Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May47
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


KLM may scrap some EX-YU routes in 2023 over green cap

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

KLM could potentially terminate over thirty destinations from its network if the Dutch government proceeds with its plans to impose a “green cap” limiting movements at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport to minimise noise pollution and CO2 emissions. As EX-YU Aviation News learns, services to Belgrade and Zagreb are among those shortlisted for termination along with the likes of Istanbul, Porto and Tel Aviv. Medium and long haul destinations would also be cut. In total, 25 of the proposed routes would be in Europe. In a sign of things to come, KLM has halved its planned flights to both Belgrade and Zagreb this coming winter season from double daily to daily, although this reduction is in relation to the ongoing caps Schiphol Airport has introduced due to a chronic shortage of staff. The airline still plans to upgrade its seasonal summer Split service to year-round operations this winter, with daily flights to be maintained to Croatia’s second largest city.

The Dutch government has detailed changes that would effectively limit Schiphol to a maximum of 440.000 flight movements per year from November 2023. This marks a significant reduction from the current 500.000-movement cap, as well as reversing earlier plans that would have allowed growth to 540.000 movements, which is 20% above the planned cap. KLM is pleading with the Dutch parliament to reverse the planned capacity limits. The airline spoke of “significant damage” to its network, in part because the company has to cope with transfer passengers who fly from, for example, Asia via Schiphol to another destination in Europe. “In recent years, we have added unique connections to make the Europe operation profitable and to make KLM financially healthy”, the airline said. According to KLM, this shrinkage is unnecessary because fleet renewal leads to better outcomes for noise and emission reduction. Replacing old aircraft with more fuel-efficient planes could cut noise by half by 2030. The newer aircraft would also reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emissions by 15%.

KLM’s operations to both Zagreb and Belgrade have been successful. Services to the Croatian capital were launched on a seasonal summer basis in 2014 but were quickly extended to year-round flights. Operations were increased to double daily last year as the Dutch carrier became Zagreb’s busiest foreign airline during the height of the coronavirus pandemic. On the other hand, KLM introduced three weekly services to Belgrade in May of last year. The route has performed well with the airline boosting operations to double daily within just three months of its launch. KLM competes against both Croatia Airlines and Air Serbia on its respective operations to Zagreb and Belgrade.



October 12, 2022
Belgrade croatia Feature serbia Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 zagreb
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    I'm beyond words about this policy by the Dutch government.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:43

      The Netherlands keeps winning!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Dejan Milinković11:55

      Yes, it my scrap over green crap.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:22

      Absolute nonsense. Green FRAUD. CO2 constitutes 0,3% of the atmosphere. Human activity is responsible for about 0,3 to 0,5%.... So make your own conclusion. Regurgitation of that stupid neomalthusian garbage will return you too the stone age. Yes, the price of realizing this is high; institutions do not work for you.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:59

      Totalitarianism as it best.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Dejan Milinković13:26

      Haven't we all been living in totalitarianism for last three years? If closing people or introducing covid passport were not clear signs of totalitarianism I really don't know what they are.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous14:26

      @Dejan
      Yupp, some people don`t see it even if it`s in front of their nose. Despite all of their education. Strange.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:02

    We are going backwards...
    Wth is this?
    The planes that are used right now are the most environmentally friendly there ever were

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:02

    Greta Thunberg likes this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      Lufthansa too

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:48

      So does OU!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:03

    I think it is so unfair how activists blame aviation for all environmental problems yet it is an industry that has done the most to innovate and turn to becoming more green.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:27

      But you understand that people who don't travel for work or who don't have far flung families think of it as a frivolous waste of resources and source of CO2? I need to fly, and maybe you do too, but we are in a minority.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous08:05

      These arguments would end once and for all with a flat tax on carbon emissions. This would increase the flight ticket prices in actual proportion to the damage inflicted upon nature. Not hard to imagine this increase being significant enough to stop those fly because they’re bored or want to go to a disco for weekend, and NOT significant enough to stop those who go see family once per year or who fly for significant business. Problem solved. It would also significantly stop unnecessary urban sprawl (lots of emissions taxes every day = don’t live an hour of driving away from your work just so you can have 5 bathrooms and a wine cellar, but = still OK to go for one or two road trips per year) and actually stop all significant sources of emissions while relieving us of the absurdities of energy-saving vacuum cleaners and similar nonsense that saves 0.0001% of emissions. But this will never come to pass because this way the politicians don’t get to meddle and decide who gets to emit CO2 and who doesn’t…

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:03

    The Dutch government certainly knows how to kill off its economy and jobs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      Not the first time. Dutch farmers are protesting because the government's proposals for tackling nitrogen emissions which means a big cut in livestock. They have lost the plot.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:36

      They kill the economy and peoples purchasing power with their climate stuff. In the Netherlands there are more then enough jobs so that's not the biggest problem besides Schiphol already has staff shortages.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:50

      The Netherlands everyone knows is past, welcome to the future aka trying if new stupid ideas would work so they can be world's first in everything.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:57

      * more than enough

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:04

    There is more and more pressure on the government to amend this ridiculous policy so hopefully they won't be ending these routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous09:06

    Not good. Especially since they are already significantly cutting frequencies to BEG and ZAG this winter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      Wouldn't it have made more sense to keep ZAG double daily this winter and not launch Split?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:18

      I find it odd too although they cut BEG and ZAG in just the last few days. Obviously it wasn't something they planned on doing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:57

      Launching winter flights into a highly seasonal leisure destination while cutting flights to already proven capital destinations (and decimating their transatlantic connectivity) is totally weird. Considering all the developments including farmers' protests, lack of the cheapest labor (security staff and ramp workers) causing collapse of most advanced and complex business sector, and these measures to go green, I wonder if Dutch people finally started to smoke what they sell to the tourists so far?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:26

      I think a world famous and highly experienced airline knows better than people on forums

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:31

      Anon 10:26 Alitalia, PanAm, Malev, Kingfisher, Transaero, Air Berlin, Monarch, Spanair, Germania and Thomas Cook liked this comment.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:51

      It is likely they got incentives to keep the route over winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:07

    KLM has become very popular in BEG very fast. They are performing extremely well with a lot of transfer passengers to a lot of destinations. It would be a real shame to loose them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:15

      And they are actually quite a good airline, especially on eurosectors, compared to others.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:52

      Another factor is profitability. KLM flies a lot of business-heavy routes like, for example, London City, Billund, Bergen etc. Ticket prices are often in the high 3-digits. So I guess they would want to reserve enough capacity for those first, before looking at gasto/transfer routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:54

      Sorry, this should have been a reply to the comment below :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:08

    I wonder what their rationale was to deciding which routes get cut? Considering they went from 3 weekly to double daily to BEG in just a few months is an indication that loads aren't the issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      Maybe where they have competition? IST is also on the list.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:11

      In Belgrade and Zagreb they have a codeshare with JU and OU so transfer passengers would just use them to fly to and from AMS.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:12

      I agree with last anon. They were probably looking on which routes they have codeshares and where they can transfer passengers to partners.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:16

      It is likely a mixture of factors. Competitions, weaker routes, routes where they can codeshare with others...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:16

      *competition.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:53

      Another factor is profitability. KLM flies a lot of business-heavy routes like, for example, London City, Billund, Bergen etc. Ticket prices are often in the high 3-digits. So I guess they would want to reserve enough capacity for those first, before looking at gasto/transfer routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous10:51

      Certainly yields played a big role in their decision.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous15:21

      What are the yields?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:10

    AMS is an absolute mess. I flew from/to there just 10 days ago. Huge lines everywhere, over an hour at immigration, we had to wait in the plane for 30 minutes until someone showed up to connect the air bridge to the plane, huge lines at every shop at the airport. Shambles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      No wonder more and more airlines are looking at alternatives for AMS.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:11

    So by winter 2023/24 these routes could be gone from KLM's network?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:13

      Yes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:51

      Hopefully it won't come to that

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:51

      Hopefully it will! Both OU and JU will profit from this left, sorry, green agenda!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:11

    This practically limits KLM from any growth in the future. Madness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      That's what KLM has been telling the parliament. It is a death sentence for them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:11

    Well, I guess (yet) another opportunity for ASL.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:13

      I think all airlines will be limited from growing at AMS from winter 23/24. Not just KLM.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:13

    Stunned by how progre the Netherlands are heading to. A super important European airport like Amsterdam with 6 runways, flights to worldwide destinations and a pioneer for years...and a country with a population of almost the entire ex-Yu region to "think green" similar to the same bs in Sweden is just hilarious.
    Not to mention the hectic and embarrassing situation in Schiphol with the lack of staff. Probably hired as the news libs in the "green government".
    Man, the West that you all praise is heading towards a sure and slow end.
    Simply unbelievable..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:09

      W
      Because they are takong action? Are you aware that we can bot keep living like we do, we are becomi g more and more people on earrh and if we all lived like westerners the world would be gone already. We just consume consume consume without thinking of enviromenent

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:15

    KLM to scrap Istanbul over green cap?

    Yeah yeah. :)

    KLM daily 1 flight in AMS - IST route with 737.
    TK daily 5 flights in AMS - IST route with all wide bodies (A333, B787 and A359).

    Yeah green cap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      Nobody will even notice they are gone.
      It's like BA or LH would say they are terminating flights to the Gulf. I wonder who on earth flies with LH to DXB or DOH anyway....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:31

      True

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:32

      Mostly transfer passengers reaching destinations they can't from DXB or DOH, especially in Europe.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:16

    I fly Amsterdam to Belgrado at least 7-8 times per year and on KLM. Flights are always full and frequently get upgauged to 295 Embraer. The fares on this route is also usually much higher than to nearby places I also visit for work. But with Schiphol today being 3rd world garbage and our cows seen as enviromental facists, nothing more can surprise me from this ridiculous government. Netherlands is sliding backwars at F1 speed so this forced decision should not surprise anyone and KLM will pay a huge price undeservadly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous09:17

    Go woke, go broke

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:21

      Couldn't have said it better.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:28

      Liberalist extremism and fundamentalism of Western Europeans will be the death knell of Europe.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  18. Anonymous09:19

    Why would you do something like this to your airline and airport?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous09:20

    Sad

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:21

    Makes no sense, especially with KLM getting newer and greener planes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  21. Anonymous09:22

    What other routes does KLM fly to in ex-Yu?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:23

      Other than the ones mentioned in the article, just Dubrovnik.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:17

      Very limited presence.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  22. Anonymous09:22

    Well there goes my wish of them introducing Ljubljana anytime soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:35

      Slovène government is almost on the same mindset similar to the Dutch. Instead of fixing the business lounge in LJU and creating new routes, they are "thinking green" and busy with other way less important issues.
      Man, look at Serbia. A non-EU country and less economically developed compared to Slovenia.
      During the last, couple of years it managed to significantly improve its aviation. BEG secured so many new routes, has slowly developed its smaller regional airports. Not to mention the significant improvements made by Air Serbia.
      Slovenia government is probably busy with gender issues rather than having a strong and important, regional airport that'll give jobs to many people and invite more business to the country.
      Just a shame, really.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:49

      What does the government have to do with fixing an airport lounge?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:01

      Did Fraport drop that to the government's lap too?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:03

      File a serious complaint against the concessionaire for instance. Did you read yesterday's comments about the airport business lounge in the news section? Did you read the online reviews?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  23. Anonymous09:25

    This will probably impact Transavia too

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:39

      It will impact all airlines, but KLM the most.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  24. Anonymous09:32

    Who knows, maybe in 10 years we'll be paying double for healthy Dutch agro products. I wouldn't call stupid all these measures, they are smart folks, although this one looks too particular. Best regards from Belgrade which is, last evening and this morning, the most polluted capital city in the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:41

      When you guys have your metro ready by 2028 things will change. Believe me, a big city without a proper metro system is not good and traffic becomes a nightmare. Good example is neighbouring Sofia. They now have almost 50 stations and traffic and pollution are still there but decreased as time went by.
      A city like Beograd with 1,7 million people urgently needs at least 50 stations as well if not more.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:12

      No, metro is green agenda. Fossil fuels rock.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  25. Anonymous09:38

    I hope they give up on these plans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous09:38

    Hope not. Would miss their blue and white planes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  27. Anonymous09:39

    Don't know for who they are expanding infrastructure at AMS for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:42

      The expansion project started before these silly policies were announced.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:52

      The project is really delayed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  28. Anonymous09:44

    Talk about self destructive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:52

      You could look at it both ways. Maybe long term it is the right decision.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:23

      Maybe is not an argument.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  29. Anonymous10:03

    Not surprised at all. WEF infested Rutte government and the Great Reset.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  30. JU520 BEGLAX10:20

    The only question is, how much do we people allow them (politicians) to go? In my eyes it's already clear since 2020: we need millions on the streets of AMS PAR BER FRA MUC HAM DUS CGN STR FLR NAP MAD BCN LIS VLC ROM MIL VIE PRG WAW STO OSL ZRH GVA BRN BRU AMS CPH HEL BUD SOF LJU ZAG ATH and if this is not helping, general strikes until all government fall and we get reasonable politics back, not just in terms of the green agenda, also in terms of Covid and the relations to Russia. We need immediate peace in the Ukraine, with current governments in the EU and WAS, this however is not possible.

    AMS is just the start. In the UK they are studies (financed by the gvment) to shut down all airports by 2030, except for LHR BFS and GLA. I have the study and could share it with admin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:42

      What are you going on about???

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:01

      @Admin how is this comment allowed?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  31. Anonymous11:22

    Wow a real shame

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  32. Anonymous11:51

    This is ludicrous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  33. Anonymous11:53

    I don't understand that they still haven't sorted out their staffing issues at AMS. Are we to expect caps next summer too because they have no workers?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:04

      No hard workers is not the problem.The problem is that Schiphol wants to compete with the global big airports. That's why they pay the staff minimum wage. There is loads of work in the Netherlands. You can easy find a job that is easier and pays better.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  34. Anonymous14:42

    Lowcosters will be hardest hit by green reductions. No more citybreaks for 30eur.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23:56

      Big mistake. Because those 30€ citybreaks usually end up you paying 150€ for instance. You sustain the local economy, local hotel, bus driver and so many others.
      Greeners think that by introducing green politics they will "protect the environment". Will a protected enviornment pay your future pension or sustain the current economy?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:18

      KLM like other major airlines will have to reduce operations and fleet over time. If proud tradition and legacy of KLM is not spared from government pressure, who will then save lowcosters? Lowcoster's dreams about doubling fleet will face brutal reality once EU is done with major airlines. LCCs will be thrown under the bus.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  35. Anonymous15:43

    Will they limit the number of flights by OU & JU to AMS?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:11

      Probably. Since they have limited staff.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  36. notLufthansa16:20

    Flying is privelege, not right. Use trains lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:45

      What an intellect.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:47

      Use trains to get around? Like before the invention of the aeroplane? Go back 150 years? Very smart.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:53

      I'm pretty sure he is being ironic.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. notLufthansa17:45

      ^^^ at least one with brains.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:09

      If you think trains today in (western) Europe are same as they were 150 year ago, then I really wonder under which rock do you live.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  37. Anonymous16:37

    I understand the issue with the climate but in some Western European countries it really has become “cult” like. You have them talk about the existence of humanity as if they haven’t had below replacement fertility for years lmao

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:46

      More of a mad house than a cult.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  38. Boris17:16

    I wouldnt look at this decision too tragically. It is conscious decision to gradually shutdown Capitalism. It run its course of ever expanding growth with shrinking resources. Of course there is also an element that certain countries decided that they dont want to trade anymore their hard assets for imaginary assets (oil/gas for digital/paper currency) . So what is left to do ? You have to create some Value based ideology (Green agenda) to justify decisions of shutting down gradually the economy. For Ex-Yu transatlantic passengers is a bit inconvenience in terms of choices to reach their final destinations but they will al find the way. Amsterdam loss is Istanbul gain. Instead of KLM passengers will use TK on transatlantic flights; so it is not big deal. Maybe even have a day layover in Istanbul and taste some good baklava LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:18

      So communism with extra steps. No thanks.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Boris22:22

      All I am saying that KLM cancellations are not tragic. As far as new transhumanism promoted by West they will have to resolve by themselves in the West.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  39. Anonymous18:01

    Expect KLM to follow Shell on moving to the UK. Air France will be happy to have a weak partner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  40. Anonymous20:11

    Get woke, go broke

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  41. Anonymous20:28

    This happens when you are listening without asking. Then you do not deserve to fly or go anywhere. Stay home, work 9-9, and die. Thank you but no thank you 🤣.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  42. Anonymous21:37

    Who cares? There are other, cheaper alternatives to KLM. And those people who are off topic about the air pollution and traffic in Beograd should try living in New York City or any other large city in the USA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  43. Anonymous03:20

    This is what Liberalism has done to Nertherlands and Europe overall, keep listening to Climate protesting Liberals, this what happens.

    Liberalism has destroyed Europe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:03

      So we should return to socialist way of managing economy?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:49

      But this is contrary of liberalism.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Kazakhstan’s SCAT Airlines to launch Belgrade service

Image

Air Serbia plans 32-member fleet in 2026, eyes MRO facility

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025