Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May28
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Ljubljana Airport handles under 5.000 passengers

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport handled 4.923 passengers in January, representing a decrease of 93.5% on last year. The number of aircraft movements stood at 708, down 59.4%. During the month, the airport was served by Lufthansa from Frankfurt, Turkish Airlines from Istanbul and Air Serbia from Belgrade. Available two-way capacity on commercial flights stood at 9.828 during the month.

February 11, 2021
Ljubljana Newsflash Results 2021 slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:46

    And even figures for January 2020 were disastrous! Compare Jan21 to Jan19 and you will see that LJU has decrease of 99% in terms of passenger. Bravo Fraport!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:12

      Yeah, they should have at least 100k passengers per month, when nobody is allowed to leave their municipality and their is curfew established. Really poor amangement.

      Some of you people really need to get a grip with reality, you can't have high numbers if you have so many restrictions in place, and people obey them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:42

      Yep, only Slovenia has restrictions

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:44

      I completely agree with 11.12 comment.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:50

      You have to understand that Slovenes still do travel, but due to limited possibilities they have to use flights out of VIE/ZAG/BEG/VCE. Even if there are restrictions there are people who need to travel. Restrictions are only excuse for incompetent managers of Fraport!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:28

      @11:12:

      How on Earth did you come to that conclusion? Slovenia's restrictions are no more restrictive then elsewhere. Blame it on lack of national carrier and an uninteresting market. How many times will I have to say it? If you want air connectivity, pay for it.

      If corona showed anything, it's how unimportant Slovenia is for foreign carriers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous14:44

      +1 last comment

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous15:22

      @13:28

      Oh, don't comment if you don't know what happening in Slovenia. In Slovenia you are not allowed to leave your municipality. I live in capital Ljubljana and if I go to Brnik airport (which is in another municipality) penalty is 400€!!! You can do that for business reason, but not for tourism purpose.
      It looks like this travel ban will be canceled in the next days.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous18:17

      @15:22:

      Unfortunately for you, I live in Slovenia. And just to let you know, you are allowed to leave your municipality if you have a reason.

      Besides, do you really think people are following government's rules to the letter ? Why do you think we had so many infections? Not because of the government and its rules, but because people didn't give two di*ks about them.

      Like it or not, Slovenia will never be a very popular destination. If you're paying for the railways, pay an airline to do its job.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous18:43

      @15:22
      Situation is pretty much the same in Western Europe compared to Slowenija.
      People are not allowed to travel to other regions or provinces and you have to have a proof. If not, you will get fined and in some extreme cases go to jail just like in the UK.
      Still, much work needs to be done to recover the 2018 levels.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous19:06

      @18:17
      "pay an airline to do its job"

      For now we decided not to pay, except some small money for last tender. And I think at least 70% of others Slovenians agree with that.

      It's very nice to see Croatian pax numbers. But bill, for all empty seats in last year, is already coming. And I'm sure most of taxpayers are not happy with that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous21:42

      @19:06

      Hmm, I wonder how did you come up with that number (70%)?

      Do you always pay such close attention to how the government is spending your hard earned money? Or you just have/had something against Adria?

      From what I can tell, there are a lot of areas where savings can be made. Air connectivity is not one of them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous21:49

      Even if people are against that, some strategic investments has to be done if that will improve state economy. How much money did Croatia get during summer seasons because they had good connections to coast? Do you really think that would possible without OU? Or in case of JU, they just transported 500.000 vaccines by their aircraft.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Reply
  2. Anonymous10:48

    Sad

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous10:50

    So LF is around 50%

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:12

      That's actually not that bad.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:00

      probably bit less because also non commercial pax are counted too

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. notLufthansa11:01

    Did they cout the crew members of the planes brouhgt to LJU for storage?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:06

      Probably

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  5. Anonymous11:03

    I don't understand how LJU counts aircraft movements. I guess they calculate all private planes, cargo flights and charters because there were barely a hundred return flights (98) last month by TK, LH and JU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:07

      Did you think only commercial flights are counted as aircraft movements?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:11

      Aircraft movement is aircraft movement. Citation Excel is an aircraft, so is a B777F.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:01

      LJU counts aircraft movements like every other airport

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  6. Anonymous11:17

    It doesn't surprise me. Look at the top 100 European airports for 2020:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_airports_in_Europe#2020

    Most of them are now Russian but even leading airports like PRG and BUD had barely.4 million passengers!!!

    Krasnodar jumped by 49 positions. Crazy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous11:30

    Go home Fraport!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:39

      Please don't blame Fraport. Today, there was a conference with Wizzair and Fraport Burgas, and they just agreed to base a new seasonal aircraft there and launch 7 new routes. The problem is definitely not Fraport but rather the current management that seems to be utterly passive and not taking any initiative.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:52

      I suppose that by Fraport he actually meant Skobir and Krasnja..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  8. Unknown11:47

    this is all Lh Group fault, they didnt gave money to adria, took the profitable routes, and target the near airports like ZAG, VCE and VIE. Go Slovenia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous12:04

    crazy LJU, thats 7 x less then ZAG, 10x less then SKP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous12:15

    Independent of reasons why, with this frequency of operations they are bleeding money like crazy. They really need the market maker (state) to come in and do something about it.

    As nobody will benefit from them closing the doors, not fraport not the firms and not the little guy.

    That's why I'm for reestablishment of national airline, with cargo and pax operations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:20

      It is time that the state takes back the strategic infrastructure. !

      PAX from LJU, cargo from MBX

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. not from SLO12:24

      LCCs to MBX

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:33

      Shure why not they treat their PAX as cargo anyway. No rights, no voice.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:39

      Slovenia doesn't need more than 1 proper airport. MBX has no place in modern Slovenia in EU/Schengen.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:06

      It has its place. As a Slovenian Cargo hub.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous13:14

      Cargo hub? 800m shorter runway than LJU, no Cat II/III, 120km away from Ljubljana, at least 3 hours by truck to Novo Mesto (Krka, Revoz, etc.), no fire equipment for anything larger than B737/A320, etc.

      What can MBX do that LJU can't? And then, at what cost to have 2 fully operational airports in such a small country?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:54

      A bit of tarmac, equipment and rail link.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous15:48

      Have you seen the state of Slovenian railways? It takes about 5 hours with faster passenger trains from MB to the seaside.

      Sure, just couple of tens of millions and MBX can be a cargo hub. Or you know, cargo aircraft can land at LJU, where we already have all the infrastructure in place.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous16:02

      LJU does have rail link ? or do Slovenians transport cargo only by trucks ?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous16:25

      It doesn't. But it's still faster by truck to most of Slovenia from LJU than MBX.

      In 2019, LJU handled 24.875 tonnes of freight, which is about 68t per day, or roughly about 5 large trucks. There's no need for railway link for that amount of traffic, especially when you consider that most of that are express courier shipments (DHL/UPS/TNT), which are transported via vans around the country, not even trucks.

      I don't see the need to invest an obscene amount of money into yet another failed project (remember the extremely utilised brand new terminal in MBX?), as long as LJU can handle cargo that comes to Slovenia by air.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous16:48

      interesting, so what's the role of big warehouses of Kuehne + Nagel and Air Cargo near LJU ? How does Slovenia post handle its shipments ?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  11. Anonymous13:30

    Is it Aeroflot starting to fly to Ljubljana tomorrow?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:48

      Yes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  12. azdren16:57

    how does a country of 2.1 million people only have fewer than 5k passengers fly ? the country isn't accepting any foreign tourists ? Slovenians cant fly to other Euro nations ? total disaster

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:37

      Yes, in Slovenia all hotels, restaurants and bars are closed, so there are no tourists, not even domestic ones. And Slovenians can't even cross the border of their municipalities, so basically you can't even travel to the municipality where the airport is located. Only essential travel is allowed, internal end external.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous21:42

      You can't travel for personal reasons but there are many exceptions in decrees for which you are allowed to travel. And people do travel, just not out of LJU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:47

      @18:37:

      Aaaa, so are elswhere?

      @azdren:
      Because we let our national carrier go down the drain. Actually, a former comedian an a prime minister , Marjan Sarec decided it would be in his best interest to let Adria go bankrupt in order to get some votes. The guy voluntarily stepped down a couple of months later and now he wants to get back. Only in Slovenia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  13. Charlie19:00

    Curious why Lufthansa didn't base a regional jet in LJU when Adria collapsed. They could have covered all of the connections to FRA, MUC, VIE & ZRH. Probably could have done these four cities daily with one aircraft. Later they could add another to increase daily flights and to add new destinations as demand warrants. In the future a third aircraft and so on.

    LJU could be treated as any other small to medium sized Germany city, like NUE, or Austrian INN, or SZG. Basically incorporate LJU into the entire Lufthansa network of flights as a feeder for their hubs, but also with some direct flights to select cities. Demand surly exists (pre-Covid). That way they could corner the market for most transfer flights from LJU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:11

      Which is pretty much what they did, except ''basing'' an aircraft? Lufthansa flied to FRA and MUC while Swiss to ZRH

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Charlie21:19

      But by basing a plane at LJU they could potentially fly to BEG or SKP, or other cities, if there was a demand.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:38

      @anon 20:11

      If LX/SN flies to ZRH/BRU once per day and even that flight is in the middle of the day then we can not talk about good connectivity. Those flights were completely useless and that's why they were canceled first. Even LH took half a year to place aircraft overnight in LJU.

      Charlie

      From JP figures we sat that there is demand for morning and evening rotations to main hubs (FRA/MUC/ZRH/BRU) and some flights to Balkan (PRN/SKP/TIA/SJJ).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous22:33

      Well that just shows how much Lufthansa group values LJU. If they weren't bothering to at least add more frequenices or change the schedule, i highly doubt they would even considering basing an aircraft there.

      I don't know about SJJ and SKP, but i can guarantee you there is zero O&D demand between TIA and LJU. Maybe a bit more for PRN, but not to justify direct flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Charlie00:40

      I would think that Lufthansa would be interested in LJU if for no other reason than to consolidate their market, and to lessen the competition.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous01:53

      It seems logical from our ex-yu aviation perspective but from Lufthansa's perspective its probably quite irrelevant. Especially nowadays when LJU is handling 5k pax a month.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:46

      @Charlie:

      What competition? LJU has 5000 pax.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  14. Anonymous19:20

    (Unofficially) European commission did not approve adria2.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:40

      How's that possible when decisions are not taken? That's official statement from EU commission which is also published on their official website.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous21:48

      @19:20:

      Really? Do you know why? I just hope it's not so we could give our (taxpayers) money to Lufthansa in order for them to fly to LJU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous22:42

      Just seen it on rtvslo. Perhaps EU (Germany) wants us to subsidise Lufthansa and Fraport?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  15. Anonymous23:49

    Let's just for fun compare traffic figures among all 24 Fraport group airports in January; LJU had the worst performance with -93,5 decline, followed by second worst SKG with -87%. The best was St. Petersburg with -30,3%. FRA itself had -80,9%.
    For perspective, let's see the absolute numbers: LJU had 4.923 pax, which is similar to Corfu (4.818), Santorini (4.659), Kos (5.021), Samos (5.077); all between -58% and -84%. Btw, Chania, the secondary Crete's airport had twice as much pax as LJU. If you don't like comparisons with island airports, Varna had -72% and 4x LJU pax figures.

    So, question for all the guys saying Slovenia is in lockdown and we are not allowed to go out of our municipality and that's why LJU is suffering so much: How come a small greek island with 15.000 inhabitants has the same pax numbers. Oh, yes and Greece is also in lockdown, you have to do a PCR test and self-isolate for a week upon arrival. Probably there's not many tourists and also, it's January.

    I think sooner or later it should be clear there's something going on in LJU. I bet on a combination of bad management and lack of government strategy. We'll see that in the coming months, when LJU will still be lagging behind everyone else, despite increase in traffic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:37

      Very good points you pointed there, but the examples for the Greek coastal airports are like this because they rely on domestic flights from bigger cities especially Athens. Slovenia does not have domestic traffic similar to Croatia for example.
      As for Varna, same scenario, there is some domestic traffic combined with selected European winter destinations.
      We don't know if there's something going on with LJU but let's not forget about geography. This has been discussed here for many years. Slovenia is a drive society and surrounded by many big airports especially Venice Marco-Polo.
      Adria managed to bring a good number of passengers to the country yet again, the figures were never soaring.
      It remains a tricky market for the LCCs and we see U2 becoming more dominant on the London route. W6 seem to act quite passively and preferred to stay with Charleroi.
      Whatever happens, the new terminal must be filled and utilised and more work should be done not only by the government but by the local municipalities. They have to unite and try working closely with Fraport and determine, which destinations would work best.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:53

      On the positive note if they manage to bring additional 5000 PAX to LJU this will mean that LJU will register highest growth in the EXYU region.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:12

      @00:37:

      Big airports?? You gotta be kidding me. ZAG and VCE are big? Perhaps VIE but it's nowhere near LJU.

      @23:49:
      Very nice analysis. Just goes to show that LJU is dead without a national carrier. Some people are just to arrogant to admit they were wrong and will search left, right and center to find other excuses.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Ljubljana tipped for new Tirana and Las Palmas service

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025