Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Onboard Aviogenex, 1986

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June48
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia prepares for Chicago service launch

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia is preparing to add its second destination in the United States in just over a month and a half, on May 17, with the airline to connect Belgrade and Chicago with a nonstop air service exactly 31 years to the day since operations were last maintained. Air Serbia has told EX-YU Aviation News that advanced bookings have been strong, and that the majority are currently made up of point-to-point traffic although a greater share of transfer passengers is expected in the coming period. The Chicago service will be maintained three times per week, using the same flight numbers that were utilised by Air Serbia’s predecessor JAT Yugoslav Airlines. The last scheduled flight between Belgrade and Chicago was carried out on May 17, 1992.

One of the airline's largest sellers in North America, travel agency Axioma Travel, says the new route has generated a lot of interest. Speaking recently to EX-YU Aviation News, Axioma Travel’s President and CEO, Fedja Stepanovich, said, “There is lots of interest as expected. Fares across all airlines are very high for this first full post-Covid summer and Air Serbia’s nonstop flight from Chicago to Belgrade is no exception. Most potential passengers are still on the sidelines hoping for lower fares, which I think will not come this summer. Based on available RBDs [booking class] in the CRS [Central Reservation System], I would say that the Chicago flights are ahead to JFK in terms of booked passengers for summer 2023”. Air Serbia itself said last month that load factors on the Chicago route are stronger than to New York, although it noted that there is significantly less capacity on the Chicago service. “However, we consider it a very positive surprise because it is a newly launched route, while JFK has already matured”, the Serbian carrier noted.

Mr Stepanovich explained that there is interest for the Chicago service outside of the city as well. “We get many customers requesting the new flights via Chicago but wind up booking via JFK because they are cheaper. We have a lot of customers that dislike JFK, but not enough to pay more to connect via Chicago. The Chicago flights operate three times a week and all three have very different departure times. While this may be convenient for passengers living in Chicago and going beyond Belgrade, it does not really help USA beyond Chicago connection traffic at O’Hare”. Commenting on customers booking tickets for travel via Belgrade, Mr Stepnovich said, “As far as beyond Belgrade is concerned, it’s mainly Skopje and Podgorica / Tivat that we see. Sarajevo does not have a connection both ways and Ljubljana and Zagreb passengers have virtually no interest to connect via Belgrade. It’s a shame Sarajevo does not have a connection, as I am sure that would sell well”.

In addition to the three weekly Chicago service, the Serbian carrier will maintain daily flights to New York during the peak summer travel period. Air Serbia is interested in adding more destinations in the United States once it commences operations to Chicago, with Miami being one of the front runners. “We're looking at other destinations in the US. But again, our main strategy is to target cities that have year-round potential. We do not want to increase seasonality, which is already high in our region”, Air Serbia previously said.



March 27, 2023
Air Serbia Belgrade Feature serbia Summer 2023
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    Which terminal will JU use at ORD?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      Terminal 5

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:11

      T5 is the airport's main international terminal

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:21

      Any idea which lounge they will be using in Chicago for business class passengers? They haven't listed it on their website yet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:36

      Probably Swissport lounge. Used by Etihad too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Nemjee09:51

      Some like Lufthansa arrive to T5 but depart from UA's terminal. Even though this might be easier for transfers, T5 is much nicer than the UA terminal.
      ORD is quite ok for transfers even if you have to clear customs. Done it at least a dozen times and never had a problem.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous12:49

      Once these direct flights happen we will no longer be at the mercy of the EU strikes and cancelled flights for trips to Canada, US and Latin America!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Nemjee20:30

      Now it's OS' turn to go on a strike ... sorry, they are calling it a collective meeting or something like that. Austrian Airlines had to cancel a whole bunch of flights tomorrow.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Congratulations to Air Serbia for their courage and vision for long haul development. Wishing them good luck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      Can't wait for the launch. Will be a historic day.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:05

    I am sure that Chicago will prove to be a success for Air Serbia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:15

      Maybe even bigger than JFK.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:17

      I always wondered why they launched JFK ahead of ORD.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:34

      Much bigger number of connecting passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Nemjee09:53

      Not just that, New York is the single biggest O&D market from Belgrade. A lot of Serbs go there for holidays which isn't the case with Chicago.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:31


      No sane people goes to Chicago all year and Miami in summer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:05

    Miami next please

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:34

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous02:30

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous04:43

      -2

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  5. Rodney Marinkovic09:05

    Bratski let u pobratimski Cikago. Prvi put Er Srbija siri krila prema Micigenu. 🛫♥️✈🌐🛫
    Pozdrav iz Sidneja. 🇦🇺♥️🇷🇸🛫🇺🇸✈

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      Chicago is in Illinois, not in Michigan.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:48

      He meant Lake Michigan :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Avionlet11:34

      I guess he meant the Lake Michigan and not the state

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:04

      JAT used to fly to Chicago and Cleveland.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Rodney Marinkovic06:14

      Aero Put vas Aero Put. All so JAT was JAT. And Air Serbia is at present in glory to Serbia. National airline of the same state, Serbia. Proudly facts! ✈🇷🇸🛫🌐✈

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:07

    The Balkan Diaspora is huge in Chicago. It will do well on this route.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nemjee09:55

      Not just in Chicago but in south Wisconsin as well. Lots of Serbs are living around Milwaukee and they can easily use this route.

      It's a shame they don't have a partner in ORD as they could have offered convenient connections to the Midwest and especially to places like Ohio where a lot of Serbs live.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:20

      AA might work

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:08

    I'm surprised that P2P is dominant on this route. Would have thought it would be the other way around.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      It shows there is a huge diaspora.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee09:56

      There is more competition for the transfer market. Just look at the amount of flights that are offered by UA, LH, LX and OS to VIE, FRA, MUC and ZRH.

      A friend of mine flew on LX to BEG from ORD and he was told that there were 75 transfers to BEG alone!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:11

      Anecdotal evidence. If that flight carries 50% of all ORD-BEG pax it would mean 110k annual return pax based on that sample. Annual number are just over 30k.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Nemjee16:22

      Well, the market will grow once non-stop flights are added. Don't forget that BEG has a large catchment area so in the future passengers from Croatia, Romania and maybe even southern Hungary might use BEG for flights to North America. Once they do numbers will grow quite a bit.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:08

    Interesting insight from the tour operator. Good to hear that point of view.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous09:10

    The fares are expensive

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      It means demand is high.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:18

      There were promo fares on the first few days of sale but it didn't last long.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:24

      I purchased my BEG-ORD-BEG flights for 820 euros a few weeks ago. But I have to say the additional cost for selecting a seat is pretty expensive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:29

      What is the cost to select the seat?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:48

      Almost a 100 euros for exit row.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:54

      Similar on other airlines too. I was recently shocked when I booked a Swiss business class ticket from ZRH to JFK that I had to pay to select a seat in business class on the A330! And it was 150 euros each way.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous02:34

      100 EUR for a exit row seat on a transatlantic flight is standard on all airlines sometimes even more

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous04:20

      When you pay to get an exit row seat, you are not paying to select your seat; you are paying for a premium product. Obviously the exit row seats are preferable for most passengers; they will carry a premium. I know because I regularly pay almost $200 per tatl leg for extra legroom on other airlines

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:12

    I completely agree with the statement that the current scheduled does not give good transfer opportunities on the US side. Why are all of their flight at different times?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      Maybe slot constraints? A330 availability constraints?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:19

      With this schedule, on each day of arrival to Belgrade they are targeting a different wave of departures to the region and beyond.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:22

      I like the evening departures from both BEG and ORD. Gives you an entire day in each city.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Nemjee09:59

      Well why should they focus on transfers in ORD when they don't have a code-share with a US based carrier? It would make no sense. Not to mention that JU's code-shares are generally expensive and make little sense (35 hour flight times for example).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:34

      They managed to offer connections onto ORD from midnight, morning and midday wave so I think it is quite good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:13

    They have enough ATRs for night wave, so it would be obvious to launch 5pw night flights, as well as 5pw day flights. I wouldn’t be surprised if they increase SJJ to 14pw.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous09:14

    Wonder how long it will take this one to become profitable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:16

      Likely much quicker than JFK. Completely different story when you have already developed flights to the USA then when you start long haul for the first time in 25 years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. pozdrav iz Rijeke14:12

      Much faster than OU's ZAG-OMO or other Q400's feeder flights which will become profitable NEVER, especially with "brand new shiny A220 fleet"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:07

      Anonimous 09:16 first time?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:17

    I really like that they kept the same flight numbers as JAT :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      Obviously I mean on the Chicago route

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:23

      Does anyone remember what their timing/schedule was for the Chicago flight back during JAT times?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:28

      @9.17 I don't think the flight numbers are the same. I think Chicago used to be JU520/JU522.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:30

      ^ No, it was the same flight number. But JAT did change the flight numbers later on, like in 1990.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:22

      506 was BEG-ZAG-JFK-ORD late70's early 80's 522 was BEG-ZAG-ORD

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:21

    Fingers crossed. It would benefit their long haul flights and SJJ loads too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous09:33

    10 weekly to the USA from BEG is fantastic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous09:36

    Congratulations to Air Serbia for expanding long haul. Well done on moving in the right direction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous09:37

    Anybody knows where from the third A330 will come?
    When will JU start to name their ATRs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous09:44

    Interesting to learn that there is fewer transfer traffic. Chicago is home to a sizeable Balkan diaspora. Again, problem is that JU needs to spend on advertising plus LO are usually fierce on the Chicago route. They too have a diaspora there and very good connections via WAW.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nemjee10:01

      I don't know if they still do but before covid they used to have KRK-ORD flights as well. Back then they used to run a mini hub in Krakow.
      LO is a beast in Chicago as they can dump fares for transfers since they have a massive O&D demand. LO flies double daily WAW-ORD with B789.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:37

      They have been a beast for a long time. Plus it is much cheaper to operate the Dreamliner. A330 (excluding neo) is also an old-fashioned aircraft similar to the 767.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Nemjee10:54

      Well, beggars can't be choosers. JU didn't have an investor who was willing to get them new, shiny toys. They were treated the same way OS is treated by its evil stepmother.

      For Poland LO was and still is a matter of national pride and an important national project. Just look at the proposed new airport for Warsaw.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:26

      The fact that i got a LOT polish airlines add on this article is so funny to me

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  19. Nemjee09:50

    To be honest, I think a night flight to SJJ can immediately start with the A319. If you add JFK and ORD to the transfer mix there should be no problems filling at least 100 seats on the A319 the first season.

    Anyone know what's happening with SJJ opening at night? There were no updates for a while now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:57

    Info is that two airlines have submitted requests for SJJ night operations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  21. Anonymous10:05

    Exciting times for JU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous10:08

    Now the hard work begins in making Chicago sustainable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nemjee10:14

      It's easy in summer, winter will be a true challenge.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:15

      We will see if they keep 3 weekly in winter or if it goes down to 2.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:19

      I doubt they will keep it at 3x in winter. Most likely 2x like JFK used to be.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Nemjee10:21

      Depends what their regional network will look like and if they will start promoting this service in order to attract transfers.
      Marketing done right can produce fantastic results. Just look at BEG-BUD and compare it to BEG-OTP.

      JU invested quite a bit in BEG-BUD and results are starting to show. They invested next to nothing in BEG-OTP and the route keeps on producing mediocre results.

      Just watch BUD outperform OTP this summer despite being launched this year. To make things even more tragic, I think BUD is already performing better than their SOF route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:41

      I wouldn't compare BUD to SOF just yet. SOF is performing quite well, they scheduled A319 on certain days because of transfers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Nemjee10:55

      On what days? It could be caused by fleet unreliability. A large chunk of their fleet is grounded either for regular or unscheduled repairs/checks.
      OTP on the other hand got the A319 because of increased demand.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:34

      Still too early to judge BUD. It failed not only from BEG but from INI too:

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/10/air-serbia-to-axe-nis-budapest-service.html

      Hungary is becoming a more O&D market and such between Serbia and Hungary is not large.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous11:36

      I was attending a conference in Tirana a few days ago and interestingly all the delegates from Hungary had flown with Air Serbia via Tirana.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous11:36

      Sorry meant *via Belgrade

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous11:52

      Makes sense

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Nemjee16:25

      Thing with BUD and BEG is that the two are so close to each other that passengers can fly with JU to pretty much anywhere, the backtrack isn't such a big deal.
      Just like Lufthansa sells most of their West Coast flights as well as Nevada, Utah, Arizona via California with UA.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  23. Anonymous10:10

    Wonder what the cargo potential is on this route.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:12

      If they have a lot of cargo to New York as they indicate and data shows, then Chicago should be similar.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:18

      When they were explaining the reason for choosing Chicago over Toronto they said cargo played a big factor too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  24. Anonymous10:11

    Nice to see US market developing for JU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Nemjee10:13

    I am certain OS is one of them and I wouldn't be surprised if JU was the other.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous10:18

    Performance would be a lot better if they could find a US codeshare partner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:22

      Interline partner works just fine for now.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:22

      They have interline partner. For passengers it is the same like codeshare.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:22

      What would help them the most on US flights is alliance membership.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:23

      Marek thinks differently.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:47

      @10.18 They wanted to but I don't think any US airline is interested.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:52

      Why not?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Nemjee10:59

      Because JU is too small for them to matter and they don't have someone to lobby for them. I doubt OS would have a code-share agreement with UA if it weren't for LH.

      That said, with daily flights to JFK they might just become interesting for B6. However we read on here that currently 19% of their passengers connect in JFK. If their A330 arrives full that means, on average, 50 passengers are connecting onto AA/B6.
      When you look at the size of both carriers, 50 transfers might not seem all that appealing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  27. Nemjee10:18

    There is also growing investment from the US in Serbia. Rivian which is from Illinois recently opened a research center in Novi Beograd where they hired roughly 200 people, mostly engineers.

    Black Rock rented five floors in Belgrade Skyline and they should be moving in soon.

    Similar cases should help in creating corporate demand (usually high yielding) between BEG and the US.

    Now the only question remains if they will stick to their existing corporate contracts with US carriers or will they start booking with JU. United is extremely committed to their corporate clients so this growing business demand might end up flying via Star Alliance hubs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:22

      These are good developments. I doubt JU will be able to take over these corporate passengers. Like you said, US airlines have very big corporate contracts which obligate these companies to use them. And I doubt anyone at JU is even paying attention to this.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee10:25

      As someone who works for a company that had a corporate account with JU, I can tell you with certainty that their program is trash and that they have no idea on how to gain clients and have even less idea on how to retain existing ones.
      I doubt much has changed but back then you couldn't even book a corporate ticket without going to their office via their call center. Welcome to 2000.

      That said, this growing investment could explain Star Alliance's improving performance in BEG.
      A friend of mine flew BEG-VIE about ten days ago on OS and there were 6 passengers in business class.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:35

      I feel your pain Nemjee. Maybe when they launch their new frequent flyer program they will do something about corporate program.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:37

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:45

      It is definitely time to finally unveil their new frequent flyer program and start focusing on retaining their repeat customers. Cheaper in the long run. With Etihad Guest the perks currently top out at Gold, the only Platinum benefit is the gold nomination.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Nemjee16:26

      They will definitely need to think of this and I hope they somehow develop their own program which they can adjust as they please.
      Belgrade is developing quite nicely and there is more and more corporate demand. JU should find a way to ride this wave before it's too late. LH Group has become quite a force in BEG and they are extremely convenient when looking for an optimal schedule.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Boris17:29

      “ Black Rock rented five floors in Belgrade Skyline and they should be moving in soon.”

      Thats scary! LOL
      I like Air Serbia improvements but i am scared in which direction Serbia and the whole ex Yu is going with overbuilding, rentier type of economy etc

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Nemjee20:33

      Well, a friend of mine who works for them told me that they are interested in investing in IT companies. I guess banks aren't too willing to go on investing so they found an opening.
      If it helps companies gain access to affordable funding then why not.

      Main issue with Belgrade is lack of office space. Right now occupancy is over 95% which isn't good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  28. Anonymous10:34

    Any news on YU-ARC cabin refurbishment? Will they use the same product before ORD launch?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:35

      There was an article about it.
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2023/03/air-serbia-eyes-new-long-haul-cabin.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:41

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:08

      When is it returning to service?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  29. Anonymous11:08

    Now if they would just join OneWorld so I can earn mileage….

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:52

      This is my dream. I hope they will. Would be beneficial for both sides.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  30. Anonymous11:52

    A couple of years ago these sort of route launches seemed unimaginable. Great work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  31. Anonymous12:08

    Once upon a time Cleveland and Los Angeles was served also by JAT, I wonder if eventually those will come back as well?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:33

      Detroit as well was part of JAT's route map

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:49

      Cleveland is, unfortunately, a shadow of itself after United closed its hub. Air Lingus is offering the last intercontinental connection.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:29

      Could Detroit ever return?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous15:17

      Air Serbia would really open up all of Europe from Cleveland if they chose to fly there, there would be alot of connections as Cleveland currently only has Dublin that begins in May.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  32. Rodney Marinkovic12:16

    Postovani Anon 09:08. Hvala Vam na ispravci. Bio sam par puta u Cikagu. Lep grad i jezero ga krasi. Vama zelim srecan put ukoliko se odlucite za Cikago... ✈😀🛫🌐✈

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  33. Anonymous12:29

    MIA could be the perfect 3rd US-destination and makes a lot of sense. Many people from ex-YU countries reside there, PLUS a huge Jewish community and wealthy Russians. It can easily be a year around service due to perfect weather conditions (OCT-APR). Also, good connectivity to CUN, MEX, PTY and the rest of the Caribbean. LAX No 4!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:36

      🤡🤡🤡

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  34. Anonymous12:36

    Makes sense to be OS and JU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  35. Anonymous12:43

    After Chicago and eventually Miami are launched don't expect more destinations to US. LAX is extremely expensive and has few slots, and other cities in US would not be profitable for Air Serbia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:06

      Although I agree with you I would really like to see Air Serbia fly to the west coast. But still 3 destinations in the US is really not bad.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. maxi449221:52

      IT industry is a growing force in Serbia. I could imagine San Francisco or Seattle at one distant moment.
      But Miami and Canada should come before west coast. And maybe some mid-west.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  36. Anonymous14:49

    Miami is the next one, more Flight in Africa will be great, like Lagos or Johannesburg.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:14

      Ah, finally, it's good to know you're OK and well. Was worried something happened to you, we haven't seen you in the comment section for a while. Welcome back :-)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:24

      Air Serbia mentioned Mombasa or Zanzibar as potential winter leisure destinations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:27

      Yeah, a Great suggestions. Nairobi too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  37. Anonymous15:40

    More Long-Haul Flight = More Aircraft :) I hope they will buy 2 A332 this year, with Novak Djokovic tail.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  38. Sam15:51

    ORD as well YYZ have much more potential for connecting flights to the rest of the US / Canada than MIA. I have never heard of anyone connecting via MIA to anywhere than the Caribbean or Latin America. These markets are almost non-existent for JU and they would have to rely primarily on P2P market, which is not that significant right now. If they want to capture the US market and offer better connectivity, JU should start DFW, IAH or LAX.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  39. Anonymous16:02

    After KJFK, it’s KORD, after KORD it can be KMIA and after it can be KDFW. It’s great for AirSERBIA to make USA flights, we hope AirSERBIA will have enough Aircraft for new long-haul routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Želje i pozdravi17:05

      I would like Orlando, Denver and Bozeman KBZN.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:53

      Belgrade-Montana ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  40. Nemjee16:20

    Very few connect to southern USA via MIA because Atlanta or Charlotte are better positioned for that role when flying from Europe.
    I don't see JU launching DFW, IAH or LAX in the next ten years especially since they don't cooperate with one of the large US carriers.

    MIA has some O&D demand which should help in filling those seats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  41. Anonymous17:15

    Why can't you book INI-ORD? WTF GUYS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23:30

      Are you for real?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. JATBEGMEL01:08

      No flight from INI connects to ORD may be the reason why you can't book INI-ORD.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous08:15

      JFK neither.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. JATBEGMEL15:48

      INI-JFK-INI transfers via BEG work only once a week on different days depending if the sector is outbound or inbound.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  42. Anonymous19:45

    Their A330s are capable of reaching Perth. They should start non-stop flights to Australia and be the first European airline to do so :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  43. Anonymous00:19

    We are still missing and therefore waiting for Anchorage, Salt Lake City and Edmonton!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      Lagos!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  44. Eight18:02

    I still ponder the idea of Alaska Airlines as a codeshare partner. It would make sense. Seattle on the West Coast could be a way to go if supported on the other side. All of my friends from IT business who emigrated to US, settled around Seattle. And not only them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Onboard Aviogenex, 1986

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

easyJet to launch new Belgrade and Ljubljana routes

Image

Air Serbia enters Caucasus and eyes more destinations in the region

Image

Air Albania to launch Ljubljana service

Image

Uzbekistan’s Fly Khiva to enter EX-YU market

Image

Iceland’s PLAY to help establish Kosovo airline

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025