job.
Fast forward today and you have surplus of pilots who fly half the normal rosters (unless you are in "favorites" group), and you have routes that do not perform well because someone in the marketing or sales is not doing their job well. Or because a politicians decide where you fly...
Expenses keep increasing, cost rise and revenues then must go down. Its very simple, and the cure to this is also very simple. But you have to face the truth and be honest and transparent with your self and more importantly with your employees.
A320 neće da stignu, a fijasko sa JFK bolje ne iznositi jer 3 leta sedmično sa tako skupiom avionom najbolje pokazuje kakva je glupost ova linija bila.
But for sure you can not just say "sorry Etihad, we change our mind, those A320 are your problem".
http://www.rts.rs/page/stories/ci/story/134/hronika/2672019/incident-na-letu-iz-beograda-za-london-uhapseno-cetvoro-putnika.html
Let's wait few more weeks to see if they would introduce some new line.
Sigurnost putnika na prvom mestu!
Odmah vanredno sletanje a ne čekati 2 sata!
Wizz neka vozi gastose.
Radim za svetsku kompaniju, znam o čemu pričam.
U pravu je anon. Trebali su da slete...
They positioned themselves as a quality airline that offers a level of service few others in Europe can match.
Making a 180 degree turn on all that to completely different business model in my opinion is crazy. Not to mention very, very expensive.
All operations to Germany may be handed over to AB in order to support the latest restructuring of that EAP member, in a code-share agreement. In addition, JU's AUH route may be merged with EY's flight. In such scenario EY would start using wide-body on the route to be competitive with EK's new service to ZAG.
That would make reduction of another 40 flights pw. JU is facing a tough period.
No. VAR, SOF, ATH, SKG, TLV, BEI, IEV, IST, OTP, BUD, TIA and the Ex-Yu countries were supposed to do that.
In fact the JFK route was supposed to strengthen the short haul flights by providing feed to them. And to help the opening of new shorthaul destinations.
So either something went very wrong during the execution of this plan or the plan itself was flawed from the start.
Either way AZ and AB have nothing to do with it.
Also from flying more fuel efficient aircraft and standardizing the flying experience for its customers.
This really sucks for Air Serbia because their business model probably aloud them to some financial support from the group. Now that this is gone or limited, they are left in a pretty unpleasant position.
Does it make you fell better to mentions OU? Do you feel vindicated now?
I support the optimization of the routes, AS should find a way to be profitable without the backing of ethihad or the serbian government, yugo times are over. This is the moment of truth
Going by the info given, the JU crew did what they could in regards to the above incident. As much as the crew would like to do more, the fact is that crew are sometimes helpless in these situations and nothing much can be done. In some countries, smoking on board is taken seriously, in many nothing much is done. JU crew have no right to restrain pax due to Serbian law not allowing it, which imo needs to change, while adequate training for such implemented. JU have a number of crew from the ME3 which train their crew in restraining dusruptive pax, however as above, have no handcuffs/restraining devices nor the legal right to do so under Serbian law.
Even if they had the right to restrain, the above is still no grounds to restrain. JU crew did what they could, and did a good job. Well Done!
- JU are not reliable with their schedules, as mentioned above, many last minute changes does not evoke customer confidence.
- JU never had a perfect timetable where all flights connected all the time. Additional reductions dont help either.
- JU is late to release flights for sale. With the seasonality of the domestic market, quickly filling seats with lower yields especially for transit pax bleeds money that is already scarce, or non existant.
- Too many A319's in the fleet. JU never replaced the DC9 which is a huge mistake. A regional jet such as the ERJ in 2 variations would solve the ATR issue as well as regional/euro destinations not suited for ATR ops and too small to send the A319 ie PRG, VCE, WAW, VIE, SKG, MXP, FCO. SJJ many times takes on a payload restriction and its their shortest flight!!!
- No proper plan was in place for the A330 as evident earlier in their late attempt into long haul charters. There was always intention to serve PEK, and preparing a reduced JFK would of easily fit a 2 p/w PEK. This boosts ac utility.
- BEG is not an ideal transit hub which doesnt work the most efficiently. Not much to do other than browse over priced shops or relax at cafes partially stocked.
- Pax in longer transit litterally have nothing to do. With the city soo close, JU could easily run 'mini tours' for those transiting over 6 hours. Its a fantastic product that TK offers, which JU could easily implement.
JU is in a perfect location, in a region which is underserved and not well connected. JU in many of its markets has little to no competition yet seems to struggle with expansion and holding onto what theyve built the last couple years.
The qualification of every comment not in favor of JU as "haters squad activity" is the invention of JU's communication department, very much involved in this blog.
Now, even that department is dismantling rapidly - head is leaving in ten days. JU is losing its own people very fast.
Fixed that for you!
What OU have with issues at JU????
Not
And luckily Air Serbia has her own bus company unlike Croatia. Upsss... it does not, they sold it year ago... Aaaaa, pity...
So it is not decline Zagreb and new route to Venice. It is decline Zagreb, Amsterdam, Brussels, Berlin, Ljubljana...etc..
And we are talking about company that was announce how results are perfect, how their system is profitable even this year. Profitable, more passengers, better results, better LF, but still huge downsizing.
I don't know any company that was successful with downsizing. It is always begging of end.
Instead we have -46 weekly flights!
We have name for that:
JATOVANJE!
Predicting that W6/RY would create a totally new market out of INI was not completelly correct. There is an imapct on AS. While there is a possibility that LCC at Nis have created a new market on the traditional gastarbeiter routes like ZRH/MLH/BTS they have endangered the position of JU on markets like Denmark, Belgium or The Netherlands.
However I wish all the best to JU. Glad to see their OHD route is doing well!
Greetings from Skopje
Two big mistakes they made led to this:
1. Should have been a network LCC/Hybrid carrier similar to Air Baltic, JetBlue, Aegean, Southwest, etc from the very beginning.
2. Should have gotten regional jets. If they didn't want two jet fleets, then get regional jets instead of airbuses. Look at the size of LOT and they are almost exclusively RJs.
But you are so obsessed and frustrated with Croatia and OU.
Here's another way how JU can make company more profitable - stop flying to ZAG.
You still live in the past, wake up.
BEG and JU is not the center of the world.