Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT B707 preparing for departure
Belgrade Airport, 1980

Slovenia set for new route subsidy call ahead of reshaped aviation policy

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

The Slovenian Ministry of Infrastructure has confirmed to EX-YU Aviation News that it is preparing the groundwork for the launch of a ninth public tender aimed at encouraging airlines to introduce new subsidised routes to the country, as part of ongoing efforts to enhance the country’s air connectivity. In a statement, it said, “The Ministry of Infrastructure is preparing the starting points for a new (ninth) tender”. The announcement follows the previous public call, which resulted in applications from airBaltic and Air Albania for services to Las Palmas and Tirana, respectively, both set to commence during the upcoming winter season. In previous rounds, carriers such as Luxair, airBaltic, Norwegian Air Shuttle, Iberia, Eurowings and Cyprus Airways have also submitted applications, although the latter was disqualified for failing to provide complete documentation.

If launched by October as anticipated, the ninth tender could mark the final round held under the current framework. Based on the current air connectivity tender rules, the Ministry of Infrastructure subsidises up to 50% of airport fees (landing charges, passenger fees, etc.) for each new route launched by an eligible airline, applicable for flights to Ljubljana, Maribor or Portorož airports. Funding comes from a total allocation of approximately 16.8 million euros over the 2023 - 2026 period, although less than two million has been used so far. Only airlines registered and based in the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) are eligible for the subsidies. The ECAA is made up of states that are part of the European Union, as well as Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Iceland, Macedonia, Norway, Kosovo and Montenegro.

Slovenia’s new Aviation Act (ZLet‑1), adopted in September 2024, which came into effect in April of this year is scheduled to become fully applicable on October 5. The law consolidates both civil aviation and state aviation activities under a single cohesive legislative framework. The new act provides the legal basis for revised air connectivity subsidy schemes. The current subsidy law (Aid for Ensuring Greater Air Connectivity) remains effective until October 5, and eligible to be replaced by schemes under ZLet‑1 afterward. The Ministry is already evaluating policy adjustments and keeping the door open to long-term strategic aviation partnerships. The new law will enable Slovenia to designate routes as Public Service Obligations (PSOs), which are air services deemed essential for regional connectivity and eligible for state subsidies when they cannot be operated profitably under normal market conditions.


July 15, 2025
Feature Ljubljana Maribor portorož slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    With the PSO, does that mean they will offer money for infivifual routes and any EU airline can apply?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      Yes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:56

      It will actually be interesting to see if all the PSO routes are from Ljubljana only or if we see Maribor or even Portoroz offered.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:21

      Maribor does not even have infrastructure to handle commercial passengers anymore.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:41

      Slovenia has the money and the new legal tools. What’s missing is urgency and leadership to execute a coherent plan.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:01

    Bravo Fraport!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    So which routes will fall under PSOs then?

    Have a guess

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      FRA is a must, others aren't needed..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:06

      I think that there is a big chance VIE will be one of the PSO routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:07

      Vienna, Brussels, Rome, Madrid Berlin

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:08

      BRU is already served so I highly doubt it will be a PSO route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:09

      Crl

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:10

      Sorry but what would be the reasoning to make CRL a PSO route?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:11

      They put it on priority list of the current tender :P... If it was up to me it wouldn't be

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous09:16

      Ah, ok. That was probably to get some LCC interested.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous09:17

      The list of PSO destinations will probably depend on who they do a deal with beforehand :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous09:44

      PSO by priority: Vienna, Berlin, Prague, Rome, Madrid/Barcelona, LHR

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous09:46

      ^ this makes sense

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous10:34

      PSO for LHR. Why not?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous12:42

      LHR with British serving the route 8pw? How is this justified

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous12:47

      It's not year round.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Anonymous12:58

      Anonymous12:42 - PSO for winter flights ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Anonymous13:13

      All those dreamlists... and at the end in will be Brussels. :-)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. Anonymous14:46

      PSO means Public Service OBLIGATIONS. E.g. LOT has a PSO route from Vilnius to London City. Many PSO routes also originate in Brussels. Therefore it will be LJU-BRU but nothing else, I suppose. Putting LJU- MAD, BCN, BER (examples only) totally misses the point of PSO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    18. Anonymous15:16

      Anonymous14:46 - sure ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    19. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:05

    So this in reality means OU/LOT/WIZZ can sit down with the government and discuss which routes they want to fly, and then the government putting down the tender for those routes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      Likely they have already done that :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  5. XYZ09:14

    So: Stockholm, Helsinki, Copenhagen, Berlin, Rotterdam (?), Paris (?), Bern, Madrid, Barcelona, Lisbon, Rome, Milano, Vienna, Budapest, Bucharest, Sarajevo, Pristina, Sofija.... Anything else?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:16

      HEL, CPH, CDG and PRN are already served. I doubt Bern will be a PSO route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. XYZ09:17

      Not in the winter months, and the government actively is promoting that on their state visits

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:49

      PRN is 1x a week w GP and that's a joke.
      ADRIA used to maintain this route 2x DAILY!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:50

      Bur Adria flew 2 daily because of transfer passengers. P2P can only probbaly sustain 1-2 weekly flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:51

      Saying that 13 out of 14 passengers from PRN were transfer is a bit of a stretch.
      I have flown to PRN via LJU many times in the past and I can attest each time maybe one-third or max. 1/2 would remain for the connecting flight - the rest would go collect their luggage and leave the Terminal.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:01

      It's the same guy that complained SKP-LJU would never work because supposedly Adria carried only transfers. Also that it would never work because of the "high density" A320.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous12:45

      50% of PRN and 70% of TIA were transfers. But still nice numbers and this was in 2018. Both routes should survive today under low-cost model.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:55

      That's pretty doubtful. PRN possibly yes because of their immigrants but TIA no chance.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous12:57

      Sure you would know.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous12:59

      Yeah that's why no one wanted to serve it before the subsidies. Because it's very profitable route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous13:02

      Oh so just like SKP? Is that also unprofitable route for you?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:19

    I'm really hoping there is some positive development from the new law.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous09:19

    The fact that they are so slow with the ninth tender could be that they are waiting for October and these changes to take place. Let's see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:23

    It’s encouraging to see the ministry being proactive

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      Unlike the airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:34

      Stop with conspiracies!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:30

      You really think the airport does not negotiate with any of these airlines before they apply for subsidies?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:52

      I really think the airport does not.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:06

      Only if the airline fits into their business model. Which means LH Group only.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous12:06

      ^ exactly

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:23

    If PSOs can be introduced under the new framework, maybe we’ll finally get year round service to key European hubs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous09:26

    Only 2 million used out of almost 17? Why not offer more money?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:28

      Law os written in a way where they literally can't

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:06

      Will they be able to use this left over money for PSO subsidy?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:31

    We’ve been hearing about long term strategic partnerships for years. Time to actually make one happen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:05

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:33

    Maribor Airport deserves a chance too

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:56

      It has a chance. The problem is no one is interested.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:07

      Maribor will be taken over by Maribor municipality, and there is a plan to redo the whole spacial plan by 2027,it has a bright future if the municipality takes over.... Quite a few airlines are interested too, mostly for summer flights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:13

      I can't believe that they still haven't adopted a spatial plan. That is absolutely crazy. it's why the Chinese left so many years ago.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:39

      What's more crazy is they still haven't fixed the roof after one year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:05

      It's just sad how they have left the airport to rot. Waste of EU funds to renovate the airport in the 2000s.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:34

    Let’s hope this is the last tender under the current rules. Clearly it’s not working as intended if 90% of the budget is still untouched.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:39

      I think they might even wait till October to start the tender under new rules.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:50

      They'll only go ahead with it if they see that another airline is interested in winter flights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:55

      Yes, that makes sense

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  14. Anonymous10:05

    So definitely no new national airline?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:09

      Definitely not.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:28

      So Bratusek lied to everyone? She made it an election campaign promise to set up a new national airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:04

      Well she said her party would do that but that does not mean they can do it in a coalition.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:04

      @11.28
      You are discovering now that politicians lie?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  15. Anonymous10:09

    Could Portoroz sustain a weekly flight from Zurich and Luxembourg in the summer? And could those be included? I think TradeAir has enough free capacity for 2 weekly flights out of Portoroz in the summer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:10

      Large aircraft can't land at Portoroz because the threshold is displaced more or less in the middle of the runway. Even JAT flew to Porotorz with load restrictions on the ATR72.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:15

      TradeAir has Saab that's ehy I mentioned it. 34seater could work great for some Portoroz routes, even to the likes of Prague or Frankfurt

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:40

      Portorož would be doable with atr 42 without restrictions and it could work for routes like Beg, Bud, Muc, Vie, Kra, maybe something around Milan or Florence . It could cover slovene coast and Northern Istra to Novigrad or even Poreč - but it would have to be established in cooperations with TO's and Hotel chains

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:07

      TDR does not have Saab. That aircraft is leased. And it is fully utilized on domestic PSO flights. It is based in OSI. They don't have crews and free termins to operate it plus it would be too expensive to ferry/position aircraft twice weekly to and from Portoroz. So it is definitely not an option

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:21

      Portorož airport is a regional airport mostly used by smaller private jets. During the main season 50+ jets land daily on it. It is also used for some charter flights and panoramic flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  16. Anonymous10:29

    I think the tenders have been pretty sucsesfull. Minimal money spent but over 5 new airlines at LJU. Not bad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:00

      I agree. The results of these tenders are better then I expected.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous23:41

      Yes those 4 weeks of flights to Madrid are amazing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:02

      Iberia didn't get a single EUR as their flights are profitable all the time (those flights are leisure flights for tour operators). But all other routes are more then welcome.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  17. Anonymous11:00

    Let's go Slovenia!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:27

      Lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:28

      No, it's Bravo Fraport!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  18. Anonymous11:27

    Things are moving in the right direction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:03

      Still 20% below 2019 passenger levels.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:16

      Same like in Croatia Airlines 11 27 🙂

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous23:40

      Well I would not use OU as an example for anyone to strive to achieve.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:23

      OMG. I was sarcastic. Of course OU being pathetic feeder, going for extremely expensive single type fleet which will cement its feeder role, and making more and more losses, is not moving into right direction. The same as LJU with much less passengers and much less destinations than before. Is it really so difficult to understand it?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:35

      How dare you with those conspiracies again!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  19. Anonymous14:39

    The ability to designate PSO routes is a big deal. That’s how other small markets keep essential air links alive. Hopefully Slovenia will use that tool wisely.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23:39

      Agree

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  20. Anonymous17:55

    Lets fingers cross for VIE,MAD,LIS,ARN,OSL and DUB.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23:39

      This would be ideal

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous08:09

      It would be nice to see Barcelona happen

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous08:12

      I think Vueling would be a good fit for that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:07

      Ma kakvi, don't you know that all routes from LJU are unprofitable and that only FRA works?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  21. Anonymous23:41

    Some Lufthansa Group airline will get all the PSO routes for sure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:06

      Air Dolomiti.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:33

      I think there is a big possibility it could be Air Baltic.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous07:57

      I'm really hopinh its Ryanair or Wizz Air.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous08:04

      ^ Don't hold your breath

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous08:07

      It will most certainly be someone from the Lufthansa group.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  22. Anonymous07:55

    At this pace of spending, they will be organizing these tenders for the next decade.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  23. Anonymous08:07

    Austrian and ITA please

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  24. Anonymous08:08

    It would be good if non EU airlines could apply.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT B707 preparing for departure
Belgrade Airport, 1980

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Wizz Air Abu Dhabi's exit opens door for competitors in the Balkans

Image

Slovenia courts airlines for new routes as Ljubljana's growth continues

Image

Air Serbia registers strong start on Shanghai service

Image

Belgrade’s Spain flights register record passenger numbers in H1

Image

Air Serbia expected to start Miami flights in summer 2026

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025