Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • January64
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Adria Airways suspends three routes

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Adria Airways has quietly discontinued three of its routes out of Ljubljana, with services to Bucharest, Kiev and Warsaw no longer operational or on sale. The airline advertised the three destinations in its recent winter season line-up just two weeks ago, but has since updated its press release, removing all mention of the three points from its network. Flights to Kiev and Warsaw were to run three times per week this winter, while Bucharest was to be maintained twice weekly. As a result, Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport will no longer be linked with Kiev and Bucharest, while LOT Polish Airlines continues to maintain daily flights between the Polish and Slovenian capitals, with the route codeshared by Adria.

Flights between Kiev and Ljubljana were launched last winter season, while services to Bucharest were inaugurated in March together with a further six other new destinations. Of those seven, only two have made it to this year's winter schedule - Dusseldorf and Sofia. Services to Warsaw were introduced in 2014, prior to LOT's arrival, with the latter quickly upping frequencies and capacity on its Ljubljana flights. The long-term fate of the three discontented routes is unknown as neither is yet on sale for the 2019 summer season, which will begin on the last day of March next year. Adria has wet-leased a number of its aircraft this winter, including three Airbus A319s to Lufthansa (all of which will leave Ljubljana by mid-December), three Saab 2000s to Swiss, two Bombardier jets to Austrian, and one to Luxair, whose lease contract has been extended until the end of next year.

Commenting on the suspensions, Adria said, "Taking into the account available capacities and given circumstances, we decided to further optimise our operations with the start of the winter season and decided not to continue flying to these three destinations at the moment, namely Bucharest, Kiev and Warsaw. Our long-term goal remains growth, but we want to keep it sustainable and stable and our services reliable and safe".

Adria Airways' Chief Commercial Officer, Christian Schneider, recently said the airline must be "smart" when growing in the future. "We are open to new opportunities and cooperation, but we need to be smart when growing. Before opening a new route, we always focus on a detailed analysis that shows us which markets and destinations could be interesting and sustainable for the company". He added, "We are interested in a destination on the Iberian peninsula in the southwest of Europe, a point in Italy, and more further afield we are looking at Dubai. So far, we have decided to strengthen links between Western and Central Europe with the Balkan region". The Slovenian carrier will take on a further three Bombardier CRJ900 aircraft in 2019 after signing an agreement with lessor Regional One to acquire the jets earlier this year.

November 06, 2018
Adria Airways Feature Ljubljana slovenia Winter 2018/19
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

Anonymous said…
Odd. If they were planning these routes for winter and suddenly cancel them, what could be the reason?
09:03
Anonymous said…
Let's hope at least that this helps resolve their flight cancellations since they will no longer be operating 8 weekly flights.
09:04
Anonymous said…
Oh doesn't matter. Good thing we have flights from Paderborn instead.
09:04
Anonymous said…
Regarding to Bucharest it is great news for JU as it offers best connection between LJU and OTP
09:04
Anonymous said…
Hmmm let me guess, no one was buying tickets?
09:05
Anonymous said…
But it's just odd because they had Kiev last winter and during the summer and they also planned it for this winter and then they just drop it.
09:06
Anonymous said…
Were they hoping no one would notice?
09:06
Anonymous said…
Fighting against WIZZ and Rynair with a more expensive one stop in LJU is not so clever.
09:07
Anonymous said…
Seems they lost out against LOT on the Warsaw route. Shame.
09:07
Anonymous said…
Same will happen on Moscow route against Aeroflot unfortunately.
09:08
Anonymous said…
lol seems like it.
09:10
Anonymous said…
We can assume these were the three worst performing routes in their network.
09:11
Anonymous said…
Seems it might. No cancellations planned for today so far.
09:12
Anonymous said…
That's substantial.
09:12
Anonymous said…
Yes, same story with JU on other BEG-WAW route.
09:14
Anonymous said…
I never understood this. Shouldn't Star Alliance member cooperate more and not compete against each other on the same routes if the market is limited?
09:14
Anonymous said…
Waw and Otp were but kbp was doing well....
09:15
Anonymous said…
It's not just about load factors about about finances. KBP might have been doing well load wise but its a long flight with a long rotation and the prices tickets were sold at probably couldn't cover the route's expenses.
09:16
Anonymous said…
Probably. Aeroflot already used A320 twice in a last few days, on the other hand Adria is now flying with CRJ700 instead of planned CRJ900.
09:17
Anonymous said…
The first indication was Adria introducing free checked in luggage for lowest fare on Moscow flights. It indicates their bookings have been affected.
09:18
Anonymous said…
Smart decision ! Greetings fm ZRH (last weekend 2 flights cancelled..)
09:18
Anonymous said…
Perhaps a chance for TAROM to start flights to LJU with their ATR42.
09:19
Anonymous said…
So not they will have just 18 destination in winter :/ and 21 aircraft!
09:22
Anonymous said…
They are always on time from Paderborn and there is no technical issues with Saab stationed there. Also flights from Lugano for Swiss are operated as scheduled. So, we have very reliable ACMI operator and a total mess with regular service from their main hub.
09:23
Anonymous said…
If it means this is a way to get their finances in order then I support the move.
09:23
Anonymous said…
Half of the fleet is being wetleased.
09:24
Anonymous said…
well if you lose money, you cancel the worst performing routes first.
09:25
Anonymous said…
That was supposed to say *but about finances
09:25
Anonymous said…
+1
09:26
Anonymous said…
Not really. Dusseldorf this morning was cancelled, yesterday afternoon Sofia. Despite discontinued routs still with problems in Ljubljana. It seems lack of crews might be the reason since all the Saabs are not flying and in lots of cases one or even two CRSs are parked in Ljubljana while their flights are cancelled.
09:30
Anonymous said…
Flight crew shortage.
09:30
Anonymous said…
Adria was hoping to connect OTP with the like of FRA, CDG, AMS etc, without seeing that FR and W6 offer huge capacities for as much as 9€ . How on earth would the convince a pax to fly via LJU for 10x the price of a direct flight?? P2P demand is too thin here...
09:33
Anonymous said…
It's slightly faster to go with JP to VIE and then with OS to OTP. Plus you don't have to ride on a 25-year old turboprop.
09:34
Anonymous said…
Well Anon 09:23 check the facts - Lugano-Zurich flights operated only for 3 days, now Austrian is back with DHC8 and Saab is quietly sitting in ZUR. No reason known so far, but something went wrong.
09:35
Anonymous said…
Not good.
09:39
Anonymous said…
Have they also reduced frequencies on some routes?
09:40
Anonymous said…
This seems to have been a rash decision since just a week ago they were saying they would fly these routes.
09:41
Anonymous said…
No. Other routes are operating as planned.
09:43
Anonymous said…
Are Brac and Dubrovnik on sale for next summer?
09:43
Anonymous said…
So Warsaw went down from 5 per week last winter to 0. Wow.
09:46
Anonymous said…
Starting to get really worried about Adria.
09:46
Anonymous said…
Dubrovnik is, Brac isn't.
09:47
Anonymous said…
bojo kmalu spet začel letet za swiss
09:53
Anonymous said…
Considering what is going on with their finances, do you think they will add a destination in Spain and one in Italy next summer? And in Italy, Milan or Rome? (if...).
09:56
Anonymous said…
I guess we will know soon enough. Last year they announced their new routes for summer at the end of November.
09:59
Anonymous said…
Same thing happened with all ex-Yu airlines on flights to Istanbul. Turkish butchered them on the routes.
10:01
Anonymous said…
The main problem for Adria is not having the right yield management and marketing.
10:02
Anonymous said…
JP still doesn't have the right fleet for its destinations.
10:02
Anonymous said…
It is not possible to get crews for SAABs - no one has the type rating. Those planes were leased as part of a money funneling scheme, since the company who is leasing them is connected to 4K.
10:03
Anonymous said…
If you are taking morning flight then it is slightly faster to fly with JU and if you are taking later OS flight you arrive to OTP earliest at 18.00h
The portion with ATR takes only 1 hour LJU-BEG
Not to mention that JU is much cheaper and usually flies with A319 to OTP ( I took approx. dates 05-07.12).

10:04
Anonymous said…
Well, you're a bit late. The Austrian wet lease ends next month, no one knows what's happening with Swiss wet lease.

And there is still no sign of those magical 10 million euros the CEO promised a week or two ago.
10:06
Anonymous said…
As far as you ask me, it's better to get other carriers doing their job correctly from LJU to major hubs. Also ticket prices are more affordable. Can't wait that Lufthansa takes over routes like FRA and MUC - no more ridiculous "codeshare" connecting JP+LH flights where adria still wants to get as much money as they would for P2P passenger.
10:06
Anonymous said…
This really does not look good.

If 4K fails in Slovenia I do not think they will go after YM.
10:08
Anonymous said…
Well, this is it, the implosion has begun - let's remind ourselves, just a couple of weeks ago the CEO was talking about acquiring new CRJ's next year, new routes, new ACMI deals, I was surprised he didn't promise trips to Mars. And now this. Plus, he promised 10 million euros of new capital - which was of course another lie. There is 0 chance Adria will make it through Decembre - zero!

There is also an exodus of foreign FO's, whom they 'occasionaly' forget to pay, thus deepening their crewing issues. When the first supplier pulls the plug, it's game over for Adria.
10:19
Anonymous said…
absolute smart decision. there is no profitable market to KBP ex LJU. WAW is covered by LO and OTP with two weekly flights makes no sense. Adria should focus to run the important destinations without cancellations and keep that schedule stable. they cancelled my flight ex ZRH last saturday, had to rebook me via VIE and will still pay 250 EUR compensation. That def. makes no sense
10:21
Viktor said…
This only shows, how tough is the airline environment out there...small airlines in particular must be very lean otherwise....KAPUT.

10:23
Anonymous said…
finally some smart words coming from JP Management.... greetings JU520 BEGLAX
10:23
Anonymous said…
What is this mess?
10:36
Anonymous said…
I believe they were a bit too optimistic. They probably realized their brand image and perception is worsening. So they can't afford cancelling flights anymore. Therefore, they had to cut some routes. At least I hope that's the reason.
10:39
Anonymous said…
I believe Adria does not have more than 3 months left for bankruptcy. And with these fuel prices, Croatia Airlines and Air Serbia don't have more than 1-2 years for the same end. Tough times ahead, here comes the long expected consolidation of commercial aviation in Europe.
10:39
Anonymous said…
Air Serbia is here to stay, I wouldn't worry about them
10:46
Anonymous said…
I am still shocked how Sofia is doing that well....no comments!
10:50
Anonymous said…
Everyone knows that with 4-coupon tickets to mostly ethnic destinations you can't make money. Get rid of the transit traffic and concentrate on point to point!
10:51
Anonymous said…
I doubt flight crew shortage is the issue. If it was, the flights would be on sale for next summer but they are not, they have been completely removed from the schedule.
10:56
Anonymous said…
Mess on number of fronts - unreliable old aircraft (saabs), crew shortage, money shortage, passenger shortage... take your pic. That's what happens when you sell an airline to a company that has never run an airline.
10:57
Anonymous said…
@Anon 9.35 not surprised. Those Saabs have been very unreliable since they have been at LJU. Lots of mechanical problems.
10:58
Anonymous said…
Some views very optimistic ,some more pessimistic, the truth i think lies in between these extremes. I think that 2019 will become T H E definitive year for JP in regard to its very existence. Even the so called better airlines will have a tough situation.
11:00
Anonymous said…
Seems to be working for JP and JU. To bad OU didn't join the party on time.
11:00
Anonymous said…
I wonder how many people they have had to rebook. A guy wrote here just a few days ago he had a flight from Bucharest to some western European destination with JP via LJU in a couple of weeks.
11:02
Anonymous said…
Agree with above anon. The P2P demand is low so I doubt even TAROM would make it work. Although I would have said the same about OTP-BEG but TAROM is flying something like 8 weekly flights on top of JU daily. So who knows.
11:03
Anonymous said…
+100
This is especially true for small airlines like the ones from ex-Yu. JU has/had the same issue.
11:05
Anonymous said…
Mrcvarenje ce se jos malo nastaviti inace

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoBwRjCiHpQ&list=RDbo4apVcp4_U&index=2
11:06
Anonymous said…
Adria has the least competition out of all the ex-yu airlines. If they can't make it with such a monopoly then the market probably is too small.
11:10
Anonymous said…
Brac was cancelled in September. Was supposed to run till October.
11:24
Anonymous said…
Of course they won't. I think they only plan to take YM if they can somehow find synergies it with JP.
11:25
Anonymous said…
JP prices FRA-LJU are poisonly expensive!
11:28
Anonymous said…
In a real competition world without state aid neither Air Serbia nor OU would make it..
11:29
Anonymous said…
There IS a reason, why there is much less competition in LJU. Because demand is not sufficient. hen egg problem...
11:30
Anonymous said…
Why no KBP anymore? Schedule was terrible but still this connection has potential.
Many new international connections to various airports in Ukraine are scheduled.
Few examples: Ernest will fly from Rome and Milan to Kharkiv from March 2019. Wizzair is starting London-Luton and Vienna to Kharkiv from this month.
The second airport of Kiev: EV is booming with new flights (mostly low cost).
Currently announced new destinations from EV (various airlines): Genoa, Barcelona, Poprad, Tbilisi, Billund, Bremen, Riga.
So many destinations are already covered ex KBP.
Why Adria can't make it. I can't get it.

Will be KBP back in spring? Or is it the end? And that's it?
11:33
Anonymous said…
Imaju pravi vec otplaceni avion atr42. Kad njega nestane bice tesko da drze tu liniju. To je problem mnogih aviokompanija u Evropi nestanak manjih komercijalnih aviona od 50 do 70 putnika koji mogu da se isplate na kracim linijama. Pun atr42 je tek malo profitabilan atr72.
Prosle godine je narucen samo JEDAN Atr42.
11:35
Anonymous said…
To za JU ne vazi,oni imaju prekookeanske letove
11:36
Anonymous said…
I don't think Adria will see much of 2019.
11:36
Anonymous said…
Dubrovnik Needs better departure days. Days 3,5 is not really ideal.
Suggest 1,5,7 or even 1 3 5 7
11:41
Anonymous said…
Transfer flying times and total journey time from both OTP and SOF is shorter compared to JU.
Passengers would enjoy CRJ compared to ATR but JU has more destinations to offer and now free food, which is not so nice news for JP.
11:52
Anonymous said…
This will probably impact LJU numbers.
12:08
Anonymous said…
Well in total it's a loss of 8 weekly flights compared to last winter (WAW was 5, Kiev 3 and Bucharest was not operated last winter). Then again there are foreign airlines that have increase or introduced new flights to LJU. We will see.
12:13
Anonymous said…
5.12.2018
LJU-BEG-OTP 4:35h
LJU-VIE-OTP 4:45h

There is a possibility to fly only 4h but in that case you land in OTP at 22:55h. Not sure if it is convinient especially for business travellers

7.12.2018
OTP-BEG-LJU 4:45h
OTP-VIE-LJU 4:00h

JU price 250,-EUR
OS price 480,- EUR

LJU-BEG-SOF 4:45h
LJU-VIE-SOF 4:40h

Again. there is a possibility to fly only 4h but in that case you land in SOF at 22:55h. Not sure if it is convinient especially for business travellers

SOF-BEG-LJU 4:50h
SOF-VIE-LJU 5:00h

JU price 190 EUR
OS price 500 EUR

I would surely chooose JU
12:18
Anonymous said…
Of course, ADRIA'S S5-AAX - Airbus A319-111 and crews are in MUC, operated behalf of LUFTHANSA. Currently operated MUC - OTP , every single day
12:40
Anonymous said…
Sadly but JU failed in Ukraine too
12:45
Anonymous said…
Such a shame :(
13:57
Anonymous said…
As far as foreign airlines go I think LOT increased flights, there are easy jet flights from Berlin and new Aeroflot flights, plus Adria's Dusseldorf and Sofia flights... if they don't suspend those as well.
13:58
Anonymous said…
All of this costs the airline. If they planned to suspend these flights they should have closed reservations from W18/19 at least a month ago. They have already paid millions in compensation to people for delayed or cancelled flights this year.
14:08
Anonymous said…
They have just written on Twitter that they are suspending these routes to "optimize" their scheduled and operations. lol
14:16
Anonymous said…
Their statement is in the article actually:\

Commenting on the suspensions, Adria said, "Taking into the account available capacities and given circumstances, we decided to further optimise our operations with the start of the winter season and decided not to continue flying to these three destinations at the moment, namely Bucharest, Kiev and Warsaw. Our long-term goal remains growth, but we want to keep it sustainable and stable and our services reliable and safe".
14:19
Anonymous said…
Do you really believe that LH, AF, KL, AZ and many others did not receive state's aid until they become so big?

Once they became huge they invented that state's help is not anymore allowed.
14:24
Anonymous said…
Actually AZ has still been receiving state's support.
Let's not talk about EK, EY, QR, TK and many many others
14:28
Anonymous said…
@1424

Well, they still recieve state aid in one form or another. LH has an exclusive right to use one of the terminals in MUC for over 20 years - a friendly agreement between LH and the operator of MUC, they are of course not connected in any shape or form.

RYR is living of municipal subsidies, which are just another name for state aid. Plus the European Comission is willingly blind to their tax, shall we say, scheme, their labour contracts etc.

So yes, there is plenty of state aid to go around, you just have to come from the right country.
14:33
Anonymous said…
Technically speaking, Slovenija could be compared to Latvia especially when it comes to populations.
Today, Latvija is home to one of the biggest regional airlines in Europe - airBaltic. But Latvija is also a W6 base and smartlynx one.

RIX 2017 figures: 6,097,765
LJU 2017 figures: 1,683,045

BT fleet: 36 aircraft + 1 order
JP fleet: 19 + 2 orders

Latvija GDP per capita 2017: 13 645€
Slovenija GDP per capita 2017: 20 648€

So, there is no excuse for SLO not to reach LV standards.
15:34
Anonymous said…
Just keep on flying core network from LJU without interuption.
15:34
Anonymous said…
Or one or two hours by car (depends which city in Slovenia) to ZAG, and than nonstop to OTP for 160 euro return on Croatia Airlines
15:45
Anonymous said…
@10.21 that's crazy for Adria but turned out good for you, unless you had to wait too long for your Vienna flight.
15:45
Anonymous said…
So if there is a great news for anyone here, it would be OU
15:47
Anonymous said…
OU only flies to Bucharest during the summer.
15:48
Anonymous said…
Nemaju prekookeanske letove nego jedan jedini prekookeanski let za Njujork koji je uveden radi licne promocije Velikog Vodje i po njegovim recima pravi gubitke, dakle suprotno od onog sto tvrdis, jer je jedan let malo da se oko njega gradi mreza za feed
15:57
Anonymous said…
So what? It's still good news for OU during 7 months of summer timetable when people travel more and prices are higher, and that's precisely why they fly it summer only, along with plenty of other routes
16:09
Anonymous said…
I highly doubt anyone is interested to fly to Zagreb only to have to drive afterwards for longer than the actual flight took them. Account into that the price of parking a car somewhere for days, or paying for private transport, waiting at the boarder etc.
16:12
Anonymous said…
Exactly.
You can never be sure what is going to be the situation on the roads, how long you will need to get to ZAG, how long you will be waiting on the border (once going there and once on the way back to Slovenia) etc.
And now winter season comes...During that season BEG and VIE offer the best connections from LJU to OTP with the fact that JU is much cheaper.
ZAG is not on the map.
16:27
Anonymous said…
How many competitors does RIX have in a 200km area vs how many does LJU have? I think that answers your question. Combine Trieste, Zag, whatever pax Klagenfurt has and some Graz and you'll get to the number 6m too. There's just more aiports to choose from here then from around RIX area.
16:34
Anonymous said…
Finally someone who is thinking out of the box and not looking just ticket cost!
+ 100
16:46
Anonymous said…
Also Slovenia has much better road connection with the rest of Europe than Latvia.
17:13
Anonymous said…
But of course. If you go from LJU via BEG or VIE, it cannot happen that you have jammed road, you don't need to park at LJU and pay for parking, or the other way round, friend cannot take you and return your car, not only to LJU but for example to Novo Mesto, Celje, Maribor and so on. How much you are wrong shows the number of cars with Slovenia plates parked at ZAG. But when OU and ZAG are in question, when seasonality didn't work out, than let's try something else, cause, hey, somebody dared to say there is quicker, more convenient and cheaper way than JU. Pathetic, Pathetic, Pathetic
17:50
Anonymous said…
Well, richer VNO and TLL are all very close too, within 2 hour drive. The 3 Baltic capitals have a traffic of almost 13 million combined. Not to mention the secondary airports like KUN:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_airports_in_the_Baltic_states

The total size of the Baltics is smaller than Romania and look at them!

Slovenia must adopt the Baltic or Nordic model in order to achieve their results.
JP should learn from BT.

17:55
Anonymous said…
^you just don't get it. And you are comparing "jammed roads" between Ljubljana city centre and Ljubljana airport to possible traffic between Ljubljana and Zagreb with a boarder crossing. And no one says people from Slovenia don't use Zagreb, but I'm highly doubtful you will see an onslaught of passengers from Bucharest. This route was suspended by the way because of a lack of P2P passengers in the first place. Croatia Airlines could certainly pick up transfer passengers in the summer (depending on how the flights are timed).

I would suggest you think a bit rationally. Not everything is related to nationalism. deal with complexes elsewhere
17:56
Anonymous said…
And btw we are probably talking about 5 P2P passengers per sector here. What gives OS or JU an advantage is that they actually fly this route during winter and their flight times are such that they can connect passengers to western europe (this was the only reason this route was introduced by JP in the first place) not because of the 'massive' demand between Ljubljana and Bucharest which you suddenly think people will flock with their cars to Zagreb when for the same duration those couple of passengers flying between LJU and OTP can connect through Vienna or Belgrade within an hour of landing and reach their final destination without having to drive, cross land and airport boarders, pay tolls and pay parking etc. But you are right, maybe their friends drive them. The nonsense some people write here just to prove how they are better or superior in some way without using any logic is astounding.
18:07
Anonymous said…
And one final note, Croatia Airlines does not operate this route for the entire summer season. Flights start in May.
18:13
Anonymous said…
lol, LH co-build MUC's T2. its THEIR Terminal! svasta procitas
19:05
Anonymous said…
The situation is not really comparable because other methods of transport are a lot more viable options from Slovenia than from Latvia because of its central location.
19:15
Anonymous said…
Didn't Easyjet and Transavia also increase their frequencies?
19:17
Athos_cro said…
E kume. Čitaš mi misli, ali to ti je ono kako se kaže naški: prošla baba s kolačima ili pak u Dalmacija partila ferata.
JP je propustila šansu da bude neke vrste Air Balkan 15 i kusur godina natrag. Da su tada pametno pustupali bila bi LJU ono što je sad RIX. RIX je veza između zapadne Europe i bivšeg SSSR. Lete među ostalim (barem pola godine) za GYD, ALA, KZN, ODS da mjesta na Baltiku (ne samo LT, LV i ES) ni ne spominjemo.
LJU mogla je biti takva ista veza između Europe i zemlja bivše Juge plus Albanija. Nisu bili poharani ratom, nisu imali sankcije, a još ljudi su nekad tamo imali povjerenje u SLO firme.
Trebalo je prilagodit letove letenja, da se ima što bolja mogućnost prestupanja, uvesti letove na destinacije koje su zanimljive našoj emigraciji (DUS, ARN...) i da se mene pita imati call centar na makedonskom, albanskom i onom što razumiju i Srbi i Hrvati i Bosanci. Kako ima u Sloveniji masa izvornih govoraca to uopće ne bi bio problem. Uz to je trebao puno jaći marketing u Istri, Rijeci i Friuliju. Jer budimo iskreni, LJU nudi i dan danas puno više P2P destinacija nego TRS.
Sad ta šansa više ne postoje. Karte su podijeljene između velikih (prije svega LH) i Low Costova. JP tu više se ne može ušuljat.
19:42
Athos_cro said…
PS. Bilo bi zanimljivo znati koliki % transfernih putnika ima LJU a koliko RIX.
19:43
Anonymous said…
Ah, ok, now I got it, if it's via ZAG, than it's 5 per flight, if it's via VIE (BEG deliberately omitted), than it's 50, maybe even 500. However it's always nice hearing from the fanboys you talk nonsense. Cheers!
20:23
Anonymous said…
No you obviously haven't got it at all. Coming from the person who suggested that driving between Ljubljana city centre and Ljubljana Airport is the same as driving between Ljubljana and Zagreb, I'm not surprised. My assumption is that travel between point to point Ljubljana to Bucharest is very low whether you transfer through BELGRADE (hope you got that) BELGRADE, Vienna or the moon. I suggest you go deal with your complexities and nationalism first. Goodbye.
20:50
Anonymous said…
Више је него нула.
23:31
Anonymous said…
Anonymous6 November 2018 at 20:50
+1

12:41
Anonymous said…
sve neprofitabilne linije treba da budu reducirani tjekom zime, a ne samo prosle tri destinacije.
15:25
Athos_cro said…
A ljeti je ok letit neprofitabilno ili?
19:48
Post a Comment

VINTAGE EX-YU


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Air Serbia prepares for “very dynamic” 2027, plans specialised charters

Image

Former Yugoslav airports handle 39 million passengers in 2025

Image

Podgorica aims to regain Tirana’s Montenegro passengers

Image

All EX-YU capital airports set for February growth as Wizz dominates

Image

Belgrade Airport registers busiest year on record

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026