Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June8
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Slovenia to decide on new national carrier by mid-2023

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

The incoming Slovenian Minister for Infrastructure, Alenka Bratušek, has renewed hopes of the country establishing a new flag carrier, three and a half years following the collapse of the former national airline Adria Airways. Ms Bratušek noted that a task force is examining the feasibility of setting up a new state-backed carrier. "I believe that somewhere by the middle of the year we will be able to come up with an answer based on sound facts and data”, she said. Ms Bratušek, who was the Minister for Infrastructure when Adria Airways declared bankruptcy in September 2019, campaigned during last year’s election with the promise of establishing a new national carrier.

Ms Bratušek previously said she repeatedly warned against the sale of Adria Airways to the German capital fund 4K Invest, noting that the then government of Slovenia should have found a strategic partner within the aviation industry that would have ensured the long-term existence and development of the carrier. Key people at 4K Invest are under investigation over their role in Adria’s collapse and are accused of fraud and theft. The General Manager of operator Fraport Slovenija, Babett Stapel, said last year, “I cannot decide whether Slovenia or the state should establish a national carrier. However, I can say that if it is established, it will be more than welcome on our part. We support any development that is sustainable and increases connectivity”.

Slovenia’s current political establishment has direct links to Adria. The carrier’s former CEO, Klemen Boštjančič, who led the airline in 2011 and 2012, now serves as Slovenia’s Finance Minister. Mr Boštjančić implemented wide-scale cost cutting measures at the airline, which stabilised the carrier’s finances. However, it came at a cost, with the company diminishing its route network, resulting in a major plunge in passenger numbers. Furthermore, Rok Marolt, who was the head of the Slovenia Civil Aviation Agency, and served as Adria’s Chief Operating Officer in 2012, is the country’s Secretary General at the Ministry for Finance. Slovenia’s President, Nataša Pirc Musar, had a short stint as a member of Adria’s cabin crew and recently expressed her deep regret at the airline’s collapse.



January 15, 2023
Adria Airways Feature Ljubljana slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    I can bet they will decide it's unnecessary and that the new subsidies are sufficient.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Here we go again

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:35

      They should stop giving us hope.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:05

    With the recent LH increases, Fraport will probably try and not make this happen. They own the airport at a 100% stake. There might be a strong protectionism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:16

      If Fraport really wanted a new airline we would have had one by now.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:29

      What does Fraport have anything with national carrier?!?!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:08

    Not gonna happen unfortunately

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:24

      Fortunately!
      So tired of that tax payers parasites.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:30

      I agree anon 11:24. Regards from Slovenske železnice! :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:33

    She “warned” that selling adria to 4K could be bad. Warned who? Herself?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous09:35

    Interesting how many former Adria executives now have top jobs in government. Not sure if that's good or bad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eight09:54

      Bad, always bad. Business is always about profit, politics are about being reelected.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:03

      I don't think these people can deliver it but let's see. Hope dies last.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:31

      If anyone can, then they are last hope. All other's are openly against national carrier.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous20:47

      This country is becoming more and more like the mafia every day! Same people in high positions everywhere. Who's the next CEO? Tanja Fajon?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:35

      Janez J. ;)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:35

    There is still some hope

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:36

    I still don't think it will happen in the end but for Slovenia's sake I hope it does.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous09:39

    The subsidies that were announced yesterday are more than enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous09:39

    What's the point? The EU won't give approval for a new airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:56

      The EU does not need to approve it. What it had to approve was when the government had the idea to set up a new airline using EU covid recovery money. That they didn't approve.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:40

    What for?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:24

      I agree.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:32

      Maybe to improve connectivity in Slovenia which is on last place within EU!?!? That's why!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:48

    I am against new carrier if they try to make new Adria. Maybe connectivity would be better, but prices would soar. What we need is one regional carrier establishing base at LJU and base two or three regional aircraft there and offer better timings on existing routes and start few new ones. And they should keep all existing carriers to have competition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eight09:52

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. notLufthansa11:31

      you are entitled to use whatever connection you please. So stop your bs. Yes, bring that regional carrier already. It has been more than two years since Adria demise. Regional carrier with base in LJU has not materialised yet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:34

      @9:48:
      And I'm against salary increases for physicians, attorneys and judges due to their piss poor services. But the elected imbeciles did just that. Now let them set up an airline. At least there will be something in it for me.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous05:57

      notLufthansa: And since Adria's demise, has something special happened? Maybe something that has crippled the airline industry and made all but the strongest airlines or those with government support go bankrupt? I struggle to see the relevance of more than two years passing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:01

      And what happened from September till March (when Covid started)? few flights and that's it..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. notLufthansa10:21

      since Adria demise aviation is in steep decline in Slovenia. Know how slowly dies off, connectivity is worse than in 90', people are driving for hours to get to the airport with at least some connectivity. Neoliberals were joyful when Adria went under saying, market will take care of everything. As I already said in some other post - this situation now clearly shows, how insignificant Slovenia and Ljubljana are in terms of air connectivity. I said many times that Adria could maintain itself, if it was properly managed. This is not a myth and not only wishful thinking. But it needed to be in sync with tourist industry in Slovenia or else end.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:30

      @9:44 LCC for sure won't open a base in LJU. Taxes are just crazy high for them to have employees on a local contract, not to mention fees at LJU airport. I fly for pink airline and if you pay us (subsidies) some routes will be flown, but when that stops, flights stop as well. Prices will soar?...with all the legacy carriers collapsing, LCC is taking over the routes plus ticket prices as well. But LCC will cancel the flight after the check in if they need the aircraft somewhere else in more important route or base

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  13. Eight09:51

    "Incoming minister" can speak whaterever she wants, but reality check is needed. Politicians and greed burried Adria. Same faces, same stories... same outcome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:20

      And they always bring that 4k to blame. Real fact is that these bunch of greedy politicians were the reason for Adria's collapse before, during and after that German management period. There was no aviation related company interested to take Adria. That German management just extended the running time of airline by few years and nothing else.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:55

    Yes and that has been a smashing success so far...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous09:56

    I'm really hoping we see some improvement in Slovenia's aviation sector, be it with subsidies or the new national airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Rodney Marinkovic10:03

    Slovenia is rich country. Will establishing leading airline.
    Those people is business orientated. Capable and Know How.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous10:10

    This whole situation is hilarious already isn’t that a 3rd consecutive year when the government will talk about establishing a new carrier? And I will be extreamly surprised if the results will be any different.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:10

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:49

      "Good" guys are now in government, making same stupid decisions, but hey at least they are "good".

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:59

      From my side of view that (establishing national carrier) would be smart and would improve connectivity in Slovenia significantly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:48

      Of course, it would be, but this is the 3rd or 4th time this was announced since Adria's collapse, and there was always the same result.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  18. Anonymous10:10

    I wish Slovenia all the success in creating new airline. They deserve it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous10:54

    Yup.... YM 2.0 that just racked up more debt.

    One difference that goes in favour of YM is that they attract a lot more tourism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous11:04

    From what I know, this is actually going ahead...If the goverment holds

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:09

      I just don't understand what is the point then of offering subsidies to airlines which are significantly more than what has been offered in the past.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:14

      Past ones were for keeping the routes, the new ones are for creating 10 extra daily flights, so we could see up to 15-18 new routes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:14

      because they are for SS season.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:00

      Also do not forget that new national carrier would get most of those subsidies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  21. Anonymous12:21

    well they still have less tourists than slovenia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous14:29

    Slovenia should at least make a half-documentary, half-telenovela series about the national airline saga.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:45

      Agree. There is a lot of material and it could be an excellent comedy show.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:52

      From Adria being a very good airline to becoming a total disaster, the Maribor airport saga, Portoroz airport, and its runway extension saga, and all the nonsense that the Slovenian government made since the Adria collapse. This could get an Oscar.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:54

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous23:37

      I would watch it for sure

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous23:00

      Another double episode could be the development and the upgrades of LJCE airport

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  23. Anonymous10:10

    How can we talk about bad connectivity of Slovenia, when airports with good connections are betwen 45 minutes to the max 2,5 hour away. Who say that flights should start in Ljubljana? For two third of Slovenians LJU is not really an option.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:24

      And when you want to attract people to Slovenia, do you really think that high valued guest will use go-opti and drive 2-5 hours to Slovenia? Forget about that. Slovenia needs national carrier asap!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:55

      @anon 1342 Among many tourist visting Slovenia the majority arrive by car but only a handful by plane. If they decide to visit Slovenia, they will organise themselves the convenient transfer. No doubt.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:24

      No they won't! Why would they visit Slovenia if most convenient flight is to ZAG/VCE? They will stay in Croatia/Italy then. After JP demise Slovenia does not have any congress tourism at all, just because of lack of connectivity. Not to mention about all other business aspect which has impact on Slovenia economy as well.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  24. Anonymous07:27

    It is not about being a National carrier. It is about connectivity and with that the positive GDP impact. There are example that the economy can get a boost when connectivity is the focus. Good example is airBaltic in Latvia with the right aircraft and a mix between connectivity needs for business and leisure. Latvia is also a small country but has a profitable airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous16:18

    Guys is the new national carrier of Slovenia going to be Camex Adria Airlines?? Because if it's that then it's a joke because it will use Cargo planes such as B738-800 BCF

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Emirates: No plans for Zagreb or Belgrade service

Image

Two North African carriers considering scheduled Belgrade flights

Image

Air Serbia gains access to Trans-Siberian air corridor

Image

Croatia Airlines outlines A220-100 deployment

Image

Montenegro to launch subsidised PSO flights

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025