Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Onboard Aviogenex, 1986

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June41
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Mostar Airport seeks Belgrade flights

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Mostar Airport hopes to secure flights to Belgrade in the near future, as it looks to expand its destination network. During a recent session of the Mostar City Council, the airport’s General Manager, Marko Djuzel, said there are contacts and talks taking place in order to introduce services to the Serbian capital. However, Mr Djuzel emphasised the process was still in the early stages and there are no guarantees flights would be established. The only scheduled carrier in a position to do so is Air Serbia, which currently maintains operations to both Sarajevo and Banja Luka in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Scheduled flights between Belgrade and Mostar were first established on March 15, 1962 by JAT Yugoslav Airlines. The service would operate off and on throughout the coming decades. The route initially served the local population but from the 1980s onwards became popular with transfer passengers traveling for religious purposes to visit the Medjugorje site. JAT itself sold special travel packages to Mostar for pilgrims in markets including the United States, the United Kingdom to as far afield as the Philippines. As Yugoslavia started to disintegrate, services were discontinued. JAT’s last flight on the route, which was also the final commercial flight between the two cities to date, took place on November 23, 1991.

During the final summer season unaffected by the Yugoslav wars, in 1990, JAT operated eight weekly flights from Belgrade to Mostar, and six weekly services from Mostar to Belgrade. The reason for the discrepancy in frequencies on the outbound and inbound operation was that services from Mostar to both Belgrade and Zagreb intertwined, with operations to Zagreb maintained eight times per week. Departure times from Belgrade to Mostar were in the early mornings, middays and evenings, depending on the day, while return services from Mostar to Belgrade also included early morning, early afternoon, late afternoon and early evening departures.

JAT's Belgrade to Mostar schedule, summer 1990

Earlier this year, Air Serbia’s CEO, Jiri Marek, said, “We already fly to fifteen destinations in the ex-Yugoslavia. That’s more than any other airline. And we will continue to add frequencies to all the countries since they also provide us with passenger flow for connecting flights, especially for our long-haul operations”. As previously reported, Mostar Airport is also attempting to secure scheduled flights to Rome in 2024, which would be operated by Croatia Airlines. “In 2024, it is planned for Croatia Airlines to introduce services to Rome. Afterwards, we will draft a four-year plan with the carrier which would see them add a third destination in 2025 and then we would gradually increase the number of routes by one each year”, Mr Djuzel said earlier this year. Croatia Airlines restored operations between Zagreb and Mostar this summer, with services maintained three times per week on a year-round basis.



October 07, 2023
Belgrade bosnia and herzegovina Feature mostar serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    I think it could work seasonally twice per week.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:32

      I think so too. The majority of passengers flying to Mostar during the summer are from Italy. Air Serbia has a huge network in Italy and I think they could shuttle quite a few passengers. The question is just does it make sense yield wise.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    I doubt it will materialize but let's see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    What has more potential in JU's network - Mostar, Portoroz or Maribor?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      Maribor could cover Graz very well if they decide for them instead of Graz...also there is a very big Serbian population there

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:09

      Neither line makes sense, so it won't happen

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:21

      What about Tuzla?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:28

      ^ no demand whatsoever.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:32

      Brac

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:06

      Trieste didn't work for JU, so Portorož has even less sense. Mostar & Maribor are 0 interest too. People fly to Portugal&Spain from BEG, planes are loaded, they don't even think about flying to Mostar or Maribor. JU has pretty much covered exYu space. Mostar will have to look elsewhere for connections.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:51

      How come trieste didnt work? There is serbian, bosnian and macedonian disaspora there, literally half of the population there are from ex-yu and it is the best city to live in italy according to their statistics.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous11:55

      It is not true that it didn't work but it was sacrificed due to fleet shortage. It should be back next summer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous12:35

      Source?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous23:04

      Trieste should be all year round.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous00:10

      TRS wouldn't of been sacrificed if the load and yield justified it's existence in the network. JU this year increased the number of ATR's, not decreased, so if TRS was in the network in 2022 than 2023 wouldn't of been a problem. JU doesn't have issues with dropping routes that underperform and can easily use capacity elsewhere, especially with ATR's. JU has a decent amount of options around TRS which obviously works out better for them.

      As for the 3 options in the opening comment, I would say OMO. POW has weight restrictions for the AT7, MBX not worth serving since JU is going after frequencies in both LJU and ZAG. Mostar is increasingly popular with Serbian tourists (O&D), as with other cities in the vicinity (Trebinje), not to mention the tourism (and religious) sector which JU already has going via SJJ. JU has a decent amount of routes and frequencies in Italy, they have returned to Poland which has been successful for them as they plan to increase flights with another destination tipped for next summer (WRO), plus the JU network via BEG which is more than decent. I see OMO going 3-4 weekly next summer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous08:37

      I'd also say rather BWK 1-2pw during summer season.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:05

    It would make sense twice a week if subsidised, and maybe three times a week during
    the summer season.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:06

    i like the information about the history of the route. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:04

      That's true. Someone did a great investigation.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. JSG22:49

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:09

    I think this route could definitely work during the summer. In the winter, not so sure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:10

      I agree as well. It seems that the route will be subsidized. So, there is great potential for both sides because Air Serbia has a strong network in Italy, which is usually a main source for OMO travelers considering Medjugorje. Additionally, Mostar has a significant diaspora in the EU, where BG has a great connection.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:13

    The route could work with ATR and a decent subsidy. There would be a certain level of demand for both p2p and transfers. It’s a nice catchment area and would also help improve business relations.. it is difficult and time consuming to travel to Mostar and Herzegovina.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      Agree with this. The question is is OMO offering some sort of subsidy or incentive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:11

      It seams the HNK government is giving a subsides.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous00:35

      HNK?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:05

      @anon 00:35
      HNK stands for Herzegovina-Neretva Canton

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:13

      Tanks man.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:20

    Well I for one am glad to see Mostar finally proactive and working on securing scheduled flights. A nice change on the previous 30 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:23

      It's nice. But in my opinion they would have more success if they focused on bringing Eurowings back or attracting Ryanair or Wizz Air rather than Croatia Airlines and Air Serbia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:20

    Wouldn't JU coming to Mostar impact OU's operations? Or are OU's passengers mostly point to point so it wouldn't make any difference?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:51

      Majority of OU passengers are p2p

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. pozdrav iz Rijeke22:16

      Small part of transfers are to Minken and Vrankvurt

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous08:39

      OU doesn't give a damn about loads to OMO, they get paid well for it from other parties. Otherwise also no chance for OU serving OMO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:21

    Would be fantastic!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous09:24

    wow I always thought JAT just used ATr42s to Mostar

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      They also had charters from the UK to Mostar.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:46

      They had quite a few nonstop flights from Europe to Mostar

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. pozdrav iz Rijeke22:21

      During the last decade of Yugoslavia, 1980-1990, JAT was a giant, worldwide known carrier, self-sustainable, professionally managed, profitable, with excellent product and very good on time record

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous23:15

      The model airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:27

    That terminal actually looks rather decent on the photo for an airport which so few passengers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:04

      Terminal is small but very nice. Recently refurbished and has everything that someone needs. It’s clean and with the most friendly airport staff ever experienced. The big plus is a free bus to/from the city for all OU flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:31

    What would be the most appealing transfer market from/to Mostar?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:33

      Italy is number 1.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:34

      Numero uno.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:57

      Italian, Poland (Because of Medjugorje) and scandinavian countries because of diaspora.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:34

    Air Serbia could offer very decent transfer options to Mostar. I think they will add it next summer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous10:01

    Only and only if JU gets at least so much money as OU got.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:31

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:53

      +bus transfer to the city center

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  16. Anonymous10:01

    With JU network and very good transfer options it could work at least 3 times per week, much much better as a transfer with OU and ZAG. I’m regular on OMO-ZAG flights, sometimes using SJJ for inbound flight (late night) on Friday. Recently loads on OMO flights are better than on this particular late night ZAG-SJJ flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Slav.Man10:59

    Hoepfully the flights are started and are successful. Also hope OU are successful on their flights. Great news for Bosnia, Most, the people in the catchment area and the national airlines.

    really wish that OU and JU would also improve their frequency to Sarajevo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous11:00

    Perfect for E145 if AirPink decides to actually go in the scheduled ops.
    It would lose money by default but with subsidies it would definitely work

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:43

      Wouldn't the cost per seat be quite a bit higher to fly a 50 seater jet with a significantly higher fuel burn on such a short flight where a 68 seater ATR could fly?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  19. Anonymous12:21

    Uprava aerodroma Mostar je bila vise nego darezöji a u svojoj ponudi za 3 x nocenje ATR72 u Mostaru prije 5-6 godina, cak su nudili i FOC smjestaj i prevoz posade...medjutim, nije bilo sluha u BEG!?! Ne znam da li bi ta ponuda bila jos aktuelna.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous13:52

    All the people going to Medugorje, should fly to Mostar and not to Split, to avoid a hour bus ride, at least at my opinion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:48

      Let the fools take a two hour bus, who cares.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  21. Miroslav NY14:22

    Why wouldn't it work. And perhaps a one or two weekly flight during the winter (if you can call it that in Mostar)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous15:01

    Jat used to fly ATR72, 737, 727, and Adriaerways Dash 7 to Mostar. Most interesting was landing 727, down the wind above Mostar valley, with shorth base and final.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  23. Anonymous17:40

    Not necessary, Air Serbia should focus only in profitable routes, Mostar it's insignificant airport. I also think Air Serbia should should stop pandering to EX YU airports Podgorica and Skoplje yes rest of them no.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:08

      They don't "pander" too anyone. They fly there because there is demand and feeds their long haul flights. Read what the CEO said.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:54

      Anon@17:40 wins stupid comment of the day award. Congrats.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous00:19

      So JU should cancel proven profitable routes like TIV, LJU, ZAG, SPU, DBV, SJJ? Or only SKP and TGD are profitable in your opinion and what you say is final?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous00:32

      See comment @20:54

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  24. Anonymous19:28

    I would love to visit Mostar but really don't feel like driving to there. If they do establish flights, I would definitely use it to visit. I have never been

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:35

      Same here, plus ton of people would use it for Trebinje and the seaside.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous01:30

      It takes about 4 hours by bus from Mostar to Trebinje, by car much quicker. Btw, Currently there is only one bus line (daily) from Belgrade to Mostar and scheduled travel time is 11h30min plus possible border delays. This line also serves much of eastern (Serbian) Herzegovina, and the bus normally arrives in Mostar with sometimes no more then 5-6 passengers daily. Very few of those could afford the air fare, eventhough it would sorten the trip to just one hour. I have no clue about the potential with new and connecting travelers though.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous05:44

      * no more than

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  25. Anonymous22:02

    JU should give it a try next summer with the Atr.
    Three times a week for the begin would do wonders.
    I would even claim that they would get a lot of O&D on that route.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:31

      True dat.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  26. VladaSEA04:10

    Hi. I recall flying the “hop on, hop off” service to OMO. That said the route was “convoluted” to say the least. Beograd, Zadar, Mostar, Titograd, Beograd. Yak 40. No ATR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Onboard Aviogenex, 1986

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Wizz Air to reopen Tuzla base, launch nine new routes

Image

Zagreb Airport reopens after hours-long closure due to runway incident

Image

Air Albania to launch Ljubljana service

Image

Air Serbia to add more aircraft, looks to 2027 for new orders

Image

Air Serbia readies for loyalty overhaul and lounge launch amid cabin review

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025