Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May25
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Croatia Airlines to cancel A320neo order

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
Fuselage of a Croatia Airlines aircraft

Croatia Airlines is in negotiations with European plane manufacturer Airbus over the cancellation of its order for four A320neo aircraft. The first two A320neos were scheduled to arrive in Zagreb in 2022, while the other two were due a year later. The carrier has so far deposited 8.5 million euros for the four jets. The total value of the deal has never been made public. The carrier commenced negotiations over the termination of the order just prior to the coronavirus pandemic. “Negotiations concerning the Termination Agreement, which will result in the cancellation of the A320neo order and the use of the deposit for other Airbus services are currently on hold due to Covid-19 and will resume as soon as possible”, Croatia Airlines said.

Croatia Airlines successfully converted a 2008 order for four A319s to the neos in 2015. Although the new aircraft were originally to be delivered by the end of 2013, their arrival was put on hold and the deal was renegotiated. The carrier put off the arrival of the jets due to the company's financial situation at the time. The Croatian carrier currently boasts a fleet of five A319s, two A320s and six Dash 8 Q400 turboprops. The latter's operating lease agreement was extended in 2018. In addition, the airline has been wet-leasing two CRJ1000 aircraft from Spain's Air Nostrum over the summer season between 2016 and 2019. Plans to lease an additional Dash 8 this summer have been cancelled as a result of the pandemic.

Based on the company’s five-year business development plan (2020 – 2025), it intends on renewing its fleet with mid-age A319 and A320 aircraft, as well as replace wet-leases with long-term dry-leases. The current average age of Croatia Airlines’ fleet amounts to 15.7 years. The A320s are currently the oldest, averaging 20.8 years, followed by the A319s at nineteen years and the Dash 8s at 11.3 years. Out of 255 carriers operating the A320 aircraft, Croatia Airlines ranks 223rd in terms of the age of the jets, while out of the 125 A319 operators, the Croatian carrier ranks 113th in the world. Among airlines utilising the Dash 8s, Croatia Airlines has one of the younger fleets of this type in the world, ranking 31st globally.

August 21, 2020
croatia croatia airlines Feature Fleet
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:00

    Ouch. This hurts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Γιωργος12:20

      Airlines have made it a horrible a/c for passengers. With 31 rows is very tight legroom, very uncomfortable for legs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    They can't pay for them. It was obvious from the beginning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:05

      What was the point of ordering them then?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:04

    I understand the cancellation but the replacement plan I don't like. "it intends on renewing its fleet with mid-age A319 and A320 aircraft". So it will be same old same old at OU for the next god knows how many years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:16

      If you understand the cancellation than what did you expect for replacement?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:40

      Quite frankly, it was a smart move. OS will be able to purchase slightly used from a bankrupt carrier for a much better price than it would have last year. Other carriers in Ex-Yu should take note and do the same.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:05

    This sucks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:05

    The saga with this order should really come to and end. Its been going on for 12 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous09:06

    Couldn't they have taken out a loan to replace them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      * I mean to replace the Airbuses and get the neos.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Petar09:10

      And who would repay that loan?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:35

      Owners obviously, they are the ones choosing CEOs

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:39

      Banks don't want to issue OU loans that easily anymore. They require government guarantees and the government can't give them guarantees under EU rules.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:08

    What other "Airbus services" could they get with 8.5 million?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:08

    And what will happen to deposit?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      “Negotiations concerning the Termination Agreement, which will result in the cancellation of the A320neo order and the use of the deposit for other Airbus services"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:17

      It means actually nothing specifically.

      Seems like being lost.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:09

    That is great news for Croatian tax payers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:37

      Fantastic news, "we've thrown 8,5 million EUR of your money straight into the sea".

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:01

      Yes, that's not a small sum for OU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:08

      There are always costs related to such on-going orders.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:10

    What I find interesting is that this order would have been cancelled regardless of corona.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      Because regardless of corona the airline didn't have the money to pay for them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:11

    A320neo is suited for Croatia Airlines. Pitty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      They need more 100 seater jets not A320neos.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:16

      What they need is more CRJ planes if you ask me. Lower capacity plus cheaper.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:18

      Again with what money? As you can see they don't have the cash for these Airbuses or extra new planes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:12

    The current A319/A320s are getting quite old

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      "Out of 255 carriers operating the A320 aircraft, Croatia Airlines ranks 223rd in terms of the age of the jets, while out of the 125 A319 operators, the Croatian carrier ranks 113th in the world".

      Not nice.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:13

    This order was a financial burden for OU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:15

      +1 and a big one. Also a burden for any potential partner/investor.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:14

    You have to be crazy to buy new aircraft knowing the financial status of the company. Better to lease out older planes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:15

      Exactly. New aircraft are the least necessary thing that OU needs at the moment. These planes are too expensive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:16

    Too bad they are not changing the order for A220, but probably its too expensive for them.

    Maybe they could get some "mid-aged" planes cheap now with corona to replace the older ones, but that wont make a big difference in the long run :/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous09:19

    Do they have any open credit line?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous09:23

    OU definitely needs a change.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous09:23

    How many planes does Croatia Airlines own?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:24

      Good question.

      I would add that they even sold and leased back some engines, so it would be nice to know how many of them actually belong to OU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:25

      5 airbuses. 4 A319s and 1 A320.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:56

      2 A320s not one.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:24

    They must act on doing something with their fleet. It is becoming older and older. A strategic partner would definitely help here. They don't have the funds to finance a fleet modernization on their own.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      There is no strategic partner.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:35

      Times of strategic partners for falling airlines has passed. Corona changed everything, no one will step in anytime soon, OU is on its own.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  20. Anonymous09:28

    This order was destined for failure from the beginning. It was a politically motivated order by the government in 2008 to get French to approve EU membership. No consultations with OU were made about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:34

      This Airbus order which probably costs over 300 million euros is the worst for attracting any sort of potential investor.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:36

      What I don't get is how come this order was a secret? Isn't that against the law since they are a government owned business?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:44

      Smatra se da je taj ugovor zapravo bio politički deal između bivšeg premijera Ive Sanadera i bivšeg francuskog predsjednika Nicolasa Sarkozyja.

      U kuloarima se govorilo da je Sanader na taj način želio pridobiti naklonost Francuske, koja je tada predsjedala EU, i osigurati brži završetak pregovora s EU. Čak se tvrdilo da je tim ugovorom sebi osigurao ulaznicu za Elizejsku palaču, odnosno službeni prijem kod Sarkozyja.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  21. Anonymous09:35

    Instead of neos they should have picked the CRJ1000. Good plane, good economics and passenger friendly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:55

      It is also expensive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:03

      You can lease them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Unknown13:05

      that is a good idea

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  22. Anonymous09:39

    Couldn't they have done a sale and leaseback?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:57

      The contract with Airbus might not allow it. Sometimes there is such a clause that they cannot do it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:14

      Which leasing company is going to buy a brand new A320neo in these times for more than pocket change?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  23. Anonymous09:40

    Hope they are not penalized for cancelling the order.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:41

      It is for sure they are not getting cash back.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:45

      And what's worse this deposit was only made last year! So it isn't some historic money locked up at Airbus.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  24. Anonymous09:45

    Well it's no surprise

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous09:56

    Those planes are too expensive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous09:58

    I'm interested to see how their fleet will develop in the next few years. The neos would have been a great addition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:02

      How could it?

      "Based on the company’s five-year business development plan (2020 – 2025), it intends on renewing its fleet with mid-age A319 and A320 aircraft, as well as replace wet-leases with long-term dry-leases."

      Renewing with mid-age planes? If they make reneweing with mid age planes it means only that those currently used are extremely old.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:07

      I think they will take 10- 12 years old planes not 20 years old ones.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:13

      Exactly. The A319 they leased this year is 8 yrs old.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  27. Anonymous10:22

    At some point you would hope they would get planes to expand their fleet and open new markets and not just to replace older aircraft.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  28. Anonymous10:28

    This is an order they wanted to get rid off for a while but there was no way out of it so they had to go along. It's good Airbus is willing to terminate the deal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. JU520 BEGLAX10:29

    They must get rid of their 319, that aircraft is too heavy for short range and is uneconomical

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:36

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:37

      A319 is perfect plane for OU. With regional jets they wouldnt make money on the most of the routes during a season.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:41

      And they wouldn't loose all they make in winter with this planes which have too much capacity.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  30. Anonymous10:36

    Best of luck OU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  31. Anonymous10:41

    A220 would be ideal. But way to expensive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  32. Petar Čelik10:52

    this needs to be printed and put on every wall of surviving ex-yu companies:

    "WE CAN AFFORD ONLY TO LEASE 10+Y OLD AIRCRAFT. WE CANNOT FINANCE NEW BIRDS. NO CASHFLOW FOR THAT"

    but nevertheless, i am looking forward to see comments like "ju/mgx/ou needs to buy A350 and fly to canada" ad infinitum

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:42

      ok so no A350 to Canada. Got it. No problem. 10+Y old A332 to PEK or ORD will have to do.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:29

      And what about profitability? JU currently losses money on their only long haul route so I dont expect to make any money at PEK/PVG/YYZ/ORD/LAX...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous19:38

      Who was talking about JU?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  33. Anonymous11:14

    Better that than leasing 20+ years old aircraft

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  34. Anonymous11:41

    Balkans is the replacement for a boneyard. Instead of leaving a 30 years old plane in desert for scrappage as in a real boneyard, find a Balkan airline who will keep flying it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  35. Anonymous12:01

    What can they get from Airbus for those 8.5 million?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  36. Anonymous12:08

    Dumping 363m EUR onto your balance sheet while trying to avoid bankruptcy was ludicrous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:09

      Where did you get that figure from?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  37. Anonymous12:08

    I support this decision. They had no choice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:12

      Agree. This offer would have been a nail in the coffin.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:09

      Offer?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:30

      *order

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  38. Anonymous12:56

    It is a pity that the airline industry of such a tourism powerhouse is in such state...what went wrong?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:12

      Poor politically appointed management happened.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:10

      How else will we provide jobs we promised in order to gain power? Where will my cousin work?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  39. Anonymous13:11

    Should have cancelled it in 2015 when they converted it to neos. At least they would have avoided paying the deposit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:07

      they probably thought the situation would improve.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  40. Anonymous16:38

    Very bad decision, they dont see how much they will safe fuel and oil with the neos compared with the ceos!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:06

      Yes but if you can't pay for them, what are you gonna do

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous23:46

      New aircraft only make sense if you have high utilisation (think LCCs with 12h+ per day) and can get good finance on it or even buy it in cash.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  41. Anonymous17:08

    So for the next five years we probably can't hope for anything younger than 10 yrs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  42. Anonymous17:08

    A rational decision that should have been taken much earlier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  43. Anonymous17:25

    I think they need to invest in more Q400s. Routes that can sustain A319 can just get extra frequencies and there we go. As for FRA, LH is more than welcome to give OU a better deal otherwise they will keep on losing money on the route. It's not a long-term solution for them. I feel OU is just living from one day to another, no long term strategy and vision. This will be very much needed now after corona.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  44. Anonymous18:27

    Btw, is it true that there is a quarantine for the UK and Slovenia if you come from Croatia ?
    And if, how does it affect the coast ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:30

      Yes there is from tomorrow. Most flights from Croatia to the UK are sold out today. There is a record number od cases and I'm not surprised since our government opened everything and barely tests anyone. Our testing capacity is much larger but...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:51

      Ah, so its true !
      Little to nothing of information on the internet .
      I will fly into Britain, thought about going to Croatia for a week ...
      That must be a pain in the ass to have practically only a single day for leaving .
      Imagine that with children .

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous19:45

      Will the travel ban for Brits be a problem for Croatia Airlines ?
      And what is with BA and Easyjet flights ?

      Easyjet is the second biggest airline in Croatia, that must be bad for them .

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous00:17

      Everybody wants to visit beautiful Croatia .
      If Brits leave others will come to replace them !

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  45. Anonymous23:34

    Incompetent management pushing airline beyond the point of no return. Sold engines, sold LHR slots, unable to get NEOs, expecting more money from taxpayers. Someone should just pull the plug on this misery of an airline. Does anyone have decency and common sense to admit it was good while it lasted but it is time to end it? There is no future for OU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown03:53

      Biggest problem of pulling the plug if a national airline would be detrimental for Croatia. Pulling the plug on the way it is run is the way forward. Cut the middle management and better utilisation if aircraft and more power-by-the-hour arrangements.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  46. Unknown03:50

    On face value and without reviewing the statistical details, I believe OU need to fill two holes in the market. The 50 to 100 seat markets. Q400 would continue to be the obvious choice but, another smaller aircraft to meet demands of shoulder and low seasons. Shame that 200-300 series Dash 8, are no longer produced. They are utilised very well on low capacity routes as seen in small regional community markets in Australia.

    The Airbuses do need to be upgraded eventually. This will be very important. Power-by the-hour arrangements will work here, which I hope they will utilise the 8.5 million on (provided they are credited their deposit).

    Better utilisation of crew, higher load factors and removal of many middle management positions will be critical to realising a future profit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  47. Unknown12:20

    Such a pity, they would have been better off dry leasing an a320neo from a lesser with the 8.5 million rather then use it as a downpayment... now its just going to be used for over priced airbus support services

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Riyadh Air launches first recruitment drive in region

Image

Air Serbia registers busiest April on record

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025