Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • January64
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Ljubljana Airport figures hit amid Adria demise

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport has seen its passenger numbers decline 10.1% in September after Adria Airways discontinued most of its operations on the 25th of the month, prior to declaring bankruptcy five days later. Slovenia’s busiest airport welcomed 172.387 travellers through its doors, while aircraft movements stood at 2.976, also down 10%. Overall, during the first three quarters, Ljubljana Airport still improved over last year with 1.450.849 passengers handled, up 1.9%. The airport expects for its figures to decline between 100.000 and 200.000 travellers this year. Over the weekend, General Manager, Zmago Skobir, said, “It's hard to say exatctly how business will perform until the end of the year. However, there will certainly be consequences”.

MonthPAXChange (%)
JAN103.525▲ 3.1
FEB105.470▲ 6.3
MAR133.641▲ 3.0
APR157.992▲ 0.1
MAY170.307▲ 1.8
JUN188.622▲ 6.7
JUL207.292▲ 4.2
AUG211.431▲ 4.5
SEP172.387Decrease 10.1

In the coming weeks, Swiss International Air Lines, Brussels Airlines and Lufthansa will introduce flights from Zurich, Brussels, Frankfurt and Munich to the Slovenian capital. Furthermore, low cost carrier Wizz Air, which was to discontinue services from Charleroi to Ljubljana over the winter months now plans to resume operations on the route on December 19. Mr Skobir noted that ČSA Czech Airlines will likely introduce flights from Prague, while a carrier would be found to cover services from Copenhagen “sooner or later”. However, the General Manager said a replacement for Adria on destinations such as Pristina and Tirana are unlikely to be found, while efforts were being made to link Ljubljana with Skopje “as soon as possible”. Commenting on flights to the Middle East, which Ljubljana Airport has been attempting to secure for years, Mr Skobir said, “I believe we'll see the day when Qatar Airways or Emirates arrive. The key question is whether Slovenia as a market is interesting for long haul or trans-oceanic flight. My response is probably not for a long while yet. Market size is essential”.

Almost all airlines currently serving the Slovenian capital plan to increase their operations to the city this coming winter season. Air Serbia will boost frequencies from last year’s eleven weekly rotations to seventeen, while Air France will almost double its flights, from six to thirteen weekly. LOT Polish Airlines will fly from Warsaw eight times instead of seven times per week, while Aeroflot will strengthen its daily operations from Moscow by deploying the larger Airbus A320 instead of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft. Finally, Montenegro Airlines will add an extra two rotations this winter season for a total of six flights per week.




October 14, 2019
Feature Ljubljana low cost airline Results 2019 slovenia Winter 2019/2020 Wizz Air
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

Anonymous said…
10% isn't that huge all things considered.
09:01
Anonymous said…
Good to hear CSA will come again :)
09:01
Anonymous said…
Without JU the drop would be much higher.

Three new flights are selling ok, I was surprised to see transfers to FCO.
09:03
Anonymous said…
That was the result of 5 days of Adria being gone. Let's see what happens in October.
09:03
Anonymous said…
What a miscalculation on Wizz Air's part.
09:04
Anonymous said…
Sad to see. Numbers will decline further :(
09:06
Anonymous said…
they are obv in talks with Wizz to start Skopje
09:06
Anonymous said…
Hardly a good airline but it is good someone will take over the Prague route.
09:06
Anonymous said…
Well at least they are back in December. But something tells me they won't resume London.
09:07
Anonymous said…
why? they will keep Brussels
09:07
Anonymous said…
"I believe we'll see the day when Qatar Airways or Emirates arrive."

Emirates?? Seriously? With flights to Zagreb in the back yard. Don't think so.
09:08
Anonymous said…
+1
09:08
Anonymous said…
Because they are giving Brussels Airlines (operating from main airport) a nice head start with very low fares. What was the point of suspending this route in the first place? Even the birds knew Adria would not be around this winter.
09:09
Anonymous said…
PRG is a popular destination in the whole ex-Yu and could be working for a lcc (LJU,ZAG,BEG, SKP) but rarely some of them is flying east-east
09:09
SLOWvenia said…
Chisinau airport will have over 1 million more pax than Ljubljana this year.
09:09
Anonymous said…
B733 last night to LJU had over 110 passengers in both directions.
09:12
Anonymous said…
You might also want to compare the geographical position of Moldova to Slovenia.
09:13
Anonymous said…
Those new airlines can't come soon enough.
09:14
Anonymous said…
Interesting what he says about Copenhagen. Who could take over this route. SAS or Norwegian?
09:15
Anonymous said…
We need more LCCs.
09:16
Anonymous said…
But an LCC would mean B737-800 or A320. Would there really be so much demand between Prague and Ljubljana to have a LF of 90%+ on this route?
09:17
Anonymous said…
October will be an absolute disaster. Things should improve in November.
09:17
Anonymous said…
Time running out to set up a new national airline with all these foreign companies picking up routes.
09:18
Anonymous said…
SN will be killed on the route by Wizz.
09:19
Anonymous said…
Airport should offer incentives to other airlines which could step in to replace Adria. In my opinion they should strike a deal with either Wizz Air or Ryanair so as to have a base there.
09:20
Anonymous said…
On top of that Moldova has a significant diaspora.
09:21
Anonymous said…
SN is selling tickets for 75 euros return. They are competitive.
09:21
Anonymous said…
Thank goodness. Really don't want to finance another airline that will be "restructuring" in 2 years time.
09:22
Anonymous said…
Their costs are much higher than Wizz Air though. They might not be able to make money from 75 euro tickets.
09:23
Anonymous said…
I do not get why LCC are so weak at LJU. Maybe Ljubljana could have capitalised on the fact that most low costers are avoiding Zagreb.
09:23
Anonymous said…
Slovenia is wealthier and has a larger and wealthier catchment area.
09:23
Anonymous said…
Such a shame after really good figures up until this point.
09:23
Anonymous said…
Yes and that's why many people fly from Venice, Trieste and Zagreb where there is greater choice and many people can drive a short distance by car to numerous European capitals.
09:25
Anonymous said…
Where is Eurowings??
09:27
Anonymous said…
There are still a number of airlines Ljubljana could try to attract like KLM, Iberia, SAS, Alitalia....
09:27
Anonymous said…
For Fraport it's better to fly us (Slovenians) over Frankfurt where they can sell us some sausages at the airport. Even flying to Rome, you have to fly over some hub.

I believe that's why they bought LJU. To slowly turn it into a Frankfurt puppet.
09:28
Anonymous said…
LJU airport fees are quite high (including things out of LJU's control like fuel) and the market is relatively small and in close proximity to more affordable airports. So it is not surprising why a lot of foreign carriers are avoiding LJU.
09:29
Anonymous said…
So maybe we can expect growth again in November?
09:29
Anonymous said…
a Wizz base is not imppossible now
09:30
Anonymous said…
LJU will bounce back.
09:30
Anonymous said…
No way.
09:31
Anonymous said…
Unfortunately Ljubljana's numbers won't improve until the end of the year.
09:32
Anonymous said…
Trying to fix its financial disaster.
09:33
Anonymous said…
SN is selling tickets for 75€ Return- They won´t be there next winter, unless they find 150pax per flight paying 100€ on average one way.
09:33
Anonymous said…
Yes, would be smarter to secure flights to Vienna first.
09:33
Anonymous said…
"However, the General Manager said a replacement for Adria on destinations such as Pristina and Tirana are unlikely to be found..."

This is actually the best possible news for JU. They will make a lot of money on these tranfers.
09:33
Anonymous said…
Let's not forget the possibility of Windrose from Kiev this winter :D
09:34
Anonymous said…
If LJU management was smart they would try to strike a deal with them ASAP.
09:34
Anonymous said…
Especially from Priština :)
09:38
Anonymous said…
Skobir is known as a man whose predictions and statements should be ignored. As long as I can remember he has been working on establishing routes to the Iberian peninsula, Italy, Scandinavia and so on.
09:39
Anonymous said…
Result of over reliance on one airline.
09:39
Anonymous said…
I'm surprised Turkish Airlines hasn't done much.
09:40
Anonymous said…
It would yet another subsidized route since the A320 is too big. Also they could fly maximum two times per week so business passengers would still fly via BEG.
09:42
Anonymous said…
Haha! Loved this, plus SKP seems to be much more imporant than Amsterdam, Madrid, Barcelona, Rome, I should not continue...
09:43
Anonymous said…
PRN traffic will fly on INI-LJU.
09:43
Anonymous said…
Well at least the residents in Brnik who were bitching and yelling about the noise earlier this year can now sleep soundly.
09:46
Anonymous said…
Well I doubt TK carries many people from Slovenia to western Europe where Adria flew to. So little need to react.
09:47
Anonymous said…
+1
09:47
Anonymous said…
Not to mention that their flight times suck so there isn't much to connect to.
09:48
Anonymous said…
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/05/public-urges-noise-reduction-at.html
09:48
Anonymous said…
Late Christmas this year will surely not help them boost their numbers. Too early to judge the full effect of JPs demise but 10% is not so bad for 10 days of Adria's agony in September given their market share there but then again market is very small and little changes produce huge percentages. October will show the full effect but hopefully numbers will stabilize in November. This time next year no one will think about this shame.
09:49
Anonymous said…
Plus JU stepped in much faster and they took over the market to the Balkans from Slovenia. While TK was sleeping JU stole its lunch.You snooze you lose.
09:49
Anonymous said…
Hahahahahahahahah
09:50
Anonymous said…
I think the majority of slo taxpayers are cheering for as much foreign airlines as soon as possible. Now even the average joes started to notice that every time there is a debate about strategic and/or national interest they have to hold on to their wallets.
09:51
Anonymous said…
aha
09:55
Anonymous said…
So will JU become the busiest airline in LJU in terms of passengers and frequencies?
09:56
Anonymous said…
well obv it is
09:56
Anonymous said…
except there is none according Skobir
09:57
Anonymous said…
Improvement in November? Highly unlikely.
09:59
Anonymous said…
Yeah, it's getting really busy in LJU. So many new destinations, people just can't make up their mind where to fly next :D.
10:01
Anonymous said…
Or for years to come.
10:01
Anonymous said…
Why shouldn’t be SKP important for LJU? The market is obviously there since there is a solid O&D demand with the perfect mix of Business, Tourist and VFR traffic from both sides, the key for the success of a route on the long run.

Wizz will do wonders there if they are going daily and offering a good price which both will generate even more demand for the new route.
10:03
Anonymous said…
well JP was in reality a LCC: average income from 1 ticket sold was 115 EUR. For example Ryanair's is 110 EUR I believe. And both really had no service on board. And if we account in that JP had a "business" class, where tickets were more expensive, the horse-wagon class was therefore even more low in the income scale :)

But on the serious side. Where to would LCC's cover the route at least 3-times weekly with 90% load factor with A319 or A320 high density planes? These are the numbers where LCC's break even usually.

To add salt to injury, you have quite some studies (just read one from Berlin school of law and economics) that examine if economics of relationships between LCCs and airport revenues. It was concluded that the lowering of fees in order to get LCCs is not fully compensated by the higher ancillary revenue (increased parking fees, rent fees, higher sales of hotel/food/drinks, etc.) from increased passenger numbers.

So based on the amount of discount that the LCC would request, there is probably a no-go mathematical situation with the airport. And on top of that every other airline that serves the airport would start to extort the aiport. And airport with only LCCs generally cant be profitable (seen already multiple times).

Remember Ryanair and MBX: they will fly if there are no fees from the airport and the local community additionally has to give them some subsidy.

So generally airports with established legacy carriers tend not to be very keen on a huge LCC presence.
10:03
Anonymous said…
Wrong. Traffic figures will be affected for years to come.
10:03
Anonymous said…
Daily SKP-LJU on the high density A320? LOL
10:04
Anonymous said…
No in term of passengers.

Only in term of frequencies
10:05
Anonymous said…
With so many A319s and B733s sent to LJU and the noon flights selling well as well as full flights from INI, I think they might become number 1 soon.
10:12
Anonymous said…
keep calm INI boy. if Wizz can feel 3 A320 with 5k macedonians on Malta imagine it how much would they need for 40k macedonians in SLO
10:17
Anonymous said…
Who is number 1 anyway now that Adria is gone?
10:23
Anonymous said…
In my opinion October will perform the worst. At the same time it will be interesting to see if Zagreb benefited in October because of Adria's bankruptcy.
10:27
Anonymous said…
KLM is already here - in the form of Transavia. Also increasing frequency. They would switch to mainline KLM only if they would conclude that they would have a lot of transfers for long haul or sell many business tickets. And the likelyhood of this in the short-ish term is small.

The Iberian peninsula has so far proved to be a bit of a challenge. Not that much demand for south america flights (transfer point MAD), O&D was more in the direction of BCN, and even there only 2 flights per week were sustained, but then dropped. There isn't that much business traffic, but mainly touristy, so Iberia would have to provide really low prices. And focus on what O&D BCN or MAD. Both can't work in such a small market and with ZAG close at hand.

Italy was a always a disaster. Business connections are huge, but with the northern part of italy, where you are quicker with a car. Italian tourists also drive here. JP has tried it a couple of times, always failed miserably. Maybe some LCC 2-3x per week, but Alitalia is almost a no-go from the get-go. They cover the FCO route from TRS.

As said by others. The next one I think will be SKP. There is business travellers and O&D. But it would have to be 5x or greater per week in order to not lose passengers to let's say JU and such.

10:33
Anonymous said…
lol
10:37
Nemjee said…
Will be interesting to see JU numbers at the end of 2019.

Q1
LJU-IST: 21.895
LJU-BEG: 13.108

April plus May 2019:

LJU-IST: 27.808 (-1.532 pax)
LJU-BEG: 11.178 (+215 pax)

I suppose JU has more than doubled its capacity to LJU in recent weeks so numbers should considerably grow.

10:48
Anonymous said…
now just wait for the 40 or 60 LJU employees whose contracts were not prolonged, that they will be protesting for the government to establish a state-owned additional airport :D
10:50
Anonymous said…
It will take at least 5 years for LJU to see those passenger numbers again. Remember, most of Adria passengers were transfers, so even if LJU manages to find airlines to operate to the main hubsn in Europe, the passengers transferring in LJU have disappeared. And lack of transfer passengers will make it more difficult for the newcomers to operate those routes financially.
11:04
Anonymous said…
Aha what Anon 09.55, could you present some arguments maybe?
11:05
Anonymous said…
Anon 10.17 you are making a condescending comment towards INI when it's the one that has flights to LJU while SKP doesn't. That's enough to indicate who has a bigger priority. If the market was that large Wizz would already launch LJU from SKP. So I am not the one who needs to calm down, I am just presenting facts here.
11:06
Anonymous said…
Why are you laughing Anon 10.37? TK stayed the same while JU boomed.
11:07
Anonymous said…
I am surprised LO is sending E75 to LJU. I thought with JP gone they would be able to fill E95.
11:10
Anonymous said…
He is laughing as he can't accept the fact JU reacted so good and fast.

He and his friends probably think it is still "too early" to do anything related to the situation in LJU after JP went belly up
11:31
Anonymous said…
Wonder what CSA will use to LJU. ATR72?
11:45
Anonymous said…
That's the only aircraft that they have that would make sense on this route.
11:54
Bel Cielo said…
OMG! TK will burst into tears now that JU took over the Slovenian market.Get serious please. The financial figures between JU and TK are not comparable.
12:19
Anonymous said…
As if LJU wouldn't survive without the JU 737 :D
What would TK say with their 2 daily A321s?
Jesus Christ.
Luckily enough it will not be necessary to fly south and east and then fly back to the north.
LH, OS, LX and SN are all coming.
Not to mention OK which flies to SEL and have a decent A330.
12:25
Anonymous said…
Might want to scrub up on your facts a bit. OK no longer flies to Seoul and neither does it have an A330. And this has been the case for a year now. Experts.
12:28
Anonymous said…
Yet JU keeps on flying full to LJU despite what you write on here. Your hate towards JU is making you blind to certain facts. ;) Look at Nemjee post, TK numbers are actually going down in LJU.
12:28
Anonymous said…
There is nothing to panic and those red figures are temporary. We saw the same thing with BUD and look where it is now. People even forgot who Malév is.
Fraport have a good relationship with FR so my guess is that there might be some new destinations next year: BVA, DUB, KBP, HHN, FKB, BCN, MAD and maybe MLA and VIE.
12:29
Anonymous said…
The report Nemjee is using is not accurate because he´s using a free version of the software.
In fact TK are doing so well, they sent A330 to LJU.
They are currently evaluating a 3rd daily flight to LJU by that time, JU will be out of the game when the LH family arrives.
12:36
Anonymous said…
Ah yes LH family with its horde of CRJs? :D As if they will be a threat to JU, they did just fine even when JP was around and they will do even better now when they are gone because LH will not fly passengers at a loss like JP did. First sign of this is that OS is not coming to LJU.
12:40
Anonymous said…
LJU can survive without JU / JP but without JU the passengers could not get to their final destinations when JP ceased all the operations.

And that was the moment JU steped in with great rescue fares. I am sure many of those rescued passengers were quite happy with "737".

Mind you, LH, OS, LX still do not fly to LJU and TK did not offer anything to the passengers that lost all the connections due to JP. Not not mention OU - it is comic story.

So, no matter if you like it or not JU did great job and obviously they intend keeping it so. Nobody flies more often to LJU than JU.

12:40
Anonymous said…
There has been no TK A330 in Ljubljana for over a month. There will be some in next 2 weeks but it has nothing to do with Adria and has been scheduled since July
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/07/turkish-to-deploy-a330-to-ljubljana.html
12:41
Anonymous said…
duuhh ... you have basically only 2 transfer airlines that cover the region with transfer options - JU and TK at th emoment (AF is just now upping up freq.). so you kind of have to use them or drive by car.

wait for 2-3 weeks and not all of passengers will stay with JU and/or TK, cause why fly south to then fly north again if nothing else time-wise. But if pricing will be right they still can retain a chunk of these additional passengers.

it will depend really on how much LH/LX will charge for FRA/MUC/ZRH with connecting flights and how quickly they will adapt the hours of departure to catch the wave for transfer flight onwards.

We'll see, it's going to be interesting for sure.
12:41
Anonymous said…
Flights from LJU to INI just started couple of months ago, with 2 weekly flights
On the other hand, JP had 2x daily to SKP for many years - to continue to present facts and priorities.
12:42
Anonymous said…
SAS
12:50
Anonymous said…
JU has already upgraded some flights in November to A319/733 which is after LH Group starts flying to LJU.
12:52
Anonymous said…
Ryanair's average fare in FY19 was 37 EUR, not 110. And even if you think JP was a low cost airline, it was more of a low fare.

Anybody can make a low fare airline - you just sell cheap tickets until you run out of money. It's the true low cost that is difficult to achieve. Certainly with 50% of staff (as was the case of JP) in admin, you can't have low operating costs.

Airports with legacy carriers not having LCC presence: FRA, MAD, BCN, LGW,... LCCs not flying to major airport was perhaps true 10 or 15 years ago but definitely isn't anymore.
12:52
Anonymous said…
This project looks over before it started - the law that was supposed to help was rejected by the parliament comission, didn't even go into the main session yet. All the main parties outside government were voting against it. It would need some serious political push to get this over, and since there are much bigger stories for the government deal with, I doubt this will happen with government support.
And also as Anon 9:51 noted, it is getting increasingly harder to sell "national interest" in Slovenia.
13:00
Anonymous said…
Yes two daily on a tiny regional jet, the route did so well by the end that they merged it with another regional destination. So in other words it didn't have more than 40 passengers.
13:04
Anonymous said…
If SN fly 85 squid return to Brussels then imagine the rest of LH Group.
AF will most likely become agressive, what do you think...they will just be passive¿

So far:

LH - 3 daily
LX - DAILY
SN - 6 weekly
Total: 5 daily flights and no 737s.
13:07
Anonymous said…
Everbody knows, that LH, SN, LX will start new flights to LJU on 27th Oct/ 1st Nov.
13:07
Anonymous said…
LH and LX are sending regional jets to LJU. On top of that LX will exclusively rely on transfers since there is almost no point to point traffic. In the end I think LX will fly seasonally to LJU, there is no market for them, at least for an airline with their costs.

LH is a joke with three daily CRJ with 86 seats.
13:11
Anonymous said…
Wizzair to CRL is absolutely no competition to SN to Brussels. Target customers are completely different and there is more demand for BRU than CRL (except summer tourism). Expect summer schedule to bring 2 flights per day BRU-LJU.
13:13
Anonymous said…
We don't need more LCCs - we need "some" LCCs to balance the supply side, and we really need proper connections to the main economic interest areas. The people commenting here about flying from Venice etc are maybe flying 1-2 times per year. These people are a minor contribution to the market. They are only loud on this forum, but not heard by the actual LCC airlines because they know they can't make money with such passengers. A lot of commuters and business people need reliable legacy airlines - so addition of Prague sounds good. Hopefully more connections come with the summer schedule.
13:19
Anonymous said…
SAS? They are not flying to ZAG and BEG, but they will fly to LJU? LOL
13:32
Anonymous said…
There are no 100seat A/C in LCC fleets. Entering a Slovenian market with A320 (170seats) with daily flights is a commercial suicide. Plus why would Ryanair jeopardize good LF from TRS or TRF?
13:35
Anonymous said…
kind of don't agree with you, because the facts are against you anon 13:11. the ZRH route was by no means only transfer. Quite a lot traffic - Slovenian and from Kärnten for onwards transfers and also O&D. and what are you blabbering about CRj....what did JP fly these destinations beforehand...boeing 747? jesust christ some of you are really with IQ in the ballpark of room temperature.
13:36
Anonymous said…
its not true that most were transit. however transit pax counted twice in the statistics
13:44
Anonymous said…
I wouldn't brag with a biweekly flight that's being subsidized at 100 EUR / pax.
13:44
Anonymous said…
lol. when you talk about something you know nothing about.

2 CRJ flights were always merged into one 319.
13:54
Anonymous said…
Nope, not by the end.
14:12
Anonymous said…
Slowvenia is right. LJU in sharp contrast to Chisinau is much wealthier, has more tourism, more higher yielding and better paying business pax, plus a wealthy Austria just 20 or 30km away. Not far from Chisinau, there are also many other airports (large and small: Odessa, Iasi, Suceava etc), therefore also Moldavians use many other airports in neighbouring countries.

LJU should have at least 3 mio pax+ per year - already at this point.
14:26
Anonymous said…
They are not even flying to VIE
14:27
Anonymous said…
Major loss in Oct - and maybe a bit smaller but still very high loss from Nov...
14:29
Anonymous said…
If 5 days no JP (in Sept.) already equals a 10% drop of monthly pax, then 30 days no JP in October should be equal to about 60% passenger drop.
I can hardly imagine that!
I think the numbers are that large, also because pax were counted twice when they were transferring at LJU?
14:36
Anonymous said…
Transfer passengers are counted twice at every single airport in the world.
14:37
Anonymous said…
Not sure if 737 klassika or CR9 is better.
Nothing beats TK and their elegancy....
14:48
Anonymous said…
You are being over-optimistic. It will be a success if Ljubljana reaches the same number of PAX next year ... growth is almost impossible.
14:49
Anonymous said…
Elegancy? Maybe in the air but on the ground they are pure disaster!
14:53
Anonymous said…
You forget it's much easier for Slovenians to go to VCE, TSF, GRZ, etc. than it is for Moldavians to go to ODS or IAS. Schengen and all that jazz.

It is true that greater presence of LCCs could increase the number of pax in LJU significantly, but I doubt it will ever reach 3 mio.
15:31
Anonymous said…
60% is too much. Adria actually cancelled almost all flights from 23rd of September, which makes it 8 days without Adria or a bit more than a quarter of the month. This means that the airport loses max 40% of passengers in October, but the actual number will be lower because LX arrives in the middle of the month and LH at the end of it. But these are of course very rough estimations.
15:44
POPO said…
Everyone is freaking out for no reason. Let the market stabilize and order will be restored. LJU will be fine just like BUD was fine after Malev disappeared.
16:07
Anonymous said…
There is every reason to panic. We'll never see Adria's frequencies to main hubs for years to come (if ever). LJU is not the same as BUD. Budapest alone has almost the same population as whole of Slovenia! People will start missing Adria in a couple of months, mark my words (of course, not the ones traveling twice per year who are usually the loudest when it comes to Adria's demise).
16:11
Anonymous said…
I must take my hat off for Air France for making the best out of the situation .
Also they have the right aircraft for LJU even if it is not mainline .
Their HOP brand is actually very nice .

It will be interesting to see if they send their Embraers also to their other new destination in Ex Yu -
Airbus will definitely have bad loadfactor there in first quartal 2020 .
16:12
Anonymous said…
Actually JU made the best of the situation, AF is second, right behind them.
16:56
Anonymous said…
Actually it was JU and then YM since they had rescue fares as well. :D
17:07
Anonymous said…
Actually LJU/JP had approx 300.000 transfer passengers
18:33
Athos_cro said…
Ma nema šanse. Letio sam ja nekoliko puta jer živim u Češkoj. Nisu uspjeli napuniti CRJ.
Ovisno je doduše također o vremenima letova. Ako bi OK letio tako, da bi bilo zanimljivo za transferne putnike iz/za ICN moglo bi biti nešto više.
19:40
Athos_cro said…
A kako ćeš drukčije? Ako nemaš auto, da odeš do TRS... A vjerojatno ti vremenski dođe isto kao i preko CDG ili WAW a treću varijantu nemaš
19:41
Athos_cro said…
DA. A W6 leti triputa tjedno, tako da je neprimjeran za poslovne putnike.
19:42
Athos_cro said…
Rumunjska nije u Shengenu a Ukrajina još manje!
19:44
Athos_cro said…
Kako ne leti OK PRG-INC??? Zašto lažeš???? https://www.csa.cz/cz-en/destinations/
19:54
Athos_cro said…
Mrtvi se zbrajaju na kraju. JU na dugi rok nema šanse, da preuzme puno putnika iz LJU osim za balkanske linije poput SKP i TIA
19:58
Anonymous said…
Always undermining JU. for the record JU has increased capacity on flights after LH and LX launch flights to LJU so...
21:13
Anonymous said…
Живи били па видели. Многи су тврдили да ЈУ неће опстати на многим тржиштима па ето нас ту где смо данас. ЈУ ће наставити да доминира у Љубљани.
21:16
SLOWvenia said…
"We saw the same thing with BUD and look where it is now."

Ah okay no big deal. Just have one of the largest LCCs in Europe have their headquarters in your city. That is easy.

It took Bratislava over a decade to match their 2008 numbers after the collapse of Slovak Airlines, SkyEurope, Air Slovakia and Seagle Air.
21:33
Anonymous said…
JP had more than 50% of all passengers at lju airport so the noumbers are ok...
08:06
Anonymous said…
It would be very hard for LCCS to fill the planes because JP high load factor on some routes was because of transfer passengers from balkans
08:13
Anonymous said…
Budapest has ten times the population of Ljubljana.
Still don't get the point of considering Slovenia and Ljubljana as any other country in Europe.
It is not, it's a tiny country with a tiny capital city and small business going on. That's it.
14:22
Post a Comment

VINTAGE EX-YU


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Former Yugoslav airports handle 39 million passengers in 2025

Image

Air Serbia prepares for “very dynamic” 2027, plans specialised charters

Image

Podgorica aims to regain Tirana’s Montenegro passengers

Image

All EX-YU capital airports set for February growth as Wizz dominates

Image

Belgrade Airport registers busiest year on record

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026