Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May31
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Ryanair to end Stockholm flights from EX-YU markets

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Low cost carrier Ryanair will discontinue its year-round flights from Stockholm Skavsta Airport to Banja Luka, Niš and Podgorica at the start of the 2020 summer season, as well as seasonal services to Rijeka due to the closure of its base. However, its seasonal flights from Zadar remain unaffected. The airline said the base closure comes as a result of delays in the delivery of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft which are currently grounded by aviation authorities across the world. “We also expect to cut summer capacity in a number of other existing bases, and we are currently in discussions with our people, our unions, and our affected airports to finalise these minor reductions”, Ryanair said in a statement. The no frills airline currently maintains two weekly flights from Skavsta to Podgorica, Niš and Banja Luka, with their last services scheduled for March 27 and March 28.

Ryanair handled some 1.2 million passengers to and from Skavsta each year and accounted for about 50% of the airport’s traffic. "We are continuing to work with Boeing, our people, our unions and our affected airports to minimise these capacity cuts and job losses", Eddie Wilson, Ryanair’s Chief Executive Officer, said. Its decision gives Wizz Air the opportunity to pick up some of the suspended routes. The low cost airline has a significant presence at Skavsta Airport although it doesn’t boast a base. It serves the city from Belgrade, Tuzla and Skopje, among others.

Meanwhile, Ryanair handled its 100.000th passenger on flights to and from Banja Luka in 2019 last Sunday. The traveller arrived on a flight from Berlin. The budget airline will introduce a new service from Hahn to Banja Luka next year and anticipates handling 160.000 passengers on its flights to the city. “We will continue our successful cooperation with Ryanair which enables our passengers connectivity with Europe and the world and brings us constant growth”, the General Manager of Banja Luka Airport, Milan Račić, said. Ryanair subsidiary Lauda will also introduce flights from Vienna to Bosnia and Herzegovina’s second largest city next year, although the route will be maintained with Ryanair equipment.




December 07, 2019
Banja Luka bosnia and herzegovina croatia Feature low cost airline montenegro podgorica Rijeka
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. pozdrav iz Rijeke09:07

    7 months per year, the entire summer timetable, Ryanair operates Skavsta from and to Rijeka, for years already. And Rijeka is not mentioned in the text at all. Also if both ZAD and RJK are staying, than FR is not withdrawing from ex-yu market(s). So, @ex-yu, correction please

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      Rijeka is suspended too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:13

      It says in the article, Rijeka is suspended too. And you can't buy tickets for it. Zadar isn't suspended because it's operated with an out of base plane.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. pozdrav iz Rijeke10:59

      Corrected later; original article was not including "as well as seasonal services to Rijeka due to the closure of its base"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:35

      I am actually not sure, it was there from the beginning.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. pozdrav iz Rijeke15:28

      Maybe it was there when you read it. But my post was the first today and I reacted and asked ex-yu to correct it which he did. Why should have I reacted if it was there?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous17:47

      Who knows really? Only you know that my friend. :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:07

    It would be good for Wizz to take over, at least from Podgorica and Niš to which they already fly from to other airports.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:39

      I doubt they will. They seem to fly to NYO only from base airports.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:48

      They could fly W routing. For example BEG-NYO-INI-NYO-BEG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:58

      JU may start that W route with ARN instead of NYO

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:08

      That would be great.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Unknown17:14

      Too long rotation to be legal.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:11

    Typical Ryanair excuses. Yes, Max is to blame but NYO is also not bringing them enough money. Sweden is expensive and you already have 2 other Stockholm airports - better connected and not so far.
    Anyway, it seems BNX will soon reach INI. Gap is becoming narrower.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:38

      Ιt isn't really an excuse, more like an explanation.
      Ιt makes sense to cut the least profitable routes and bases first.
      Τhe 737MAX fiasco has caused major issues to a lot of airlines.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:53

      I wouldn't have suspected that NYO was once of their least profitable bases.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:55

      Why not? Tell us more please.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Happy taxpayer14:05

      I would guess that a Swedish base is among the most expensive bases in FR's network.
      Cost of salaries, insurance contributions, cost of handling, fuel, etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:17

    And people were saying how Nis is being suspended due to protectionism. Lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:30

      INI sales were closed long before this announcement, so...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:38

      I'm sure they didn't decide about the base closure yesterday and that they knew it for several months.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:49

      But why did they ended just the Nis service and not the others back then. They could have waited to do it now if its related to the base closure.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:51

      They closed Rijeka then too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:09

      They also closed several destinations in Spain and one German destination, can't remember which now. So INI wasn't the only one for your information.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:33

      @10.09 not true. they were all put on sale for the summer schedule. the german destination was Memmingen. INI was closed due to economic reasons

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:52

      Do you have a source that INI was closed due to economic reasons?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:19

    Would be nice to go back to the topic about INI losing NYO flights and to read comments and compare it to the published text today. It wasn't INI that was the problem, it was Sweden. ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      INI is clearly facing issues.
      It will lose LX, has lost EIN, NRN, HHN, BUD and now NYO. This is the main reason why BEG is also growing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:43

      It was growing when all those routes were in service too. In fact it has been growing continuously each month since 2009. So your conclusion is irrelevant.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:59

      Which issues? LX - terminated in both Sarajevo and Zagreb, and just recently launched in Ljubljana, after three years and after Adrias bankruptcy.

      Hahn - wasn't even launched, our guys didn't give them permission.

      Budapest - well nobody except Belgrade has those flights (in May 2020).

      NYO - explained in the article.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:18

      Also, EIN was closed because of FR from Weeze. FR closed the Weeze base and INI was discontinued. EIN can't really get more flights because the airport is capped.

      And no, BEG is growing because E.V.E.R.Y. airline there is doing well.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:00

      BEG is growing because of INI ending routes. Makes sense now. No wonder why FR will never be allowed to land in BEG.
      Oh well...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:53

      Do you have a source that BEG is growing at the expense of INI? The last time I checked in November INI grew by 17%. Also BEG got many routes which are not duplicated from BEG.

      Also BEG doesn't even have an air link with Budapest right now.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:34

    wow that's a big deal for them to shut an entire base. They must have been loosing money big time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:11

      Seems they closed it because of union negotiations, not because of unprofitability. NYO was their third base outside the UK after CRL and GRO. :/

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:49

      Can you explain more? Why would they close a base because of unions?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:55

      From another forum:

      Most likely union busting. The pilots in Skavsta did get a better deal a couple of years ago but Ryanair still has problems to negotiate and accept a collective agreement with the Swedish pilot union.

      For the Cabin Crew it’s even worse, a deal the Swedish union could accept, would mean a cabin crew would cost more than Wizzairs Captains they are competing directly with on the Eastern European routes.

      I’m sure Ryanair will start a base again soon with new people and delay all union negotiation because suddenly no one is a member of the Swedish union anymore.

      Routes towards eastern part of Europe with workers and Swedish tourists looking for a cheap weekend they can fly from more cost effective bases and timetable is less important.
      However the tourist routes to Mediterranean benefits from an early morning departure from Stockholm Skavsta.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:59

      Thanks! Very interesting.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:15

      There we have it, that is how FR and W6 make money, by providing extremely bad work conditions for their workers. Such a shame for Europe, we need better than that. We need human dignity for the working class.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:19

      Yet they still pay more than a lot of other airlines and offer more time off.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous06:17

      Not more than legacies though.Especially not FR.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:36

    Ouch

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:37

    It isn't really an excuse, more like an explanation.
    It makes sense to cut the least profitable routes and bases first.
    The 737MAX fiasco has caused major issues to a lot of airlines.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous09:42

    Going down and well done, Ryan!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:30

      Small bases are less profitable than larger ones. Add to that probably higher costs in Scandinavia than elsewhere and...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:57

    Now they have to wait until MC21 enter production. :)

    Strategy having only one model (holy grail for bunch of "experts") comes to be paid...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:27

      Well, it's worked for them (and a bunch of other very profitable airlines) for decades.

      Having 50% of the fleet A320, MC21 or whatever other type wouldn't change such problems. If you don't get new aircraft, you have to modify the schedule you are planning to fly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous10:32

    Unfortunate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous10:41

    Has Sweden introduced that eco-tax on airlines or has that been scrapped?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:49

      It was introduced, then scrapped and now it will probably be introduced again.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:03

      They will reintroduce it so they can fund the reduction in income tax.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  13. Anonymous11:47

    I hope they will introduce another route as a substitute.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous11:50

    Pity. Banja Luka flights were performing really well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous11:51

    The MAX grounding has really messed with a lot of airlines

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:52

      Is there a provisional timeframe when they should return to service?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:16

      There were some timeframes but each time they were moved further and further back. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if they are grounded for another year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous22:02

      Most airlines don't expect the planes to be back in service before April 2020

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  16. Anonymous19:16

    Good news for Croatia Airlines and Air Serbia for their respective Arlanda flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:10

      How? Ryanair flies from Rijeka and Nis, not from Zagreb and Belgrade.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:01

      Yes, but now people from those regions won't have a choice and will have to come to either Zagreb or Belgrade.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  17. Shinnam19:18

    The monopoly Flygbussarna has for transport to NYO might be part of the problem for Ryan and Wiz. Skavsta is awful to get to, especially if you live in south east Stockholm. A ticket has to be at least 1000 SEK(108€) more for me to consider using that airport. When the bus passes by Skarholmen, I often think about telling the driver I have to get off right now because I have terrible diarrhoea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Air Serbia plans 32-member fleet in 2026, eyes MRO facility

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Middle East Airlines commences Sarajevo operations

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025