Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport has seen its passenger numbers decline 10.1% in September after Adria Airways discontinued most of its operations on the 25th of the month, prior to declaring bankruptcy five days later. Slovenia’s busiest airport welcomed 172.387 travellers through its doors, while aircraft movements stood at 2.976, also down 10%. Overall, during the first three quarters, Ljubljana Airport still improved over last year with 1.450.849 passengers handled, up 1.9%. The airport expects for its figures to decline between 100.000 and 200.000 travellers this year. Over the weekend, General Manager, Zmago Skobir, said, “It's hard to say exatctly how business will perform until the end of the year. However, there will certainly be consequences”.
| Month | PAX | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| JAN | 103.525 | ▲ 3.1 |
| FEB | 105.470 | ▲ 6.3 |
| MAR | 133.641 | ▲ 3.0 |
| APR | 157.992 | ▲ 0.1 |
| MAY | 170.307 | ▲ 1.8 |
| JUN | 188.622 | ▲ 6.7 |
| JUL | 207.292 | ▲ 4.2 |
| AUG | 211.431 | ▲ 4.5 |
| SEP | 172.387 |
In the coming weeks, Swiss International Air Lines, Brussels Airlines and Lufthansa will introduce flights from Zurich, Brussels, Frankfurt and Munich to the Slovenian capital. Furthermore, low cost carrier Wizz Air, which was to discontinue services from Charleroi to Ljubljana over the winter months now plans to resume operations on the route on December 19. Mr Skobir noted that ČSA Czech Airlines will likely introduce flights from Prague, while a carrier would be found to cover services from Copenhagen “sooner or later”. However, the General Manager said a replacement for Adria on destinations such as Pristina and Tirana are unlikely to be found, while efforts were being made to link Ljubljana with Skopje “as soon as possible”. Commenting on flights to the Middle East, which Ljubljana Airport has been attempting to secure for years, Mr Skobir said, “I believe we'll see the day when Qatar Airways or Emirates arrive. The key question is whether Slovenia as a market is interesting for long haul or trans-oceanic flight. My response is probably not for a long while yet. Market size is essential”.
Almost all airlines currently serving the Slovenian capital plan to increase their operations to the city this coming winter season. Air Serbia will boost frequencies from last year’s eleven weekly rotations to seventeen, while Air France will almost double its flights, from six to thirteen weekly. LOT Polish Airlines will fly from Warsaw eight times instead of seven times per week, while Aeroflot will strengthen its daily operations from Moscow by deploying the larger Airbus A320 instead of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft. Finally, Montenegro Airlines will add an extra two rotations this winter season for a total of six flights per week.

Comments
Three new flights are selling ok, I was surprised to see transfers to FCO.
Emirates?? Seriously? With flights to Zagreb in the back yard. Don't think so.
I believe that's why they bought LJU. To slowly turn it into a Frankfurt puppet.
This is actually the best possible news for JU. They will make a lot of money on these tranfers.
Wizz will do wonders there if they are going daily and offering a good price which both will generate even more demand for the new route.
But on the serious side. Where to would LCC's cover the route at least 3-times weekly with 90% load factor with A319 or A320 high density planes? These are the numbers where LCC's break even usually.
To add salt to injury, you have quite some studies (just read one from Berlin school of law and economics) that examine if economics of relationships between LCCs and airport revenues. It was concluded that the lowering of fees in order to get LCCs is not fully compensated by the higher ancillary revenue (increased parking fees, rent fees, higher sales of hotel/food/drinks, etc.) from increased passenger numbers.
So based on the amount of discount that the LCC would request, there is probably a no-go mathematical situation with the airport. And on top of that every other airline that serves the airport would start to extort the aiport. And airport with only LCCs generally cant be profitable (seen already multiple times).
Remember Ryanair and MBX: they will fly if there are no fees from the airport and the local community additionally has to give them some subsidy.
So generally airports with established legacy carriers tend not to be very keen on a huge LCC presence.
Only in term of frequencies
The Iberian peninsula has so far proved to be a bit of a challenge. Not that much demand for south america flights (transfer point MAD), O&D was more in the direction of BCN, and even there only 2 flights per week were sustained, but then dropped. There isn't that much business traffic, but mainly touristy, so Iberia would have to provide really low prices. And focus on what O&D BCN or MAD. Both can't work in such a small market and with ZAG close at hand.
Italy was a always a disaster. Business connections are huge, but with the northern part of italy, where you are quicker with a car. Italian tourists also drive here. JP has tried it a couple of times, always failed miserably. Maybe some LCC 2-3x per week, but Alitalia is almost a no-go from the get-go. They cover the FCO route from TRS.
As said by others. The next one I think will be SKP. There is business travellers and O&D. But it would have to be 5x or greater per week in order to not lose passengers to let's say JU and such.
Q1
LJU-IST: 21.895
LJU-BEG: 13.108
April plus May 2019:
LJU-IST: 27.808 (-1.532 pax)
LJU-BEG: 11.178 (+215 pax)
I suppose JU has more than doubled its capacity to LJU in recent weeks so numbers should considerably grow.
He and his friends probably think it is still "too early" to do anything related to the situation in LJU after JP went belly up
What would TK say with their 2 daily A321s?
Jesus Christ.
Luckily enough it will not be necessary to fly south and east and then fly back to the north.
LH, OS, LX and SN are all coming.
Not to mention OK which flies to SEL and have a decent A330.
Fraport have a good relationship with FR so my guess is that there might be some new destinations next year: BVA, DUB, KBP, HHN, FKB, BCN, MAD and maybe MLA and VIE.
In fact TK are doing so well, they sent A330 to LJU.
They are currently evaluating a 3rd daily flight to LJU by that time, JU will be out of the game when the LH family arrives.
And that was the moment JU steped in with great rescue fares. I am sure many of those rescued passengers were quite happy with "737".
Mind you, LH, OS, LX still do not fly to LJU and TK did not offer anything to the passengers that lost all the connections due to JP. Not not mention OU - it is comic story.
So, no matter if you like it or not JU did great job and obviously they intend keeping it so. Nobody flies more often to LJU than JU.
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/07/turkish-to-deploy-a330-to-ljubljana.html
wait for 2-3 weeks and not all of passengers will stay with JU and/or TK, cause why fly south to then fly north again if nothing else time-wise. But if pricing will be right they still can retain a chunk of these additional passengers.
it will depend really on how much LH/LX will charge for FRA/MUC/ZRH with connecting flights and how quickly they will adapt the hours of departure to catch the wave for transfer flight onwards.
We'll see, it's going to be interesting for sure.
On the other hand, JP had 2x daily to SKP for many years - to continue to present facts and priorities.
Anybody can make a low fare airline - you just sell cheap tickets until you run out of money. It's the true low cost that is difficult to achieve. Certainly with 50% of staff (as was the case of JP) in admin, you can't have low operating costs.
Airports with legacy carriers not having LCC presence: FRA, MAD, BCN, LGW,... LCCs not flying to major airport was perhaps true 10 or 15 years ago but definitely isn't anymore.
And also as Anon 9:51 noted, it is getting increasingly harder to sell "national interest" in Slovenia.
AF will most likely become agressive, what do you think...they will just be passive¿
So far:
LH - 3 daily
LX - DAILY
SN - 6 weekly
Total: 5 daily flights and no 737s.
LH is a joke with three daily CRJ with 86 seats.
2 CRJ flights were always merged into one 319.
LJU should have at least 3 mio pax+ per year - already at this point.
I can hardly imagine that!
I think the numbers are that large, also because pax were counted twice when they were transferring at LJU?
Nothing beats TK and their elegancy....
It is true that greater presence of LCCs could increase the number of pax in LJU significantly, but I doubt it will ever reach 3 mio.
Also they have the right aircraft for LJU even if it is not mainline .
Their HOP brand is actually very nice .
It will be interesting to see if they send their Embraers also to their other new destination in Ex Yu -
Airbus will definitely have bad loadfactor there in first quartal 2020 .
Ovisno je doduše također o vremenima letova. Ako bi OK letio tako, da bi bilo zanimljivo za transferne putnike iz/za ICN moglo bi biti nešto više.
Ah okay no big deal. Just have one of the largest LCCs in Europe have their headquarters in your city. That is easy.
It took Bratislava over a decade to match their 2008 numbers after the collapse of Slovak Airlines, SkyEurope, Air Slovakia and Seagle Air.
Still don't get the point of considering Slovenia and Ljubljana as any other country in Europe.
It is not, it's a tiny country with a tiny capital city and small business going on. That's it.