Zagreb Airport has shrugged off reports it is lagging behind its competitors, as well as concerns over a number of airlines terminating their services to the Croatian capital recently. “Since the beginning of the concession in 2013, Zagreb Airport has recorded excellent operational and financial results. We have registered passenger growth of around 46%. While Zagreb Airport handled 2.300.231 travellers in 2013, we welcomed 3.336.310 passengers five years later. This year we are also seeing an increase in our numbers. In 2013 the number of airlines serving the Croatian capital stood at 20, while today it amounts to 33. The number of destinations on offer has also grown from 34 to 52”, Zagreb Airport said. The Croatian Prime Minister, Andrej Plenković, has said his Minister for Sea Transport and Infrastructure, Oleg Butković, will hold talks with Zagreb Airport’s concessionaire concerning its operations.
In the past month, Eurowings announced it would suspend two of its routes to Zagreb, from Berlin and Dusseldorf, while Swiss International Air Lines and Czech Airlines have said they would not resume their seasonal services, from Zurich and Prague respectively, to the Croatian capital. Furthermore, Korean Air recently downgraded its year-round operations from Seoul to Zagreb to seasonal summer flights. “We expect successful operations and passenger growth to continue in the future. We also believe that travellers will recognise our efforts and reward us for our high quality of service”, Zagreb Airport added. During the January - October period, Zagreb Airport handled 2.957.109 travellers, up 2.4%, which is just under the European average so far this year. No growth was recorded in January, while figures decreased in July. Overall, it added an extra 69.739 passengers compared to 2018.
Several airlines have complained of Zagreb Airport’s high fees, although these protests have come mostly from low cost airlines. Eurowings previously noted Zagreb Airport's charges are "significantly higher than most major European airports, making it less appealing for low cost carriers". Wizz Air, which has considered resuming operations to the Croatian capital, said, “It [Zagreb] is a high-priced airport environment with fluctuating demand. Should the costs come down, we think they would attract us”. Croatia's busiest airport hiked its fees following the opening of its new passenger terminal in 2017 by two euros per each international passenger for a total of seventeen euros. Similarly, it increased its fees by half a euro per every domestic passenger to seven and a half euros.

Comments
Most of the people have really lost pace with reality. A phenomenon widely spead here unfortunately.
Thats basically 11 flights a day to Germany. Seems not bad to me
Even OK and EW can no longer afford ZAG.
That's why if there is no other incentive from other players, airports from major hubs with legacy carriers don't see too high a benefit with much LCC presence, because it can be counter productive to the balance sheet.
Tourists want to go to the seaside not to Zagreb. Don't get me wrong, Zagreb as such is not a bad city, but in Europe you have hundreds if not thousends of cities like that. And here everybody tends to think that his city is exceptional and people from around the globe should only flock to see it. This is not only about citizens of Zagreb.
The other point is gastarbeiters. Many lcc (especially Wizz) do mainly gastarbeiter routes. Apparently there are more gastarbeiters in other ex-Yu countries than in Zagreb. So less interest from lcc, especially that apparently they cannot count on many discounts or other subsidies from the airport or government or the city.
All my Croatian friends and family, people I know would never buy anything in the plane and travel only with carry-on luggage. but maybe others have very different experiences. would interest me
amazing how many people drive with bus from Düsseldorf, Hamburg or Berlin to croatia instead of flying
Old equals bitter, further explaining your posts equals fight, those two I thoroughly disagree. Looking from the other angle, you could say that trying to convince someone who disagrees, can be called being passionate, not bitter. And being passionate is usually characteristics of the young people, not old. And I assure you that I don't get upset or bitter if someone disagrees with me, even if it looks like,and I really don't need to chill and calm down. Just trying to further explain and defend my attitudes, words and information. However, I would like to thank you for the other part of your post. It's always nice to hear someone like reading your posts and can use information you provide :)
Suche a big building with lots of space and so badly used.
Didn't they planned they will have rent a car??
Why they have this containers on a parking lot??
Taxi, uber, public transportation!!
I can't say who is more expensive, unfriendly or slowest.
In one word it is DISASTER.
And we can thanks that to our beloved major.
I rest my case